South Africa: Beware - Signing Of Credit Agreements Containing Suretyship Clauses!

Last Updated: 6 May 2005
Article by Eric Levenstein and Ryan Tucker


If a person signs a credit application form in a representative capacity on behalf of a company or other juristic person and is not advised that the form also contains a personal suretyship by the signatory, such document itself would constitute a misrepresentation which induced a mistake by the signatory, and the personal suretyship obligation of the signatory would be invalid.

In the recent case of Brink v Humphries & Jewell (Proprietary) Limited 2005 (2) SA 419 (SCA); the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) has again dealt with the important principle of "caveat subscriptor". The signature to a document creates a refutable presumption that a person who puts his signature to a document knows what the document contains. If the contents of a document turn out not to be to the signatories liking, he has no one to blame but himself. The basis of the caveat subscriptor rule is a reliance upon the doctrine of quasi-mutual asset, the question being simply whether the other party is reasonably entitled to assume that the signatory, by signing the document, was signifying his intention to be bound by it.

A common defence to the principle of "caveat subscriptor" is the defence of "iustus error", i.e. unilateral mistake. If a signatory to a credit application form signed the document labouring under an honest misapprehension of the true nature of the document and which mistake was caused by the creditor, such signatory would be able to rescind the contract if his mistake was sufficiently material. The signatory would have to show that he would not have entered into the contract if he had known the truth. (Kahn vs Naidoo 1989 (3) SA 724 (N)).

In Brink, Cloete JA confirmed the caveat subscriptor principle in that when a person signs a document he is taken to have assented to what appears above his signature.

Cloete JA referred to the case of George v Fairmead (Proprietary) Limited 1958 (2) SA 465 (A). In such case the court posed the question - ‘When can an error be said to be iustus for the purpose of entitling a man to repudiate his apparent assent to a contractual term? As I read the decisions, our courts, in applying the test, have taken into account the fact that there is another party involved and have considered his position. They have, in effect, said: Has the first party – the one who is trying to resile – been to blame in the sense that by his conduct he has led the other party, as a reasonable man, to believe that he was binding himself? … If his mistake is due to a misrepresentation, whether innocent or fraudulent, by the other party then, of course, it is the second party who is to blame and the first party is not bound."

In Brink, the SCA confirmed that they would find it unconscionable for a person to enforce the terms of a document or contract where he misled the signatory, whether intentionally or innocently. Where there is such a misrepresentation and it is material, the signatory can rescind the contract because of the misrepresentation, provided he can show that he would not have entered into the contract if he had known the truth. Where misrepresentation results in a fundamental mistake, the "contract" is void ab initio.

The court in Brink stated that in deciding whether a misrepresentation was made, all the relevant circumstances must be taken into account and each case will depend on its own facts. The court went on to state that the furnishing of a document, which is misleading in its terms, can constitute such a misrepresentation. The court made the point that one of the deciding factors to be taken into account is whether the person providing the credit application to the signatory informs the signatory to the credit application form whether there is a personal suretyship included in such agreement.

The first question is whether in fact the signatory has been misled. Did the signatory know or realise that the credit application form contained a personal suretyship clause and did he expect the document to have such a clause?

Secondly, had the signatory known or realised that the credit agreement contained a personal suretyship clause, would he have nonetheless signed the agreement? Was the signatory acting under a misapprehension in signing the credit application form?

The third enquiry that needs to be undertaken is whether a reasonable man would have been misled. This is an objective enquiry which enables the court to prevent abuse of the iustus error defence in cases such as the present. Would a reasonable businessman have anticipated a personal suretyship obligation in an application for credit made on behalf of a company?

In deciding this question, the SCA analysed the following features of the credit application form relevant to that case, which in their view was relevant to the question as to whether a reasonable man would have been misled by the credit application -

  • the prominent heading of the document must be taken into account. One must look at whether the document proclaims that it is a credit application form or whether it proclaims that it is a credit application form and personal suretyship agreement. If it merely states that it is a credit application form and then subsequently includes a suretyship clause, this in itself is misleading;
  • whether there was a clear indication in the application form that the signatory was signing in two capacities i.e. in a representative capacity on behalf of the company and in a personal capacity. The suggestion offered by the SCA is to have provision for two signatures with appropriate wording indicating that the signatory provision pertains to a suretyship obligation;
  • does the wording of the credit application form convey to any person who saw it that the signatory was signing in a representative capacity or in a personal capacity? Is the clause which contains the personal suretyship, sufficiently bold and eye catching to draw the attention of the signatory to this clause? Is the clause conspicuous enough so that it would stand out on its own? Would the wording suffice to alert a signatory to the fact that he or she was undertaking a personal obligation?

In the Brink case, the SCA held that the creditor’s conduct in providing the credit application form to the signatory without clearly indicating that it contained a personal suretyship by the signatory was misleading and had induced a fundamental mistake on the part of the signatory. The signatory had been under the impression that he was signing a credit application form on behalf of the company, whereas he had undertaken, in addition, a personal suretyship for the debts of the company. It followed therefore, that the suretyship obligation was void ab initio.

A checklist for creditors in assessing the legality of their credit application forms -

  1. The creditor must inform the person signing the document that the form imposes a suretyship obligation on the individual who signs the document. If the application form states in the heading "COMPANY CUSTOMER RECORD AND CREDIT APPLICATION FORM BETWEEN …" this in itself is misleading. If the creditor required that the document would also be a suretyship undertaking, the creditor must include such an indication in the heading of the application form.
  2. If the person signing the document understood that what was required of him in signing the form was a signature on behalf of the debtor i.e. the company, and such application form includes a personal suretyship, then by his signing the application he would have been misled. If the individual signing the document did not realise that the credit application contained a personal suretyship clause and did not expect it to, then he cannot be held bound by the suretyship contained therein. If the individual can categorically confirm that had he realised that the form contained a personal suretyship clause, he would not have signed the document, then that person can rely on the fact that he acted under a misapprehension in signing the credit application form.
  3. The creditor must ask the question as to whether a reasonable man would be misled in signing the document containing a suretyship undertaking or whether he would understand that he is doing so.
  4. The creditor must ensure that the point at which signature is requested on the form by the surety is preceded by a space for the capacity of the party signing the document. If this is not done, this further misleads the individual into thinking that he is signing a document in his representative capacity and not in his personal capacity. If a creditor intends that the person signing on behalf of a company be bound also as surety, it must provide for the signing by the individual in a dual capacity ie in a representative capacity and in a personal capacity. If there is no provision for two signatures with appropriate wording indicating the dual capacity, then the document is defective.
  5. The actual suretyship clause must be in capitals and in bold i.e. it must be highlighted. This clearly assists in alerting the signatory to the clause containing the suretyship. The suretyship clause must therefore be conspicuous. The manner in which the personal suretyship clause is included in the form must alert a signatory to the fact that he or she is undertaking a personal obligation.

All in all, the creditor must ensure that the individual signing the document containing a suretyship is not misled by the features of the credit application form. One must ask the question as to whether a reasonable man in the position of such person would be misled by signing such form. If the misrepresentation is material, the signatory would be entitled to rely on the Brink case and argue that the contract should be rescinded because of such misrepresentation and therefore the "surety" cannot be bound by the contract.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions