Turkey: Potential Consequences Of Acquisitions Of Minority Shareholdings Under Turkish Competition Law

The acquisition of a minority shareholding may come under the Turkish Competition Authority's ("Authority") scrutiny in two ways, mainly: 1) it may result in de facto or de jure sole or joint control, depending on the rights possessed by the minority shareholders and/or shareholding structures and past voting patterns; and 2) it may not result in control but in cross-shareholding structures amongst competitors in a concentrated market which may raise questions about coordinated effects. This article discusses the circumstances under which the abovementioned consequences may arise under Turkish competition law with references to the relevant legislation and the most noteworthy cases in this regard.

Acquisition of De Jure Sole/Joint Control

The most common and straightforward consequence of an acquisition of a minority shareholding is the acquisition of sole or joint control over an undertaking through the controlling rights provided to the minority shareholder. The scope of these rights may change from one case to another, depending on the content of the shareholders' agreement or other tools in this respect.

To begin with, a minority shareholder may acquire sole control over an undertaking, if it holds the power to manage the activities of the undertaking, decide on the strategic matters and assign more than half of the members of the board of directors by itself.1 These shares are referred to as the "privileged shares" or, if in previously state-owned undertakings, as "golden shares". That said, these cases are quite rare in practice.

Another form of sole control through minority shares is the negative sole control which is explained in the Authority's Guidelines on the Concepts of Mergers & Acquisitions and Control ("Guidelines on Control") as follows: "A typical situation (...) where there is a supermajority required for strategic decisions which in fact confers a veto right upon only one shareholder, irrespective of whether it is a majority or a minority shareholder"2. The Turkish Competition Board ("Board") determined a negative sole control situation in its Hedef Medya decision3, where Doğuş Holding, the minority shareholder with 40% shares in Hedef Medya, had no power to make strategic decisions solely but could prevent the majority shareholder to make any strategic decisions through its minority shareholding rights. Interesting enough, the Board did not name the situation as a "negative sole control of a minority shareholder" in the decision.

On the other hand, in majority of the acquisitions of minority shareholdings, it usually results in joint control structures. Many of the Board's precedents4 and the Guidelines on Control5 list the most plausible cases where the minority shares could provide rights which are beyond "ordinary" and enable the shareholder to exercise joint control over the target. These rights are usually called "veto rights" on the decisions which are essential for the strategic activities of the joint venture6. These veto rights must be related to strategic decisions on the business policy of the joint venture such as the budget, the business plan, major investments or the appointment of senior management7. It is accepted sufficient for the minority shareholders to acquire joint control through some or even one veto right as such. The Board conducted this approach in many decisions parallel to the EU Commission's conduct before July 2013 and it Guidelines on Control provided for a proper explanation, again in line with the EU guidelines8.

Finally, joint control by minority shareholders may occur in rare situations when the minority shareholders do not hold veto rights but two or more of them gain joint control over the undertaking by acting as stable coalitions. In such cases, the minority shareholders may be able to block the strategic decisions of the joint venture successfully only with each other's agreement. However, if these coalitions are not stable and majority is set by a different combination of minority shareholders in each case, this is called "shifting alliances"9 and do not provide joint control to the shareholders.

Acquisition of De Facto Sole/Joint Control

Where the formal rights arising out of the acquisition of a minority shareholding (e.g. voting rights, veto rights, etc.) do not amount to providing de jure control, the Board also analyzes whether the acquisition has resulted in a change in de facto control. The concept of de facto control is dealt with extensively in the Guidelines on Control.

The Guidelines on Control provides that a de facto sole control situation arises primarily where, based on past patterns of attendance, the holder of a minority shareholding has a high chance of forming the majority in the shareholders' meetings10. Where the track record of attendance patterns makes a de facto sole control situation likely, the Board would conduct a forward looking analysis where it also takes into account potential changes to the past pattern of attendance which may come about after the acquisition11. In its analysis, the Board takes note of various factors such as whether the rest of the shares are dispersed among many shareholders or relatively concentrated, whether there are links (structural or economic) between the large minority shareholder and other shareholders or whether the other shareholders' investment is strategic or merely financial. The relevant criterion of de facto sole control is whether the large minority shareholder will be able to form the majority in shareholders' meetings in a consistent manner.

The Board has applied the above standard and decided on the existence of de facto sole control on various occasions. For example, in Axalto/Gemplus12, the Board took note of the attendance rates in the shareholders' meetings of Gemplus, which had remained below 80%, and therefore the acquisition of 43.7% of Gemplus' shares by Axalto Holding resulted in the acquisition of sole control. Similarly, in Jacobs/Akila13, the Board found a shareholding of 29.3% sufficient to provide sole control. The Board recognized that Akila's shares were highly dispersed and that therefore a shareholding of 29.3% would make Jacobs the largest shareholder by far. Analyzing the past attendance meetings at shareholder meetings, the Board found that the attendance rate had not arisen above 52.5% for the past five years and therefore a shareholding of 29.3% would be sufficient to provide sole control of Akila.

In addition to the ability to form the majority in the shareholders' meetings, the Guidelines on Control also provides that the economic dependency created by instruments such as long-term supply agreements for crucial resources and/or loans by customers or suppliers, coupled with structural links such as management or shareholding, may result in de facto control over an undertaking. The Board's Besler/Turyağ decision14 constitutes an example where the Board based its finding of control on economic dominance. In the relevant transaction, Besler would be able to appoint only one out of five directors in Turyağ's board according to the shareholders' agreement. The Board noted the following: (i) the financial contribution of Besler would be crucial to Turyağ, (ii) the other shareholders were unlikely to act independently of Besler, due to the strong position, as well as financial strength, of the Ülker group of which Besler formed a part in the relevant product market, and (iii) Ülker group was also the largest customer for some of Turyağ's products. The Board also noted certain economic connections between the other shareholder groups (Çallı and Uğur families) and the Ülker group. As a result of the above considerations, the Board found that Besler would possess the sole control of Turyağ after the acquisition.

The above considerations are also relevant to a joint control scenario. For example, in Luxotica15, the Board decided that, while one party had the de jure right to control the company, target was jointly controlled due to the main shareholder groups' history of acting together.

Ultimately, both the relevant provisions of the Guidelines on Control and the decisional practice of the Board show that the Board look at the totality of the circumstances in its assessments of whether an acquisition of shares will lead to de facto control.

Cross-shareholding Structures Which May Raise Questions about the Coordinated Effects

While the acquisition of a minority stake not conveying any control rights would be outside the scope of merger control regime, the acquisition of minority rights in competing undertakings may potentially come under the scrutiny of the Board under Article 4 of Law No. 4054 on Protection of Competition ("Law No. 4054"), which is closely modeled on and akin to Article 101 of the TFEU, due to the possibility of facilitation of coordination raised by such shareholdings in rival undertakings.

The fact that an acquisition of a minority shareholding can be challenged under Article 4 has been established in the Board's Nitro-Mak16 decision. The relevant transaction concerned the indirect acquisition of a minority stake in a Turkish company which came under the Authority's radar due to the suspicion of a potential standstill obligation. The Board ruled upon close inspection that the transfer of shares did not result in a change of control and therefore was outside the scope of the Turkish merger control regime (thus no standstill obligation violation). Nevertheless, the Board opined that given the concentrated nature of the market in question, the acquisition could be evaluated under Article 4. This investigation did not proceed further because the acquirer had already moved to divest the shares17. Nevertheless, the Nitro-Mak decision is of crucial importance as it laid down the the Authority's potential inclination to go after even those acquisitions that do not not conferg control. Since Nitro-Mak decision, there has not been a similar decision in which an acquisition of shares not conferring control was considered within the scope of Article 4 and therefore the exact approach that the Board would take in such a case is not altogether clear.

Past investigations concerning horizontal coordination between competing undertakings provide guidance with respect to the potential approaches. For example, in the Erdemir/Borçelik/ArcelorMittal18 decision, the Board found that Erdemir's 9.34% shareholding in Borçelik led to coordinative effects between the two companies in the form of frequent information exchanges and mandated the divestiture of Erdemir's shareholding in Borçelik. The Board also found that Erdemir's 25% shareholding in ArcelorMittal Ambalaj Çeliği ("A.M. Ambalaj"), a local subsidiary of ArcelorMittal, facilitated coordination between Erdemir and A.M. Ambalaj for the purpose of limiting the supply of steel products and required the divestment of Erdemir's shares. Particularly, the share purchase agreement and the commercial agreement in relation to Erdemir's purchase of A.M. Ambalaj shares were found to have the purpose and effect of restricting competition. The Board reasoned its position by referring to the Nitro-Mak decision and explained that "an acquisition of a minority shareholding in a competitor in a highly concentrated industry can be considered within the ambit of Article 4, even in the absence of any other restrictions of competition". As a result, while the decision rests on evidence of actual coordination in the market, it provides further support for the position that the Board could utilize Article 4 in relation to the acquisition of shares in a competitor.

In the earlier Türkiye – İtalya Ro-Ro decision,19 also mentioned by the Board in Erdemir/Borçelik/ArcelorMittal, the Board stated that interlocking directorates and high-level executives between competing undertakings in highly concentrated industries would inevitably lead to coordination. As a result, the Board ordered behavioral remedies to make sure that no employee of UN Ro-Ro would take a position in the management of Ulusoy Ro-Ro's board of directors and vice versa.

Based on the two decisions above, if the Board goes after the acquisitions of minority shares in competing undertaking within the realm of Article 4 , it will likely order behavioral remedies to prevent coordination or may order the divestment of shares altogether. Both Erdemir/Borçelik/ArcelorMittal and Türkiye – İtalya Ro-Ro have included administrative monetary fines imposed against the undertakings, but the fining decisions were based on actual coordination in the market. Given that the Board did not seek a fine in Nitro-Mak decision and was content with the voluntary divestment of shares, it seems unlikely that the mere acquisition of a minority share, without any accompanying anti-competitive conduct, would trigger administrative monetary fines. That said, in the absence of an enforcement record, the issue remains to be seen.


In light of the foregoing, it is fair to conclude that minority shareholdings may not provide anything more than a capital investment in an undertaking or may very well be a controlling device if designed properly. Another scenario is that the acquisition of the minority shares would not amount to a sole or joint control by the minority shareholder but a cross-shareholding structure in a rival undertaking. Either way, the acquisition of minority shares requires great attention of the potential acquirers and the competition law counsels. That is because minor tunings in shareholders agreements or the other tools providing rights to the minority shareholders as well as the market structures may give rise to important consequences in terms of controlling powers and shareholding structures.


1 Competition Authority's Guidelines on the Concepts of Mergers & Acquisitions and Control, para 43.

2 Ibid., para. 44.

3 Hedef Medya, 12-14/445-127, 29.03.2012

4 For instance, Airties, 10-65/1388-514, 14.10.2010; Deutsche Bank, 10-65/1371-509, 14.10.2010; Seef Foods, 08-71/1149-446, 15.12.2008; Saudi Telecom Company, 08-29/366-120, 17.4.2008.

5 Guidelines on Control, para. 51-54.

6 Guidelines on Control, para. 51.

7 Guidelines on Control, para. 53.

8 Adopted on July 16, 2013.

9 Mentioned in the Board's decisions: Cimpor, 12-24/665-187, 03.05.2012; Hayat Holding, 11-28/548-166, 04.05.2011; Aşkale, 10-27/385-140, 31.03.2010;

10 Guidelines on Control, para. 45.

11 Ibid.

12 Axalto/Gemplus, 06-33/410-107, 11.5.2006.

13 Jacobs/Akila, 06-27/319-74, 14.4.2006.

14 Besler/Turyağ, 10-64/1355-498, 12.10.2010.

15 Luxotica, 10-33/507-184, 22.4.2010.

16 Nitro-Mak, 07-29/268-98, 29.3.2007.

17 In the case at hand, the acquirer had already taken steps to sell the relevant shares to another undertaking and therefore the Board saw no need to undertake an analysis under Article 4.

18 Erdemir/Borçelik, 09-28/600-141, 16.6.2009.

19 Türkiye – İtalya Ro-Ro, 05-46/668-170, 13.7.2005.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.