Turkey: Negative Clearance And Exemption Under Turkish Competition Law

Last Updated: 6 February 2018
Article by Faruk Aktay

A guide to the assessment of negative clearance and exemption under Turkish Competition Law.

What are the applicable provisions governing negative clearance and exemptions?

Article 4 of the Law No: 4054 on the Protection of Competition ("Law") prohibits agreements between undertakings restrictive of competition. According to Article 4 of the Law, "agreements and concerted practices between undertakings, and decisions and practices of associations of undertakings which have as their object or effect or likely effect the prevention, distortion or restriction of competition directly or indirectly in a particular market for goods or services are illegal and prohibited". The article also lists certain practices that are prohibited1. However, the list is not exhaustive thus not limited to the examples provided therein.

Article 5 of the Law exempts such agreements from prohibition in Article 4 provided that certain conditions are met. The conditions for exemption (muafiyet) are explained in detail in Section 2.3 below.

In addition, Article 8 of the Law governs the negative clearance (menfi tespit). The Article 8 reads that "upon the application by the undertaking or associations of undertakings concerned, the Board may, on the basis of information in hand, grant a negative clearance order indicating that an agreement, decision, practice or merger and acquisition are not contrary to articles 4, 6 and 7 of the Law."

Therefore, within this framework, first, the Board determines whether the agreement in question violates Article 4, if not it issues a negative clearance under Article 8. In case it is found to constitute an infringement under Article 4, the Board checks whether the agreement in question can benefit from one of the block exemption communiqués or whether an exemption under Article 5 can be granted to the same.

2. How is the assessment made by the Board?

The Board, during a negative clearance or exemption application makes its assessment as follows:

i. It checks whether the agreement is restrictive of competition within the meaning of Article 4;

ii. If the agreement does not fall within the scope of Article 4, the Board grants negative clearance;

iii. If the agreement falls within the scope of Article 4, then the Board determines whether it may benefit from block exemption;

iv. If the agreement cannot benefit from block exemption, then the Board further analyses whether the agreement meets individual exemption criteria.

2.1. How does the Board determine that whether the agreement falls within Article 4?

The Board, in the first stage, while checking whether the agreement is restrictive of competition, will look into restriction by object and/or effect. It should be noted that it is not necessary that both of those factors exist but agreements that have only as their object or only as their effect the restriction of competition are assessed within the scope of Article 4.

2.1.1. How does the Board determine the restriction of competition by effect?

In light of Board decisions, with respect to horizontal agreements, restrictions of competition by object include price fixing, sharing market and customers and agreements concerning the control of supply. With regards to vertical agreements, resale price maintenance, imposing a minimum resale price limit and exclusivity agreements including passive sales are under this category.

Certain agreements may still be restrictive of competition by object even if they do not include the abovementioned provisions. Although it is not a necessary factor to determine whether the agreement has its object as the restriction of competition, the parties' intent can also be considered.

If the agreement is found to violate Article 4 "by object", it is not necessary to examine further the effects created/to be created by it in the market to "claim the violation of Article 4". In cases where the agreement is found to have as its object the restriction of competition, further analysis towards the effects of the agreement is intended to demonstrate gravity of the infringement and to determine administrative sanctions.

2.1.2. How does the Board determine the restriction of competition by effect?

Some agreements may not be restrictive of competition by object but they may be restrictive by effect, in which case, the Act requires that the effects of the agreement be examined and prohibits agreements "that have as their effect or likely effect the restriction of competition". At this point, the Board examines both "actual" and "potential" effects of the agreements in question. Therefore, beside the actual anticompetitive results, restrictive effects that have not occurred yet but are expected to occur within a reasonable probability are sufficient to claim that the agreement violates Article 4. An agreement must have or is expected with a reasonable probability to have negative effects on one of the competition parameters in the market such as price, output, quality or variety of products or innovation to be restrictive by effect.

2.2. If the agreement falls within Article 4, what type of block exemption have been granted by TCA?

The Board block exempts certain types of agreements in certain sectors provided that they fulfil the requirements covered by the relevant communiqués from the prohibition in Article 4. The agreements falling within one of the block exemption communiqués are not subject to notification obligation specified in Articles 10 and 12 of the Law. These Block Exemption Communiqués are2:

  • Block Exemption Communiqué on Vertical Agreements (2002/2)
  • Block Exemption Communiqué on Technology Transfer agreements (2008/2)
  • Block Exemption Communiqué on Insurance Sector (2008/3)
  • Block Exemption Communiqué on Specialization Agreements (2013/3)
  • Block Exemption Communiqué on Research and Development Agreements (2016/5)
  • Block Exemption Communiqué on Motor Vehicle Sector (2017/3)

You can find more information about each in our special article covering block exemptions.

2.3. If the agreement falls within Article 4, how is the assessment for individual exemption made?

Agreements that restrict competition may at the same time enhance welfare by way of efficiency gains. When welfare enhancing effects of an agreement outweigh its anticompetitive effects, the net effect of the agreement may be an increase in consumer welfare and strengthening the competitive process, which constitutes the basis of the exemption regime. So the agreement can be exempted from the implementation of Article 4, provided that it fulfills the conditions of Article 5 of the Law, which implies that the net effect of the agreement on economic/consumer welfare is positive or at least neutral.

The Board determines whether the exemption satisfies all four cumulative conditions set forth in Article 5:

i. The agreement must promote new developments and improvements or economic or technical progress in the production and distribution of goods and provision of services;

ii. Consumers must benefit from the positive effects;

iii. The agreement must not eliminate competition in a substantial part of the market

iv. Competition must not be restricted more than necessary to achieve the objectives listed in (a) and  (b)

3. How does the Board assess the conditions for exemption set forth in Article 5?

3.1. Efficiency gains

Article 5(a) requires that "the agreement must promote new developments and improvements or economic or technical progress in the production and distribution of goods and provision of services". It is necessary that the efficiency gains should be objective and not be assessed from subjective point of view of the parties. Cost efficiencies that arise from the mere use of market power by the parties cannot be taken into account.

In order to define the efficiency gains generated by the agreement, the following points must be considered:

i. The nature of the claimed efficiencies i.e. whether the claimed efficiencies are objective in nature;

ii. The casual link between the agreement and the efficiencies i.e. the efficiencies must directly result from the activities that form the object of the agreement;

iii. The likelihood and magnitude of each claimed efficiency;

iv. How and when each claimed efficiency would be achieved.

The types of efficiencies to be taken into account for the exemption analysis can be categorized under

(a) cost efficiencies and (b) qualitative efficiencies.

Cost efficiencies may result from the following:

i. Development of new production technologies and methods;

ii. Synergies resulting from an integration of existing assets;

iii. Economies of scale;

iv. Economies of scope when firms produce two or more products related to each other (especially where the same input is used);

v. Agreements that allow for better planning of production, reducing the costs of inventory and for better capacity utilization.

Qualitative efficiencies may result from the following:

i. Production of a new or advanced products, greater product variety and higher quality;

ii. Combination of complimentary assets

iii. Distribution agreements, resulting in, for example, quicker delivery and better-quality assurance.

3.2. Consumer Benefits

Article 5(b) requires that consumers must benefit from the efficiency gains generated. The concept of "consumer" covers not only end users but also producers that use the products in question as an input, as well as those who purchase the product for resale purposes e.g. wholesalers, retailers and dealers.

The Board checks the following factors in the satisfaction of this criterion:

i. Efficiencies should directly stem from the agreement: It is the case that in absence of restriction of competition, the efficiencies would not be passed on to consumers, thus they should directly result from the agreement. The resulting efficiency gains may be in the form of cost efficiencies or qualitative efficiencies as discussed above such as introduction of new products and technological progress. Consumers as a whole may benefit from lower production costs, production of new and advanced products or services and more efficient allocation of resources thanks to efficiency gains.

Assessment concerning qualitative efficiencies is subjective in nature thus it will be more difficult to demonstrate qualitative efficiencies than cost efficiencies.

ii. Proportionality of restriction: The consumer benefits should be in proportion to the restriction of competition under the agreement. The greater the restriction of competition, the greater must be the efficiencies that will pass-on to consumers.

iii. Reasonable period of time to benefit from efficiencies: A certain period of time may be required before the efficiencies are passed on to consumers. The longer the transition period is, the lesser the actual net value of the benefits that the consumers will gain. Thus, the length of the transition period should be reasonable to fulfill this criterion in the assessment.

iv. Various other factors: Characteristics of the market, position of the competitors, strategies adopted by the competitors in the inter-brand competition, elasticity of demand may also be also important factors in the assessment.

3.3. No elimination of competition in a substantial part of the market

The basic principle of the assessment is the maintenance of the competitive process in the market. When competition is eliminated in the relevant market, even if short-term efficiency gains are created, they will not be able to outweigh longer-term negative effects such as higher prices, reduced innovation and misallocation of resources.

The Board usually evaluates the following factors in the satisfaction of this criterion:

i. Evaluation of the position of competitors in the market: the level of competitive constraint that they impose on the parties to the agreement and the impact of the agreement on the existing competitive structure. Not only actual but also potential competition in the market must be considered.

ii. Competitors' market shares for actual competition: the assessment should not be based exclusively on market share. The capacity and incentive of actual competitors to compete must be examined.

iii. Examination of the agreement's effect on the various parameters of competition: When an agreement entirely eliminates the basic parameters of competition such as price competition, innovation and development of new products, this condition cannot be fulfilled.

iv. Conduct of the parties in the market: If following the agreement, prices substantially increases.

it may be an indication that the parties are not subject to competition in the market and that competition has been eliminated in a substantial part of the relevant market.

v. Whether undertakings party to the agreement provide differentiated products: The more substitutable the products offered by the parties to the agreement are the more restrictive the effects of the agreement will be.

vi. Actual condition in the market and entry barriers: This is an important factor as it is measurable. However, potential competition should not be ignored. With respect to potential competition, an analysis of barriers to entry facing undertakings that are not already competing within the relevant market is made. In the assessment of entry barriers and the possibility for new entry it is relevant to examine, inter alia, the following factors that are also included in the secondary legislation and Board decisions:

  • Impact of legal regulations in the market on new entries;
  • Cost of entry including sunk costs;
  • The minimum level of efficient scale;
  • Characteristics of potential entrants
  • Position of buyers in the market and their ability to compete;
  • The likely competitive response of incumbents to entrants;
  • Structure of the market (stagnating and declining markets may not be attractive for entrants);
  • Past entries on a significant scale and their success.

In practice, in the regulated sectors, the Board also considers whether the applicable legislation in the relevant product market allows for the restriction intended in the agreement3. If the legislation allows for such restriction, the Board, without diving into further detailed analysis, considers that this criterion has been fulfilled. In a similar vein, the Board, beforehand, sends inquiries to the regulation authority in relation to the nature and legality of the restriction intended in the agreement4.

3.4. Not limiting competition more than necessary

Article 5(d) requires that the agreement should not restrict competition more than necessary to achieve the efficiencies aimed by the agreement. The Board usually checks as to whether more efficiencies are attained under the restriction of competition than the In light of the Guideline on Exemptions, this condition requires a two-stage test. First stage is related to whether the agreement as such is necessary and indispensable in order to achieve the efficiencies.

i. Necessity or indispensability of the agreement depends on whether the desired efficiency gains could be achieved through alternative means that are less restrictive of competition. Whether the alternative is economical and practical should be also taken into account. The parties are required to explain and demonstrate why less restrictive, economically rational and practical alternatives would be significantly less efficient.

ii. Whether the parties achieved the efficiencies on their own is also important. The undertakings concerned must explain and substantiate why the same efficiencies would not occur through internal growth and price competition. While doing this analysis, it is relevant to consider what the minimum efficient scale is.

The second stage is the individual assessment of whether each restriction caused by the agreement is necessary.

i. The indispensability of each restriction of competition flowing from the agreement must be assessed. A restriction can be deemed indispensable for the claimed efficiencies if its absence would significantly reduce the efficiencies that follow from the agreement or make it significantly less likely that they will materialize. The assessment of alternative solutions must take into account the actual and potential positive effects on competition by the elimination of a particular restriction or the application of a less restrictive alternative.

ii. Restrictions that are black listed in block exemption regulations or identified as hardcore restrictions in guidelines and communiqués are unlikely to be considered indispensable. However, the assessment of indispensability must be made within the market conditions in which the agreement will operate. The more the risks and uncertainty implied by the agreement, the more a restriction may be required to ensure the efficiencies. Restrictions may also be indispensable in order to align the parties with the same object and ensure that they work jointly for the implementation of the agreement.

In practice, the Board most of the time checks for two conditions:

i. Whether the agreement is valid less than 5 years; and

ii. Whether the restriction / exclusivity is limited to the contracting party. If the agreement satisfies these two conditions, then the Board is likely to consider this criterion satisfied.

4. Can the Board withdraw its exemption decisions and if so, under what circumstances?

The Board has the power to withdraw both individual and block exemption decisions as well as negative clearance decisions in the cases listed in Article 13 of the Law, which are:

i. Change in any event constituting the basis of the decision;

ii. Failure to fulfil the terms or obligations resolved;

iii. Having taken the decision on the basis of incorrect or incomplete information concerning the agreement in question.

Footnotes

1 Article 4- Such cases are, in particular, as follows:

  • Fixing the purchase or sale price of goods or services, elements such as cost and profit which form the price, and any terms of purchase or sale,
  • Partitioning markets for goods or services, and sharing or controlling all kinds of market resources or elements,
  • Controlling the amount of supply or demand in relation to goods or services, or determining them outside the market,
  • Complicating and restricting the activities of competing undertakings, or excluding undertakings operating in the market by boycotts or other behavior, or preventing potential new entrants to the market,
  • Except exclusive dealing, applying different terms to persons with equal status for equal rights, obligations and acts,
  • Contrary to the nature of the agreement or commercial usages, obliging to purchase other goods or services together with a good or service, or tying a good or service demanded by purchasers acting as intermediary undertakings to the condition of displaying another good or service by the purchaser, or putting forward terms as to the resupply of a good or service supplied.

2 Besides the Board issued guidelines about relevant topics such as:

  • Guidelines on Certain Subcontracting Agreements Between Non-Competitors,
  • Guidelines on the Application of Articles 4 and 5 of the Act to Technology Transfer Agreements.
  • Guidelines on Vertical Agreements,
  • Guidelines on the Explanation of the Block Exemption Communiqué No. 2017/3 on Vertical Agreements and Concerted Practices in the Motor Vehicles Sector

 3 Competition Board decision dated 8 June 2017 numbered 17-19/289-126 in the exemption application for the distribution agreement between Bayer Consumer Care AG and Moltek and the license agreement between Bayer Turk and Moltek

4 Competition Board decision dated 6 April 2017 numbered 17-12/145-64 (par.24) in the exemption application in relation to the distributorship agreement to be executed by Turkcell and KVK and Genpa.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions