South Africa: Can You Trust Your Trust?

Last Updated: 24 September 2013
Article by Deon Beachen

Most Read Contributor in South Africa, September 2018

I often consult with trustees who do not understand the fundamental mechanisms of a trust, let alone the reasons why it was created in the first place. More often than not, I come across trustees who manage trust assets at their own whim and preference with absolutely no regard to the very legal doctrines that govern and regulate them.

Nature of a trust:

A trust is an agreement between the founder and the trustees for the trustees to manage the assets in a certain manner that will benefit the trust beneficiaries. The concept of a "trust" originates from English Law and has been regarded as "the most distinctive and creative achievement of English jurisprudence".


There is no doubt that trusts can serve a wide variety of personal needs and desires like the protection of your assets from creditors; providing estate pegging and tax savings; providing financial continuity upon your death; a trust may also serve as an appropriate vehicle for certain business ventures; it can provide financial protection to vulnerable dependants, reckless or extravagant children and beneficiaries with special needs; a trust may also be applied to save on substantial costs associated with the administration of a deceased estate.

The benefits associated with the application of a trust can, however, only be legitimately attained if the trust is managed effectively by the trustees in line with prevailing legislation.

Trustees have onerous responsibilities and obligations:

a) The Trust Property Control Act 57 of 1988 states that "a Trustee shall, in the performance of his duties and exercise of his powers, act with the care, diligence and skill which can reasonably be expected of a person who managers the affairs of another." [My emphasis]

This is an arduous, objective provision. The duty of care, diligence and skill required by a trustee is that of a reasonable person managing the affairs of another. A trustee cannot, as a defence, rely on his lack of skill or lack of proficiency on a particular subject matter or good intent to pass this test. There is no place in our law for a sleeping trustee.
b) Any provision contained in a trust instrument shall be void insofar as it would have the effect of indemnifying a trustee against liability for a breach of trust where he fails to show the degree of care, diligence and skill as required.
c) Once you become a trustee it is important to note that you cease to be under the instructions or commands of your client or the founder. The appointment of trustee means that you would now have to act in the best interests of the trust's beneficiaries as per your duties in terms of the trust deed and the law.

In the case of PPWAWU National Provident Fund v Chemical Energy Paper Printing Wood and Allied Workers Union 2008 (2) SA 351 (W) the court said that the trustee's obligation to exercise an independent judgment, regardless of the views of the trade union (or employer) which appointed him is analogous to the director's obligation to exercise an independent judgment, regardless of the views of any party which may have procured his or her appointment as a director. The Court held that, by following the union's policy, the union-appointed trustees had acted in breach of their fiduciary duties to do the best that they could for the beneficiaries.
d) Trusts are heavily regulated contrary to popular belief of them being wishy-washy. Trustees need to understand and appreciate what is required from them on an on-going basis. The Trust Property Control Act regulates trusts, and so too does the common law. Apart from regulations, trustees must be well acquainted with the trust deed. The trust deed is the constitution or charter of any trust. When trustees act contrary to the provisions of the trust deed, their acts are ultra vires and invalid. The general rule is that if a trust deed does not contain an express or implicit power which allows the trustees to pursue a certain risk activity, the trustees have no entitlement in law to proceed with such an activity.
e) A trustee must not without the written consent of the Master destroy any document which serves as proof of the investment, safe custody, control, administration, alienation or distribution of trust property before the expiry of a period of five years from the termination of a trust.
f) Trustees hold office and cannot do as they please. Certain rights, duties and obligations flow from the holding of office.

In Doyle v Board of Executors 1999 2 SA 805 (C) the court held that the office of trustee requires of a trustee to act with utmost good faith. The duty of care is the most important manifestation of the fiduciary nature of a trustee's office, it being an accepted principle in our law that a trustee, as any other functionary to a fiduciary relationship, must perform his duties and exercise his powers in utmost good faith.
g) Discretion does not mean that trustees can do as they please. When exercising discretion, trustees have to consider the needs of all discretionary beneficiaries.
h) If a trustee fails to perform any duty imposed by the trust instrument, the Master or any person having an interest in trust property can apply to court for an order directing the trustee to perform such duty.
i) The Trust Property Control Act specifies strict requirements for the valid resignation of a trustee. Whether or not the trust instrument provides for the trustee's resignation, the trustee may resign by notice in writing to the Master and the ascertained beneficiaries who have legal capacity, or to the tutors or curators of the beneficiaries of the trust under tutorship or curatorship. Generally, notice is only given to the Master and fellow trustees but not to the beneficiaries. In such a case, the resignation is deemed to be invalid. This could lead to a very unsatisfactory state of events as the trustee who thinks he is no longer a trustee may very well still be a trustee and the remaining trustees may be signing documents which will effectually be null and void.
j) The Supreme Court of Appeal has held that a trust is a contract akin to a stipulatio alteri, namely a contract for the benefit of a third party. Therefore, a founder of a trust and a trustee can by agreement between them vary or even cancel a deed of trust before the third party has accepted the benefits conferred on him or her by the trust deed. But once the beneficiary has accepted those benefits, the trust deed can only be varied with his or her consent. The reason is that, as in the case of a stipulatio alteri, it is only upon acceptance that the beneficiaries acquire rights under the trust. Before acceptance, a beneficiary is a contingent beneficiary only. Therefore, a trust deed varied without the beneficiary's consent after the latter has accepted the benefits conferred by the trust deed is invalid. See: Potgieter v Potgieter NO 2012 (1) SA 637 SCA.

You may then ask how does one obtain consent from beneficiaries who have benefitted under trusts where there may be hundreds or even thousands of beneficiaries?
  • If there is proper representation, the duly appointed representative may consent on behalf of all members who have accepted benefits.
  • In the case where minors are beneficiaries, the guardian may accept on behalf of the minors.
  • Alternatively, a notice may be placed in a local newspaper setting out the proposed amendments and calling upon any person who has received benefits to object to the proposed amendments. Should no objection be lodged by a certain, specified date, it may be deemed that that the beneficiaries have accepted the proposed amendments.
The acceptance to be provided need not be in the form of formal, written acceptance. It is important to note that acceptance can be obtained via conduct.

It is also equally important to note that if a guardian or a duly appointed representative is representing the beneficiaries that they do not accept if such acceptance will be contrary to the interests of the beneficiaries.
k) The Supreme Court of Appeal in Land and Agricultural Bank of SA v Parker 2005 (2) SA 77 (SCA) said family trusts should not be controlled solely by family members who are beneficiaries. The Master should ensure that an independent outsider is appointed as trustee to each trust in which (a) all the trustees are beneficiaries; and (b) all the beneficiaries are related to each other. This outsider-trustee should be someone who with proper realisation of the responsibilities of trusteeship accepts office in order to ensure that the trust functions properly, that the provisions of the trust deed are observed, and that the conduct of trustees who lack a sufficiently independent interest in the observance of substantive and procedural requirements arising from the trust deed can be scrutinised and checked. Such an outsider will not accept office without being aware that failure to observe these duties may risk action for breach of trust.
l) No trustee has any power to act until he has been formally appointed by the Master of the High Court. Any action taken by a trustee prior to his appointment is void.
m) Trustees must keep an asset register in accordance with section 11 of the Trust property Control Act.
n) Beneficiaries with contingent rights are always entitled to information.
o) Trustees must act jointly as ownership vests in trustees equally. Please see Jansen NO and Others v Ringwood Investments 87 CC (59771/2009) [2013] ZAGPPHC 129 (20 May 2013).

Important points to note:

a) A "business trust" is not a separate animal. A trust is a trust irrespective of what you call it. The only difference between a business trust and a family trust is that the trustees to a business trust are empowered to carry on business activities in accordance with the trust deed. Trustees to a business trust are not exempted from the usual trustee duties as set out under the common law or under the statutes.

Be vigilant that your business trust is seen as a trust and not as a "partnership". See for example Adcock v Adcock and Others (3617/09) [2012] ZAECPEHC 28 where the plaintiff, upon divorce, opted to sue the defendant not for her share of the accrual but rather on the alleged existence of a universal partnership that existed between her, her former husband and the trust. The purpose of the partnership, the plaintiff maintained, would have been for the joint benefit of the plaintiff, her former husband and the Trust, with the express purpose of making profits - upon the marriage being terminated it was an implied term that the partnership would be terminated and its nett asset value distributed equally between the partnerships according to the partnership ratio.
b) The trust itself cannot be sued as it is not recognised as a legal person in South Africa (unless a statute defines it as such). It is the trustees in their official capacity who will be sued.
c) The Master of the High Court is not an adjudicator. It is merely a record keeping office. Just because he may sanction something does not mean that the sanctioned document is valid and legal. A court will not entertain a defence that the acts of trustees were valid and lawful because the Master of the High Court subsequently approved the application. The onus rests on trustees to know the law and act in accordance with it.
d) Often a founder loans money to his trust. When doing so always reduce the loan agreement to writing. Our courts always look for "substance" over "form" and prefer giving greater weight to the substance of a transaction over its form because the latter may be easily manipulated or used in self-serving fashions. These days many donations are disguised as loans. If the terms of the loan agreement is to be a loan repayable on demand which is to be interest-free upon such demand, make sure that this is reduced to writing. This is essential.
e) Do not use legal jargon without understanding its full import.

In the case of Raubenheimer v Raubenheimer and Others 2012 (5) SA 290 (SCA) the Supreme Court of Appeal held that the word 'usufruct' is often loosely used, and its use in a will does not necessarily mean that a testator appreciated its legal significance. The court in this matter was satisfied that the will created a fideicommissum over the common home with the appellant as the fiduciary until her death or remarriage whereupon the property was to pass to the respondents or their children.
f) There are many reasons to create and use a trust during your lifetime. One must do an exercise to ascertain whether the value in placing assets in the trust outweighs the costs and tax implications associated therewith. In many cases, the advantages sought from the trust are far greater than the initial costs.
g) Very often, surviving spouses end up competing against children and grandchildren in a trust. If a founder intends for a certain beneficiary/ies to be preferred over others, it may well be imperative to insert this in the trust deed. It is perfectly permissible to rank or qualify certain classes of discretionary beneficiaries over others, provided the trust still remains a discretionary trust (i.e. that the nature of the trust is not changed).
h) It is standard practice for trust practitioners to request auditors to provide them with letters of acceptance of appointment as accounting officers of trusts in cases where the trust deeds provide for the accounting of trusts. The standard letter indicates that the auditor accepts his appointment and that he will also advise the Master immediately should he no longer act as auditor. Recent complaints were lodged by the Master that auditors do not fulfil their obligations in terms of their undertaking. In particular, they do not advise the Master when they cease to act or when they have not performed any form of service for the previous twelve months. The Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors (IRBA) has resolved to take disciplinary steps against accountants who fail in their duties in this regard.
i) The founder may still retain a veto right. The important aspect is that the founder must not be seen as conferring a benefit upon himself. A veto right allows its holder to protect the status quo.

Why do trusts fail?

a) Many people do not understand the true nature of trusts, what they mean and what they were intended for. This leads to reckless administration by trustees who stand the risk of landing up in court.
b) Many trustees conduct their duties in a nonchalant manner thinking that they are not regulated at all leading to reckless, negligent or uninformed administration.
c) Many planners wish to retain control over trust assets and fall foul to the separation of ownership and control requirements required of a trust. In Parker (supra) the court found that the core element of a Trust is that there should be separation of ownership (or control) from enjoyment of the Trust assets. If a planner transfers assets to a Trust but continues to deal with those assets "as before" there can be no separation of ownership. The Trust will therefore offer little in the way of protection. The trust will be seen as the "alter ego" of the founder.
d) Business enthusiasts who form trusts do not realise that they have additional duties in terms of trust regulations.
e) Many trust deeds are not formed correctly and lack essential elements. A clearly defined trust objective is always discerning to articulate - trustees should have direction in the accomplishment of their duties otherwise they may very well act ultra vires. A failure to contain a trust objective, in an ordinary trust, however, will not render the trust invalid provided there are ascertainable beneficiaries to the trust.

It is very important to note that a trust without any beneficiary is no trust at all. Such trust ceases to exist.
f) Trustees ought to know the law. If you do not understand the true nature of a trust as being one of a contract stipulatio alteri, any amendments subsequently made thereafter will be null and void.
g) A trust is meant to offer protection of assets. Many founders place assets in trusts but defeat this object by signing personal surety. When this is done, creditors have recourse against the founder.

In Slip Knot Investments 777 (Pty) Ltd v Du Toit 2011 (4) SA 72 (SCA), the defence of iustus error was taken on appeal to a claim seeking to enforce an agreement of suretyship. The respondent although admitting that he signed the deed of suretyship, denied that he was liable and averred that he signed by mistake and without the intention to incur personal contractual liability. The Supreme Court of Appeal rejected the arguments advanced on behalf of the Respondent.
h) A founder need not divest himself so vigorously so as to exclude himself from being a beneficiary. This is not necessary.
i) The capacity defining clause in a trust deed has a very important significance. If a trust deed dictates that you must at all times have a certain number of trustees in office, any decision taken by fewer trustees will be null and void.
j) It is important to note that a trustee may delegate powers to another but he may not abdicate powers.

In Hoosen and Others NNO v Deedat 1999 (4) SA 425 (SCA) the Supreme Court of Appeal emphasised that a trustee may not purport to appoint someone else and in doing so procure his own release from the inherent responsibilities of a trustee. This case dealt with the question of whether a trustee could delegate his powers through a power of attorney to a non-trustee. The court held in this case that the powers of a trustee could not be delegated to a non-trustee where the trust deed did not specifically allow for this. The court held that a trustee who is chosen by virtue of some special quality or ability may not delegate trustee's powers, authority or duties to anyone else. In all other cases delegation is valid but the trustee does not free himself from liability or conduct of the person appointed to act for the trustee.
k) Many trustees do not know the law and do not stay abreast of changes to the law. It is advisable to consult with a trust specialist today to ensure that your trust is in good, healthy shape. An admirable reference guide to use on trusts generally is the handbook by Professor Walter Geach and Jeremy Yeats, "Trusts Law and Practice."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions