The news that what's arguably the world's best known
company, Apple, is unable to continue selling what's arguably
the world's hottest product, IPad, under that name in China
will give IP lawyers the heebie-jeebies. Others will no doubt
experience a certain schadenfreude. If you've done a trade mark
clearance exercise, you'll know that even finding a name
that's available in South Africa can be tricky. Imagine trying
to do it worldwide, as many multinationals need to do from time to
time. All those translations, all those transliterations! And it
certainly doesn't help if you choose a rather weak and obvious
name like IPad, which is likely to be quite popular. When Apple
needs to prepare for a new launch it decides on a name and then
uses an agent (or special purpose vehicle) to buy up whatever
registrations it needs – it obviously doesn't want to go
in as Apple, with the 'Hi we're Apple, we'd like to buy
your trade mark registration, but please bear in mind we're a
tiny start-up and we really don't have much to spend on a
name' approach unlikely to succeed.
In 2006, Apple started buying up registrations for IPad,
including registrations in China, South Korea and the EU from a
Taiwanese company called Proview. The price: a mere US$35 000. But
Apple's lawyers slipped up - the Taiwanese company didn't
in fact own the Chinese registration, this was owned by
Proview's Chinese subsidiary or associated company, Proview
Shenzen. The news reports aren't nearly as well written as this
one, of course, but it seems that the sequence of events was this -
by the time Proview was asked to arrange for the transfer of the
Chinese registration, it realised that it was in fact dealing with
Apple and it raised the price significantly; up yours said Apple,
at the same time asking a Chinese court to order the transfer of
the registration and claiming that it had simply made a mistake
because it didn't read Chinese; tough luck Apple said the
court, you should do proper due diligences (remember parents, when
it comes to subject choice for your children, Mandarin's far
more useful that Pedi!). So Apple doesn't have a registration
in the only country where anyone can still afford an IPad. A
country where over 1 million of the silly things were sold in the
quarter April to June 2011. A country that accounts for 16% of
Apple's sales. And now Apple's been sued for infringement
and it has interdicts against it in two regions. With talk of
further interdicts and a damages claim of US$ 1 billion. OH ...!
(insert swear word of your choice). Happy holidays!
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
The African Regional Intellectual Property Organization's ("ARIPO's") amended Harare Protocol on Patents and Industrial Designs (the "Protocol"), came into effect on 1 January 2017 and includes some important changes.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).