South Africa: Cost Of Capital And Impairment Testing Study: 2012


Cost of capital and impairment testing as required by global financial reporting standards, continues to be an area of great interest to executives, investors, analysts, standard setters and regulators. The beginning of the last decade saw a high growth phase across many sectors, regions and countries only to be cut short by the financial crisis, from which much of the world is still recovering. The increased cost of capital during this time saw many acquisitions and projects being deferred but eventually companies across the globe realised that despite the persistent bearish market conditions, they needed to grow and find investment opportunities for their shareholder funds. As a result, coming out of the financial crisis period in South Africa, we have noted an increase in deal volumes in recent years, but a severely declining trend in deal values. Surprisingly, despite the low deal values, many transactions are still resulting in goodwill premiums being paid.

Some of these premiums have been paid on the back of an anticipation of the end to the downturn in markets and therefore increases in demand, margins and overall profitability. In addition, premiums are also likely given that the JSE has continued to grow quite remarkably (given such a low value of deal activity), hitting record highs in 2012 and experiencing its highest growth year since 2009. Whilst this growth in the equity market is noteworthy, it also needs to be said that certain industries have not fared as well as others. For example, the mining industry has been beset by a number of critical issues which have impacted heavily on value. In addition, we have seen a number of companies in the South African market whose price to book ratios have moved below one, which raises the question of whether these assets are impaired or not.

Impairment testing forces companies to assess whether the conditions that they anticipated when they acquired the asset or made the project investment have materialised, and therefore whether any premiums paid at the time of acquisition, are still considered to be assets of the business. Whilst the average price earnings multiples on the JSE during 2012 have finally returned to pre-crisis levels, in many ways the world market as a whole, and South Africa is no exception, has not grown at anticipated levels and the impact of this is that we would expect to continue to see impairments of goodwill based on the impairment testing framework in financial reporting standards. This survey is an attempt to establish the extent to which companies are still encountering goodwill impairments, and to understand how the cost of capital is currently being calculated, with a comparison to the prior year.

Subsequent annual valuations of acquired cash generating units, or businesses, form the basis for impairment testing. Given that the area of valuations is complex and requires a considerable amount of judgement, it is important to understand how companies are interpreting the requirements of the standard and how they are practically implementing and complying with these requirements. This survey attempts to provide some insight into these processes.

I would like to thank the companies who participated in the survey for their time and interest. I would also like to extend my sincere thanks and gratitude to the team who were involved in putting the survey together.

Elizabeth Sherratt

KPMG South Africa


Transactions & Restructuring


Significance of the impairment test

More companies recognised some form of impairment during the 2011/2012 period than in the prior period. Goodwill impairments also appear to be slightly up compared to the previous period, whilst asset impairments reported by respondents were up quite significantly. Many more companies appear to have performed trigger based impairment testing compared to the previous period, perhaps linked to macroeconomic instability experienced during 2012.

Cash generating unit criteria and valuation basis

Value in use remains the most popular basis for impairment testing valuations, with few companies using fair value less costs to sell to determine their recoverable amount. Many respondents indicated that they identify the cash generating unit at the legal entity or sub group level, whilst for half of the respondents this seemed to tie in with their segment level of reporting. There was a decrease in this year's survey in the number of companies who indicated that they identified their cash generating unit at a level below the segment level.

Measurement of cash flows

Most companies use recently prepared but unadjusted group budgets for impairment testing. This appears to tie in with the choice of value in use as the basis for determination of recoverable amount as it is requires budgets from the perspective of the entity itself, as opposed to from the perspective of a hypothetical buyer.

Determination of cost of capital

The average cost of capital calculated by respondents was up slightly from the previous year at 13.5% compared to 12.3% last year, with average terminal or perpetual growth rates being forecast at around 5%. The average cost of equity reported by respondents was 14.16% compared to 13.58% last year. In line with the decrease in the prime lending rate, the average after tax cost of debt reported by respondents also decreased. A majority of companies again determined a CGU specific cost of capital and most also indicated that they apply additional premiums such as country risk and small stock premia where applicable.

Overall economic outlook

Most companies expect overall positive economic developments in 2013 and the majority of respondents expect interest rates to remain stable.

Summary of findings

Data collected

  • A total of 350 South African companies were contacted, of which 42 responded. This resulted in a response rate of 12% (previous year: 11%).
  • The highest respondents per industry were the bank sector (12.5%) and the technology sector (12.5%).

Significance of the impairment test

  • During the 2012 financial year, 63% of companies surveyed recognised some form of impairment during the year (previous year: 36%).
  • 38% of companies surveyed stated that they recognised a goodwill impairment (as opposed to some other form of impairment).
  • The percentage of companies that performed impairment tests based on triggering events increased significantly to 83% compared to the previous year (50%).
  • 75% of these companies identified triggering events in the impairment testing of both their goodwill and assets.

Cash generating unit criteria and valuation basis

  • 38% of respondents used legal entities/sub groups to identify Cash Generating Units when testing for goodwill impairment.
  • Approximately 50% of companies surveyed identified Cash Generating Units at segment level (previous year: 42%). The percentage of respondents identifying Cash Generating Units at one level below the segment level decreased to 25% compared to the previous year (46%).
  • 83% of companies surveyed identified a maximum of ten CGUs for the goodwill impairment test (previous year: 81%). For the asset impairment test, 17% of respondents identified more than 20 CGUs.
  • 71% of companies surveyed calculated the recoverable amount using the value in use approach with 13% using the fair value less costs to sell approach. 13% of respondents calculated both. Of these companies, the 67% that calculated both approaches stated that the value in use amount was higher than the fair value less costs to sell amount.

Measurement of cash flows

  • Approximately 63% of respondents utilised their unadjusted group budget for impairment testing purposes (previous year: 58%).
  • The majority of companies surveyed (79%) prepared their group budget a maximum of three months before the impairment test (previous year: 80%).
  • 42% of respondents derived the terminal value based on the last projected year of the forecast horizon without making any adjustments.

Determination of the cost of capital

  • The significant majority of respondents use the capital asset pricing model to obtain their cost of capital.
  • Overall, 54% of respondents determine a CGU specific cost of capital.

Cost of capital parameters

  • A total of 88% of companies surveyed determine the risk free rate based on national government bonds with an average life of 13 years. The average risk free rate determined was 8.16% during 2012.
  • The average market risk premium applied by South African companies was 6% in 2012 (previous year: 5.7%).
  • Over 95% of companies surveyed utilised historic betas in determining the cost of equity. Overall, 43% of respondents derived these betas from a peer group of companies.
  • The average after tax cost of debt was 6.69% compared to 8.12% in the previous year.
  • In determining the debt to equity ratio to use in the weighted average cost of capital calculation (WACC), 63% of respondents based this calculation on book values while only 37% based this on market values. The average debt to equity ratio provided by respondents was 32%.
  • The average WACC provided by the companies who participated in this survey was 13.5% (previous year: 12.3%).
  • The average terminal growth rate applied by the respondent companies was 4.5% for the value in use approach and 4.7% for the fair value less costs to sell approach.

Overall economic outlook

  • More than 70% of companies surveyed expect positive overall economic development in 2013 compared to the previous business year.
  • 62% of respondents expect interest rates to remain stable, whilst 21% expected a slight decrease.

1. About this study

1.1 Basic principles and aims of the study

The cost of capital is required for value-related corporate decisions as well as for accounting purposes, such as the IAS impairment test. The impairment test in terms of IAS 36 is a complex process described in detail in the standard with little practical guidance, which therefore raises many questions as to its implementation. The central issue which our survey has sought to address, therefore, is to determine how the IFRS rules are actually being implemented by companies in their impairment testing processes given the fact that often applications of certain areas of IAS 36 are both unclear and detailed interpretation is frequently required.

In the context of the ongoing volatility of capital markets, both the impairment test and the rules of IAS 36 have gained even more significance than in the past. This study provides insight into the different alternatives resulting from the room for interpretation provided by IAS 36. Additionally, this study also provides an understanding of the difficulties in the practical implementation of impairment testing.

We have summarised our analysis in separate sections related to four main areas:

  • Cash generating unit criteria and valuation basis;
  • Measurement of forecast cash flows for the impairment test;
  • Method of determination of the cost of capital for the impairment test; and
  • Cost of capital used and the parameters applied.

The purpose of each section is described separately at the beginning of each section. Where necessary, we have outlined the essence of the applicable IFRS rules to provide a better understanding to the reader.

The vast majority of respondents (89%) to this survey report in accordance with IFRS and the survey results were therefore based on the financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS.

This is the second survey conducted by KPMG South Africa regarding the cost of capital and impairment testing. This survey is primarily based on an equivalent study undertaken by KPMG Europe LLP conducted across Germany, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Austria and Spain for the 4 prior years (referred to forthwith as the "European survey"). We have assessed trends in our data by comparing this year's findings to the results of our previous survey. Where considered necessary, we have also drawn comparisons of our findings to the data in the latest equivalent European study.

The central issue which our survey has sought to address, therefore, is to determine how the IFRS rules are actually being implemented by companies in their impairment testing processes given the fact that often applications of certain areas of IAS 36 are both unclear and detailed interpretation is frequently required.

1.2 Data collection

This year we contacted over 350 companies and had 42 formal responses resulting in an approximate 12% response rate (previous year: 11%). The European survey had a response rate of 27.8% in 2011, 20.5% in 2010, 18.8% in 2009 and 14.9% in 2008. Of our respondents, 88% had head offices in South Africa with 12% having their head offices located abroad.

The majority of respondents (58%) were listed only on the JSE main board with 13% of respondent's being listed on the AltX. 8% of respondents were dual listed on the JSE and other international exchanges. One respondent was listed on the LSE, and four non-listed respondent companies also participated in the survey.

Information relates mainly to financial statements released in late 2011 and during the course of 2012. The majority of respondents were from the banking sector (13%) and technology sector (13%).

2. Significance of the impairment test

Against the background of macroeconomic instability and lackluster growth, the significance of impairment testing remains in the spotlight. Most companies have become more cautious about impairment since the financial crisis began in 2008/9 and the constrained growth that continues to be experienced in more recent years. These circumstances directly influence the growth prospects of acquisitions, cost of capital and the multiples used by companies in valuations, which are required to be used to determine the values of CGUs for impairment testing purposes. Companies are continually being forced to revisit their forecast assumptions.

These slow and difficult market conditions have resulted in more respondents reporting impairments this year, compared to last year. This could be attributed to higher prices having been paid for acquisitions on the back of favourable growth prospects which have not materialised due to the instability that the economy in South Africa has experienced. Approximately 38% of respondents reported goodwill impairment in 2011/2012 (previous year: 35%), with 59% of respondents reporting asset impairment (previous year: 50%). In total, 63% of respondents incurred some form of impairment in 2011/2012, being either goodwill or asset impairment, a significant increase from the previous year (36%).

Given that impairment tests are performed either due to the annual impairment or due to a triggering event, we sought to establish how much impairment testing was being performed as a result of a trigger event.

On goodwill impairment, 83% of respondents stated that the impairment test was performed due to a trigger event, whilst 75% of respondents tested assets for impairment due to triggering events. These results are significantly higher than the previous year and the international benchmark, as the European survey for 2011/12 revealed that 37% of their respondents performed an impairment test due to a triggering event, whilst 50% of respondents reported triggering events in our previous survey. The increase in triggering events could tie into the macroeconomic instability and labour unrest experienced during 2011/2012 in South Africa.

A triggering event may arise in different ways, which are specifically mentioned in IAS 36 as impairment indicators. When considering the trigger events, the majority of respondents stated that specific pre-defined events (38%) and company specific material events (37%) were considered. Approximately 17% of respondents considered events mentioned in IAS 36.

Background IFRS – When must an impairment test be performed?

  • Goodwill and intangible assets with an indefinite useful life are not subjected to scheduled amortisation but only to be amortised in the event of impairment (impairment–only approach). Goodwill, intangible assets with indefinite useful lives and intangible assets not yet available for use are to be subjected to an annual impairment test and at further intervals if evidence suggests impairment (trigger events).
  • The impairment test is intended to ensure that assets are not valued at more than their recoverable amount. To the extent that book value exceeds the recoverable amount it is necessary to recognise impairment. At every balance sheet date, all assets are to be tested for impairment in order to ascertain if there are indications that the value of these assets has declined beyond their recoverable amounts.
  • IAS 36.12-14 contains a preliminary list of indicators which, if identified, require the performance of an impairment test. Generally a distinction is made between internal indicators (the origin of which lies in the CGU and/ or the enterprise itself), and external indicators (for example: increase in market interest rates, a significant and unexpected decline in market value, significant adverse effects in the technological market, economic, or legal environment). Ultimately, an enterprise should identify the respective relevant indicators and test for impairment at regular intervals.

In total, 63% of respondents incurred some form of impairment in 2011/2012, being either goodwill or asset impairment, a significant increase from the previous year (36%).

To view the complete study, please click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.