South Africa: Glasnost And Perestroika - What Does The Future Hold For Fatality Inquiries In The Mining Industry?

Last Updated: 21 November 2011
Article by Wessel Badenhorst

In the late 1980s, two Russian words came to epitomise Mikhail Gorbachev's vision to rebuild his country's economy and its relations with satellite nations and the West. Glasnost (openness or transparency) and perestroika (restructuring) soon became household words representing the arduous struggle of change facing the Soviet leader.

These words have meaning for the mining industry too.

Since the implementation of the Mine Health and Safety Act, No 29 of 1996 (MHSA) some 14 years ago, inquiries into fatal accidents on our mines have become commonplace. In recent years, responsible mining companies have insisted on legal representation during these inquiries and, if I may say so, for good reason. Consequently, health and safety representation has become a specialist and recognised field of legal practice.

The ideal of the MHSA is that the Department of Mineral Resources (DMR) should investigate and inquire into every serious accident or death. Such inquiries serve several purposes. Firstly, they are designed to uncover the reasons for the accident. Secondly, they provide the platform for both the mine and the mining industry as a whole to learn from the accident and, in so doing, to introduce measures to avoid the risk or failure that resulted in the accident. Thirdly, those persons who hold statutory responsibility for the safety of mineworkers are held accountable. This accountability may ultimately result in criminal conviction of those responsible.

As so often in life, there is a gaping chasm between the ideal and the reality. In an industry where there are, on average, 11 fatal accidents per month, one understands that the inquiry process receives its fair share of political attention. As she did last year, the minister again, in her budget speech in June, spoke of ways to "enhance the possibility of prosecutions" in the mining industry. To this ideal, the minister indicated that the DMR will soon have specialist investigation teams and legal advisors in regional departmental offices.

But does this political fascination with prosecution really help us? South Africans have struggled for and are proud of our constitution – one which holds its own with the most developed in the world. Enshrined in this is a developed criminal justice system, which has, at its foundation, the right against self-incrimination. During the investigations conducted by the DMR following a serious accident or fatality, as well as in the more formal inquiry process, the MHSA compels persons to answer all questions posed by the DMR inspectors, save where such answers may be self-incriminating.

The right against self-incrimination is meaningless if required to stand in isolation. Effective legal representation contextualises this right and gives meaning to it. This explains the insistence by most mining companies of legal representation at fatality inquiries. All good and well then?

Not quite. Firstly, legal representation at inquiries is not absolute and, secondly, is insisting on legal representation only at the inquiry stage not leaving it too late? In the Free State DMR June 2011 newsletter, the DMR has, for the first time since the advent of the MHSA, publicly taken the view that lawyers do not have an automatic right to represent clients at fatal inquiries. You see, these inquiries are not courts of law, and in the murky world of trying to draw distinctions between quasi-judicial and pure administrative action, one cannot really argue for an automatic right to representation by your lawyer of choice.

Although the MHSA grants persons the right to be represented, it does not expressly elevate this right to legal representation. The highest courts in South Africa have pronounced that in similar situations, like disciplinary inquiries convened by universities, or in arbitration proceedings before the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA), there is no automatic right to legal representation.

Indeed, it seems the DMR has adopted similar arguments to those which were made by the CCMA when it successfully argued against the automatic right to legal representation. It follows that, should it become DMR policy not to automatically allow legal representation at mining inquiries, we soon will see investigating officers requiring lawyers to justify their presence. Although there are several "in principle" arguments that can be made for legal representation, such as the effective application of the right against self-incrimination and that an inquiry record may be used against a person in subsequent criminal proceedings, the hiatus of an unchallenged right to legal representation may soon come to an end.

This holds certain implications for mining companies. In making a case to be legally represented, one will have to go further than the "in principle" arguments. The complexity of the matter, the importance of the particular investigation and the ability of persons to properly participate in the inquiry may all have to form part of a substantive argument to allow legal representation at the commencement of the inquiry. And if legal representation is disallowed, the investigating officer will have the right to proceed with the inquiry, which will require the mines to deal with several possible outcomes instantly.

The first phase of the investigation process often results in a preliminary investigation report issued by the DMR. This first phase starts with the in loco inspection attended by the DMR and includes the presentation made by senior mine executives to the principal inspector to uplift any section 54 stoppage order, which are these days invariably issued after fatal accidents. The presentation is not privileged and may be relied upon by the DMR in its investigation.

Ill-considered statements made to the DMR may come to haunt executives. In this first leg of the process, interviews take place and statements are collated before the report is issued. If legal representation is not insisted on during this phase of the process (where the right against self-incrimination is the same as during the inquiry phase), why insist on legal representation in the subsequent inquiry phase only? Such belated requests for legal representation attract the risk of a counter-argument that the DMR already obtained answers to incriminating questions during the investigation and, even worse, that the right to legal representation during the DMR investigation may have been waived.

Do not fall victim to procrastination. It is a luxury which will soon pass. It is best to have legal representation from the onset of the investigation process and not only during selected parts thereof. Onthe- ground legal representation at short notice may soon become an operational requirement of mining in South Africa. It would seem the minister has begun to ready the DMR for this by identifying the need to station legal advisors in DMR regional offices.

The primary focus of any forensic investigation into an accident must be to find out what happened and how it can be avoided. "Who is to blame" must play second fiddle.

Put differently, focusing on the former of these ideals does not mean that we need the threat of criminality to incentivise proper investigations and implementation of remedial action.

The mining industry has embraced the ideal of zero harm. Unsafe mining and accidents, without fail, punish the mining industry and the individual mines. With an average cost of about R4m per day, the financial punishment of section 54 stoppage orders far outstrips the value of any administrative fine which can be imposed, or fine imposed by a criminal court.

Serious accidents and fatalities cost the mines irrecoverable financial harm, and the careers of those who cause this will inevitably be transient. This, in itself, brings a real economic incentive to ensure that health and safety are continually improved. It is the proverbial carrot which, in real terms, outperforms the stick of criminal sanction.

With all of this, it becomes plain that the obsession with criminal prosecution and the insistence on maintaining criminality as a primary tool to discourage errant behavior at mines eclipse the primary ideals of the process. How can there be an open and transparent investigation when the smell of criminal sanction hangs acidly in the air?

Perhaps it is opportune, when reassessing the MHSA, to reconsider the wisdom of hunting for illusive criminal convictions. It may (regrettably) require the relinquishing of an opportunistic political platform, so often unfairly used in the aftermath of accidents, but an unwavering emphasis on and commitment to the primary goals of the MHSA will be more salutary.

In a spirit of glasnost and perestroika, should we not candidly admit that the only meaningful goals can be to uncover the facts and to so enhance best practices in pursuit of the saintly ideal of continuous improvement to health and safety?

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions