Turkey: Broadcasting Legislation

The jurisdictional clauses of the European Convention on Transfrontier Television (the "Convention") and Turkish Law No. 6112 on the Establishment and Broadcasting Services of Radio and Television Enterprises ("RT Law") overlap, potentially subjecting broadcasters transmitting or retransmitting their broadcasts into Turkey to two mutually exclusive jurisdictional schemes at once. The Turkish Radio and Television Supreme Council ("RTUK"), which is in charge of enforcing the latter law, issued the Directive on Radio and Television Broadcasts of Foreign Origin (the "Directive") in April 2012 with the explicit purpose of spelling out its interpretation of the jurisdictional clause of the domestic law as pertains to this point, but this has not helped resolve the issue. The domestic legislation should be clarified, and it should be interpreted in line with Turkey's international treaty obligations. Doing so would help achieve the broader goals of freedom of expression and integration with the European community, and also avoid allegations that Turkey has interpreted its international commitments to expand the range of its long-arm jurisdiction.

The member States of the Council of Europe signed the Convention on May 5, 1989 in order to "further the right, regardless of frontiers, to express, to seek, to receive and to impart information and ideas whatever their source." The Convention establishes a set of minimum standards that every broadcaster operating out of any of the signatories must follow, and guarantees the free retransmission of broadcasts meeting such common criteria within the remaining signatories. Turkey has signed and ratified the Convention, which has been in force in Turkey since May 1, 1994.

The Convention establishes a cascading set of principles to determine whose jurisdiction applies to any given broadcaster by evaluating the broadcaster's connection to each of its signatories through a set of progressively looser criteria of relatedness. As soon as the broadcaster satisfies one of these tests for any of the signatories, the broadcaster is made subject to that signatory's jurisdiction, and that signatory is charged with the application of the Convention. The purpose of these cascading principles is to ascertain which of the signatory States has the strongest connection to any given broadcaster, and to subject the broadcaster to the jurisdiction of that signatory. The Convention also gives signatory nations the authority to apply additional, more restrictive standards to broadcasters that are subject to their jurisdiction.

On 15 February 2011, the Turkish Parliament passed the RT Law, which set down a set of minimum standards which Turkish broadcasters must obey.

The RT Law does impose on broadcasters subject to Turkish jurisdiction more onerous obligations than those defined under the Convention, as the Convention explicitly allows. The RT Law also seemingly establishes the same criteria as the Convention for determining which broadcasters would be subject to Turkish jurisdiction, by tracking the language of the Convention's jurisdictional clause almost verbatim. However, the RT Law's jurisdictional clause might operate differently in effect, and subject to Turkish jurisdiction a much wider swath of broadcasters than the application of the Convention's language would.

It is a seeming omission in the RT Law's drafting that causes this curious effect: What the RT Law does is track very closely the Convention's Article 5(3), and subject to Turkish jurisdiction every possible broadcaster that the Convention itself would recognize to be subject to Turkish jurisdiction. This much is not controversial. However, the RT Law omits to say that if a broadcaster meets the criteria listed in Article 2 for another signatory to the Convention, it would be subject to that country's jurisdiction to the exclusion of Turkish jurisdiction. Thus, depending on how RTUK interprets and implements this clause, the RT Law might have the effect of going through the Convention's cascading criteria to subject to Turkish jurisdiction, at one step of the analysis or another, any broadcaster that has even the remotest connection to Turkey, regardless of how strong a connection the broadcaster may have to another signatory to the Convention.

Thus, under the RT Law's scheme, there is no difference whether a broadcaster has the strongest of connections to Turkey or the weakest; if the broadcaster is caught at any stage of the analysis, it becomes subject to Turkish jurisdiction. Of course the cascading method of determining jurisdiction makes sense only if there is a horizontal comparison of jurisdictions at each step; it makes no sense to use cascading criteria if only a single jurisdiction is being evaluated and there will be no difference whether a positive jurisdictional outcome is obtained at the first step or the last. The latter effect can be achieved much more naturally through a much

simpler structure. This idea suggests to us that it was an omission in the drafting of the RT Law that has caused the generously "inclusive" effect.

The RTUK, which is charged with enforcing the RT Law, issued the Directive to partially clarify the confusion created by this structure. Unfortunately, the Directive has served more to expose the confusion in the enforcement authority about the RT Law's jurisdictional reach than to explain RTUK's interpretation for industry participants. To begin with, the Directive begs the jurisdictional question by claiming to apply to all broadcasters that are under Turkish jurisdiction as determined by an application of the RT Law. The only substantive contribution made by the Directive is that it subjects to Turkish jurisdiction any broadcaster which would have otherwise been subject to the jurisdiction of another country, but which takes its broadcast into that foreign country and modifies it by "inserting additional programming, including commercial communications programming, and rebroadcasts such programming through satellites and/or cable networks owned by the Republic of Turkey." Such a rebroadcast would not be protected by the Convention in any event, because it guarantees only the "complete and unchanged" retransmission of broadcasts that meet its criteria; once the broadcast is modified in that fashion, it can no longer be considered "complete and unchanged" and RTUK would fully be in the right to subject it to Turkish jurisdiction and to expect it to abide by any other restrictions that the Turkish government might see fit to apply to it.

The Directive essentially holds that the RTUK may regulate any broadcaster using satellites and/or cable networks that are owned by the Republic of Turkey if that broadcaster aims its broadcasts at Turkey, or modifies its broadcasts to insert advertising. But this contribution does not resolve the jurisdictional question one way or the other; both of these exceptions are arguably allowed under the Convention regardless of whether Turkish jurisdiction applies. As for the former, under Article 24bis of the Convention, broadcasts that are aimed at Turkey but are set up so as to be subject to another signatory's jurisdiction may be considered to constitute an abuse of the rights conferred under the Convention, albeit under the scheme of the Convention an arbitral tribunal, not the interested regulatory body, would make the call as to whether an abuse has occurred. As for the latter, and as mentioned above, broadcasts that are modified through the insertion of advertising may fail to qualify as bona fide retransmissions and may slip out of the protection of the Convention altogether.

Furthermore, even though the Directive seemingly takes as its cornerstone the use of Turkish infrastructure when deciding when the exercise of Turkish jurisdiction would be proper, this factor alone would not conclude the analysis under the Convention. Interestingly, the initial version of the Convention allowed signatories to apply stricter rules than those provided for in the Convention to "programme services transmitted by entities or by technical means within their jurisdiction" (emphasis added), but an amendment protocol in 1998 changed that language to allow the application of stricter rules only to "programme services transmitted by a broadcaster deemed to be within [the relevant country's] jurisdiction." This change strengthens the view that the mere use of technical facilities within a country's territory does not give that signatory the right to exercise jurisdiction over the broadcaster.

As can be seen from the foregoing, the Directive still does not resolve the jurisdictional dilemma created by the RT Law. Under a literal interpretation of the RT Law, broadcasters might find themselves subject to the jurisdiction of Turkey at the same time that they are subject to the jurisdiction of another Convention signatory. This outcome would clearly run counter to the purpose of the Convention, which tries to assign jurisdiction to the single signatory that has the strongest connection to the broadcaster. This purpose is evident from the Convention's intricate jurisdictional assignment scheme; it also aligns with the Convention's general purpose to facilitate the free transmission of ideas that satisfy a set of basic criteria. To allow for multiple sovereigns to exercise jurisdiction over a broadcaster would be to allow a one-way ratchet to operate against freedom of expression by effectively applying to programs broadcast into multiple jurisdictions the tightest set of restrictions found in any of its recipients.

Thus, the two texts remain in conflict. As a matter of Turkish domestic law, under Article 90 of the Constitution, properly ratified international treaties, like the Convention, carry the power of properly passed laws. But Article 90 holds international treaties immune from challenge on the basis of unconstitutionality, and for that reason international treaties are considered to be superior to ordinary legislation. However, the consequences of the enactment of a law that conflicts with obligations under international treaties are unclear in practice. Turkish case law suggests that a broadcaster whose rights are infringed by the RT Law in violation of the Convention may theoretically be entitled to demand the rescission of the law on the grounds that it is irreconcilable with Turkey's international obligations. However, the practical application of the Convention across the continent suggests that signatories routinely interpret their local legislation in a way to expand their jurisdiction, and that the supremacy of the Convention in reality is not asserted at the expense of local legislation.

The uncertainty in the jurisdictional battle between the Convention and the RT Law should be resolved authoritatively one way or the other. This resolution could come in the form of an interpretive statement issued by RTUK along the same lines as the Directive discussed above, a court ruling, or an act of Parliament. The RT Law's jurisdictional clauses should be interpreted in line with the Convention in order to avoid conflict with Turkey's international obligations. The RT Law and RTUK's interpretation of it give the appearance of attempting a naked power grab in the form of extending Turkish jurisdiction at the expense of Turkey's Convention counterparties. The sooner that the law is clarified, the easier it will be for foreign broadcasters to chart their course of action with respect to the Turkish media market.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions