Most Read Contributor in South Africa, December 2016
A lot is written about structuring robust intellectual property
licensing programs, whether from the perspective of licensors or
licensees of intellectual property rights. This requires a careful
consideration of legal, tax and regulatory issues that impact on
the licensing arrangement.
The legal risks can't always be managed adequately through
the careful negotiation and drafting of a licence agreement. Some
of these risks need to be managed independently of the drafting of
One example of this is the risk to the licensee of the licensor
(owner of the intellectual property rights) becoming insolvent.
This is an issue that has become particularly relevant in recent
years with an increase in insolvencies.
In some countries, such as the United States there is limited
bankruptcy protection for licensees of intellectual property -
so-called Section 365(n) protection under the Bankruptcy Code. Care
needs to be exercised in relying on this, even in the United
States, as the definition of "intellectual property"
under the Code refers to trade secrets, U.S. patents and patent
applications, copyrights and mask works. It does not include trade
marks and certain other categories of intellectual property.
How best to manage this issue
The licensee should firstly consider the principles that govern
the validity of licensing arrangements after insolvency/bankruptcy
in the jurisdictions in which the licensor and the licensee are
based. If the licensee is concerned about the survival of the
licence, beyond the insolvency of the licensor, then consideration
can be given to including provisions in the licence agreement to
secure survival of the licence beyond insolvency. It is not always
possible to draft enforceable provisions dealing with these issues.
As a result many licensees resort to requiring that the licensor
deposit the intellectual property into an insolvency remote Special
Purpose Vehicle ("SPV"). This is a model that is becoming
increasingly popular amongst leading brand and technology
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
A better strategy is to actively engage such users and request, amicably, that the use of the trade mark be stopped or limited- after all your consumers are on your team and are your biggest supporters.
As a result of the US and other nations looking to ease the sanctions imposed on Iran, the international business community is once again starting to look at the opportunities presented by the largely untapped market of Iran.
Intellectual property (IP) is an umbrella term for various legal entitlements which attach to certain names, written and recorded media and inventions. The word IP refers to creation of the mind and expression: inventions, literary and artistic works, symbols, names and images used in commerce.
The GCC tent system provides a convenient way for applicants to secure patent rights effective in each of the GCC member states.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).