South Africa: The Frankie's/Woolworths Dispute: The Law Behind It

Last Updated: 23 February 2012
Article by Gaelyn Scott and Wim Alberts

Most Read Contributor in South Africa, September 2018

From time to time disputes regarding intellectual property rights catch the attention of the public. One such case is the dispute between Frankie's and Woolworths regarding certain beverages placed on the market by Woolworths. Media reports are to the effect that Frankie's approached Woolworths to market its goods, but that Woolworths, allegedly, turned the request down, and instead reproduced its own versions of the products. Frankie's proceeded to lodge a complaint with the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA).

In its ruling last week, the ASA emphasised that it considered only the use by Woolworths of "Good old fashioned", and not the copying of specific flavours, vintage flavours or labels or shapes. It relied on clause 9 of its Code which determines that an advertiser should not copy an existing advertisement in a manner that is recognisable or clearly evokes the existing concept and which may result in the likely loss of potential advertising value. The ASA rejected the idea that "old fashioned" is in general use in relation to sodas. The evidence was accepted that Woolworths imitated Frankie's advertising. The question was asked why the particular get-up was copied. It was mentioned that Woolworths could not explain how they came up with the idea of using "Old fashioned". The final conclusion was that Woolworths was involved in intentional copying.

The ruling indicates that the bar for protecting an idea is not high. An earlier case that supports the current ruling is that in the MTN case. MTN lodged a complaint with the ASA against an advertisement of Cell C showing, amongst others, a gardener who strikes oil in a vegetable patch with a small garden trowel and immediately uses her cell phone to telephone someone to tell that person of her good fortune. MTN had a series of advertisements which "exhibited a distinctive emotive theme, namely that all \strongly felt personal moments/experiences of a idiosyncratic nature, or out of the ordinary"' events should be communicated via their services. An example is a lone man on a golf course who achieves a hole in one. He looks around but there is nobody around to share the news with, and the suggestion is that he should use his cell phone to contact someone with the help of the service provided by the complainant. The MTN idea, which is of a relatively rudimentary nature having regard to the product concerned, was nevertheless held to qualify for protection in terms of clause 9. The Frankie's case is in line with this ruling.

A different ground also relied upon by Frankie's was clause 8 of the Code. In terms of clause 8, advertisements may not take advantage of the advertising goodwill relating to the trade name of another party. The application of this rule is illustrated well by the Cresta Shopping Centre case. Here it was said by the ASA that "Any mark that is made up of common words, albeit used in a unique combination, runs the risk of competitors using such words in their common meaning in such a manner to enable it to identify the competitor." Similarly, in the Discovery Health ruling, it was said that the word "discovery" is a "common word to which no one can lay [claim to] exclusive use. It is only when the word is used in a certain combination so as to evoke the identity of another party that the use of the word could become contentious." In the Frankie's case, this clause might also have been a ground of relief, and an approach different from the Cresta case might have been followed. In other words, that there was indeed goodwill attached to the concept of an old fashioned drink. The identity of Frankie's product was evoked, and the competitor was identifiable. The ASA directorate ruled on clause 9 and accordingly did not need to consider the clause 8 component of the complaint.

An interesting question is why Frankie's did not approach the High Court? An application brought to the High Court would probably have been based on the grounds of unlawful competition, and also passing-off. Unlawful competition might relate to the circumstances in which the adoption of Frankie's products were said to have taken place, as speculated in the media. Our courts have, on occasion, looked at broader "moral" issues, such as in the well-known Bress Designs case where a businessman expressed the desire to destroy a rival by copying a lounge suite. The court held that, although the copying of the products as such was legal, the motive of the one party coloured the conduct unlawful. In the Woolworths matter, it has not been alleged that they had such a motive and it is clearly not plausible, however, the principle of a "broad" perspective is illustrated. On the other hand, in the Carling decision, it was said that there must inevitably be manoeuvres, sometimes skilfully conducted, to steal a march on a competitor. However, this is permitted as it is part and parcel of our free trade policy. The Carling decision involved the pre-emption of a competitor's marketing campaign. Here a beer named Colt 45 was intended for marketing in South Africa and marketing materials were prepared, strategic studies were done, and a short trial run was conducted. About a week prior to the launching of the beer by the appellants, however, the respondent advertised its intention to market a product to be called Stallion 54. Advertisements were placed in various newspapers and the product was available at certain liquor stores. The Colt 45 product was not yet available. Applying this to the Woolworths scenario, it appears that unlawful competition could have been a difficult cause of action on which to peg relief.

With regard to passing-off, the visual impact of both products is very different. Frankie's are colourful and very distinctive whereas, in contrast, Woolworths' products are more plain, with only basic product information displayed. In addition, the name Woolworths appears, of course, on its products, thereby helping to further distinguish the products. This leaves the copying of the descriptors. The question is whether there is a likelihood of confusion arising from the use of a word suggesting an "old-style" product, combined with a descriptive word. In other words, for example, "Olde Soft Drink Co - Cinnamon Cola -The Taste of Yesteryear" versus "Good Old Fashioned-Cinnamon Cola". In relation to the parties' ginger beer products, the use of the word "fiery" by both is fairly unusual, but still has to be read in the above context of other material being used alongside it. Here, the Sea Harvest unlawful competition case might be relevant. This matter related to the use of the words "prime cut" in relation to frozen fish products. The court held that a "long line of decisions in passing-off and trade mark cases has established that where descriptive words, as opposed to invented or fancy words, are used in a trade name or trade mark, the courts will not easily find that such words have become distinctive of the business or products of the person using them, and will not give what amounts to a monopoly in such words to one trader at the expense of others." This line of thinking would have counted in favour of Woolworths.

In summary, from a broader intellectual property perspective, the matter illustrates once again the complexities of intellectual property, specifically the view relating to the difficulty of protecting an idea or concept. It is trite that copyright law does not protect ideas unless they are in a concrete format. The registration of a patent is really the only way in which an idea can be protected in terms of conventional legal rules. However, the ASA Code does protect ideas. The principle that the ASA seems to follow is that of not requiring a high degree of inventiveness in order to allow protection. The Frankie's ruling underlines this. This is in stark contrast to what might have happened in a civil matter. Rumours abound about the continued existence of the ASA. Is there an overlap with the Consumer Protection Act? It is suggested that a consumer body in a governmental structure would have been hardpressed to deliver this ruling in a relatively short period of time. One can only hope the ASA will flourish, and dispense "Good old fashioned" advertising justice!

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions