Turkey: Arbitration In The Era Of Smart Contracts

Last Updated: 29 August 2019
Article by Asli Budak and Seher Elif Köse

Blockchain is a notable emerging technology to watch in 2019.1 In this article, we will walk you through the basics of blockchain technology and smart contracts, explain why arbitration is beneficial in smart contract disputes, and explore the challenges that may arise in an arbitration procedure.

Blockchain Technology in a Nutshell

Blockchain is a distributed ledger technology, an open source-based innovation that intends to change the way how transactions are performed. It is a decentralized database system. Once a new block is entered into the system, all users add that block to their current blocks and thus a chain of blocks creates a database. Each block is chained to the previous block and is recorded across a peer-to-peer network by using a cryptographic trust and assurance mechanism. Currently, a well-known example of a public blockchain is Bitcoin in which everyone is free to create a wallet, become a miner, and perform transactions.2 However, Bitcoin is only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to blockchain technology.

Smart Contracts

One of the most promising features of blockchain technology is smart contracts.3 Smart contracts are a set of codes embedded in blockchain that enable parties to engage in transactions by performing specified actions subject to certain conditions. It can be described as pieces of code stored on a blockchain that read and write data in that blockchain's database, triggered by blockchain transactions. Smart contracts operate via distributed nodes (computers) that can be in different jurisdictions. Smart contracts are conditional in nature as they are executed only if the specified conditions are met. One of the most notable features of smart contracts is that they are self-enforcing by nature. Once a smart contract is concluded on a blockchain system via digital signatures, the smart contract executes itself independent of the parties when the conditions are met. For example, imagine a smart contract based on an insurance relationship that includes the provision "once the temperature decreases to 0° Celsius, a transfer of assets will take place from the insurance company's wallet to farmer X." In the event that the temperature falls to or below the pre-arranged 0° Celsius and this information is provided to the system by oracles (third parties providing information and data to the blockchain system), the smart contract automatically initiates the action "transfer assets from the insurance company."4

Currently, only digital assets that exist on blockchain may be transferred via smart contracts, but in the future the application of smart contracts may expand beyond cryptocurrency assets to other information that may be recorded on blockchain such as copy rights, vehicle licenses, and real estate deeds.5

Arbitrating Smart Contract Disputes

Arbitration, an alternative dispute resolution mechanism in which parties agree to resolve their disputes before an arbitral tribunal, may play a vital role in the resolution of disputes arising in connection with or out of transactions made via smart contracts.6 Disputes may arise: i) between the parties of a smart contract (e.g., due to the sale of defective goods), ii) due to technical difficulties in the smart contract application, or iii) due to the performance of oracles should oracles feed erroneous information to the system and cause unjust enrichment. In this article, we will focus on disputes between parties.

Arbitration has several advantages for settling disputes arising from smart contracts. First, since smart contracts and blockchain technology are a novel and complex area, special knowledge by the arbitral tribunal is crucial. State courts do not yet have the technological expertise to deal with such complex disputes. However, in an arbitration dispute, parties may choose specialized arbitrators allowing the needed expertise into the proceedings. Second, there may be difficulties when determining the competent state court or governing law due to the distributed ledger technology. As smart contracts operate via distributed nodes across the world, it is hard to determine the contract's place of performance which would effect the competent state court and governing law.7 However, with arbitration, parties can choose the law governing their dispute as well as determine arbitration as the exclusive jurisdiction mechanism for the disputes arising between them, thus alleviating the uncertainty over jurisdiction and governing law. Third, arbitration is likely to resolve disputes in a shorter time compared to state courts. In institutional arbitration, parties may also resort to expedited arbitration mechanisms which would save even more time.8 Finally, privacy and confidentiality is always one of arbitration's main advantages.

However, arbitration is not without its challenges in the area of smart contracts.9 Imagine that a dispute arises between two parties in a smart contract. The arbitral tribunal's first job would be to determine that the parties actually decided their dispute would be settled through arbitration. The law in several countries requires that a valid arbitration agreement be executed in written form, either directly in the contract or as a separate agreement. At the time this article was published, to the authors' knowledge, no arbitration proceedings have been initiated yet solving a dispute arising out of a smart contract; therefore we are yet to know whether an arbitration clause within a smart contract would suffice for an arbitral tribunal. To be on the safe side, the best option would be to conclude a written main contract including an arbitration clause or a written separate arbitration agreement.

Assuming there is a valid arbitration agreement between the parties, another problem might arise after an ad hoc or institutional arbitral tribunal renders its arbitral award. There may be an arbitral award that party (A) shall pay an amount to party (B). The question then would be how the award is to be executed by the parties. As explained above, smart contracts are a set of codes performing actions based on pre-defined conditions. In order for the arbitral award to transpire in the blockchain world, this arbitral award needs to be entered into the blockchain mechanism. It is argued that an arbitral tribunal may insert its award into the blockchain as an oracle and accordingly the smart contract would perform the action ordered by the tribunal.10 In other words, the smart contract would transfer the assets from party (A) to party (B) as per the award. Yet, this may require the tribunal to receive pre-determined access to the smart contract.

Even if a valid agreement exists and the arbitral award is successfully entered into the smart contract, there is always the possibility that party (A)'s assets are not adequate in the blockchain system. In this case, party (B) might also want to resort to party (A)'s assets in the non-blockchain world, i.e. through the state court where party (A)'s assets are. That's when the need for enforcement of an arbitral award would arise.

The recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards is regulated mainly by the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards ("New York Convention") to which 160 states are contracting parties, including Turkey.11 Additionally, in Turkey, the International Private and Procedural Law No. 5718 regulates conduct between parties where the New York Convention does not apply. According to these sets of rules, a competent Turkish court must render an enforcement decision for a foreign arbitral award to be executed in Turkey and Turkish courts may only do this if the judgment meets certain criteria.12 One of such criteria is the existence of a valid arbitration agreement between the parties. Above, we briefly mentioned that a valid arbitration agreement must be in written form. As the evaluation of these elements is independent of the competency decision issued by the arbitral tribunal, concern may arise if the state court decides that the arbitration agreement in a smart contract is invalid even if the tribunal decided that there was sufficient basis for competency. Under Turkish law, an arbitration agreement may either be included in the main contract as an arbitration clause or be in the form of a separate agreement. Additionally, an arbitration agreement must be made in writing and must be a written document signed by the parties or in the form of a letter, telegram, telex, or fax exchanged between the parties or via an electronic medium reflecting the parties' agreement. Likewise, Article II/2 of the New York Convention states that "the term "agreement in writing" shall include an arbitral clause in a contract or an arbitration agreement, signed by the parties or contained in an exchange of letters or telegrams". At first glance, smart contracts seem to be unable to fulfill the criterion for a valid written agreement. While it may be argued that a smart contract is an electronic medium, there is always the possibility that courts will decide otherwise. In addition, the term "electronic medium" exists in domestic Turkish law, but not in the New York Convention. Neither Turkish courts nor other state courts party to the New York Convention have faced the question yet of whether smart contract fulfill the written requirement of an arbitration agreement and no easy solution can be found within the doctrine either. Therefore, we reiterate the importance of erring on the side of caution and drafting a separate written arbitration agreement ensure that there are no difficulties in the enforcement of arbitral awards.


As blockchain technology progresses, not only cryptocurrencies but any assets registered to blockchain technology will be able to be transferred via smart contracts. This will inevitably lead to the rise of disputes between parties of smart contracts. In this article, we briefly explained the benefits of arbitration as well as the challenges smart contract disputes may face and provided some temporary solutions to overcome such challenges. Our belief is that with this emerging technology, arbitration will be a more convenient dispute resolution mechanism than litigation. Nevertheless, arbitration is not yet ready for this upcoming technology, so problems may occur in the stages of competency, implementation, and enforcement of arbitral awards. To answer these problems, arbitral institutions and law-makers would need to take action.


1.https://www.comptia.org/images/default-source/blog-images/emtech-top-10-emerging-technologies-2019.jpg?sfvrsn=0 ; https://interestingengineering.com/5-technology-trends-to-watch-in-2019

2. Miners performs transaction verification functions for a fee in the form of newly created bitcoin units. For more information: Ahmet Usta, Serkan Doğantekin, Blockchain 101, p. 123.

3. Alexander Savelyev, Contract Law 2.0: Smart Contracts as the Beginning of the End of Classic Contract Law, p. 15.

4. ICC Dispute Resolution Bulletin, 2018 Issue 1, Robots Replacing Arbitrators- Smart Contract Arbitration, p. 25.

5. Balázs Bodó, Daniel Gervais, João Pedro Quintais, Blockchain and Smart Contracts: The Missing Link in Copyright Licensing?, International Journal of Law and Information Technology, Volume 26, Issue 4, Winter 2018, p. 312. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eay014

6. Similar opinion: Francisco Uríbarri Soares, New Technologies and Arbitration, Indian Journal of Arbitration Law, Volume 7, Issue 1, (2018). Available at: http://ijal.in/sites/default/files/IJAL_Volume_7_Issue_1_Francisco_Uribarri_Soares.pdf

7. Data, Blockchain and Smart Contracts, Regulatory Task Force Report Swiss LegalTech Association (SLTA), p. 56. Available at: https://www.swisslegaltech.ch/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/SLTA-Regulatory-Task-Force-Report-2.pdf

8. Please note that arbitration institutions (such as ICC, LCIA, SCC, ISTAC, etc.) have not yet prepared or published any rules regarding the settlement of blockchain and/or smart contract disputes.

9. One debate regarding smart contract disputes is whether or not existing dispute resolution methods are sufficient. According to one approach, smart contracts may be adjudicated by existing alternative dispute resolution procedures. According to a second approach, the existing legal system cannot address the legal challenges of blockchain and smart contract disputes and thus a special mechanism in the blockchain should be established. There are some startups specialized in blockchain dispute resolution mechanisms in which arbitration mechanism is embedded into smart contract systems and once arbitral awards are rendered in the blockchain, the smart contracts transfer the assets. While we focused on traditional arbitration in this article, for more information you may refer to: Darcy Allen, Aaron Lane, Marta Poblet, The Governance of Blockchain Dispute Resolution, p. 5-7. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3334674.

10. ICC Dispute Resolution Bulletin, 2018 Issue 1, Robots Replacing Arbitrators- Smart Contract Arbitration, p. 25; Allen/Lane/Poblet, p. 7.

11. The Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958). Text: http://www.newyorkconvention.org/english Contracting parties: http://www.newyorkconvention.org/countries

12. These criteria are set out in Article V of the New York Convention and in Article 54 of the Turkish International Private and Procedural Law No. 5718

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions