Turkey: Will Turkey Be Able To Catch Up With The Class-Action Related Developments In EU?

Last Updated: 18 February 2016
Article by Şahin Ardiyok and Belit Polat Dagdeviren

A new EU Directive (published in December 2014) [1] introduced collective redress as an additional tool to deter undertakings from infringing competition rules. While some of the EU countries allow victims to claim compensation for damages suffered, the European Commission requires Member States to bring into force the rules and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the Directive by 26 December 2016. As an accession country, Turkey remains in an undetermined condition, since the debate on collective redress in Turkey is marked with obstacles on both the merits and procedural issues.

Legislative Process and Developments in EU

The green light which eased the way for developing the EU Directive came in the mid-2000s by the publication of a Green Paper[2]. Specifically, on the issue of limited access to evidence, the debate on damage calculation and the discussions on applicable law were the outlined obstacles to an efficient system for bringing claims for infringement of EU competition law.

The Green Paper -together with the comments received, studies[3] and Q&A press releases[4] in 2005- evaluated the problems with effectiveness of collective redress mechanisms in the EU. The studies and consultations were followed by the White Paper[5] which was built on the issues addressed in the Green Paper and posed possible measures for resolving the issues. The main proposition in the White Paper was the recommendation to expand possible damage claims to include indirect purchasers. The White Paper also proposed opt-in collective actions and suggested full compensation for the real value of loss including profits.

While there was still no legislative framework, the Commission intended to build a unified policy and produced a consultation paper in 2009[6]. While the Commission sought and encouraged an effective instrument of private enforcement of competition rules, this initiative went on with an intention of establishing a study[7] in 2011. Further, the European Parliament published a Resolution in 2012 calling the Commission to take necessary measures  to provide a proper use of the collective redress mechanism[8].

In 2013, the Commission published a recommendation for collective redress mechanisms in the Member States[9]. The Recommendation set out non-binding principles such as an opt-in system, procedural safeguards and alternative dispute resolution which should be put in place within two years at the latest. The Recommendation proposed a Directive on private enforcement of EU competition law in addition to public enforcement of competition rules[10].

In November 2014, the Commission officially signed into law the Directive which is the latest step to encourage private enforcement. In fact, the Directive aims to harmonize relevant rules by creating a procedural framework for all Member States to encourage a "robust competition culture", according to the Commission.

The main regulations in the Directive are summarized as follows:

  • Full compensation: Member States shall ensure that any victim is able to claim and obtain full compensation for that harm.
  • Disclosure of evidence: Parties will have easier access to evidence which is necessary for them in actions for damages for infringement of competition law.
  • Limitation periods: Member States shall ensure that the limitation periods for bringing actions for damages are at least 5 years.
  • Liability: Any participant in an infringement will be responsible jointly and severally towards the victims for the whole harm caused by the infringement.
  • Passing on defence: If direct customers of an infringer offset the increased price they paid by raising the price they charge on their own customers, the infringer can reduce compensation to direct customers by the amount they passed on to indirect customers.
  • Presumption of harm: A rebuttable presumption that cartels cause harm has been set out in order to facilitate compensation.

The Directive establishes that the Member States need to implement the rules in their national legal systems by 27 December 2016. While these new rules will likely ensure  harmonization of collective redress across EU, it is evident that the Turkish system should be improved by removing the obstacles in enforcement.

Collective redress and Turkey's accession to EU

Turkey has been linked to the EU since 1964, a customs union was established in 1995, and has been granted the status of candidate country in December 1999. Since then, Progress Reports including the evaluations of the Commission for Turkey have been published regularly. As Turkey is not an EU Member State, the Directive is not directly applicable. However, as an accession country, it remains to be seen whether enforcement in the EU should effect the reinforcement of an effective judicial system about collective redress in Turkey.

As for class actions or collective redress, there is no provision in Turkish law. However, pursuant to Turkish Procedural Law, class action is only available for legal entities and associations. Accordingly, pursuant to Turkish Commercial Code, associations and other legal entities aiming to protect the interest of their members or on their behalf, may initiate a class action to remove an unlawful situation or prevent any future violation. However, the lawsuit cannot be filed to claim compensation for damages suffered by their members or associates. In practice, the number of class action cases is very small.

The Turkish Competition Act does not include any provision for filing class action lawsuits in respect of competition law infringements. Article 57 of the Competition Act establishes that anyone who prevents, distorts or restricts competition via practices, decisions, contracts or agreements, or abuses dominant position, is obliged to compensate for any damages of the injured. Also, Article 58 states that those who suffer from the violation of an agreement or a decision of the parties may be awarded by treble damages.

Currently, the enforceability of these Articles is being tested before the courts and competition-based lawsuits are increasing in practice. Several lawsuits have already preceded before the courts but none of them have been concluded yet. For instance, the competitor of an undertaking operating in the FMCG industry brought an action and the trial is currently ongoing. Similarly, in relation to the Turkish Competition Authority's decision concerning the abuse of dominant position in the telecommunications market, the competitor as well as the distributor of the dominant undertaking brought an action for damages and the decision is still pending. Moreover, following the Turkish Competition Authority's decision to impose a fine of approximately €400 billion on the banks, it is known that a consumer association filed a case against banks.

Lack of a precedent and a unified practice has caused a number of discussions about the enforcement of the abovementioned Articles. These discussions remain in "procedure" phase such as discussions about competent courts, the role of the claimant, etc. Also, the most intense discussion has been shaped around the subject of "limitation periods". Since there is no rule on limitation periods in the Competition Act, there is a dispute as to which piece of legislation should be taken as a reference in the aforementioned cases. In fact, pursuant to Article 72 of the Turkish Code of Obligations, action for damages concerning competition law violations are subject to 2 years limitation period.

In practice, the Court of Appeal prefers to set a prejudicial issue in case the Turkish Competition Authority has not yet decided on the competition infringement. In respect of the limitation periods, some (and even court decisions) argue that the period should begin at the time of discovery of the infringement. As for "continuing infringements", there are also opinions that claim the period should begin from the publication date of the Turkish Competition Authority's reasoned decision.

The most recent discussion about the limitation periods appeared in a lawsuit before the Court of Appeal. In fact, the Court of Appeal decided that an 8-year limitation period should be applied to private enforcement cases in compliance with the Misdemeanour Act since competition infringements are described as "misdemeanour". The debate will be solved by the unified decision of the chambers.

For the moment, there are still important issues to be decided since there are still procedural obstacles for the collective redress enforcement in Turkey. However, as the EU Directive determines that national  legal systems shall be aligned by the end of 2016, Turkey as an accession country should accelerate its enforcement. As the success of Turkey with respect to the EU rules on collective redress will depend on the available legal framework and an effective practice, the resolution of ongoing cases and the establishment of a legal basis of collective redress would enhance the countries' compliance with EU rules. Otherwise, the Progress Reports might continue referring to "limited progress or no progress" in 2017.

[1] Directive 2014/104/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 November 2014 on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union.

[2] Green Paper: Damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules, COM (2005) 672, 19.12.2005.

[3] Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Green Paper,  Damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules, COM(2005) 672, 2006/C 324/01.

[4] European Commission Green Paper on damages actions for breach of EC Treaty anti-trust rules – frequently asked questions, MEMO/05/489.

[5] 'White Paper: Damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules, COM (2008) 165, 2.4.2008.

[6] Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the White paper, Damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules, COM(2008), 2009/C 228/06; European Consumer Consultative Group, Opinion on Private Damages Actions.

[7] Commission Staff Working Document, Public Consultation: Towards a Coherent European Approach to Collective Redress.

[8] European Parliament resolution of 2 February 2012 on Towards a Coherent European Approach to Collective Redress, 2011/2089.

[9] Commission Recommendation on common principles for injunctive and compensatory collective redress mechanisms in the Member States concerning violations of rights granted under Union Law.

[10] Proposal for a Directive on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union, 2013/0185 (COD).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Şahin Ardiyok
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions