Turkey: The Balance Between The Public Interest And The Protection Of Property Rights: A Judgment By The European Court Of Human Rights About Expropriation

Last Updated: 25 September 2009
Article by M. Volkan Dülger

The protection of property, historically and practically is crucial in many aspects. The laws of democratic countries, as well as the international agreements put importance on such regulations. One of the common types of restriction to the right of a peaceful enjoyment of property comes from the State, as expropriation with a legitimate aim to protect public interest. It is significant to maintain a balance between the public interest and the protection of property; but in some ways it can be disrupt against equity.

About unlawful expropriation or any other kind of confiscation; the national courts may be more distant about imposing sanction to the State; but the International Law and Courts are more restrictive and strict about State's unjust actions. The most significant International Agreement the Turkish Government sticks to is The European Convention on Human Rights. The Court's judgments are binding; so the government has efforts to adapt itself to the Convention and tries to avoid being sentenced to judicial fine. One of the Decisions that may lead to a change in Turkish legislation, is the Court's decision on the "Case of Devecioğlu v. Turkey" (Application no. 17203/03) given on 13 November 2008, about the protection of property.

1. Background and Relevant Domestic and International Law

According to the Turkish Administrative law, when the State is taking over a private property, this can happen in two ways: 1-Expropriation 2-Confiscation without expropriation. In the first situation, if the expropriation decision does not rely on public interest, or if the decision is void with the wrong choice of territory for that specific interest, the persons have legal right for a case to nullify the decision of expropriation. There is also the right for a lawsuit to increase the amount the State pays for that immovable property, due to the State's obligation to pay the "real" amount of the property taken (Expropriation Act no.465). In the second situation where the State chooses to confiscate without expropriation in some urgent or exceptional situations, it has the right to do it in return of compensation. However, this is an exceptional way to take over a private property; in ordinary circumstances the State has to follow the expropriation procedures.

The forests, shores, and other "unclaimed property" are not subject to these procedures. They are under the property of State by nature and can never be sold to or restricted in favor of a natural or a legal person. If the land is already under the property of the State, but somehow occupied unlawfully (i.e. owned or used without any permission) there is no need for expropriation or compensation, since the property already belongs and always belonged to the State. However, there are some cases where the State has sold these kinds of lands as if they are private property. Here, there is obviously a mistake by the State itself; but what will happen if they want to take the lands away arguing the land cannot be a private property by nature?

About these situations, there is a loophole in the Turkish law. The rights to bring an action as the ones mentioned in unlawful expropriation are not given to the persons in this case. They only can sue the Administration to change the land to become a private property, arguing that the cadastral examinations are wrong. However, this is against the protected public interest, and also probably not the argument land owners want to defend. It is just the only way.

While the Turkish Constitution strictly forbids the transfer of forests, shores and other public property that can never be sold, the Civil Code protects the property rights of persons who gained them lawfully. This means that they bought it, relying on the "land registry logs" which does not indicate any restriction on the property as "forest land" or anything else which will prevent its transfer. It is absurd that the title deed which is obtained lawfully is invalid in this case. Therefore, there is apparently a legal problem here: how do we protect the property rights of persons who bought the State's land relying on the records, while trying to protect the public interest? We may say that "compensation" for the loss of property is the best solution here; but on what legal grounds do we want this fee and with which legal procedure since the Administrative law does not mention one?

As we discussed before, according to the Turkish legislation there is only one type of case to bring to courts which is to annul the cadastral examination of the land as a "forest." However, if the courts reject the case, and then after the appeal the Court of Cassation also rejects, the land owners won't have any other legal option. When there is exhaustion of domestic remedies, the persons may apply to The European Court of Human Rights. In this case, if there is an application on these circumstances, the applicants will be judged from the violation of the Article 1 of Protocol No.1 to the Convention. The Article 1 of Protocol No.1 says, "Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions" and then it regulates State intervention's domain by stating that the deprivation is possible only for the public interest in accordance with the domestic and the international law. These mentioned circumstances are also against Article 13 of the Convention, which is as follows: "Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in the Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity."

2. "Case of Devecioğlu v. Turkey"

The mentioned case is brought to the Court by Feriha and Serhat Devecioğlu against the Turkish government. The disputed land ("the Yana Farm") is situated in the Marmara Island, in Balıkesir, Turkey. The land, although it is a "forest land"; is sold to a natural person in 1926, in which they then sold the area to others. The last ones to buy the land were the applicants. Before the applicants bought the land, on September 12, in 1986, the Forest Cadastral Commission conducted a "boundary marking exercise" to detect the forest areas that are not detected before. They then found out that the Yana Farm involves "forest land." within its boundaries. The forest land then had to be transferred to the State. The applicants brought an action to annul this decision; but it was rejected. Then, the decision was appealed; but the Court of Cassation rejected the case too. Then, since the domestic remedies were exhausted, the land owners applied to the European Court of Human Rights.

One of the government's arguments in response to the case in ECHR was that the owners knew the land was disputed when they bought the land, and so they cannot deny they had undisputable right of property. As an example, the Government mentions the Case of Lami Daim Namlı and Others v. Turkey but the Court finds the case irrelevant since the applicants of the Case of Lami Daim Namlı and Others v. Turkey did not have any lawful title on the property in contrast to the Case of Devecioğlu v. Turkey. So the title deed itself is accepted as evidence that suggests the applicants' right to claim property rights. The Government's another argument is that the domestic remedies are not exhausted; the case can be based on "unjust enrichment." However, unjust enrichment regulated in the Code of Obligations is applicable only when there is no legal reason of enrichment, and in this case, the "enrichment" is based on a valid transfer of property.

As the European Court of Human Rights finds the governments' arguments irrelevant, furthermore it argues that there is a violation of the Protocol 1, Article 1, with the justification explained below.

3. European Court of Human Rights' Final Judgment:

Firstly the Court examines whether the applicants owned the land in accordance with the law and so, whether if they can benefit from the protection of Article 1. Then the Court argues whether if there is a deprivation of property and if there is a legitimate aim for it. In the last step, the Court examines if there is a balance between the State's interference and the land owners' interest, to understand the scope of violation on the peaceful enjoyment of property. The Court argues:

1- The applicants bought the land from the previous owner, relying on the Land Registry Office's official records. As written in the Turkish Civil Code, these records are reliable, the log book is open to public and any damage should be compensated by the State. Here the law foresees an absolute responsibility and liability even if the officials don't have any fault. As the code says, the State is responsible from the damages caused by the mistakes in record-taking (Civil Code Art. 1007); also when one gains a right relying on the record in the log book, that right is under protection (Civil Code Art.1023).

Since the official records don't contain any limitation on the disputed land, it means that the transfer of the land is possible this way. The Court mentions that the applicants have legal rights on the land, and legal proceedings before the court, because they have the title deed in which they took in good faith.

2- It is accepted that the disputed area is "public forest" after the examination of cadastral maps and expert reports prepared according to domestic law. According to the Turkish Constitution Article 169, the forests are in the property of the State and they can never be subject to private property; which means that forests cannot be sold to or restricted in favor of a natural or a legal person. There is obviously a legitimate aim in this regulation to protect the environment, and so to protect the general interest. The Court also gives importance to the protection of environment in such situations as seen in cases like: Fredin v. Sweden, Taşkın and Others v. Turkey, Fadeyeva v. Russia, Lazaridi v. Greece.

3-There is a legitimate aim to protect the forests, and so to protect the public interest, but the Court examines whether if there is a fair balance between the "public interest" and the interest of the individuals who are deprived of their possessions. In other words: Does it put a "disproportionate burden" on the applicants, the Court asks. They note that to take a land without any reasonable payment cannot be accepted as a proportionate interference, if the case is not exceptional. This "exceptionality" is not clearly explained in the Court decisions; but analyzing the few exemplary cases, when there is a huge change in political, economical or legal order, the Court accepts that there is exceptionality which legitimizes State's intervention without any compensation. In this case, the State doesn't mention any exceptional circumstances; and take the land from the applicants without any payment. Therefore this cannot be accepted as a "fair balance" between rights.

The Court accepts that proportionality does not exist when there is no compensation about the real value, for the expropriated land. The Case of the Former King of Greece and Others V. Greece (Application no.25701/94) is an example for this. The judgment states: "...the Court has already found that the taking of property without payment of an amount reasonably related to its value will normally constitute a disproportionate interference..."

Similarly, ECHR's judgment of Doğrusöz and Aslan v. Turkey finds the State responsible in circumstances that are alike the Case of Devecioğlu v. Turkey. In the Case of Doğrusöz and Aslan, a land on the shore has been sold to the applicants by the State (The Treasury) but then it was taken away by the State, arguing that it already belonged to them, which as we mentioned is true. However, this kind of confiscation without any payment was said to be unjust, even though the government had a legitimate aim "in the public interest." As a result the Court discussed that "The requisite balance will not be found if the person concerned has had to bear 'an individual and excessive burden'" and decided that there was a violation of the Protocol 1, Article 1. It states this as follows: "In this connection, the Court recalls that not only must a measure depriving a person of his or her property pursue, on the facts as well as principle, a legitimate aim 'in the public interest', but there must also be a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be realized."

4- As a result, since there is no domestic solution to applicants' need for compensation, the Court accepts that there is violation of the owners' peaceful enjoyment of possession, which means that the State behaved against the Article 1 of Protocol 1.

4. Impact in Turkey:

Now, the case is pending in the Grand Chamber for the determination of pecuniary and the non-pecuniary damage, demanded as an application of the Article 41 of the Convention. Since the government did not offer any agreements about the amount of compensation, the Grand Chamber will be giving its final decision in these days. However, The European Court of Human Rights, with this decision, declared that the State's "unbalanced" intervention to the land of Devecioğlu is against the Article 1 of Protocol 1. Considering that Turkey has many similar cases about such problem, the Court's decision is exemplary. The Turkish government may try to prepare legislation about it, since the Convention is binding and it has the obligation to behave accordingly.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.