South Africa: Spin The "Harbottle"

Last Updated: 12 July 2002
Article by Matthew Ash

Does the Cellular Calls case present new possibilities for aggrieved shareholders?

A decision of the Witwatersrand Local Division in an action brought by a certain Mr Kalinko against the directors of Cellular Calls (Pty) Ltd and a cellular telephone service provider has caused some consternation in company law circles, inasmuch as it seems to turn the well-known rule laid down in Foss v Harbottle on its head.

That rule has two essential principles:

  1. Where a wrong is done to a company (including any wrong perpetrated by the directors of the company), it is the company itself that must assert its rights of recourse against the wrongdoers, and not individual shareholders. If the company fails to do so, then in certain circumstances an individual shareholder may assert those rights.
  2. The conduct of the business of a company is based on the concept of rule by the majority - in other words the affairs of the company are decided by the wishes of the majority of shareholders. Accordingly, where the conduct is lawful and can be later ratified and made binding by a simple majority vote in general meeting of members, an individual member cannot maintain an action in respect of that conduct.

The effect of the rule is therefore that if a wrong is done to a company, it is the company itself that must act, and if the company fails to do so, then an individual shareholder in certain circumstances may institute an action on behalf of the company, but not where the conduct can be condoned or ratified by a simple majority of members.

With this in mind, we turn to consider a summary of the facts in the Cellular Calls case.

Mr Kalinko was a 51% shareholder in the company. In terms of the shareholders agreement, he was entitled to appoint, remove or replace one director on the board. He was employed as CEO of the company from inception of the company in December 1996 through to December 1998. The company had a retailer's agreement with a cellphone service provider in terms of which the company sold cellular telephones and related equipment to customers, who would use the network services provided by the service provider.

From December 1998, the defendant directors were responsible for the management of the company. Mr Kalinko contended that, at that time, the value of his 51% shareholding in the company was some R15 million.

Cellular Calls was liquidated in January 2000. Mr Kalinko proved a claim against the insolvent estate in respect of a loan of some R500 000.00 made to the company, but received no liquidation dividend inter alia by reason of prior subordination of members' loan accounts.

Mr Kalinko brought certain claims against the defendant directors and the service provider. The claim of relevance is the claim against the directors for the payment of damages in the amount of R15 million arising out of an alleged breach of their fiduciary duty to the shareholders of the company and the consequent dimunition in the value of Mr Kalinko's shares.

The wrongful conduct alleged was the failure by the directors to maintain the contract with the service provider on a proper footing (alternatively the failure to enter into a similar agreement with a new service provider once the first contract was cancelled), unlawfully raising an unauthorised claim in the books of the company in favour of the service provider for an amount of more than R12 million, the continued trading in insolvent circumstances for more than seven months prior to final liquidation, the failure to appoint "competent and able staff to manage and direct the day-to-day running of its affairs", the failure to take any or adequate stock levels for the same seven month period, operating without sufficient stock during that period, the failure to keep adequate financial records for the same period, and the failure to take any or adequate steps to ensure that a unilateral amendment of the retailer agreement by the service provider did not occur (by which the company was compelled to pay a subsidy on contract phones, thereby resulting in a liability of some R5 million to the service provider for stock on hand).

The court has not at this stage been called upon to determine the liability of the directors for the conduct complained of. What the court was required to consider was an exception raised by the directors to Mr Kalinko's claim, based on the Foss v Harbottle rule.

In summary, the directors contended that it is the company, not Mr Kalinko, that might have a claim against them (if such claim exists at all), and as such it was for the company to advance that claim. The loss allegedly suffered by Mr Kalinko "is at best merely a reflection of the loss suffered by Cellular Calls". The directors contended that they owed Mr Kalinko as shareholder no fiduciary duty and their conduct (even if proved to be unlawful) would accordingly not be unlawful vis a vis Mr Kalinko.

Counsel for the defendant directors apparently recognised the exception to the rule applied in English and American law, which allows an aggrieved minority shareholder to bring a "derivative action" against wrongdoers in control of the company, on the basis that such minority shareholders represent the company in obtaining redress, the company being otherwise unable to do so because it is controlled by the very people against whom it seeks relief. However, it was apparently argued that because Mr Kalinko was the majority shareholder, no right to a derivative action arose.

The court stated that the Foss v Harbottle rule is not absolute. Where no risk of double recovery exists and the shareholder has suffered damages through a dimunition in value to his shares, "the continued application of the rule …would amount to an unwarranted and technical obstruction to the course of justice". The court determined that whilst a shareholder may not have a direct proprietary interest in the business of a company, there is most certainly a financial interest in it.

It was argued for the directors that the exception should be upheld on the basis that the derivative action lies in the hands of a minority shareholder only, whereas the Plaintiff was a majority shareholder and was therefore in control of the company.

For the purposes of deciding the exception, the court referred to "control" as defined in the shareholders' agreement, and found there on the facts that Mr Kalinko was in a minority situation at director's level, at which level he would not have been able to control the company in his capacity as majority shareholder. The court held that the argument that Mr Kalinko could have controlled the board through the exercise of his majority rights in a Section 220 removal of directors and re-composition of the board could not prevail in the face of the subsequent liquidation of the company. The exercise of such rights would have lapsed, and it would be futile at exception stage to deny a plaintiff rights of action simply because he failed to act previously in a different manner. The court recognised that such failure might affect the quantum of his loss, but held that, at exception stage, the question was not relevant.

It is reported in the financial press that the Defendant directors will be appealing against this judgement. If that is so, then it seems that a higher court may have the last word. In the meanwhile, the position remains that, having regard to the particular facts, a court has not been prepared to allow an "unwarranted" and "technical" mechanism such as the rule in Foss v Harbottle obstruct an aggrieved shareholder from seeking damages against directors for alleged breach of their fiduciary duties traditionally owed to the company.

Mr Kalinko is not out of the woods yet. He may yet face a "double jeopardy" problem if the liquidator decides to institute a claim against the directors. It also remains for him to prove the alleged unlawful conduct on the part of the directors and the extent of his loss. The importance of this judgment is that, despite his majority shareholding in the company, Mr Kalinko has been given the opportunity to do so. The judgement must give all directors and their insurers pause for thought.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions