South Africa: BMW And The Art Of Registered Designs

Last Updated: 10 September 2012
Article by Lodewyk Cilliers

In a recent matter heard before the Gauteng North High Court (Bayerische Motoren Werke AG v Grandmark International) BMW AG took on a spare parts manufacturer, Grandmark International, for alleged infringement of their registered designs.  The registered designs related to various parts of a motor vehicle, for example a bonnet, which BMW AG alleged were being infringed by Grandmark.  However, the court found, inter alia, that a part such as a bonnet is a purely functional article, and as such cannot be filed as an aesthetic design.  This judgment sparked debate from various corners, as it has a profound impact on original motor manufactures and replacement part manufactures alike.

A registered design is a form of intellectual property that is generally not well known, and even less clearly understood.  Essentially, the registered design is the lesser known step-brother of its more prominent siblings - patents, trademarks and copyrights – and is the mechanism by which the outward appearance of an article of manufacture is protected.  It may therefore be useful to sketch the backdrop against which the decision should be interpreted.  Keeping with the general subject matter at hand, but steering well clear of the legal jargon, an interesting departure point is to consider the cult-novel written by Robert Pirsig, "Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance".   In his book, Pirsig differentiates between two kinds of thinkers – classical thinkers and romantic thinkers.  In essence he describes how differently programmed people would perceive the same object – in this case a motorcycle.

First we have the classical thinkers.  They see a motorcycle, and they see a system of concepts worked out in steel.  To them it all boils down to a blueprint of systems, functions and processes, with the appearance of the motorcycle being but a necessary derivative of the collective functionality. This is then typically the domain of patents – the part of IP that focuses on protecting an underlying idea in its broadest form, irrespective of the specific appearance thereof.

Next Pirsig proceeds to examine the romantic thinkers.  A romantic thinker perceives the world in terms of its appearance - it is not bound by the laws of physics, but rather by aesthetic conscience.  The romantic thinker is much more concerned about the emotive reaction triggered by the motorcycle.  He would focus on the appearance, while the internal workings of the engine and the interaction of parts will remain of little concern.  Enter the registered design, and more particularly the aesthetic design – the appearance of an article insofar as it appeals to the eye, and is judged solely by the eye.

One would be inclined to conclude that the difference between patents and designs can therefore crisply be formulated – patents protect underlying concepts whereas registered designs protect appearance.  Although true, this is however an oversimplification, as with all things in life – nothing is absolute.  Sometimes an article may indeed have a particular appearance, but the appearance is necessitated by the function that the article is to perform - those rare cases where form truly and absolutely follows function.  This may, for example, be the case in the design of a gear having teeth that are designed to have a very particular profile in order to mesh with a mating gear, and to exert a force at an exact point of rotation.  The shape, and hence the appearance, is still the predominant feature, but now the shape is necessitated by the function that the gear is to perform.  This is then the territory of the functional design – a further type of registered design used to protect the design applied to an article having features that are necessitated by the function which the article is to perform.  However, this does not mean that any article that fulfills a certain function will be a functional design.  Only if the article absolutely has to look a certain way in order to perform its function will it be in the form of a functional design.  For example, every soft drink bottle has a function – to hold soft drink.  However, a myriad designs exist for bottles that all essentially fulfill the same function.  The aim of the different designs is therefore clearly to appeal to the eye, and as such the designs are protectable by way of aesthetic designs.

To complicate matters further, a specific limitation in the South African Designs Act provides that spare parts are not protectable by way of functional designs.  Therefore, if an article is in the nature of a spare part, one would not be able to file a functional design to protect the appearance of the article.  In addition, if the article includes no other aesthetic features (i.e. the appearance is necessitated solely by the function that the article is to perform), one would also not be able to file an aesthetic design.  In short – such an article will not be capable of being protected by way of a registered design.  

Returning to the case in point, BMW registered a number of aesthetic designs for replacement parts, such as bonnets, grilles and headlight assemblies based on the notion that these parts have both functional and aesthetic aspects.  It was common cause that the functional features could not be protected, but the spare part battle essentially turned on the presence, or lack thereof, of aesthetic features in a replacement part when seen on its own, and not as part of the vehicle in its entirety.  The finding of the court was that spare parts are by their nature functional, because they have only one purpose in life.  In the words of the court "Put another way, a replacement part for an E46 BMW serves only one function and that is to replace a part on that E46 BMW. It has to look the same, it has to fit the same, and it cannot look any other way".

But does it?  Obviously there are two schools of thought.  The manufacturer of the original vehicle may ask a very legitimate question - Why can a replacement part manufacturer not manufacture a bonnet that has an identical periphery to the original part, and which will therefore fit onto the vehicle, whilst having a different surface profile? Arguably there are many potential designs for various spare parts such as bumpers, grilles, and headlamp arrangements. The custom car market has shown that designs for these parts can all be modified without harming the function of the part or the function of the car as a whole – but only changing the appearance.  Whether it improves the appearance of the vehicle is of course in the eye of the beholder.  But be that as it may, practically speaking different designs can be used.  Commercially speaking it may well be suicide. Why? Because the consumer wants a spare part that looks like the "real thing" - which is as aesthetically appealing as the original part.  Many bonnets could conceivably be designed to fit the vehicle, but only the particular appearance of the original part will ensure that the aesthetic harmony remains intact.  It may therefore be suggested that through the eyes of the likely consumer, the bonnet will still have features that, in the words of the Design Act, "appeal to the eye and are judged solely by the eye", and that the court erred in its interpretation and application of the principles of registered designs. Yes – this will result in more money in the pockets of the original vehicle manufacturers, but in an increasingly competitive environment will also play an important part to ensure that the cash flow remains intact for the research and development required to continuously improve the vehicles that many of us so desire.   

The spare parts manufacturers will not sing from the same hymn sheet.  They may in turn argue that the original vehicle manufacturers should not design cars to sell car parts.  They should design car parts in order to sell cars.  They will concede that the appearance of the car is an important factor in the decision to buy the car and may even admit that it is also an important factor in the repair decision, but for a different reason.  The may argue that the original manufacturer has already made its profit on the sale of the car, but the consumer is now locked in to buying spare parts from it as well because, even if possible, your average consumer would prefer a replacement part that fits in with the remainder of the vehicle design, and which does not stick out like a sore thumb.  Understandably it may evoke negative reactions, but this is then a philosophical debate and not a question of law.

This is clearly a discussion that can turn the automotive world into an emotive warzone where vision is often obscured by the dust in the arena.  However, BMW AG has lodged an appeal to the decision, and in the end it will hopefully be up to the Appeal Court to give everybody a clear and final answer to this contentious question.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions