South Africa: The Impact Of Local Law On Claims Made Policies And In Particular Late Notification Of Claims And Circumstances And Time Bars South Africa

Last Updated: 9 September 2008
Article by Donald Dinnie

There is no common law duty on the insured to give notification of a claim to the insurer in a certain way but virtually all insurance contracts do impose on the insured a duty to give the insurer notice of the occurrence of loss1.

In most circumstances, the policy will contain a clause that requires notice of the loss to be given 'immediately'2, 'forthwith3, 'as soon as possible'4, or within a specified period of time5. These clauses are usually inserted in the insurance contract as conditions or as material terms in favour of the insurer.

Failure to fulfil them constitutes a breach of contract and absolves the insurer from liability. This is irrespective of whether or not the insurer has suffered any loss or prejudice as a result6.

"The speed in reporting the occurrence is clearly of the essence. It is also clear that a condition providing for speedy reporting of an occurrence that might give rise to a claim for indemnity is a material condition, and that the important question to be decided in any case similar to the present is whether that condition had been breached. If it has, then the questions of prejudice to the Insurer by reason of the late notification are irrelevant. The Insurer does not have to prove prejudice, but merely the breach." 7

Notification clauses usually create a strict obligation i.e. the absence of fault on the part of the insured is no excuse for breach of the condition8. Generally, it is not necessary for the insured to prove proper notice; however an insurer wishing to deny liability on that basis must plead and prove the absence of proper notification as a defence9.

While notice provisions relating to claims do not ordinarily suspend the rights and obligations under the contract of insurance, they may be construed as material terms of the contract and a breach thereof entitles the insurer to summary cancellation10.

The onus is on the insurer to establish that the term is material, that it was breached and that the breach entitles the insurer to decline to make payment11. Where the breach is material the courts have enforced it, even if it may be capricious or unreasonable12.

The purpose of a notice clause is to enable the insurer to test the genuineness of the claim within a reasonably short time of the occurrence of the loss and to ensure that immediate steps are taken to mitigate the consequences of the loss13. Notification is also relevant to reserving, renewing and solvency.

"The insurer wants notice as soon as possible to enable him to test the genuineness of the claim before the trail becomes cold"14. "The purpose of a provision for notice and proofs of loss is to allow the Insurer to form an intelligent estimate of its rights and liabilities; to afford it an opportunity for investigation; and to prevent fraud and imposition upon it."15 Those reasons have been adopted by the South African courts16.

In Resisto Dairy the policy required that "notice shall be given in writing to the company as soon as possible after the occurrence of any accident or loss or damage and in the event of any claim." The court held that such notice had not been given where the accident which occurred on 17 October 1959 was notified only on 6 January 1960. In Rossouw NO the insured was required to give notice "as soon as possible" of any event that might give rise to a claim for indemnity. The court held that the term "as soon as possible" had to be construed as meaning "as soon as is reasonably practicable in all the circumstances".

Insurance contracts often contain time-bar clauses or contractual prescription clauses which extinguish claims under the policy at a time before statutory prescription has been completed. Most commonly the clause provides that an action must be instituted within a certain period after the insurer has denied liability for a loss alternatively that the insurer is not liable for loss or damage after the expiration of a certain period of the loss unless the claim is the subject of pending litigation or arbitration.

What was then the highest court of the land, the Appellate Division, decided that if the insured's inability to comply with the insurer's request for information is due to the insurer's untoward delay in requesting that information, the time clause is not suspended as a result but the insured must issue summons to preserve its claim17 and non-compliance by the insured with the time-bar requiring an institution of action within a specified period after the insurer's repudiation of liability is not excused by the fact that the insurer has repudiated liability on the ground of the insured's alleged breach of an affirmative warranty18.

Where appropriate in the circumstances, however, an insurer may be held to have waived compliance by the insured with the contractual time limit19 or be estopped from asserting those rights.

The use of and successful reliance on breach of notification clauses and contractual time clauses will be coloured by the judgment of the Constitutional Court in Barkhuizen v Napier N.O.20.

This was a challenge to a time-bar clause requiring institution of an action within 90 days of rejection of an insurance claim, failing which the right would be forfeited. The insured won in the trial court, lost in the Supreme Court of Appeal and ultimately lost in the Constitutional Court.

The majority judgement held that the clause itself is not objectively unreasonable, and went on to enquire whether, if a provision is reasonable, it should be enforced where there are circumstances which prevented compliance with the time limitation clause.

The judgment does not put an end to the challenge to time-bar clauses, contractual prescription periods or notification clauses, whether they are found in insurance policies or in any other contract where the relevant periods are in themselves unreasonable.

The court gave the example of a time-bar period of 24 hours being manifestly unreasonable. Even where the relevant clause is not in itself unreasonable, a challenge may be possible on the basis that there is good reason why there was a failure to comply with the clause or evidence, among others, that there was an unequal bargaining position between the parties, that the clause was not drawn to the insured's attention, or because of the party's socio-economic situation, awareness of rights, access to professional advice, educational or geographical circumstances, he or she was not able to take action timeously.

The court left open the question whether impossibility of performance and the requirement of good faith could excuse non-compliance. Indications are that a forceful challenge could be raised against the enforcement of such clauses on the appropriate facts. In these circumstances any party that intends to rely on any form of time limitation provisions, will need to consider:

  • whether the clauses need amendment, having regard to the time periods allowed and whether they are objectively unreasonable;

  • the rationale for the relevant time period, taking into account the identity of the contracting party, its sophistication, financial resources, ability to obtain legal advice and geographical location;

  • the justifiability of the time limitation period in the context of the contract;

  • whether a legitimate purpose is served by the specific limitation period;

  • whether there is any merit in making time-bars reciprocal;

  • the interests of each party which is sought to be protected;

  • whether the limitation should include a provisio allowing for an indulgence to be granted where good cause exists for failure to comply with the limitation period.

What the majority judgment does is presage in the appropriate factual context:

  • further challenges in respect of time-bar clauses

  • challenges, by analogy, of the time periods in notification clauses

  • challenges to contractual prescription periods.

Challenges to time-bar and notification clauses will also be facilitated by the provisions of the Consumer Protection Bill including those sections dealing with unfair, unreasonable or unjust contract terms. Time-bar periods for personal lines policies are already ameliorated by policyholder protection rules21. And the ombudsman for insurance (a voluntary scheme to which most insurers are subject) will seldom enforce a personal lines time-bar clause without evidence of loss or prejudice to the insurer.

Looking ahead insurers can no longer be assured that the common law position on notification and time-bar clauses will on the appropriate facts, come to the assistance of the insurer. Insurers do need to look at their wordings and if necessary amend both the content and format of notification and time-bar clauses in the light of the Barkhuizen judgment and the proposals contained in the Consumer Protection Bill.


1. MFB Reinecke, Schalk Van der Merwe, JP van Niekerk, Peter Havenga General Principles of Insurance Law at 234 para 317

2. Hean v General Accident, Fire, & Life Assurance Corporation 1931 NPD 215

3. Sleight Home Farms v National Farmers Union Mutual Insurance Society 1967 (1) SA 13 (R)

4. Collen v AA Mutual Insurance Association LTD 1954 (3) SA 625 (E), Resisto Dairy v Auto Protection Insurance 1963 (1) SA 632

5. DM Davis Gordon and Gets on The South African Law of Insurance 4th edition at 299

6. see fn 1 at 235

7. See Rossouw NO v Federated Employers Insurance Company Limited 1978 (1) PH A 17 (C)

8. see fn 1

9. ibid at 236

10. Resisto Dairy v Auto Protection Insurance Company Limited 1963 (1) SA 632 (A) at 644 D – H, Pereira v Marine & Trade Insurance Company Limited 1975 (4) SA 745 (A) at 752 C – E and Napier NO v Van Schalkwyk 2004 (3) SA 425 (W) at 436 G - H

11. See Resisto Dairy supra at 644 H – 645 D and Pereira supra at 752 G – 753 B

12. See Napier NO supra at 435 F and Sleight Home Farms v National Farmers Union Mutual Insurance Society Limited 1967 (1) SA 13 (R) at 18 A – 19 C

13. See MacGillivary on Insurance Law, 10th Edition at paragraphs 19 - 34

14. See Stoneham v Ocean Ry & General Accident Insurance Company (1887) 19 QBD 237 at 240

15. See Kaplan v Guardian Life Insurance Company 231 F Supp 874 at 878 (WD) MO, (1964)

16. See Norris v Legal & General Assurance Society ANO 1962 (4) SA 673 (C) at 745 D – E, Rossouw NO supra and On-Time Printers CC v Allianz Insurance Company (unreported) WLD October 2001

17. Union National South British Insurance Co Limited v Padayachee 1985 (1) SA 551 (A)

18. See Venter v Certain Underwriting Agents of Lloyds of London 1994 (4) SA 657 (W)

19. See Ledingham v Commercial Union Insurance Co of SA Limited 1993 (2) SA 760 (C)

20. See Barkhuizen v Napier N.O. 2007 (5) SA 323 (CC). Napier was the Lloyd's syndicate representative in South Africa

21. Policyholder Protection Rules (Short-Term Insurance) 2004 Rule 7.4(a)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions