Worldwide: 2016 FCPA Enforcement Actions and Highlights

Overall, this was a more active year for FCPA enforcement actions when compared to 2015. This year, Department of Justice ("DOJ") took a total of 10 enforcement actions and Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") took a total of 25 enforcement actions. Like last year, SEC is more active than DOJ, in terms of numbers of the enforcement actions. Of the 10 enforcement actions taken by DOJ, only 1 of them was related to a real person. Of the 25 SEC enforcement actions 4 of them were related real persons.

In terms of sectoral concentration of FCPA enforcement actions, one can see that mostly the technology sector were targeted followed by the pharmaceutical sector. In terms of where the foreign bribery took place, China seems dominant. In fact, all of the 4 pharmaceutical companies were charged with foreign bribery in China.

This year, we were expecting to see the effects of Yates Memo, which underlined the significance of individual accountability for deterring corporate wrongdoing and provided a guideline on how to enforce such accountability. That said the total number of FCPA enforcement actions against individuals so far is 5, as opposed to 30 enforcement actions against corporations.

This year, one of the more interesting cases is with regard to provision of paid internships, provision of loans to universities and provision of loans for house buying to relatives of Chinese officials (the Qualcomm case). The case echoes the BNY Mellon case of last year, where provision of valuable internships to relatives of public officials was deemed bribery. Also this year for the first time, a hedge fund was found to have violated the FCPA.

DOJ Enforcement Actions

In February 2016, VimpelCom, a Dutch communications company agreed to pay a combined fine of more than $795 million to US and Dutch authorities to settle the charges that it made corrupt payments to Uzbek officials. The DOJ classified this case as "one of the largest global foreign bribery resolutions ever". VimpelCom's Uzbek subsidiary pleaded guilty, while Vimpelcom entered into a deferred prosecution agreement ("DPA") with the DOJ. According to admissions, companies paid at least $114 million in bribes to an Uzbek official, a close relative of a high-ranking Uzbek governmental official who had influence over the telecom industry. The companies attempted to hide illicit payments as payments to shell companies, payments for equity transactions, consulting agreements and reseller transactions. Vimpelcom is to pay $167 million to SEC with regard to the case.

In February 2016, two Chinese subsidiaries of PTC Inc. entered into a non-prosecution agreement ("NPA") with DOJ and agreed to pay $14.54 million in penalties. The companies admitted that they paid for recreational travel expenses of Chinese public officials and in return obtained $13 million in contract. Although the seeming purpose of these trips was training, the travel plan also included New York, Los Angeles, Las Vegas and Hawaii. Admittedly, the travel expenses were hidden in sales made to the relevant Chinese state-owned entities. In a SEC action relating to the case, PTC agreed to pay $11.858 million in disgorgement and $1,764 in prejudgment interest to settle charges.

In March 2016, Abraham Jose Shiera Bastidas pleaded guilty bribing Venezuelan public officials, in order to obtain lucrative energy contracts from a Venezuelan government owned and controlled energy company. Bastidas also made corrupt payments in order to expedite payments to his companies.

In March 2016, the Latin American subsidiary of a US based health-care company, Olympus Latin America, entered into a DPA with the DOJ and agreed to pay $22.8 million to resolve FCPA charges. According to court documents in order to increase its sales in Central and South America, the subsidiary implemented a plan to provide cash, money transfers, personal grants, personal travel and free or heavily discounted equipment to public officials. Officials would be provided with these in trainings centers whose seeming aim was to educate doctors. The bribes amounted to the approximate amount of $3 million and gains were more than $7.5 million.

In June 2016, Analogic Corporation entered into a $3.4 million NPA with the DOJ in order to settle charges that its Denmark subsidiary BK Medical ApS made illegal payments to Russian public officials. As per the scheme, BK Medical ApS would pay inflated prices to its distributor and upon getting the payments from its distributor, would then transfer the excessive amounts to third parties with whom the subsidiary did not have a legitimate business relationship. The Denmark subsidiary also admitted that it did not engage in third party due diligence with these third parties. In a SEC action relating to the case, Analogic agreed to pay $7.67 million in disgorgement and $3.8 million prejudgment interest.

In July 2016, Latam Airlines, a Chilean airline company entered into a DPA with the DOJ and agreed to pay $12.75 million to settle charges. According to the admissions, the company entered into a false consulting contract $1.15 million in value, in order for the "consultant" to funnel the money to Argentine union officials. This way, the union officials agreed to a lower wage deal. Company is to pay the SEC $6.74 million in disgorgement and $2.7 million in prejudgment interest. According to the SEC investigation when the consultant contacted the company, the consultant made clear that payments would go to third parties and CEO was aware that the consultant would not perform the actions stipulated in the contract.

In September 2016, Och-Ziff, a New York based hedge fund management entered into a DPA with the DOJ, agreeing to pay more than $213 million in order to settle the charges. OZ Africa, a wholly owned subsidiary of Och-Ziff pleaded guilty. According to companies' admissions, Ocz-Ziff employees knowingly continued their business relationship with a third party consultant who they knew gained access to lucrative investment opportunities through bribes to public officials. The company was aware that part of the money paid to the consultant would be used as bribes. In another scheme, the Och- Ziff admitted to knowingly hiring a consultant who would pay bribes to government officials in order to secure investments. Och-Ziff hired the consultant without any due diligence. Och- Ziff agreed to pay $200 million to SEC, in order to settle charges regarding the relevant case. Och-Ziff is the first hedge fund held accountable for FCPA violations.

In September 2016, OZ Africa Management GP is the first hedge fund that held liable for violating Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ("FCPA"). The company entered into a DPA with DOJ and agreed to pay $213,055,689.

The charges arose from a widespread scheme involving bribery of officials in Democratic Republic of Congo and Libya.

In October 2016, Embraer, a Brazilian aircraft manufacturer, entered into a DP A with the DOJ, agreeing to pay $107 million as penalty. The company admitted that it paid government officials in Mozambique, Dominican Republic and in Saudi Arabia, bribes in order to obtain contracts. The bribes were concealed through false agency agreements. The company also agreed to pay $83.8 million in disgorgement and $14.4 million in prejudgment interest to SEC.

SEC Enforcement Actions

In February 2016, SAP SE settled charges with SEC that it had paid Panamanian government officials bribes in order to gain sales contracts. According to the SEC investigation, an SAP employee falsified internal approval forms, falsifying documents as discounts. Panamanian partner created a slush fund with the excessive discounts and paid bribes to officials. SAP SE agreed to pay $3.7 million, in order to settle charges.

In February 2016, SciClone, an American pharmaceutical company, agreed to pay $12 million to settle charges that it bribed Chinese health officials. According to the SEC investigation, SciClone employees provided money, gifts and other things of value to health officials.

In February 2016, SEC entered into its first DPA with an individual in an FCPA related case. SEC held that YU Kai Yuan, a former employee of PTC's Chinese subsidiaries qualified for a NPA due to his significant cooperation during the investigation into PTC Chinese subsidiaries.

In February 2016, Ignacio Cueto Plaza, president and COO of LAN airlines agreed to pay $75,000 to settle charges that he has authorized payments to an Argentinian consultant who he knew would transfer the payments to Argentinian union officials in order for them to agree to lower wages.

In March 2016, Qualcomm, an American telecommunications company, settled charges with SEC that it paid bribes to Chines officials in order to gain business advantage, and agreed to pay a $7.5 million penalty. According to the SEC investigation, Qualcomm provided employment and paid internships to Chinese officials' relatives, in order to influence their business decisions. Such employment and internship applications were referred to as "must place" or "special" hires within the company. In one case, the company provided a grant to a university, in order to render the son of Chinese official a position in a Ph.D. program and renew his student visa. Further, a company executive provided the son of a Chinese official with $75,000 loan for a house payment. Qualcomm also provided other things of value to Chinese officials such as airplane tickets to their children or luxury goods for their spouses.

In March 2016, Nordion, a Canadian healthcare company and its employee Mikhail Gourevitch settled charges that they bribed Russian officials for business advantages. Mr. Gourevitch agreed to pay $100,000 in disgorgement, $12,000 in prejudgment interest and a $66,000 penalty. Nordion agreed to pay a $375,000 penalty as well. According to the SEC investigation, Mr. Gourevitch paid improper funds obtained from Nordion to a third party agent and falsified documentation regarding the payments.

In April 2016, Las Vegas Sands, an American casino and resort operating company, agreed to pay a $9 million fine to settle SEC charges that it bribed Chinese officials. According to the SEC investigation, company made improper payments to a consultant in order to gain business advantages in China. The company concealed the payments through falsifying books and records, and in one case declaring payment for an artwork which was never purchased. The company employees referred to the consultant as "the beard".

In June 2016, Nortek Inc., an American building products manufacturer, entered into an NPA with SEC in order to settle charges that it bribed Chinese officials. The company agreed to pay $291,403 in disgorgement and $30,655 in interest. According to the NPA, the company made cash payments, provided gift cards and entertainment expenses to the Chinese officials in order to obtain favored treatment and reduced customs taxes.

In August 2016, Key Energy, an American energy company agreed to pay a $5 million disgorgement in order to settle charges that its Mexican subsidiary bribed Mexican officials. According to the SEC investigation, the Mexican subsidiary made payments to a consulting company who funneled payments to the Mexican public official. The Mexican official in return provided insider information on how to successfully negotiate contracts with Mexica's state-owned oil company Pemex. The Mexican subsidiary did not conduct due diligence or entered into a written contract with the consulting firm.

In August 2016, Astrazeneca, a UK pharmaceutical company, agreed to pay more than $5 million to settle charges that the company's subsidiaries made illicit payments in China and Russia. According to the SEC investigations the subsidiaries provided officials with cash, gifts and other types of payments in order for the company products to be prescribed and obtain fine reductions for proposed financial sanctions.

In September 2016, a former employee of the Harris Corporation, an American communications and information technology company, agreed to settle charges that he bribed Chinese government officials. Jun Ping Zhang agreed to pay a $46,000 civil penalty. The SEC investigation found that Ping falsified expense receipts in order to obtain cash for the gifts provided to Chinese officials. Harris Corporation was not charged by the SEC, as Harris Corporation discovered the misconduct, its prompt self-reporting, remediation efforts and cooperation with the SEC.

In September 2016, GlaxoSmithKline ("GSK"), a UK pharmaceutical company, agreed to pay $20 million for the transfer of money, gifts, and other things of value to health care professionals in China in order to increase its sales.

In September 2016, NuSkin Enterprises, an American multilevel marketing company agreed to pay $765,688 to settle charges that it bribed Chinese officials. According to the SEC investigation company's Chinese subsidiary made a donation to a charity identified by a party official from Chinese Communist party to impact an on-going provincial agency investigation against the company. In July, Johnsons Controls, an American provider of HVAC systems, agreed to pay $14 million to SEC in order to settle charges that it bribed Chinese officials. According to SEC investigation, the company's Chinese subsidiary, which was the subject of a previous FCPA enforcement action, made payments of almost $4.9 million to employees of Chinese government owned shipyards, and others, to obtain and retain business and personally enrich themselves. The subsidiary used vendors for these actions because vendor transactions (instead of agents) were tagged as "low-risk" by the company. Even where the managers of the company oversaw these transactions, they were not able to uncover the illicit deals as the transactions were highly customized.[1]

[1]Information regarding the cases mentioned in the article has been obtained from the official SEC ( and DOJ ( fraud/case/related-enforcement-actions/2016) websites.

This article was first published in Legal Insights Quarterly by ELIG, Attorneys-at-Law in December 2016. A link to the full Legal Insight Quarterly may be found here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions