Turkey: A Swarm Of Competition Law Based Damages Claims In Turkey: Alarm Bells Are Ringing

Last Updated: 13 March 2017
Article by Şahin Ardiyok and Barış Yüksel

The competition law enforcement in Turkey is based on private and public enforcement pillars. Turkish Competition Authority (TCA) has sole discretion to enforce the Competition Act whereas the litigations initiated by the victims of anti-competitive conduct are seen in private courts. The Competition Act in Turkey which was enacted in 1994 contains certain provisions concerning the damages claims to be made by the victims of the violations of anti-competitive conduct (e.g. treble damages) and the general provisions of the Law of Obligations concerning tort are also applicable in that respect.

Main problems and legal developments to date

Although the TCA has been enforcing the Competition Act for over 20 years and had issued numerous violation decisions, only a very few individual litigations were initiated up until now. The reasons why the private enforcement pillar was much weaker compared to the public enforcement pillar are twofold. First, the rules concerning the statute of limitations are widely unclear and the precedents of the Turkish Court of Cassation requires that the infringement decisions of the TCA are finalized via due judicial review (or after the period for an action for annulment lapses), which takes approximately 5 years. Second there is a serious incentive problem due to the absence of an effective collective redress mechanism (i.e. a class action that would allow the claimants to claim damage compensation).

In some recent decisions, the Assembly of Civil Chambers of the Turkish Court of Cassation has solved the "statute of limitations problem" and held that the 8-year period mentioned in the Misdemeanours Act shall be applicable for damages claims related with the violation of the Competition Act rather than the 2-year period foreseen in the Law of Obligations. The legal basis of this holding is the Article 72 of the Law of Obligations which stipulates that in case the criminal laws foresee a longer period for tortious conducts that also constitute a crime (or a misdemeanour according to the interpretation of the Assembly), this longer period shall also be applied in private law.

With respect to the "finalization problem", decisions of the various chambers of the Turkish Court of Cassation made it clear that the courts must wait until the decisions of the TCA are finalized and that the judicial review process constitutes a "preliminary issue" in terms of Turkish law. However, this does not mean that the victims must wait until the finalization of the TCA's infringement decision to initiate litigations (and thus risk being barred by the statute of limitations). Turkish Court of Cassation also made it very clear that the finalization of the TCA decision is not a "prerequisite" for initiating a litigation and the courts may not refuse to examine the claims on the procedural ground that the mandatory prerequisites are not satisfied. To recap, the finalization problem does not prevent, but greatly delays the competition law based damages claims and is still a major source of inefficiency.

Although the second issue is yet to be resolved, the "Banking Decision" of the TCA condemning an anti-competitive agreement between 12 major banks in Turkey to collectively determine the interest rates for certain loans, attracted massive attention in the media and significantly raised public interest in competition law based damages claims. Due to this increased demand for such claims, a huge number of individual litigations have been initiated for the same violation in various courts in different cities of Turkey (courts in different cities have jurisdiction in tort cases per the Civil Procedure Act).

Along with these developments, it is realized that, as the second issue remains unsolved, the increased significance of the private law pillar is not just an opportunity but also a threat.

Currently, in the absence of an efficient collective redress mechanism, all these individual claims concerning the same violation are litigated separately. This means that the courts should request (and afterwards probably rely on) different expert reports, the preparation of which demands extensive resources (e.g. data, time and expertise) and this could lead to huge inefficiencies due to the multiplication of expenses. Other than that, the judicial costs and the legal expenses of the undertakings would also multiply as many courts would spend resources over the same issues and the undertakings would have to incur immense legal costs for simultaneously following a vast amount of cases.

We should add that the current laws which only require the losing party to compensate a certain portion of other parties' legal costs paves the way for abusive litigation. It might be more appropriate to require the losing party to compensate all the legal costs of the other party especially in case of collective redress.

Quantification of harm and treble damages

For now, there are no precedents or established practices concerning the calculation of damages. Assuming the experts would probably rely on the European Commission's Practical Guide for Quantification of Harm (as there seems to be no other alternative), it seems very likely that all the expert reports would include counterfactual scenarios. Since there are many different methods for the determination of counterfactual scenarios, all of which require a significant amount of assumptions and involvement of economists experienced in industrial economics, it is almost certain that the counterfactual scenarios in different cases will not be identical although they are built to determine the same market conditions (i.e. the Turkish banking market during the period of the infringement). As the counterfactual scenarios relied on would ultimately determine the amount of compensation to be awarded, it would be inevitable for the courts to award (significantly) different amounts of compensation for the same damages incurred.

This discrepancy could also be exacerbated because the courts have absolute discretion to award "treble damages" in competition law based damages claims per the Article 58/2 of the Competition Act and this means that some litigants would receive much higher compensations than the actual harm the suffered (which conflicts the basic principles of Turkish tort law and is against the EU Directive on competition law based damages) whereas the others would not. The legal uncertainties and excessive costs that arise due to the absence of an efficient legal framework is also alarmingly dangerous for the undertakings that are the defendants in these litigations.

Identification of the "victims"

Other than these, there is also a problem with respect to the identification of the "victims" that have the right to initiate damages claims. In the United States, the "antitrust injury doctrine" and more importantly the "indirect purchaser rule" are useful tools to limit the number of potential victims of an anti-competitive action who may initiate litigations. Yet, the Turkish Competition Act does not contain any special provisions in that respect and it is very difficult (if not impossible) to argue that the general principles of Law of Obligations might be interpreted in a way that would allow the judges to adopt those tools. Although the problems associated with the absence of such tools are not yet realized since the current debates are largely influenced by the immediate threat posed by the Banking Decision, there is also a pressing need to resolve this issue as fast as possible.

In summary...

The Banking Decision seems to be the fuel for the private competition law enforcement pillar that had been a very scary "stick" that only acted as a tool to "fear up" the undertakings and was never actually used. Although these new litigations are definitely a strong signal about the effects of private enforcement mechanism, the threats posed by the current system must also not be ignored.

It is crucial for the policy makers to understand that the current system that lacks clear procedural rules concerning the statute of limitations, the relation between the TCA decisions and the damages claims made in private courts and most importantly a well-functioning collective redress mechanism falls way short of being efficient. Absence of substantive rules for identifying (and limiting the scope of) the victims that may claim compensation and lack of precedents and guides for calculation of damages are also significant defects. The potential negative impacts of these issues are further exacerbated by the institution of "treble damages" which is completely alien to the Turkish legal framework and is not required (for deterrence) in the presence of a well-established public enforcement pillar (which is sufficiently deterrent by itself).

If these problems are ignored or set aside for being "too complicated to be solved" (as some claim when discussing the pressing need for a collective redress mechanism), the increased amount of litigations may become a curse rather than being a blessing soon.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Şahin Ardiyok
Barış Yüksel
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.