South Africa: Private Arbitration Removes Choice In The Court’s Review Test

Last Updated: 16 March 2012

Article by Imraan Mahomed and Carolyn McKechnie

Alternate dispute resolution has long been established in employment law. The Ministerial Legal Task Team which highlighted the main innovations in the present Labour Relations Act, 1995 also placed great emphasis on alternate dispute resolution. While the vast majority of employment disputes continue to be resolved by way of compulsory statutory arbitration, this form of arbitration often gives way to consensual private arbitration.

Given the seminal decision of the Constitutional Court in Lufuno Mphaphuli and Associates (Pty) Ltd v Andrews & Another 2009 (6) BCLR 527 (CC) and the earlier Supreme Court of Appeal decision in Telcordia Technologies Inc v Telkom SA Ltd 2007 (2) ALL SA 243 (SCA), which held that private arbitration awards are reviewable only on the grounds stipulated in s33 of the Arbitration Act (1965), it is to be wondered why the issue of the appropriate test of review of private arbitration awards is even being considered in the realm of employment law. The recent Labour Appeal Court decision of Volkswagen SA (Pty) Ltd v Koorts NO & Others (2011) 6 BLLR 561 (LAC) illustrates the importance of the question.

It is trite that a private arbitration award is capable of being reviewed in terms of s33 of the Act. s145 of the LRA, however, has "wider" grounds of review than those provided in s33. The LRA review test is subsumed by the constitutional test of reasonableness while the same is not the case in relation to s33. The appropriate test accordingly has serious practical implications.

Where a party draws an arbitration agreement it is, by operation of law, subject to review only on the limited grounds established in s33. As a general rule, an aggrieved party may not seek a review of the award on the grounds listed in s145 of the LRA. In addition, the Labour Court would also not have the power to determine a review on the wider grounds even in an instance where the parties provide for this in their arbitration agreement. This is trite. Harms JA for instance had in Telcordia said:

"by agreeing to arbitration the parties limit interference by courts to the ground of procedural irregularities set out in s 33(1) of the Act. By necessary implication they waive the right to rely on any further ground of review, 'common law' or otherwise. If they wish to extend the grounds, they may do so by agreement but then they have to agree on an appeal panel because they cannot by agreement impose jurisdiction on the court." [our emphasis.]

This view was reconfirmed by the SCA in Lufuno Mphaphuli and Associates (Pty) Ltd. On appeal in that case, the Constitutional Court held that the right of access to court in s34 of the Constitution did not apply where the parties had concluded a private arbitration agreement. The Labour Appeal Court adopted the same view in National Union of Mineworkers on behalf of Employees v Grogan NO & Another (2010) 3 ILJ 1618 (LAC).

In Volkswagen SA (Pty) Ltd the parties agreed that "although the proceedings are private in nature, they will be entitled to rely on the grounds of review encapsulated in section 145 of the LRA." Volkswagen was aggrieved with the award and approached the Labour Court on review on "grounds of review encapsulated in section 145 of the LRA". The review was unsuccessful and determined by the court a quo on the s33 grounds of review. Volkswagen argued that the parties intended to afford themselves the right to invoke s145 of the LRA and sought to prescribe the review standard to be adopted by the Labour Court. This argument was obviously rejected.

It was also argued by Volkswagen that the review clause was a material term of the arbitration agreement, as it would not have entered into the arbitration agreement on such terms, had it been aware that the award could only be reviewed in terms of s33. As a result, the parties' mistake was sufficiently fundamental that the contract be declared void ab initio. The LAC considered Wilson Bayly Holmes (Pty) Ltd v Maeyane & Others 1995 (4) SA 340 (T) and Van Vuuren Steel (Pty) Ltd v Smith N.O. & Another 2002 (4) SA 264 (SCA), which held that a common mistake will not affect the validity of the contract, unless the parties have agreed that the validity of the contact was conditional upon the existence of such term.

The LAC accepted that there was a common error. However, it was held that the parties had specifically chosen the private arbitration route, in order to avoid having to go to the CCMA. As a result, the contract was not void ab initio and the portion of the arbitration agreement, which imposed a s145 review obligation on the court, was severed from the remainder of the arbitration agreement.

The LAC also found that there was no justus error. The court using the officious bystander test found that the test would yield the following results:

"Clearly, the parties labored under a common error. But would the appellant (Volkswagen) not have concluded the submission to arbitration had it known of the true legal position? What would the parties have said to the officious bystander, if told that they could not instruct the Labour Court to review their matter on broader grounds than those in section 33 of the Arbitration Act? They probably would have said:

"We have a limited choice. Either we go to the CCMA and have no say as to which commissioner will be allocated to arbitrate our matter but we can review the award on wide grounds; or we can continue with arbitration, choose our arbitrator but accept the narrow grounds of review."

The probabilities are that the parties would rather wish to choose their arbitrator and the benefits of private arbitration. The parties would also probably say:

"Although we cannot prescribe to the Labour Court how it should review an award, we can validly charge the arbitrator with the injunction to hear the matter as would a CCMA commissioner. If the arbitrator fails to do so his award can be reviewed on the basis of misconduct."

They may also have said:

"We could arrange for an appeal to a panel and charge that panel with powers similar to those relating to the wide grounds of review. But if we do so the decision of that panel could be reviewed on the narrow grounds."

Volkswagen accordingly was unable to persuade the LAC that arising from the common error of the parties, the agreement was void. The LAC then went on to determine the appeal by applying the s33 grounds of review.

The ultimate lesson to be derived from Volkswagen is that when drawing an arbitration agreement, including an arbitration clause in an employment contract, the parties must ensure that their rights of appeal/review are properly safeguarded. A failure to do so will not easily be remedied by an unscrambling of the omelette in subsequent court proceedings.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions