South Africa: Remedies In Respect Of Decisions Made Under The MPRDA: There Are No Quick Fixes

Last Updated: 3 September 2012
Article by Chris Stevens

When it comes to appealing against or reviewing administrative decisions under the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act (MPRDA), the wheels of administrative justice tend to grind slowly. However mining and exploration companies need to understand the process to achieve results.

The backlog in internal appeals under the MPRDA is growing daily and currently stands at approximately 2 000 unresolved matters. The main spoke in the wheel is the sheer volume of appeals being lodged and the lengthy, convoluted appeal process, which, unfortunately, is unavoidable.

For a party aggrieved by a decision of an official of the Department of Mineral Resources (DMR) under the MPRDA, it is not possible to sidestep, circumnavigate or accelerate the appeal process. However, it can be managed, provided that the appellant has a clear understanding of the process itself and of the appellant's rights and remedies.

Mining and exploration companies should also consider that there comes a time when it makes business sense to explore alternative avenues rather than continue with or even initiate the appeal process.

Appeals and reviews

In the past three or four years, a number of high-profile disputes around the granting or refusal of mining or prospecting rights in South Africa have been the subject of appeals and/or reviews.

A well-known example is the case in which the Bengwenyama community appealed against the grant of a prospecting right. The community argued that it had not been properly consulted over the decision to grant the prospecting rights to the mining company Genorah and that the fairness requirements of the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act had not been met. The matter eventually went all the way to the Constitutional Court, which ruled in favour of the Bengwenyama community. The matter had been initiated by an internal appeal and ended up being the subject of a High Court review, an appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) and a further appeal to the Constitutional Court.

Other recent high-profile disputes over decisions around decisions to grant mining rights or prospecting rights include Sishen Iron Ore Company versus Imperial Crown Trading, Norgold versus Rhodium Reefs, Southern Sphere versus Rhodium Reefs and BHP Billiton Energy Coal versus Finishing Touch Trading, all of which ended up in the High Court on review.

Such matters demonstrate that MPRDA administrative decisions may result in various parties becoming aggrieved, including surface owners, competing right holders, environmental groups and communities with rights of preference.

The MPRDA allows the right of appeal to any person or party who is aggrieved by, for example, a decision to accept or reject a prospecting right or mining right application or to grant or refuse a mining or prospecting right application. The MPRDA and the Regulations in force thereunder set out the process for submitting an appeal, as well as the timeframes that go with it.

No initial recourse to the courts

One of the most important points to note about the MPRDA's internal appeal process is that it is an internal administrative process managed by the Department of Mineral Resources. There is no option available for an administrative review through the courts - at least not until all the prescribed internal avenues have been exhausted.

The Supreme Court of Appeal in the Bengwenyama matter confirmed that a decision of the Deputy Director-General or the Director-General as delegatee of the Minister is not a Ministerial decision but rather a decision of the Deputy Director-General or the Director-General and thus is subject to the appeal process.

Here is a brief outline of the main steps involved in lodging an appeal against a decision under the MPRDA.

Firstly, any party wishing to appeal must do so within 30 days of gaining knowledge of the decision, or should reasonably have become aware of the decision, and such party must submit the appeal to the correct appeal authority.

If the decision concerned was made by the regional manager or another officer of the Department of Mineral Resources, the correct appeal authority is the Director-General of the Department. On the other hand, if the Director-General made the decision, the appeal must be directed to the Minister of Mineral Resources.

After receiving the appeal, the Director-General or the Minister, as the case may be, must then send copies of it to whomever in the Department made the decision, as well as to any person whose rights could be affected by the outcome of the appeal. These parties then have 21 days to respond in writing. Generally, the appeal is sent to the Regional Manager who would have recommended the grant or refusal of the right. These responses must be sent by the Director-General or the Minister, as the case may be, to the appellant to furnish a response.

Within 30 days of receiving the latter response, the Director-General or the Minister, as the case may be, must do one of the following: confirm the initial decision, set it aside, amend it, or make another decision in the place of the original one.

There are often delays in that the Regional Manager does not furnish the reasons to the Director-General timeously or the Director-General or the Minister fails to take a decision on the appeal timeously after having received all prescribed responses.

Dealing with delays

Should there be an unreasonable delay in receiving a decision on the appeal, the appellant may turn to the High Court for a mandamus – an order of court instructing the Director-General or Minister, as the case may be, to furnish a decision on to the appeal forthwith. The Bengwenyama decision held that a four month delay in furnishing a decision on an appeal is unreasonable.

Such an order may get the process moving but will not necessarily bring it to a speedy conclusion. For example, if the appeal authority dismisses the appeal on its merits after the mandamus, the next step would be to appeal to the Minister if the initial appeal was decided by the Director-General.

That, too, might take an unduly long time, in which case the appellant's recourse would be to obtain another mandamus, this time against the Minister.

The Minister might then take a decision that goes against the appellant, prompting the appellant to take the next step in the process, namely a High Court review. The outcome of that could result in an appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal and ultimately, as we have seen in numerous instances, an appeal to the Constitutional Court. If the matter is taken to the High Court on review there is a specific rule of the High Court Rules of South Africa, namely Rule 53, which sets out the process. Often a delay results from the lack of furnishing of a record of decision by the DMR and often one has to resort to obtaining a Court order directing the DMR to furnish the record, after which it is produced. Adherence to the strict time limits and the rules will help to expedite the review application, but obtaining a court date, if it is opposed, can delay the matter somewhat.

By this time, two to three years may have passed since the original appeal was lodged and ultimately the decision may go against the appellant.

Managing the process and exploring alternatives

As mentioned earlier, there is simply no sidestepping the appeal process set out in the MPRDA, but it can be managed.

The most effective way to approach an appeal is to ensure one follows the process correctly and completely, including submitting all the required documentation and directing the appeal to the correct appeal authority within the prescribed timeframe.

A very important piece of advice, however, is to be aware of an aggrieved party's right to object before a decision on a mining or prospecting right application is taken. The fact that an aggrieved party has objected upfront will more than likely strengthen the objector's case if, and when, the objector lodges an appeal. Conversely, not objecting may well be taken into account, to the detriment of an appellant, in the event of an appeal being lodged against the grant of a prospecting right or mining right.

Provision for the lodging of objections is built into the process of applying for mining or prospecting rights. Within 14 days after accepting any application for such a right, the regional manager must call on interested or affected parties to comment on the application in writing which objections have to be made within 30 days thereafter.

The regional manager is then obliged to refer any objection to the Regional Mining Development and Environmental Committee (RMDEC). This is an internal committee, one per province, which meets once a month to consider objections and advise the Minister on the grant or refusal of an application.

Another critical point to be aware of is that the lodging of an appeal under the MPRDA does not suspend the decision leading to the appeal. For instance, if one is appealing against the grant of an overlapping or competing right granted to another party, the fact that one appeals does not suspend the other party's right pending the outcome of the appeal. On the contrary, the other party may continue exercising their granted right until the MPRDA appeal process has run its course, which, as pointed out above, can take years to complete. In this event, one should, as the appellant apply to the High Court for an urgent interdict preventing the other party from exercising its right while the administrative appeal process and any subsequent review is pending, which interdict should be granted if the requirements for an interim interdict are met.

There may also be times when it is advisable to consider alternatives to litigation (which, as we have seen, often goes hand in hand with the appeal process). For example, it might be worthwhile to approach the other party for a commercial settlement as opposed to litigation. A commercial settlement could benefit both parties and obviate a long, drawn-out dispute where potentially no party wins at the end of the day. The rights which are the subject of the dispute may lapse before finalization of the dispute. The costs of running the matter through the entire process up to the Constitutional Court could run into millions of rands.

One must bear in mind furthermore that an appeal must be based on the merits of the matter. The appellant will have to demonstrate that the decision taken by the administrative authority was wrong in law or unlawful. For example, if the holder of a platinum mining right wishes to appeal against the decision to grant a chrome mining right to a third party over the same piece of land, the appeal will not necessarily be granted merely because the right was granted to the chrome right company. The appellant will have to demonstrate that in taking the decision to grant the right under section 23 of the MPRDA, the Minister erred in concluding that the chrome right company fulfilled all of the requirements of section 23(1) of the MPRDA. The appellant would have to demonstrate that one of the elements of section 23(1) was not satisfied. For example, the platinum right company may argue as appellant that the mining of chrome would not be optimal because the chrome is situated in the same ore body as the platinum and chrome cannot be mined optimally on its own.

Otherwise the appellant may wish to argue that the chrome right holder cannot mine in a healthy and safe manner thus contravening the provisions of section 23(1) of the MPRDA because of the existence of the platinum operation, or that mining for chrome in addition to the platinum will result in unacceptable pollution and degradation to the environment, This once again does not satisfy the requirements of section 23 of the MPRDA. The platinum right company could not successfully bring an appeal merely because the mining of chrome on the same property would be an irritation to the platinum right company. Similarly, if a landowner wishes to appeal against the grant of a right on his property, the landowner would have to argue that the holder, whether it be a prospecting right or mining right, did not satisfy the requirements of section 17(1) or 23(1) of the MPRDA respectively. Thus, the landowner would have to argue for example that the holder would cause unacceptable degradation to the environment or could not mine in a healthy and safe manner or does not have the financial competence to execute the work programme properly.

In the final analysis, whatever choice a company takes when faced with an unfavourable MPRDA decision, it pays to be fully informed about the appeal process, aware of one's rights and willing to consider all options at one's disposal.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions