UK: Financial Sector Pay - The Latest Instalment

Last Updated: 14 July 2010
Article by Nicholas Stretch, Anthony Fincham and Simon Morris

There have recently been very well-publicised European developments restricting banking pay.  However, the important thing to note is that all financial sectors (not just the banking sector) will, sooner or later, be affected by remuneration restrictions originating in European law and so this is just the start of wider changes across the industry.

Last week's news coverage was prompted by the passing of amendments by the European Parliament to the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD), which affects credit institutions and investment firms, in the form of an amending Directive known as CRD3. CRD3 is now almost finalised at the European level.  However, this is just the first of many Directives likely to contain remuneration provisions. Not only do they feature in the Alternative Investment Fund Managers (AIFM) Directive expected to be passed in September but remuneration provisions are also anticipated for the Undertakings for Collective Investments in Transferable Securities (UCITS) IV and under Solvency II Level 2 Directive implementing measures.

What really matters now though is how the FSA chooses to amend and/or extend its Remuneration Code in response to and anticipating all these developments, which in some cases exceed the G20 remuneration proposals.  The remuneration restrictions clearly capture all firms subject to CRD (which means credit institutions and the majority of MiFID firms) but crucially the provisions are to be applied in a proportionate way. In particular, according to the recital of CRD3, certain types of MiFID firm may not be subject to all of the principles. While most media and European Parliamentary reports have been about "capping" and "preventing bonuses", the underlying European legislation is more flexible than has been portrayed and is required to be implemented proportionately.  However, it is possible that the FSA will apply the CRD3 proposals strictly and CRD3 gives the FSA considerable discretion to do so. In addition, the Financial Services Act implemented earlier this year would generally seem to allow relevant changes to be made by the FSA without any further primary legislation. 

The FSA had already promised to consult this summer on changing its Remuneration Code and extending its application.  It also wants to respond to market developments since it published its Remuneration Code last year and international developments at the G20 level, where the G20 principles were published after the FSA produced its own code.  We understand that a paper from the FSA is expected by the end of July with proposals to take effect from 1 January 2011.

The attached article gives more details of the current position and other relevant European developments.  However, until further guidance is issued at EU level and the Treasury and FSA publish their proposals it will not be clear how CRD3 will be implemented in practice in the UK.  However, one thing is for certain, pay will now be a hot regulatory topic across the financial services sectors in the next year or so.

To view the article in full, please see below:



Full Article

There have recently been very well-publicised European developments restricting banking pay. However, the important thing to note is that all financial sectors (not just the banking sector) will, sooner or later, be affected by remuneration restrictions originating in European law and so this is just the start of wider changes across the industry.

Last week's news coverage was prompted by the passing of amendments by the European Parliament to the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD), which affects credit institutions and investment firms, in the form of an amending Directive known as CRD3. CRD3 is now almost finalised at the European level. However, this is just the first of many Directives likely to contain remuneration provisions. Not only do they feature in the Alternative Investment Fund Managers (AIFM) Directive expected to be passed in September but remuneration provisions are also anticipated for the Undertakings for Collective Investments in Transferable Securities (UCITS) IV and under Solvency II Level 2 Directive implementing measures.

What really matters now though is how the FSA chooses to amend and/or extend its Remuneration Code in response to and anticipating all these developments, which in some cases exceed the G20 remuneration proposals. The remuneration restrictions clearly capture all firms subject to CRD (which means credit institutions and the majority of MiFID firms) but crucially the provisions are to be applied in a proportionate way. In particular, according to the recital of CRD3, certain types of MiFID firm may not be subject to all of the principles. While most media and European Parliamentary reports have been about "capping" and "preventing bonuses", the underlying European legislation is more flexible than has been portrayed and is required to be implemented proportionately. However, it is possible that the FSA will apply the CRD3 proposals strictly and CRD3 gives the FSA considerable discretion to do so. In addition, the Financial Services Act implemented earlier this year would generally seem to allow relevant changes to be made by the FSA without any further primary legislation.

The FSA had already promised to consult this summer on changing its Remuneration Code and extending its application. It also wants to respond to market developments since it published its Remuneration Code last year and international developments at the G20 level, where the G20 principles were published after the FSA produced its own code. We understand that a paper from the FSA is expected by the end of July with proposals to take effect from 1 January 2011.

The enclosed article gives more details of the current position and other relevant European developments. However, until further guidance is issued at EU level and the Treasury and FSA publish their proposals it will not be clear how CRD3 will be implemented in practice in the UK. However, one thing is for certain, pay will now be a hot regulatory topic across the financial services sectors in the next year or so.

What European legislative development has recently occurred?

The EU has for some time been proposing changes to the CRD to prevent a repeat of the banking instability of the last few years. These were proposed in the form of a draft amending Directive (known as CRD3) and principally address capital adequacy, but remuneration structures were also increasingly seen as relevant on an international basis. The Commission therefore last year inserted remuneration provisions into CRD3 so as to give the G20 remuneration proposals greater force as a formal part of the European regulatory framework.

The European Parliament's various committees and sponsoring MEPs then considerably expanded the Commission's proposals. This went significantly further than the Remuneration Code and the G20 guidelines in terms of restrictions on pay practices and was the cause of many of the headlines. In the event, the version passed by the European Parliament considerably watered down the most controversial proposals. The final version has now emerged after Parliament's vote. Council and final adoption is expected soon with very few further changes.

Are the changes prescriptive – do Member States have to implement them in full?

The short answer is no, despite media headlines. Member States and relevant European and national supervisory bodies are required to "take account" of the remuneration provisions in a way which is proportionate.

The references to proportionality in CRD3 have been welcomed by the industry but different conclusions seem inevitable among Member States as to which size and type of banks/credit institutions are affected and Member States will have different thresholds or de minimis levels. The devil will, as always, be in the detail of national implementation, which may provide opportunities in terms of regulatory arbitrage. FSA had previously indicated that it may consider gold-plating the CRD3 rules and that in any event the Remuneration Code is indicative of best practice for all significant firms. The FSA may therefore take a rather more extensive view of how to apply these new requirements "proportionately" than might otherwise be the case.

What are the key proposals which differ from the Remuneration Code?

Apart from some key headline matters, most of the remuneration elements in CRD3 are part of the FSA's existing Remuneration Code. Less change to the Remuneration Code may therefore be needed to comply with the European principles than is popularly supposed.

The following are the key areas of divergence:

  • What is the minimum proportion of variable remuneration which must be deferred and what is the minimum deferral period?

The principle in CRD3 is that between 40 and 60 per cent must be deferred, with a higher level of deferral the greater the amount of variable pay. Clawbacks would operate during the deferral period. The Remuneration Code says that "a reasonable starting point" is that at least two thirds of a bonus should be deferred where it is significant compared to salary and so in this respect the relevant CRD3 principle (based on G20 principles) seems less strict than the Remuneration Code. It is therefore possible that the FSA may propose that the deferral limits in the Remuneration Code are scaled back.

On the other hand, CRD3 provides that full payment should not be received within 5 years of the performance year in question and vesting should be pro rata each year. In contrast, the G20 guidelines and the Remuneration Code simply refer to at least a three year deferral and it will be interesting to see whether or how the FSA decides to change the Remuneration Code to deal with this.

  • What about the up-front bonus?

Press releases have been adamant that only 20% to 30% of bonuses could be received in up-front cash. The various original European Parliament Committee proposals were much harsher. The reasoning for describing a 20% to 30% limitation seems to be a provision in CRD3 that at least 50% of variable remuneration consists of shares or "contingent capital" (i.e. debt instruments which convert to equity) since only 60% to 40% of a bonus can be paid up-front, and only half of that can be paid in cash as opposed to shares/debt. This then means only 20% to 30% can be paid in up-front cash. However, the wording of CRD3 would seem to allow a bank to pay out a bonus in cash first and only then pay out in shares later rather than have to pay pro rata. Whether this will be permitted by the FSA is quite another matter. Accordingly, how the 20% to 30% up-front cash restriction emerges will be eagerly awaited.

The Remuneration Code currently does not require payment in either shares or debt. It says that this may be suitable, but does not go as far as CRD3, which requires at least 50% to be paid in this way.

The UK's high tax rates also make for an interesting analysis of the payment schedule. Let us say someone is awarded a bonus amount of 100 (and there is no other variable remuneration e.g. options, restricted stock or LTIP arrangements). If his up-front bonus is equally split between cash and shares which cannot be sold for 2 years, then presumably the cash payment needs to be fully used to pay the tax due (at 50%) on the overall cash and shares amount, and so no cash is received. Additional employee's NICs at 2% might mean that the employee needs to use his own cash resources to pay the tax due! It is therefore hoped that employees will be able to sell shares otherwise restricted to meet tax liabilities.

These and other issues will all have to be addressed by the FSA in its consultation paper.

  • Which firms and employees are caught?

The Remuneration Code currently applies to the top 26 banks, broker dealers and building societies. CRD3 applies to all credit institutions and all investment firms which are caught by the Capital Requirements Directive, albeit that not all of the remuneration provisions will apply to all firms within scope due to the principle of proportionality. As stated above, a key point for the FSA's review will be whether it will extend its Remuneration Code to more entities if it feels it is appropriate to do so (and bearing in mind that the AIFM Directive may have similar provisions to CRD3 when it is implemented).

In terms of the employees caught, the provisions in CRD3 and the Remuneration Code both focus on those in management affecting risk and those on similar levels of remuneration (this latter point is not explicit in the current Remuneration Code although it is expected that this will become so in the revised version to be issued later this year).

Additional provisions in CRD3 require that financial penalties can be enforced by Member States for "risky remuneration". It also provides for public disclosure of remuneration details, but the Financial Services Act already provides for this to occur in the UK.

What provisions proposed by the European Parliament committees were not approved by the full Parliament?

Two key provisions were completely dropped in addition to others which were substantially moderated. The provisions which were dropped were a provision limiting variable pay to 1 times salary which, if implemented, would have sent shockwaves around the financial services world, and a provision preventing variable remuneration at an entity benefiting from exceptional state support. In both cases, variable remuneration must now be "appropriate", which seems a better solution.

What further work is going to occur?

Now that the CRD3 European legislative process is almost over, national governments and regulatory authorities will start work as will the Committee for European Banking Supervisors (CEBS), the co-ordinating body for national banking regulators, which is required to draw up guidelines to implement the remuneration principles included in CRD3. CEBS had in fact already drawn up guidelines, many of which found their way into CRD3, and so it will be interesting to see how much further their revised guidelines go. In addition, the Commission is also directed to undertake a substantial amount of technical and co-ordinating work, and there is to be a review in 2012/2013.

At the UK level, the FSA is due to produce a paper suggesting changes to its Remuneration Code. This is due to be published in late July. It will contain most of the relevant UK proposals for the changes proposed in CRD3 and so will be the key document and set of provisions so far as UK firms go. It will be these rules that they have to comply with and where breach will lead to enforcement action. Whether the FSA is going to exceed European and G20 principles or trim them back will be closely monitored – on the one hand the banking sector will want to ensure there is a level playing field but on the other hand stakeholders from the non-banking sectors will be anxious to ensure that inappropriate read-across from the banking sector is avoided.

The FSA review of its Remuneration Code will also take into account its experience of the Remuneration Code in the first year of its operation, market reaction and any perceived undesirable practices which have emerged, as well as what is happening internationally so the UK does not lose undue competitiveness.

When will the CRD changes take effect?

There is an unusually tight implementation timetable. Member States are required to ensure that they or their regulatory bodies have complied with/implemented the remuneration provisions contained in CRD3 by 1 January 2011. It seems we should expect to see anti-avoidance measures to make sure that remuneration which would normally be paid in 2011 is not artificially accelerated to subvert the new rules. Equally, the new rules would appear to apply on their face to remuneration packages already agreed leading to the possibility that they may have to be amended to comply with CRD3 from 1 January 2011, although whether this would be applied in practice must be doubtful in all but the most outrageous of cases.

As stated above, the FSA already has legislation in place to allow it to implement most provisions with effect from this date.

What other European developments are occurring?  

The CRD remuneration policies are part of a wider cross-sectoral clamp down on remuneration and risk management that has been instigated at EU level. The European Commission in its Green Paper entitled "Corporate governance in financial institutions and remuneration policies" and the accompanying Commission Staff Working Paper has recently endorsed the approach being taken to ensure that the financial system is strengthened in an even handed way. In this context, as well as the reform of the European supervisory architecture through the creation of three European Supervisory Authorities and a European Systemic Risk Board, a host of legislation is currently being developed containing remuneration provisions relevant to individual sectors.

The AIFM Directive, which is currently expected to be voted on in Parliament in September, is an example of this. Although the final specifics of the Directive have not yet been agreed on, fund managers to which it applies will be required to implement policies, which currently include rules on deferral of payments, to staff whose professional activities have a material impact on their risk profile or the risk profiles of the funds under management. For the insurance sector, the Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors (CEIOPS) has advised the European Commission to include remuneration requirements into the Solvency II Directive regime. These provisions are expected to be in place by the end of 2012. Finally, further measures affecting remuneration are also expected for UCITS managers under UCITS IV.

The European Banking Federation (a banking sector trade body) has recently highlighted the importance of maintaining a level playing field throughout the implementation of these cross-sectoral remuneration policies as a key element in maintaining fair competition. In particular it was emphasised that if the remuneration policies of banks become subject to stricter regulation, then the same should apply for other financial institutions. However, as stated above, stakeholders from other sectors have also been lobbying against inappropriate read-across from the banking sector.

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 13/07/2010.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.