Turkey: "Turkish Restrictions On The Internet"; The Highly Debated New Law In Turkey Enters Into Force And Is Subsequently Amended

Last Updated: 11 March 2014
Article by Uğur Aktekin, Selin Sinem Erciyas and Bentley James Yaffe

The Law Regarding the Amendment of the Decree Law on the Structure and Duties of the Ministry of Family and Social Policy and Other Laws and Decree Law ("Omnibus Law") that entered into force after being published in the Official Gazette of February 19, 2014 has become an important topic of debate due to the proposed amendments regarding online broadcasts and publications. The Omnibus Law contains amendments for the Law numbered 5651, on the Regulation of Broadcasts and Publications Made Online and Regarding the Countering of Crimes Committed via These Broadcasts and Publications ("Internet Publication Law"). These amendments have raised concerns of inordinate levels of state control over the use of the Internet, and the amendments have faced accusations of introducing streamlined mechanisms for state censorship.

Following widespread criticism of the Omnibus Law, new legislative measures to amend several provision introduced by the Omnibus Law were introduced as of publication in the Official Gazette of March 1, 2014.

1 Increased Responsibilities and Stricter Controls Regarding Access Providers, Content Providers and Hosting Providers

The amendments introduced by the Omnibus Law will implement the following additional requirements for companies and individuals engaged in providing Internet related services;

Content providers

  • Content providers will be obligated to provide the Telecommunication and Communications Directorate ("Directorate") with the information they request, in the form that they request it presented in order to aid the Directorate in the execution of their statutory duties.

As content provider is defined as "any real or legal persons that create, amend or provide the information or data provided to users online", the scope of who will be obligated to provide the Directorate with information and data is extensive. As the amendment does not provide clear guidelines as to what information the Directorate may request and in what particular form they may request it transferred in, the inclusion of such a provision would seemingly cause an undue burden on any provider and creator of online content.

Hosting providers

  • Once issued with a notification, hosting providers will be obligated to remove all offending content that falls under the scope of Articles 8 and 9 of the Internet Publication Law (both Articles will be explained below),
  • Hosting providers will be obligated to store the traffic data for the services they provide for a duration that will be clarified with the publication of a later directive, but which will be between one and two years. The hosting providers will also be responsible for the integrity and confidentiality of this stored Traffic data.
  • As with content providers, hosting providers will also be obligated to provide the Directorate with the information that they request for the execution of their statutory duties.
  • If the hosting providers are in violation of any of their obligations they will face an administrative fine ranging from ten thousand TRY to a hundred thousand TRY.

These increased traffic data storage measures will lead to concerns for hosting providers, as increased infrastructural burdens will require increased investment. Additionally, concerns remain that the reasoning for an increase in the duration of such traffic data has not been clearly stated. Even though the Directorate has repeatedly stated that this storage will not include personal digital data, unclear definitions might be regarded as increased opportunities for state surveillance.

The aforementioned subsequent legislative measures that came into effect on March 1, 2014, have provided a reduced scope for the definition of user traffic data and have made it necessary for a court order in the scope of an investigation or prosecution to be presented before the Directorate before such traffic data can be requested.

Access providers

  • If issued with a blocking order, access providers will be obligated to block all access to the content, including any and all alternative means of access.
  • As in the case of content providers and hosting providers, access providers will also be obligated to provide the Directorate with the information that they request for the execution of their statutory duties.

The amendments regarding access providers are particularly criticized due to the fact that an obligation to prevent all means of alternative will be placed on such parties. As, under the current Internet Publication Law access providers face administrative fines ranging from ten thousand TRY to fifty thousand TRY if they are in violation of their obligations, placing the burden or preventing all means of alternative access can be regarded as too broad and technically impossible task for any access provider to undertake.

Another amendment that will impose stricter controls on the aforementioned parties relates to notification process. The amendment would allow the classification of any communication to the aforementioned parties (domestic or foreign) via the communication tools on their websites or email or other means of communication directed to their contact information located through their domain name or IP address as an official notification. However, this amendment regarding the right of notification contravenes the current requirements under Turkish Law that regulate notifications made to parties. Allowing such online communication tools and emails to be classified as official notifications made to parties would seemingly undermine the certainty of attempted notifications and cause issues relating to a fair right of reply.

2 Establishment of The Association of Access Providers

One of the most controversial aspects of the Omnibus Law is the addition to the Internet Publication Law that establishes an organization called "The Association of Access Providers". This Association will be formed of all Internet service providers and access providers, and membership will be compulsory, with companies that are not members being banned from operation within Turkey. The centre of the Association will be in Ankara, and the charter and any such subsequent changes to the charter must be presented to the approval of the Directorate. The main duty of the Association will be the implementation of blocking orders issued under Article 9 and 9A of the Internet Publication Law, and the Association is tasked with the provision of any hardware or software required for such implementation. The Association will also serve as the representative of all of the parties engaged in Internet related services, with all notifications or blocking orders notified by the Directorate to the Association accepted as having been made to the individual party/company that the notification or blocking order relates to. In their role of representative of the sector, the Association will also be able to appeal against any notification or blocking order made by the Directorate.

Having such an organization, with compulsory industry-wide membership that is so closely connected and supervised by the Directorate could be interpreted as extending state control over the private sector parties engaged in the provision of Internet related services. Additionally, the establishment of such an Association requiring compulsory membership with membership fees to be determined based proportionally on each member's net sales will increase operating costs for companies providing these Internet services.

3 Blocking Order Applications

Under the current, pre-amendment version of the Internet Publication Law, blocking orders are allowed under Articles 8 and 9.

Article 8 regards the blocking of access to content that is illegal under the Turkish Criminal Code, and grants prosecutors and judges to issue blocking orders for situations where content relating to one or more of the stated catalogue crimes are featured.

The Omnibus Law has introduced two significant amendments to this Article, the first one being that judicial authorities can now issue a blocking order that is limited to a set period of time and will expire after such a time has passed. The second and more significant amendment has replaced the sanction of a prison sentence for access providers or hosting providers that fail to comply with the blocking order with a sanction of a criminal fine.

The Omnibus Law has completely redrafted Article 9 and has introduced an additional article titled Article 9A.

Article 9 relates to the cases where a legal or real person's personal rights have been violated. In such cases the person may apply to the content provider, the hosting provider or apply directly to the criminal court of peace. The content provider or hosting provider is obligated to answer the applicant within 24 hours, and similarly the criminal court of peace is obligated to evaluate the application within 24 hours.

If an application has been made to the court and if the court judges the application valid, a decision for a partial or full blocking of access can be issued and subsequently notified to the Association of Access Providers. The Association must then implement said blocking order within 4 hours of receipt.

While the decision of the court can be appealed, the blocking order will stand during such an appeals process.

Additionally, if the offending content that was the subject of the blocking order is featured on another website, the applicant may directly approach the Association for the blocking of such content without needing to seek a further court order.

The Omnibus Law introduces criminal fines as sanctions for those who fail to implement court issued blocking orders.

While such a process for a blocking application also existed under the previous Internet Publication Law, the applicant could only apply for a court issued blocking order if their notification to the content provider or hosting provider was not answered within two days.

However, the previous form of the provision also included stricter sanctions for cases of non-compliance with a court issued blocking order, in the form of a prison sentence ranging from six months to two years.

Article 9A as included in the Omnibus Law introduces a completely different process of blocking order application on the grounds of "violation of personal privacy". This process of application is limited to real persons, and in a situation that their right to personal privacy is violated by online content they are granted the right to directly apply to the Directorate for a blocking order.

If the Directorate decides to issue a blocking order, the subsequent notification to the Association must be implemented within 4 hours. The applicant must then apply to the criminal court of peace within 24 hours in order to gain a court issued blocking order. If the court does not grant such an order within 48 hours of application, the initial blocking order implement by the Directorate will automatically be removed. The decision of the criminal court of peace can be appealed through the courts. The new Article 9A also grants the Directorate the authority to block access to the content itself without notification to the Association, if it is deemed that a delay in blocking the content will prove detrimental to the protection of personal privacy. As per the initial provisions of the Omnibus Law, this blocking administered by the Directorate could be appealed by application to the criminal court of peace, with the Directorate not being required to seek prior judicial or administrative authorization before implementing such a blocking of content. However, with the introduction of the new legislative measure that came into effect on March 1, 2014, in the situation that the Directorate issues such a blocking of content, they must submit this decision for approval to the criminal court of peace within 24 hours. The judge must then rule on the matter within 48 hours.

The second administrative route for Blocking Order Applications can be criticized as empowering an administrative body that lacks the accountability of the courts with the right to directly block access to content and websites undermining the certainty and accountability of legal processes. Concerns can and have been raised over the granting of the Directorate the right to issue blocking orders at short notice and requiring the Association to implement such orders within four hours and even granting the Directorate the right to block content themselves, especially with regards to the potential of immediate action against any potential content that is critical of government and political figures.

The fact that the "right of personal privacy" is not sufficiently distinguished from the personal rights that are under the scope of Article 9, has strengthened such concerns and opposition to the new process of blocking orders. Another unclear definition relates to the blocking of content directly by the Directorate, where "if delay proving detrimental to the protection of personal privacy" has not been clearly defined. This is a particular area of concern, as the exact application of a process that should only be resorted to in exceptional cases seems to have been afforded a wider scope of application. Even in light of the new legislative measures that came into effect on March 1, empowering the Directorate to directly block content and subsequently apply to the courts for affirmation rather than permission can be seen as continuing the aforementioned problems of application and accountability.

Another change that has been implemented with the legislative measures that came into effect on March 1 is that in situations that require application to a criminal court of peace, in jurisdictions that have multiple criminal courts of peace, the court with specific jurisdiction will be determined by the Supreme Board of Judges and Prosecutors. While this new change seemingly serves to clarify problems relating to the determination of jurisdiction, the fact that the Supreme Board of Judges and Prosecutors has recently been assigned to the control of the Ministry of Justice as a result of another controversial law has called into question the issue of government and state control over the administration of the new Internet provisions.

4. General Criticism Against the Omnibus Law

The Omnibus Law has been criticized by many parties, including NGOs, special interest groups and opposition parties in the course of its enactment in parliament and while waiting for approval of the President. The most vocal opponents of the provisions of the Omnibus Law relating to online broadcasting and publications have been The Turkish Industrialists' and Businessmen's Association (TÜSİAD), the Istanbul Bar Association and the Turkish Bar Association.

After the passing of the Omnibus Law by Parliament, many of these parties and foreign NGOs and representatives of the EU had written letters to the President, asking him to send the Omnibus Law back to Parliament. One of the more comprehensive of these letters were drafted by the Digital Turkey Platform, a platform formed by the Turkish Informatics Foundation, TÜSİAD, the Informatics Association of Turkey, the Turkish Electronic Industrialists Association and the Association of the Manufacturers of Electronic Products under the scope and framework of the Digital Europe Initiative.

Even though the President has stated that he recognizes areas of concern within the Omnibus Law, his passing of the law would seemingly indicate that many of the civil rights and industry related concerns featured in the criticism and letters have been overlooked.

A primary area of opposition has been that the Omnibus Law is disproportionate in terms of the aims that the government has stated were behind the drafting process. Criticism has been leveled at the disproportionate powers granted to the courts and governmental institutions in the guise of ensuring that personal rights and privacy are safeguarded. TÜSİAD has also highlighted that the provisions of the Omnibus Law that remain vague and not clearly defined will place companies operating in this sector under a burden of adhering to unpredictable and, at times, technically impossible provisions. Critics have argued that in a country such as Turkey, where internet access costs are already at a high level, the introduction of vague provisions and increased technical burdens will only serve to increase the price of access and coverage.

Another area of criticism regards the perception of the provisions of the Omnibus Law as increasing the state's ability to influence, censor and surveil internet access and internet content. Statements issued by the Turkish Bar Association has emphasized that the additional powers granted to the Directorate threatens the principle of freedom of expression on the internet.

Opposition parties have also voiced their criticism of how the Omnibus Law was prepared; particularly highlighting the fact that the Parliamentary Committee that prepared the Omnibus Law was not made up of individuals qualified or knowledgeable in the required technical areas and because the Committee and government have seemingly failed to incorporate the results of a recent Parliamentary Study conveyed on the topic of Internet use.

Representatives of the European Union have also voiced concern at the more restrictive provisions of the Omnibus Law, particularly regarding the collection of personal data and issues of online censorship. The President has stated that he understood these concerns, and in his statement made after approving the Omnibus Law, he stated that these concerns would be addressed with new legislative measures to be released after the Omnibus Law came into effect.

The Minister for Transportation and Communication detailed which changes will be implemented by these legislative measures. The Minister has explained that the definition of traffic data would be reduced in scope and that a request for such traffic data would be conditional upon a court order. Additionally, it was stated that when the Directorate directly blocks access to content in situations where a delay will be detrimental, the Directorate must then refer this blocking to a court for approval within 24 hours. Then blocking of the content would be removed if the Directorate fails to refer the blocking to the court within the set time, or if the court rules against the blocking. The Minister also stated that he had conferred with the leaders of the opposition parties and that there was already bi-partisan support in place for the drafting and passing of such new legislative measures. These changes were passed by Parliament and came into effect upon publication in the Official Gazette on March 1, 2014.

However, some of the aforementioned NGOs had criticized the President for passing a law that he has openly acknowledged to be lacking in some areas, rather than vetoing the Omnibus Law to send back to the Parliament for further debate and amendment. Additionally, criticism of the proposed new legislative measures have also been made on the grounds that they do not cover all of the controversial aspects of the amendments brought by the Omnibus Law. Additional concerns have also been voiced regarding the authority of the determination of the competent criminal courts of peace being granted to the Supreme Board of Judges and Prosecutors.

5. Conclusion

While it is true that Turkey must develop in areas of security and protection of the individual with regards to online content and online services, the current provisions of the Omnibus Law seem to introduce heavy handed methods of application that tip the balance of favor away from the protection of the individual and more towards the protection of the interests of the state.

The strict and streamlined processes of court and Directorate issued blocking orders seem open to abuse in a country like Turkey where the judiciary and supervisory governmental bodies have been shown to be highly politicized.

An additional, state supervised Association that unites all of the private sector is also an area of concern for any real or legal person engaged in content, hosting or access providing services within Turkey. The requirements of the Association and the additional obligations placed on hosting providers and access providers have the potential to make the industry more expensive to operate in, for both foreign and domestic companies.

Numerous calls of opposition to the provisions of the Omnibus Law, by both national and international NGOs and special interest groups only highlights the extent to which these proposed provisions may function in clamping down on civil liberties and maintaining state sanctioned censorship and control over online content.


1 The Minister stated that the new definition for Traffic Data will include "IP address, start and ending dates, services used and if applicable, user information and the amount of data transferred".

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Uğur Aktekin
Selin Sinem Erciyas
Bentley James Yaffe
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.