South Africa: Exchange Control And The Shuttleworth Decision

Last Updated: 19 November 2013
Article by Beric Croome

Most Read Contributor in South Africa, September 2016

Billionaire Mark Shuttleworth certainly did well when he disposed of his business – he realised approximately R4,2bn.

He decided to emigrate from South Africa on February 23 2001. As a result, the assets located in South Africa were blocked. In order to remit the funds from South Africa, Shuttleworth was required to pay a 10% levy of R250 474 893 to the South African Reserve Bank.

This wasn't the first time Shuttleworth had to pay a 10% levy of for wanting to take assets out of the country. Under the rules in place governing exchange control, he was required to submit an application to transfer his blocked assets out of South Africa via an authorised dealer, that is, a commercial bank authorised to deal in foreign exchange, and submitted an application via his bank, namely, Standard Bank.

In submitting the application to remit funds , he asked Standard Bank to forward the Reserve Bank a document that he had prepared containing certain written representations regarding his application. Standard Bank omitted to to do so. When that was discovered, Shuttleworth instructed Standard Bank to place those representations before the Reserve Bank to enable it to reconsider its position regarding the imposition of the 10% levy. Subsequently, the Reserve Bank confirmed its earlier decision, taken in October 2009, to imposed the 10% levy on the funds.

Shuttleworth wanted to know what lay behind the decision to impose a 10% levy and the Reserve Bank responded by pointing to the Minister of Finance's Budget Speech of February 26 2009 which contained details whereby emigrants' blocked assets were to be unwound and amounts of up to R750 000 would be eligible for removal from South Africa without charge.

It was indicated that those emigrants who wished to take out more than this would have to apply to the Reserve Bank's Exchange Control department for approval and would be subject to an exiting schedule and an exit charge or levy of 10% of the amount.. Shuttleworth sought relief from the court (MR Shuttleworth v South African Reserve Bank and Others, Case No 307 09/210, North Gauteng High Court, as yet unreported) that the 10% levy paid by him was unlawful and should be returned to him and that certain provisions of the law and the regulations regulating exchange control did not comply with the Constitution ( Act 108 of 1996), as amended, and should, therefore, be found to be unconstitutional.

Currency and Exchanges Act of 1933

It is appropriate to point out that the legal framework regulating exchange control in South Africa flows from the provisions of the Currency and Exchanges Act (9 of 1933), and the regulations, rules and orders which have been issued in terms of that statute. It is thus clear that the Act was enacted long before the dawn of the constitutional democracy in South Africa and the Bill of Rights.

The Currency and Exchanges Act was introduced to amend the law relating to legal tender, currency, exchange and banking. It also creates a framework regulating exchange control and has thus been in place on the statute books for many years. It did not originate, as is often thought, as a consequence of the Sharpeville massacre of 1961. The legislation was designed in such a way that it can be amended quickly and easily by way of the issue of regulations in order to address developments in the economy and the currency markets so as to protect the South African currency.

The legal challenge

Shuttleworth sought an order reviewing and setting aside the Reserve Bank's 2009 decision to impose a 10% levy as a condition permitting the transfer of his remaining blocked assets out of the country. In other words, he sought a refund of the R250 474 893.50 levy paid together with interest.

Furthermore, he sought an order declaring that the words "and an exit charge of 10% of the amount" used in Exchange Control Circular No D375 (February 262003), and Exchange Control Circular No D380 ( February 26 2003) and sB2(E)(iii)(e) of the exchange control rulings were at all material times inconsistent with the Constitution and thus, invalid.

In addition, Shuttleworth sought an order declaring that s9 of the Currency and Exchanges Act is inconsistent with the Constitution and invalid and, in the alternative, an order declaring that certain specific sub-sections of s9 of the Currency and Exchanges Act are invalid.

Furthermore, the order requested the court to declare certain paragraphs of regulation 3(1) of the Exchange Control Regulations to be inconsistent with the Constitution and thus invalid, and that regulation 10(1)(b) was invalid, together with an order declaring regulations 18 and 19(1) inconsistent with the Constitution and therefore invalid.

He also sought an order directing that parts of regulation 22 were inconsistent with the Constitution and thus invalid, as well as the orders and rules issued under the Exchange Control Regulations were inconsistent with the Constitution and thus invalid.

"Closed-door Policy"

Currently under existing policy persons wishing to seek approval from the Reserve Bank regarding transactions dealing with foreign exchange are required to communicate with the Reserve Bank via authorised dealers. Shuttleworth sought an order that this policy of refusing to deal with members of the public directly in the exercise of its delegated powers under the regulations was inconsistent with the Constitution and invalid.

In the judgement, this was referred to as "a closed-door policy" and the court had to determine whether that process was procedurally right and fair.

Mootness of proceedings

The Reserve Bank raised the question whether the proceedings before the court were academic or moot in light of the decision by the Minister to do away with the 10% levy on blocked assets or funds. In considering this question, the court looked at the merits and historical background of the exchange control system and pointed out that it is important that authorities are able to react quickly and without delay to changes in the international monetary system. This is achieved through the current structure in place of empowering an official to issue regulations and has been a central feature of exchange control in South Africa since 1933.

The Exchange Control Department was subsequently replaced by the Financial Surveillance Department and exists in order to protect the value of the Rand in the interests of a balanced and sustainable economy in South Africa. The purpose of the Financial Surveillance Department within the Reserve Bank is to regulate the inflow and outflow of capital in terms of the powers granted to it by the legislature. The Department also comprises an investigations division, which is required to investigate alleged contraventions of the exchange control regulations and to recoup losses on the country's foreign currency reserves.

The judgement contains a useful summary of the inception of exchange control in South Africa and the refinements made over the past number of years.

The court held that the issues raised by Shuttleworth were neither academic nor moot, that he had an interest in the court ruling on those issues and, in addition, it was in the public interest that the issues raised in his challenge on the various regulations and sections of the statute regulating exchange control should be considered.

The regulations, orders and rules governing exchange control

The primary legislation regulating exchange control is the Currency and Exchanges Act of 1933, and any regulations that may be promulgated. Furthermore, the Minister of Finance is empowered to issue various orders, rules, exemptions, forms and procedural arrangements. Regulations may be issued by the Minister in terms of s9 and, furthermore, he may delegate such duties or powers to any person in terms of regulation 22E of the exchange control regulations.

Thus, the furnishing of information or advice on exchange control or currency matters are matters governed by the regulations and, similarly, the approval or permission in respect of exchange, currency or gold transactions are also governed by the regulations.

Shuttleworth sought to argue that the requirement that members of the public must approach the Reserve Bank via their bankers was contrary to the obligations imposed on the public administration by s195 of the Constitution, as well the foundational values of accountability, responsiveness and openness of Section 1 of the Constitution. The Reserve Bank pointed out that the exchange control rulings are amended from time to time by way of exchange control circulars made available to all authorised dealers; the contents thereof may be made available to the public. In addition, the Exchange Control Manual is published by the Reserve Bank on its website as a general guideline for the public in an attempt to provide a general understanding of the purpose, scope and operation of the exchange control system.

It was pointed out that the majority of applications for permission to carry out transactions fall within the scope of rulings and are dealt with by the authorised dealers. In the judgement, it was indicated that in 2010, a total of 10 147 090 foreign exchange transactions took place, of which the Exchange Control Department received only approximately 54 000 applications from all recognised authorised dealers. It was therefore argued that the authorised dealer system allows for the sifting of applications so the Reserve Bank is only required to deal with those applications, which fall beyond the scope of authority granted to authorised dealers.

In the result, the court found that the so-called "closed door policy" was lawful and complied with the Constitution. In addition, the court declined Shuttleworth's request to direct that the 10% exit levy paid by him be refunded on the basis that the exchange control circulars issued were valid and did not violate the Constitution.

The decision to impose the 10% exit levy was not made by the Reserve Bank itself, but by the Minister of Finance, who had the authority to make that decision. Shuttleworth sought to argue that the regulation imposing the 10% levy had not been approved by parliament but this argument was rejected on the basis that the regulation did not constitute the making or promulgation of a regulation intended to raise revenue or tax as envisaged in s9(4) of the Currency and Exchanges Act but was rather a measure to protect the currency of South Africa.

The court accepted that the 10% exit levy was imposed as a means of restricting the export of capital from South Africa and was valid under the Constitution.

Court's decision on the other challenges made by Shuttleworth

The judgement deals with the various challenges made by Shuttleworth insofar as various regulations and sections of the Currency and Exchanges Act are concerned and these are summarised in the table set out below:

Cost Order

The court concluded that the issues raised are important from a constitutional point of view. Its decision was not only of importance for Shuttleworth but also for the Reserve Bank and the Minister of Finance. Ordinarily, the court directs that the costs shall follow the outcome of the decision, in the Shuttleworth case, the court ordered that each party must each pay his or her own costs.

Exchange Control Circular No 19/2013

On August 2 2013, the Financial Surveillance Department of the South African Reserve Bank issued a circular in response to the judgement. The circular summarises the decision of the court and points out that the court rejected Mr Shuttleworth's contention that the exchange control system as a whole and the legislation and regulations, which comprise the system, are unconstitutional. The circular informed authorised dealers that the effect of the judgement of the court is that the exchange control system and its administration remains unchanged.

The circular refers to the court's conclusion that s9(3) of the Currency and Exchanges Act is constitutional but is is subject to confirmation by the Constitutional Court. The court also declared certain regulations unconstitutional, a finding which has been suspended for twelve months. The Reserve Bank advised all authorised dealers to note that the provisions in question remain of full force and effect until the matter has been finally adjudicated by the Constitutional Court.

It has been reported in the media that Shuttleworth has decided to seek leave to appeal the decision handed down by Legodi J, and it is therefore likely that the case will proceed to a full bench of the North Gauteng High Court and, ultimately, to the Constitutional Court for final adjudication.

It is clear that certain regulations governing exchange control have been found wanting and that sections of the Currency and Exchanges Act must be refined to comply with the Constitution. This does not come as a surprise, taking account of the fact that the Currency and Exchanges Act was enacted in 1933, long before the Bill of Rights and the dawn of the democratic era of constitutional supremacy.

On September 17 the North Gauteng High Court granted Mr Shuttleworth leave to appeal and granted the Reserve Bank leave to cross-appeal.

Originally published in without.prejudice, October 2013.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.