Turkey: Decision Of Joint Jurisprudence Declaring That The Lack Of Justification Shall Not Constitute Grounds For Denial Of Enforcement Of Foreign Judgments


There is a difference of jurisprudence between the 2. and 13. Civil Chambers of the Court of Appeals whether enforcement of (final) judgments which do not include any justification constitutes incompliance with the ordre public. The Court of Appeals Grand Chamber of Unification of Jurisprudence conclusively decided on whether the lack of justification constitutes an obstacle to enforcement, to resolve this jurisprudential difference. The decision of the board with Case numbered 2010/1, Decision numbered 2012/1 dated 10 February 2012 ("Decision") was published in the Official Gazette dated 20 September 2012 numbered 28417. This Decision and its justification shall be assessed in this article.

Enforcement of foreign court judgments

As elaborated on in detail in the newsletter article entitled "Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards and Foreign Judgments" which was published in the Newsletter issue of March 2012, the enforcement of foreign court judgments are subject to the provisions of International Private and Procedure Law No. 5718 ("IPPL"). In order for a foreign court judgment to be enforced (a) there should be contractual, statutory or actual reciprocity with the relevant foreign country with regards to enforcement, (b) the matter resolved upon by the judgment shall not fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of Turkish courts (such as claims related to the rights in rem over an immovable property), (c) the person against whom the enforcement is sought should have not been improperly summoned, or not represented in court or, a default judgment should not have been rendered against him which was contrary to the laws of that country, and (d) it shouldn't explicitly violate Turkish ordre public (art. 54 of IPPL).

Jurisprudential difference

Court of Appeals 2. Civil Chamber has amended its jurisprudence1 declaring foreign judgments not including any justification being in violation of the Turkish public order. In its decision in the year 20062, it declared that the court shall disregard the accuracy of a judgment, the applied provisions and the legal or procedural determinations thereunder whilst considering enforcement, and therefore that the lack of justification shall not constitute a violation of public order. The decision also underlines that explicit violation of public order is limited to events such as violation of fundamental rights and freedoms regulated under the Constitution, fundamental legal principles accepted by international law, right to fair trial and right to defense.

Court of Appeals 13. Civil Chamber, on the other hand, states in its decisions3 that the lack of justification in foreign court judgments shall constitute violation of the Constitution and of the public order. Therefore, it accepts that lack of justification of foreign court judgments constitutes obstacles in recognition and enforcement of such awards. The Court of Appeals Assembly of Civil Chambers has not adopted a decision governing the enforcement of judgments not including any justification.

The jurisprudential difference between the Civil Chambers of the Court of Appeals arises from whether the lack of justification of foreign court judgments constitutes an explicit violation of the public order or not.

Justification and the public order

The explicit violation of Turkish public order is regulated as an obstacle to the enforcement of foreign court awards under the IPPL. The State, in principle, waives its sovereign right to rule on conflicts over which its own courts have jurisdiction and adopt the decision of a foreign court while enforcing a decision. Consequently, the sovereign right of the state is exercised by the bodies of another state.  Therefore, violation of the public order is a materially important obstacle to the enforcement of foreign court awards.

The concept of public order is dependent on the time and place, and its content and limits may not be precisely delimited. The Court of Appeals has assessed, in the justification of the Decision, the relevant provisions of Turkish law and how such provisions shall be taken into consideration with regards to enforcement, in order to determine whether the lack of justification constitutes a violation of public order or not.

Justification under Turkish law

Article 141 of the Constitution of 1982 regulates that court judgments shall include justification. Article 297 of the Civil Procedural Code numbered 6100 (as well as article 388 of the abrogated Civil Procedural Code numbered 1086) stipulates that the judgment shall include (in its justification) the matters on which the parties have or have not agreed, the proof for contested matters, discussion and assessment of proof, the deducted conclusion and the legal cause. Court judgments shall include a justification as per Turkish law. The justification of judgments derives from public order. The justification shall justify the judgment and is binding. The justification states how the claims and defense of the parties are assessed. It is apparent that under the Turkish law the justification is directly in relation to the fundamental right to defense.

Public order and prohibition of revision au fond

The investigation made for the enforcement regarding whether the public order has been explicitly violated or not comprehends an assessment of whether the legal consequences of enforcement of the foreign judgment in Turkey are in violation of the public order or not. Nevertheless, while assessing the noncompliance with public order, the prohibition to review the merits of the case must be taken into consideration. The court handling the enforcement request may not disregard this prohibition by using its discretion. Assessment for enforcement is limited to identification of the existence of requisite conditions for enforcement. The due application of law and procedural provisions to the merits of the foreign judgment may not be inspected (art 54 of IPPL).

The formal and material content of justification under the Turkish law is regulated by the Civil Procedure Code. The justification is subject to the lex fori principle, as it is a matter of procedural law. Foreign states may provide for different provisions under their procedural law rules with respect to the justification. Therefore, the lack of justification in a judgment and the violation of the fundamental right to defense should be assessed as separate and independent matters; and the mere lack of justification in foreign judgments should not be assessed as a violation of public order per se.

Turkish legal rules concerning verdicts under Turkish law should not be applicable by analogy to a foreign court judgment regarded as a "verdict" as per the procedural rules of a foreign state. Drawing conclusions from the existence or lack of justification in the foreign judgments shall constitute assessment of compliance of the foreign verdict with the civil and procedural Turkish law. This constitutes violation of the prohibition revision au fond. Any procedure to the contrary shall constitute a renewal of the litigation procedure by Turkish courts.

The criteria to be taken into account for enforcement are whether the verdict of the foreign decision explicitly violates the Turkish public order or not. Bearing the prohibition of revision au fond in mind, in order for the procedural law applied to a judgment to constitute an obstacle to its enforcement, it shall per se violate the principles of due and fair trial, prevent any defense and constitute a violation of the Turkish public order.

The justification of the Decision specifically states that, instead of the differences with the Turkish law or incompliances with mandatory legal Turkish provisions of foreign judgments; what shall be taken into consideration is whether the fundamental values of Turkish law, the general public moral and main legal policy, fundamental rights and freedoms, concept of justice are violated by such foreign judgment or not.

Decision of the Court of Appeals Grand Chamber of Unification of Jurisprudence

The Court of Appeals Grand Chamber of Unification of Jurisprudence has resolved with a majority exceeding two thirds of the votes that "the mere lack of justification of foreign judgments shall not prevent the enforcement of final foreign court judgments". The Decision states that the justification is a concept of procedural law and thus the declaration of foreign court judgments not including any justification in violation of the public order is regarded as a violation of the prohibition of revision au fond. Whilst assessing compliance with public order, violation of fundamental principles and the concept of justice as well as fundamental rights and freedoms shall be taken into consideration instead of violation of any mandatory provision under Turkish law.

Nonetheless, the chair and members of the Court of Appeal 13th Civil Chamber have given negative votes to the Decision and submitted their dissenting opinion. The dissenting opinion states that violation of the public order may only be assessed with the justification of a judgment. The members having given negative votes affirm that the verdict section of a judgment is a mere statement of conclusions with respect to the claims and that compliance with the public order may only be assessed once the verdict and the justification are regarded as a whole.


The Civil Chambers of the Court of Appeals had adopted different jurisprudence with respect to whether the lack of justification of foreign court judgments constitutes an explicit violation of the public order or not. Therefore, the Court of Appeals Grand Chamber of Unification of Jurisprudence resolved this difference by its Decision adopted on 10 February 2012.

Justification is a matter of procedural law. Although Turkish law relates the existence of justification with public order, foreign states may have adopted different rules of procedure. The foreign court judgments are subject to their own procedural laws. Declaring foreign judgments as explicitly in violation of Turkish public order based on the mere lack of justification constitutes a violation of the prohibition of revision au fond regulated under the IPPL. Whether the foreign verdict explicitly violates the Turkish public order or not shall be taken into regard when compliance with public order is assessed for the sake of enforcing such decision.

The Civil Chambers of the Court of Appeals has therefore, with the majority of the votes, declared that foreign judgments may not be deprived of enforcement or be declared explicitly in violation of Turkish public order merely for the lack of justification.


1. Decision dated 30.06.1999 with Case numbered 1999/5858 and Decision numbered 1999/7609.

2. Decision dated 08.06.2006 with Case numbered 2006/2612 and Decision numbered 2006/9147.

3. Decision dated 05.12.2001 with Case numbered 2001/9007and Decision numbered 2001/11406 and decision dated 02.10.2003 with Case numbered 2003/6226and Decision numbered 2001/11095.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.