South Africa: Competition Tribunal Fines Telkom R449 Million For Abusing Its Dominance In The Telecommunications Market

Last Updated: 13 August 2012
Article by Lee Mendelsohn, Derushka Chetty and Aidan Scallan

Most Read Contributor in South Africa, September 2018

The Competition Tribunal ("Tribunal") has today issued its decision and reasons in a much awaited judgment and imposed a penalty of R449 million on Telkom for abusing its dominance in the telecommunications market.

The penalty is levied in respect of conduct that took place between 1999 and 2004, a period during which Telkom was a monopoly provider of telecommunications services.  The Tribunal found that Telkom had refused to supply essential services to independent value added network services ("VANS") providers and induced customers of such VANS providers to not deal with them in contravention of sections 8(b) and 8(d)(i) of the Competition Act No. 89 of 1998 (as amended) (the "Competition Act").

The Competition Commission (the "Commission") referred the matter to the Tribunal on 24 February 2004 after it received a complaint from the South African VANS Association (SAVA) and 20 other Internet service providers.  Telkom challenged the referral on a number of grounds, including a challenge to the Tribunal's jurisdiction which was brought (and ultimately lost) in the High Court.  After five years of litigation, the Supreme Court of Appeal referred the matter back to the Tribunal and it was eventually heard by the Tribunal over a number of weeks beginning in October 2011 and concluding in February 2012.

In its complaint referral, the Commission alleged that Telkom had refused to supply essential access facilities to independent VANS providers, induced customers of such VANS providers to not deal with them, charged such customers excessive prices for access services and discriminated in favour of its own customers by giving its customers a discount on distance related charges which it did not advance to customers of the independent VANS providers. Through this conduct, the Commission alleged, Telkom had sought to expand its exclusivity to services over which, in law, it did not enjoy a monopoly. Moreover, through the use of these tactics, Telkom sought to bypass the regulator, which was entrusted with enforcement of the Telecommunications Act, in order to obtain for itself an even more privileged position.

The Commission therefore alleged that Telkom's non-pricing restrictive practices were in violation of sections 8(b), 8(c) and 8(d)(i) of the Competition Act and that its pricing of components and services at levels that were excessive and were discriminatory when compared to the rates at which the selfsame components and services were supplied to its own VANS customers was in violation of sections 8(a) and 9(1)(a) of the Competition Act.

Telkom did not deny that it had acted as alleged by the Commission, but it argued that it was justified in doing so because the VANS providers were engaged in illegal conduct.  Telkom argued that the VANS providers were 'trespassing' on its exclusivity rights as set out in the Telecommunications Act and read with the provisions of its erstwhile licence.

After its consideration of the matter, the Tribunal found Telkom to be in contravention of section 8(b) and 8(d)(i) of the Competition Act.

Section 8(b) of the Competition Act provides that it is prohibited for a dominant firm to refuse to give a competitor access to an essential facility when it is economically feasible to do so.  An essential facility is defined in the Competition Act as an infrastructure or resource that cannot reasonably be duplicated and without which competitors cannot reasonably provide their goods or services.

As stated above, Telkom admitted that the facilities in question comprised an essential facility.  It also admitted that it was economically feasible for it to supply these facilities.  Its only defence, therefore, was that, in its view, the VANS provided illegally services and that this justified its refusal.  The Tribunal did not accept Telkom's defence on the strength of a number of rulings by SATRA, and its successor, ICASA, which had both found Telkom's defence to be invalid. 

In addition, the Tribunal stated that "a dominant firm's requirement that a downstream competitor accede to unreasonable conditions in order to obtain supply could nevertheless still amount to a refusal to supply.  This is sometimes referred to as a constructive or effective refusal to supply, because the conditions of supply are so burdensome or were aimed to extract concessions which it would otherwise not be able, or so unreasonable as to render the purchase of the input uneconomical.

The Tribunal found that Telkom's requirements that its competitors accede to its conditions of supply that were not contained in legislation/regulation and its strategy of freezing its competitors' networks (which Telkom engaged in when its competitors did not comply with its conditions) which adversely impacted on their businesses did amount to a constructive refusal to supply and therefore a contravention of section 8(b) of the Competition Act.

The Tribunal went on to state that while it is unnecessary to show harm for the purposes of section 8(b), the effect of Telkom's conduct was "clearly adverse to both the VANS providers and their customers who relied on them for network services and ultimately the consumer who relied upon the services of these customers." 

Section 8(d)(i) of the Competition Act provides that it is prohibited for a dominant firm to require or induce a supplier or customer to not deal with a competitor unless that firm can show technological, efficiency or other pro-competitive gains which outweigh the anticompetitive effect.  Unlike section 8(b), section 8(d)(i) does require that the Commission show harm.

The conduct that was complained of was that Telkom had insisted (in respect of the leased line services provided to VANS), that the leased lines be registered in the names of the end users and that the VANS providers could only obtain these from Telkom through agency agreements.  Again, Telkom did not did not deny engaging in the aforementioned conduct but claimed that it required customers to do this in order to comply with the prohibitions on sub-letting and ceding in terms of the Telecommunications Act and its licence.

The customers of VANS providers were inconvenienced by Telkom's requirement that they contract directly with Telkom for their access lines.  Lines had to be transferred from VANS providers' names to those of the customers resulting in delay, increased costs and administration.  Telkom also approached the customers of the independent VANS to dissuade them from contracting with them on the basis that they were engaging in illegal activities, which conduct Telkom did not deny.

The Tribunal found that the inducement by Telkom was not in the form of discounts or favourable terms but a campaign to instill uncertainty in the minds of the VANS's customers about the risk to their business. 

Telkom did not raise any technological, efficiency or pro-competitive gains in respect of this conduct.  Its central defence was that the VANS were acting illegally and infringing on Telkom's exclusivity.  The Tribunal held that Telkom's conduct as described above resulted in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition in that market.  Accordingly the Tribunal found that Telkom had contravened section 8(d)(i) of the Competition Act.

The Tribunal found that the Commission had not presented sufficient evidence to prove its excessive pricing or price discrimination allegations as contemplated in sections 8(a) and 9(1) of the Competition Act respectively.

The Tribunal imposed a penalty of R449 million, which constitutes 2% of Telkom's turnover for the 2010/2011 financial year.  In calculating the penalty, the Tribunal drew on the penalty guidelines articulated by the Competition Appeal Court in an earlier case involving Southern Pipeline Contractors and by the Tribunal in the Aveng case.  The factors that were considered included, inter alia, the determination of the affected turnover in the relevant year of assessment, the duration of the contravention and a consideration of the factors that may mitigate or aggravate the quantum of the penalty.

While the percentage of Telkom's turnover fined (i.e. 2% of its turnover for the 2010/2011 financial year) appears to be low, there appear to be reasons to justify it.  The most significant of these reasons are that the conduct is historical as opposed to current, and the case is an abuse of dominance matter rather than a cartel and, accordingly, the nature of the contravention is considered to at the lower end of the scale.

The decision is, however, clearly reflective of the competition authorities' desire to monitor and prevent the leveraging by a dominant upstream competitor of its market position downstream, to the detriment of competition in that downstream market.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions