Turkey: Broadcasting Legislation

The jurisdictional clauses of the European Convention on Transfrontier Television (the "Convention") and Turkish Law No. 6112 on the Establishment and Broadcasting Services of Radio and Television Enterprises ("RT Law") overlap, potentially subjecting broadcasters transmitting or retransmitting their broadcasts into Turkey to two mutually exclusive jurisdictional schemes at once. The Turkish Radio and Television Supreme Council ("RTUK"), which is in charge of enforcing the latter law, issued the Directive on Radio and Television Broadcasts of Foreign Origin (the "Directive") in April 2012 with the explicit purpose of spelling out its interpretation of the jurisdictional clause of the domestic law as pertains to this point, but this has not helped resolve the issue. The domestic legislation should be clarified, and it should be interpreted in line with Turkey's international treaty obligations. Doing so would help achieve the broader goals of freedom of expression and integration with the European community, and also avoid allegations that Turkey has interpreted its international commitments to expand the range of its long-arm jurisdiction.

The member States of the Council of Europe signed the Convention on May 5, 1989 in order to "further the right, regardless of frontiers, to express, to seek, to receive and to impart information and ideas whatever their source." The Convention establishes a set of minimum standards that every broadcaster operating out of any of the signatories must follow, and guarantees the free retransmission of broadcasts meeting such common criteria within the remaining signatories. Turkey has signed and ratified the Convention, which has been in force in Turkey since May 1, 1994.

The Convention establishes a cascading set of principles to determine whose jurisdiction applies to any given broadcaster by evaluating the broadcaster's connection to each of its signatories through a set of progressively looser criteria of relatedness. As soon as the broadcaster satisfies one of these tests for any of the signatories, the broadcaster is made subject to that signatory's jurisdiction, and that signatory is charged with the application of the Convention. The purpose of these cascading principles is to ascertain which of the signatory States has the strongest connection to any given broadcaster, and to subject the broadcaster to the jurisdiction of that signatory. The Convention also gives signatory nations the authority to apply additional, more restrictive standards to broadcasters that are subject to their jurisdiction.

On 15 February 2011, the Turkish Parliament passed the RT Law, which set down a set of minimum standards which Turkish broadcasters must obey.

The RT Law does impose on broadcasters subject to Turkish jurisdiction more onerous obligations than those defined under the Convention, as the Convention explicitly allows. The RT Law also seemingly establishes the same criteria as the Convention for determining which broadcasters would be subject to Turkish jurisdiction, by tracking the language of the Convention's jurisdictional clause almost verbatim. However, the RT Law's jurisdictional clause might operate differently in effect, and subject to Turkish jurisdiction a much wider swath of broadcasters than the application of the Convention's language would.

It is a seeming omission in the RT Law's drafting that causes this curious effect: What the RT Law does is track very closely the Convention's Article 5(3), and subject to Turkish jurisdiction every possible broadcaster that the Convention itself would recognize to be subject to Turkish jurisdiction. This much is not controversial. However, the RT Law omits to say that if a broadcaster meets the criteria listed in Article 2 for another signatory to the Convention, it would be subject to that country's jurisdiction to the exclusion of Turkish jurisdiction. Thus, depending on how RTUK interprets and implements this clause, the RT Law might have the effect of going through the Convention's cascading criteria to subject to Turkish jurisdiction, at one step of the analysis or another, any broadcaster that has even the remotest connection to Turkey, regardless of how strong a connection the broadcaster may have to another signatory to the Convention.

Thus, under the RT Law's scheme, there is no difference whether a broadcaster has the strongest of connections to Turkey or the weakest; if the broadcaster is caught at any stage of the analysis, it becomes subject to Turkish jurisdiction. Of course the cascading method of determining jurisdiction makes sense only if there is a horizontal comparison of jurisdictions at each step; it makes no sense to use cascading criteria if only a single jurisdiction is being evaluated and there will be no difference whether a positive jurisdictional outcome is obtained at the first step or the last. The latter effect can be achieved much more naturally through a much

simpler structure. This idea suggests to us that it was an omission in the drafting of the RT Law that has caused the generously "inclusive" effect.

The RTUK, which is charged with enforcing the RT Law, issued the Directive to partially clarify the confusion created by this structure. Unfortunately, the Directive has served more to expose the confusion in the enforcement authority about the RT Law's jurisdictional reach than to explain RTUK's interpretation for industry participants. To begin with, the Directive begs the jurisdictional question by claiming to apply to all broadcasters that are under Turkish jurisdiction as determined by an application of the RT Law. The only substantive contribution made by the Directive is that it subjects to Turkish jurisdiction any broadcaster which would have otherwise been subject to the jurisdiction of another country, but which takes its broadcast into that foreign country and modifies it by "inserting additional programming, including commercial communications programming, and rebroadcasts such programming through satellites and/or cable networks owned by the Republic of Turkey." Such a rebroadcast would not be protected by the Convention in any event, because it guarantees only the "complete and unchanged" retransmission of broadcasts that meet its criteria; once the broadcast is modified in that fashion, it can no longer be considered "complete and unchanged" and RTUK would fully be in the right to subject it to Turkish jurisdiction and to expect it to abide by any other restrictions that the Turkish government might see fit to apply to it.

The Directive essentially holds that the RTUK may regulate any broadcaster using satellites and/or cable networks that are owned by the Republic of Turkey if that broadcaster aims its broadcasts at Turkey, or modifies its broadcasts to insert advertising. But this contribution does not resolve the jurisdictional question one way or the other; both of these exceptions are arguably allowed under the Convention regardless of whether Turkish jurisdiction applies. As for the former, under Article 24bis of the Convention, broadcasts that are aimed at Turkey but are set up so as to be subject to another signatory's jurisdiction may be considered to constitute an abuse of the rights conferred under the Convention, albeit under the scheme of the Convention an arbitral tribunal, not the interested regulatory body, would make the call as to whether an abuse has occurred. As for the latter, and as mentioned above, broadcasts that are modified through the insertion of advertising may fail to qualify as bona fide retransmissions and may slip out of the protection of the Convention altogether.

Furthermore, even though the Directive seemingly takes as its cornerstone the use of Turkish infrastructure when deciding when the exercise of Turkish jurisdiction would be proper, this factor alone would not conclude the analysis under the Convention. Interestingly, the initial version of the Convention allowed signatories to apply stricter rules than those provided for in the Convention to "programme services transmitted by entities or by technical means within their jurisdiction" (emphasis added), but an amendment protocol in 1998 changed that language to allow the application of stricter rules only to "programme services transmitted by a broadcaster deemed to be within [the relevant country's] jurisdiction." This change strengthens the view that the mere use of technical facilities within a country's territory does not give that signatory the right to exercise jurisdiction over the broadcaster.

As can be seen from the foregoing, the Directive still does not resolve the jurisdictional dilemma created by the RT Law. Under a literal interpretation of the RT Law, broadcasters might find themselves subject to the jurisdiction of Turkey at the same time that they are subject to the jurisdiction of another Convention signatory. This outcome would clearly run counter to the purpose of the Convention, which tries to assign jurisdiction to the single signatory that has the strongest connection to the broadcaster. This purpose is evident from the Convention's intricate jurisdictional assignment scheme; it also aligns with the Convention's general purpose to facilitate the free transmission of ideas that satisfy a set of basic criteria. To allow for multiple sovereigns to exercise jurisdiction over a broadcaster would be to allow a one-way ratchet to operate against freedom of expression by effectively applying to programs broadcast into multiple jurisdictions the tightest set of restrictions found in any of its recipients.

Thus, the two texts remain in conflict. As a matter of Turkish domestic law, under Article 90 of the Constitution, properly ratified international treaties, like the Convention, carry the power of properly passed laws. But Article 90 holds international treaties immune from challenge on the basis of unconstitutionality, and for that reason international treaties are considered to be superior to ordinary legislation. However, the consequences of the enactment of a law that conflicts with obligations under international treaties are unclear in practice. Turkish case law suggests that a broadcaster whose rights are infringed by the RT Law in violation of the Convention may theoretically be entitled to demand the rescission of the law on the grounds that it is irreconcilable with Turkey's international obligations. However, the practical application of the Convention across the continent suggests that signatories routinely interpret their local legislation in a way to expand their jurisdiction, and that the supremacy of the Convention in reality is not asserted at the expense of local legislation.

The uncertainty in the jurisdictional battle between the Convention and the RT Law should be resolved authoritatively one way or the other. This resolution could come in the form of an interpretive statement issued by RTUK along the same lines as the Directive discussed above, a court ruling, or an act of Parliament. The RT Law's jurisdictional clauses should be interpreted in line with the Convention in order to avoid conflict with Turkey's international obligations. The RT Law and RTUK's interpretation of it give the appearance of attempting a naked power grab in the form of extending Turkish jurisdiction at the expense of Turkey's Convention counterparties. The sooner that the law is clarified, the easier it will be for foreign broadcasters to chart their course of action with respect to the Turkish media market.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.