The nuclear tender (the "Tender")
process, officially called the "Competition to Be Launched
to Determine the Company to Construct and Operate a Nuclear Power
Plant and Sell Electrical Energy to TETAŞ,", is
still going forward, despite the disappointment arising from
submission of an offer by only one party from among the thirteen
interested parties who purchased the Tender documents. The lone
party was the consortium of Atomstroyexport (Russia), Inter Rao
(Russia) and Park Teknik (Turkey) (the
"Consortium"). As mentioned in our
previous Newsletter (Fall 2008), we believe that this disappointing
lack of interest should not ultimately be very surprising. The
Tender documents failed to meet the expectations of prospective
bidders, and certain crucial issues were not clearly established,
even under the Addenda to the Tender documents. Furthermore, the
Tender date was not postponed despite repeated requests.
Pursuant to the Specifications Regarding the Competition to Be
Launched to Determine the Company to Construct and Operate a
Nuclear Power Plant and Sell Electrical Energy to TETAŞ
(the "Tender Specifications"), the
offers were to consist of three envelopes that included,
respectively: (1) certain corporate information and documents
(mainly); (2) information regarding the criteria determined by the
Turkish Atomic Energy Authority (the
"TAEK"), and annexed to the Tender
Specifications (the "TAEK Criteria");
and (3) the offer letter, offer form and evaluation form. Upon
evaluating the first envelope submitted by the Consortium, the
Tender Commission decided that the enclosed information and
documents met the criteria in the Tender Specifications, and
submitted the second envelope to the TAEK.
Towards the end of November 2008, TAEK officials announced that
the offer submitted by the Consortium met almost all the
prerequisites of the TAEK Criteria, and determined a period for the
Consortium to clarify certain issues. Finally, on 19 December 2008,
it was announced on the official web page of the TAEK that the
offer of the Consortium had been found to satisfy the TAEK
Criteria, and that a certificate in this regard had been issued in
favor of the Consortium and submitted to the General Directorate of
After a short break full of discussions and debates, in which
the most significant concern appeared to be the risk that Turkey
might become dependent on Russia for its energy resources, the
third envelope of the Consortium was opened on 19 January 2009.
Another disappointment followed. Considering the world-shaking
economic crisis, the content of the third envelope was astonishing,
featuring a discounted unit price of 21.16 US Cents/kWh, a weighted
average of the total average active electrical energy unit price of
20.79 US Cents/kWh, and a total electrical energy amount of 415.5
billion kWh. It is worth noting the unit cost of electricity
generated from the nuclear energy in some other countries to
evaluate the unit price offered in the tender: Finland 2.76 US
Cents, France 2.54 US Cents, Germany 2.86 US Cents, Switzerland
2.88US Cents, Japan 4.80US Cents, South Korea 2.34 US Cents, USA
3.01US Cents, and Canada 2.60US Cents1.
According to our understanding, the Consortium –
taking into account the traumatic global developments which had so
deeply affected the national economies of the Consortium partners
– had its "Plan B" ready and submitted a
revised offer. Initially, despite certain news reports mentioning
that acceptance of the Consortium's revised financial offer was
under consideration for the report to be submitted to the Council
of Ministers for final approval, the revised offer was rejected and
given back to the Consortium. According to recent news,
TETAŞ and the Consortium has been conducting private
negotiations with regard to price reductions, and the Consortium
has submitted a new pricing plan that starts with 15 US Cents/kWh
and decreases to 13.4 US Cents/kWh in the year 2030. Although
TETAŞ has been planning to request authorization from the
Council of Ministers to conduct official negotiations with the
Consortium, normally, at this point in the overall process, no
negotiation is foreseen under the relevant legislation and Tender
Turkey is now awaiting the report to be submitted to the Council
of Ministers, together with the figures to appear in it. The
subsequent decision of the Council of Ministers will determine the
next chapter in Turkey's nuclear adventure. Meanwhile, the
Ministry has been reporting that work is underway for the second
nuclear project, to be built in Sinop.
1. This information was published in the web-site of the
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
On 6 October 2016, the UK's Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Sajid Javid, overruled local councillors on appeal and approved Cuadrilla's plans to explore for shale gas in Lancashire.
On Friday, 7th October the General Assembly of the International Civil Aviation Organisation passed a resolution, resolving to implement the world's first global regime for combatting CO2 emissions from aircraft.
Turkey's energy regulator previously ruled (decision numbered 5709, dated 30 July 2015) that a total capacity of 2,000 MW would be reserved in the period up until 2020 for wind power pre-license applicants to connect to the grid.
The WTO dispute "India – Solar Cells" concerns the Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar Mission ("National Mission"), launched in India six years ago.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).