Turkey: Distinction Between Incomplete Work - Defective Work In The Context Of Performance Of Construction For Allotment Agreements


A. Definition and Elements

In practice, especially in Turkey, there are numerous types of construction agreements relying on various terms and principles by virtue of the "freedom of contract" principle governing law of obligations. Construction for allotment agreement is the most common one among agreements that diverges from traditional construction agreements.1 On that note, a traditional construction agreement can be specified as an agreement, pursuant to which the contractor undertakes to construct a specific structure whereas the client undertakes to pay a certain amount in consideration thereto.

In the light of the foregoing definition by which parties' duties in a traditional construction agreement are elaborated, two basic elements are revealed, construction of a specific structure and making a payment for it. When the parties mutually agree on those basic elements, which constitutes the fundamental aspects of a construction agreement, the agreement is founded and inures effect.

In a construction agreement, construction of a specific structure is the characteristic (main) performance and this is the contractor's responsibility, scope of which is elaborated through agreement. On the other hand, the client's responsibility is to make the agreed payment to the contractor, which is remuneration for the work undertaken by the contractor.

In a construction for allotment agreement, the client (land owner) promises to transfer a certain land share (allotment) to the contractor whereas the contractor undertakes to construct the agreed independent sections to the land owner.2

B. Legal Features of the Agreement

Prominent legal features of construction for allotment agreements are, put succinctly, as follows:

  1. Construction for allotment agreement is a synallagmatic agreement, since the client (land owner) and the contractor has reciprocal responsibilities and duties.
  2. Construction for allotment agreement creates a continuous and, at the same time, temporary relationship tangled up with each other. This is reiterated in High Court of Appeals' decision on unification of conflicting judgments.3 Then again, this is a controversial issue in doctrine. Some scholars4 argue that those agreements create a temporary relationship since the end result of the contractor's performance, which also represents the land owner's benefit out of this agreement, occurs at the same time when the structure subject to the agreement is handed over. An opposing argument5 is made on the premise that construction period of the structure shall be construed as preliminary performance/work and thus, the contractor's performance is, in fact, continuous, which makes the relationship between parties continuous.
  3. Construction for allotment agreement is of composite nature as this agreement encompasses property sales agreements along with agreement for work. This is so because land owner's responsibility is to transfer ownership of property to contractor, which is an element of property sales agreement; whereas the contractor's responsibility is to construct the structure and transfer the independent section, which is an element of an agreement for work.


A. Introduction

Identifying a breach of agreement as incomplete work or defective work has always been a controversial issue both in doctrine and practice. Settling theoretical debates on this issue has paramount importance considering the big difference between incomplete work and defective work in terms of legal consequences thereof.

Performing the undertaken work and constructing the building in accordance with the agreement and if the agreement has no stipulation, legislation, is contractor's main responsibility.6Failure to fulfill this responsibility constitutes a breach of agreement, making the contractor liable; regardless such failure being qualified as incomplete or defective work. Then again, incomplete work and defective work are two different concepts in Turkish law and entail different legal consequences. Therefore, it is prominent to distinguish those two concepts. The following is to serve as a guideline to make such distinction.

B. Distinction between Incomplete Work and Defective Work in Construction for Allotment Agreements

1. In terms of occurrence;

When it comes to construction agreements, issues surrounding incomplete work and defective work come up quite frequently. Although those two concepts are different in nature, they may, under certain circumstances, intertwine since incomplete work is, in a way, defective too. That is why it can be tricky to tell incomplete work and defective work apart. Those concepts can be identified as such:

If the contractor fails to do a part of or the whole work, which is agreed upon by agreement (or technical specifications attached thereto) or deemed integral in a regular and ordinary construction, then this falls under the category of incomplete work. In other words, where there is an incomplete work, there is not even a work that can be made subject to an examination on whether it meets the agreed terms, since that specific part of construction is not complete at all.7

On the other hand, if the contractor does the work specified in the agreement but the work does not meet the agreed technical specification, this is defective work and provisions with regard to contractor's liability for defect become applicable.8 In case of defective work, the work lacks the terms/specifications stipulated in the agreement or, if the terms are not pre-specified through agreement, fails to meet the utilization purpose of the construction that can be determined in consideration of good faith principle and commercial fairness.9 In other words, in case of defective work, a quality which is integral for construction or agreed upon by agreement is missing. Since the integral or agreed qualities of construction is directly associated with the contractor's duty for performance, any defect in that regard is considered a breach of this duty, which ultimately means the agreement is not duly fulfilled by the contractor. If the handed over construction does not bear the required specifications, for instance, if the roof leaks or a swimming pool is not made long enough to be used for Olympic purposes, the work is considered defective.10 In such cases, the contractor has warranty liability against defect.

In doctrine, distinction between incomplete work and defective work is elaborated as such11: "Lack in performance (incomplete work), if the performance pertains to something undividable/unitary such as construction, means that the client cannot benefit from this performance in a way that fits to purpose of the work. However, if it is possible to benefit from performance in such a way, but the benefit is not at the level that it is supposed to be and the value of performance accordingly diminishes, then this is a case of defect." This distinction can be exemplified as such with a view to provide a clearer understanding on this:

If a construction lacks funnels, kitchen cabinets, bathroom tiles, one of the two elevators that were supposed to be installed or electric panels thereof even though the elevators are in place mechanically12, this is incomplete work. On the other hand, if a regular funnel is installed whereas it was supposed to be suitable for natural gas use or the woodwork is made of ordinary material whereas it should have been made of first class material13, this is defective work.

Despite theoretical explanations and examples on this issue, it can be challenging to decide whether a specific case attests to incomplete work or defective work. For instance, if the handed over construction or independent section is smaller than it is agreed upon by agreement, does this qualify as incomplete work or defective work? This is examined in detail in a decision of High Court of Appeals Assembly of Civil Chambers14, which, put succinctly, says the following:

  1. The dominant view and well established precedents suggest that, in cases where surface area of a real estate is smaller than agreed upon, this has nothing to do with quality, hence no defective work. That is why provisions on warranty liability against defect, which applies in cases of defective work, are not applicable to such cases. Deficiency in surface area cannot be considered as defect.
  2. Deficiency in surface area is incomplete work and shows that the contractor's performance is only partial.
  3. In case of incomplete work, the client does not have the responsibilities that cases of defective work impose as a pre-requisite for exercising rights against defect, which are inspection of construction and giving notice for defect. Rights against incomplete work can be exercised pursuant to general provisions of Turkish Code of Obligations No. 6098 ("CoO"). (Those provisions will be explained in the following chapter.)

Recent decisions of High Court of Appeals15 are also in line with the abovementioned decision and qualify deficiency in surface area as incomplete work. Then again, as pointed out before, separating incomplete work from defective work can be challenging and lead to erroneous conclusions, which we believe is the case in the High Court of Appeals' decision below16. Relevant part of the ruling goes as follows:

"The defendant is an architect who has undertaken to do the work subject to the lawsuit, and an expert on this work in every aspect. The defendant is well aware what circumstances hinder obtaining a resident permit. The appointed experts conclude that shelter walls, which are 20 cm thick, must have been 60 cm thick subsequent to environmental collocation. Unless the deficiency in that regard is made up, the work must be considered as incomplete. The client is entitled to sue for incomplete work within the statute of limitation."

In the abovementioned case, the work in question, the wall, does not bear the quality that it is supposed to, but is sure completed. As mentioned above, where there is an incomplete work, there is not even a work, on which an inquiry for existence of agreed qualities can be conducted, since the relevant part of the work is not completed. However, if the agreed work is completed but not done in accordance with the agreed technical qualities, then this qualifies as defective work. In light of the following, deficiency in thickness of walls is a defective work, not an incomplete work, as there exists a wall in the construction and it is possible to run an examination on the wall to see if it bears the agreed qualifications, which would not be the case if the work (wall) is incomplete.

2. In terms of legal consequences;

Distinction between incomplete work and incomplete work is of essence since those two concepts bring different legal consequences to the table.

If an incomplete work is of question, the rule of thumb is that provisions on default (Article 117 of CoO and subsequent articles) apply.17 The remedy granted by those provisions is compensation of the incomplete work, which is the required amount for finalizing the incomplete work plus the damage incurred due thereto.18

In construction for allotment agreements, incomplete work can manifest itself in common areas as well as independent sections that are agreed to belong to land owner. If the incomplete work is in the independent sections, the land owner can make a claim for the whole incomplete work; whereas if incomplete work is in common areas, then the land owner's claim shall be pro rata its land share (allotment).19

If a defective work is of question, provisions on contractor's liability against defect apply.20 Accordingly, by virtue of Article 474 of CoO and subsequent articles, the client may request for reneging on agreement, deduction from the amount paid for the work or removal of defect, and also for compensation of damages should circumstances (existence of damage, causal link between damage and defective work, contractor's fault) are met. Those remedies are available to client only if the client inspects the work in a timely manner (the law does not provide any specific time period) and gives notice for defect, again in a timely manner. Unless those duties are fulfilled, the client is deemed to have accepted the work as it is and thus, loses the right to make any claim against the defects in the work.21

As provisions on default apply to incomplete works, contractor's liability for incomplete work remains until the statute of limitation, five years as per Article 147 of CoO, expires,22 without any obligation for timely inspection or notice.23 Then again, despite lack of any legal provision imposing duty for inspection and notice on the client, it would be best to reserve all rights against any defect or incomplete work by adding an annotation in that regard on the delivery receipt report pertaining to the construction in question. By doing so, any argument asserting that the client had tacitly accepted the construction, will be eliminated. On that note, the doctrine suggests that an overall reservation would work and there is no obligation to enumerate each and every incomplete work.24

On a final note, remedies available against incomplete work may vary depending on the severity and significance of the incompleteness in question. For instance, the client may resort to reneging on agreement only to the extent that the incompleteness can be considered to justify termination. Otherwise, the client can only request for deduction from the amount paid for the work or completion of work, and also for compensation of damages should circumstances (existence of damage, causal link between damage and defective work, contractor's fault) are met.


Distinction between incomplete work and incomplete work is of essence since those two concepts entail different legal consequences.

If the contractor fails to do a part of or the whole work, which is specified in the agreement (or in technical specifications attached thereto) or deemed integral in a regular and ordinary construction, then this falls under the category of incomplete work. On the other hand, if the contractor actually does the work specified in the agreement, but the work does not meet the agreed technical specification, then this is defective work.

Where there is an incomplete work, provisions on default shall apply and the client is entitled to exercise its rights without any obligation to inspect the work and give notice for incompleteness thereof. However, defective work imposes inspection and notice duties on client as a pre-requisite to be entitled to exercise any right against defect, thus it has paramount importance to assess whether a breach of agreement qualify as incomplete work or defective work, with a view to determine availability of any remedy against this breach and safeguard future benefits.


1. For detailed information, see. Hasan Erman, Arsa Payı Karşılığı İnşaat Sözleşmesi (Construction for Allotment Agreement), 3. Edition, İstanbul, DER, 2010.

2. Erman, İnşaat Sözleşmesi (Construction Agreement), p. 4; Cevdet Yavuz, Türk Borçlar Hukuku Özel Hükümler (Turkish Code of Obligations, Special Provisions), İstanbul, 2006, p. 352; Özgür Katip Kaya, Arsa Payı Karşılığı Kat Yapımı Sözleşmesi (Construction for Allotment Agreement), İstanbul, 1993, p. 5.

3. High Court of Appeals' decision on unification of conflicting judgment, E. 983/3, K. 984/1,. 25.1.1984, For detailed examination on the decision, see Hasan Erman, "Kat Karşılığı İnşaat Sözleşmelerinde Müteahhidin Temerrüdü-Bir İçtihadı Birleştirme Kararının Düşündürdükleri" (Contractor's Default in Construction for Allotment Agreements, Thoughts on a Decision on Unification of Conflicting Judgment), İBD, Vol: 58, Year: 1984, Issue: 4-5-6 (Contractor's Default), p. 216.

4. Yavuz, p. 355; Özer Seliçi, İnşaat Sözleşmelerinde Müteahhidin Sorumluluğu (Contractor's Liability in Construction Agreements), İstanbul, 1978,p. 7; Fahrettin Aral, Borçlar Hukuku Özel Borç İlişkileri (Code of Obligations, Special Liability Relations), Ankara, 2003, p. 326; Haluk Tandoğan, Borçlar Hukuku Özel Borç İlişkileri (Code of Obligations, Special Liability Relations), Vol. 1, İstanbul, 2008, p. 147.

5. Erman, İnşaat Sözleşmesi (Construction Agreement), p.9; Rona Serozan, Sözleşmeden Dönme (Reneging on an Agreement), İstanbul, 1975, p. 174; İsmet Sungurbey, Medeni Hukuk Sorunları (Civil Law Issues), Vol. 4, İstanbul, 1980, p. 486; Zarife Şenocak, Eser Sözleşmesinde Ayıbın Giderilmesini İsteme Hakkı (Right to Request for Removal of Defect), Ankara, 2002, p. 11-12.

6. Efrail Aydemir, Eser Sözleşmesi ve İnşaat Hukuku (Agreement for Work and Construction Law), 2. Volume, Ankara, Seçkin, 2012, p. 227.

7. "In an incomplete work, there is no question on whether the work is done properly. As this is case, it is not possible to evaluate incomplete work under the concept of defective work.", Decision of High Court of Appeals for the 15th Circuit, 05.10.1987, K. 775/3419, Erman, İnşaat Sözleşmesi (Construction Agreement), p. 200 footnote. 28.

8. Erman, İnşaat Sözleşmesi (Construction Agreement), p. 199.

9. Turgut Öz, İnşaat Sözleşmesi ve İlgili Mevzuat (Construction Agreement and Relevant Legislation), İstanbul, Vedat, 2013, p. 190; Aydemir, p. 228.

10. Ayhan Uçar, İstisna Sözleşmelerinde Müteahhidin Ayıba Karşı Tekeffül Borcu (Contractor's Warranty Liability Against Defect in Agreement for Work), Ankara, 2003, p. 125; İzzet Karataş, Eser Sözleşmeleri (Agreement for Work), Ankara, 2004, p. 147.

11. Öz,s. 193.

12. Aydemir, s. 228-229.

13. Aydemir, s. 228.

14. Decision of High Court of Appeals Assembly of Civil Chambers, 09.12.1992, K. 649/732, Yargı Kararları Dergisi (Judicial Decisions Journal), Year: 1993, Issue: 3, p. 331-334. Fort he same decision, see Erman, İnşaat Sözleşmesi (Construction Agreement), p. 199-200 footnote. 28; http://www.kazanci.com/kho2/ibb/giris.htm

15. Decision of High Court of Appeals for the 15th Circuit, T. 01.04.2008, E. 2007/136, K. 2008/2056, http://www.kazanci.com/kho2/ibb/files/15hd-2007-136.htm.

16. Decision of High Court of Appeals for the 15th Circuit, T. 20.03.2002, E. 2001/5694, K. 2002/1253, http://www.kazanci.com/kho2/ibb/giris.htm.

17. Erman, İnşaat Sözleşmesi (Construction Agreement), p. 199.

18. Erman, İnşaat Sözleşmesi (Construction Agreement), p. 201-202.

19. Erman, İnşaat Sözleşmesi (Construction Agreement), p. 201.

20. Erman, İnşaat Sözleşmesi (Construction Agreement), p. 199.

21. Erman, İnşaat Sözleşmesi (Construction Agreement), p. 199.

22. Aydemir, p. 228-229 ve 233; Erman, İnşaat Sözleşmesi (Construction Agreement), p. 199.

23. "In case of incomplete work, client is not obliged to give notice for incompleteness to contractor. This is because whether the work is performed in accordance to the agreement is not an issue in cases of incomplete work, since there is no work that can be deemed to be done" Decision of High Court of Appeals for the 15th Circuit, 27.09.1988, K. 92/3020, Erman, İnşaat Sözleşmesi (Construction Agreement), p. 199, footnote. 28.

24. Erman, İnşaat Sözleşmesi (Construction Agreement), p. 201.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions