Large capital projects, with their multi-year timelines,
changing requirements and complex procurement issues, are
inherently risky, warns PwC. "They require diligent oversight
from management and the board, given the common occurrence of
budget overruns and their effect on the company's financial
health," says Jonathan Cawood, Capital Projects Leader for PwC
"Boards have the responsibility to oversee an
organisation's strategy and key risks. Capital projects fall
squarely within the realm in the light of their significant costs
and the business implications of delayed or over-budget
projects," says Cawood.
He points out that lack of oversight from the board can result
in severe consequences, For example, in the power sector,
regulators have rejected substantial portions of capital funding
requests in situations where they believe management and the board
could have exercised better oversight of costs, schedules and
Any institution that has ever undertaken major capital building
projects knows they almost always take longer and cost more than
expected. Unless strong project controls are in place, project
owners often don't realise the severity of delays and cost
overruns until well after a project has foundered.
How a board and its management handle the various issues on a
capital project go a long when determining the success of the
project, he says.
A recent analysis carried out by PwC of 52 capital projects
missteps at public companies showed that after a public
announcement of a capital project delay or shutdown, a majority of
companies experience a steady decline in the share price. By the
three month mark following the announcement, the declines in price
averages 15 percent. In the most severe case of the companies
analysed, one experienced an almost 90 percent decline in share
While cost overruns and delays have always been serious issues,
companies have become increasingly concerned about them since the
recent economic uncertainty. A new report issued by PwC,
'Correcting the course of capital projects',
states that mega-projects usually exceed their budgets by 50% or
more. Also, large projects tend to be risky with some exceeding $1
billion over many years and encompassing many moving parts,
resources and contractors.
"In emerging markets, such as Africa, project developers
also face unique problems, including language barriers in contract
negotiations, different legal standards, a greater likelihood of
political interference, and the need to import skilled labour,
equipment and materials."
A number of infrastructure projects have been rolled out across
the African continent. The Industrial Development Corporation has
invested a total of R6.2 bn in 41 projects across 16 African
countries in 2012, the majority of these being in mining,
industrial infrastructure and tourism.
Within South Africa, the Government is on track to spend in
excess of R4-trillion on infrastructure in the near future,
focusing on rail, roads, water, energy, communication and
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
The Act has brought about fundamental changes in the manner in which shareholder resolutions are passed.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).