South Africa: Healthcare Sans Frontiers?

Last Updated: 6 September 2011
Article by Neil Kirby

The policy on national health insurance was recently published for public comment. Unfortunately it lacks particularity, which makes it difficult to provide meaningful feedback.

On 12 August 2011, the policy on national health insurance (NHI) was published in the Government Gazette. In accordance with this Government Gazette, the public enjoys two months from 12 August 2011 to comment on the policy. Certainly, the process sounds equitable. However, in light of the policy's lack of particularity, it is difficult to make precise comments at this juncture.

The policy opens with a number of statements including that the national health insurance scheme or NHIS, "is intended to ensure that all South African citizens and legal residents will benefit from healthcare financing on an equitable and sustainable basis".

The point of the NHIS is apparently to provide coverage for the whole population and minimise financial burdens carried by individuals for the purposes of purchasing healthcare insurance and thus in accessing healthcare services. In this regard, the problem statement on page 5 of the policy sets out what, in accordance with the policy, is wrong with South African health services. The problems with the healthcare service in South Africa then reach their crescendo in paragraph 15 of the policy where the statement is made that "[t]he high costs [of healthcare] are linked to high service tariffs, provider-induced utilisation of services and the continued over-servicing of patients on a fee-for-service basis. Evidently, the private healthcare sector will not be sustainable over the medium to long term".

The difficulty with this statement is that it remains unsupported with any particular and empirical evidence in the policy. Stakeholders are required, to a large degree, to accept at face value the statements contained in the policy especially in relation to both the problems with South African healthcare and the solutions that are proposed.

The issue of quality of healthcare is fleetingly dealt with in section 2.2 of the policy. The quality of healthcare services is dealt with in the context of the quality of healthcare services at public facilities. Very little attention is given to the issue of quality of healthcare at public facilities. A passing statement about quality of public health establishments is made that "[t]his type of arrangement is not suitable for the country's level of development".

The steps to be taken to address the issues concerning the quality of services rendered by public facilities are central to the success or failure of a public healthcare system in South Africa. Arguably, due to the nature, scope, ambit and overall poor quality of services at public facilities and the consequent fear of this system, the Department of Health is facing a great deal of resistance to the introduction of the NHIS.

The debate may very well be different if public facilities provided good quality and effective healthcare. This appears to be the irony in the current debate about the suitability of NHIS for South Africa.

A great deal of attention is also paid to the provision of private healthcare services and the costs that are incurred by the average person as a result of the provision of these services. Once again, the policy document reads as a statement of facts - based on evidence of an empirical nature. Care should be taken before accepting what it is that the policy is expressing in relation to both fact and opinion.

The objectives of a NHIS for South Africa are set out expressly in paragraph 55 of the policy. Once the objectives are understood, what emerges is that the NHIS consists of, or is to be constructed as, a large medical scheme. Most people who are familiar with private healthcare funding, understand the workings of a medical scheme and therefore a NHIS should not be unfamiliar.

In terms of current legislation governing medical schemes, medical schemes are not entitled to discriminate amongst applicants and members alike on the basis of grounds such as health status or sex. This is an important feature of current medical schemes legislation in South Africa.

The policy is not clear on whether or not such a similar regime will be applicable to the NHIS especially in relation to the:

  • calculation of contributions or premiums;
  • the particular basket of benefits to which people will be entitled; and
  • co-payments that may be required from time to time, in order to access the benefits available from the NHIS.

Certainly, pooling risks and funds "so that equity and social solidarity will be achieved through the creation of a single fund" is laudable. But in the context of the particular problems with which South African healthcare services are faced, and that are dealt with as part of the description of the burden of disease in the policy document, the pooling of funds must take place on the basis that either:

  • the younger and the healthier will contribute more relative to their utilisation of the NHIS that they enjoy; or
  • individuals who potentially pose a greater threat to the NHIS through increased utilisation as a result of their healthcare condition, may be required to pay extra in relation to the utilisation and accessing of required health services.

The objectives of the NHIS are stated as such:

"(a) To provide improved access to quality health services for all South Africans irrespective of whether they are employed or not.

(b) To pool risks and funds that equity and social solidarity will be achieved to through the creation of a single fund.

(c) To procure services on behalf of the entire population that efficiently mobilise and control key financial resources. This will obviate the weak purchasing power that has been demonstrated to have been a major limitation of some of the medical schemes resulting in spiralling costs due to strengthen the under-resource and strain public sector so as to improve the health system's performance".

Fundamentally, the process that is envisaged divides the country into district health services. These services will be responsible for identifying healthcare needs in order to establish the required services in each district.

Healthcare providers will then be accredited, through a separate office, which falls under the Department of Health, to provide services to members of the NHIS. The services will be purchased by district health authorities. This means that members of the NHIS will not be required to make payment (other than the co-payment referred to in the policy) for the provision of healthcare services.

This is an important qualification in so far as the promise of universal care is not universal as much as it is qualified by both the particular benefits that will be available and the services that are to be provided in terms of the NHIS.

A further aspect of the policy document that requires attention is the precise scope and ambit and contents of the "defined comprehensive primary care package" that is referred to in paragraph 66.

Certainly, the aspirational or notional ideal of a NHIS is laudable and there is no difficulty with accepting its place in South African society. However, aspirational or notional ideals are not those that should be necessarily driving the debate for the purposes of establishing a NHIS. In any event, the debate has probably progressed beyond such notional and aspirational ideals. In accepting the NHIS as a reality, the benefits of NHI must be made plain and clear.

Conspicuous by its absence in the policy document is the particular benefits to which South Africans will be entitled once they join or are included in the NHIS; bearing mind that it is not possible for anyone to be excluded from the NHIS.

In this regard, paragraph 137 of the policy states expressly that "[m]embership to the national health insurance will be mandatory for all South Africans." In paragraph 138, the policy states that "... no South African and legal permanent resident can opt-out of contributing to national health insurance even if they retain their medical scheme membership".

Therefore while membership of the NHIS is compulsory, it is not apparent what it is that this membership will entitle its members to receive. This is a major failing of the policy which must be addressed in order for it to achieve any of the goals and objectives that are set for a NHIS.

While the principle funding mechanisms for NHI are also vague in relation to the people who will pay for NHIS or even how payment will be made, especially in light of the socio-economic diversity in South Africa, one must not ignore the fact that co-payments may be levied as part of the NHIS process.

Therefore, the ideal of universal coverage providing all South Africans access to primary healthcare benefits or some sort of defined primary healthcare package on the basis that no cost will be levied on the patient when the healthcare service is delivered, is not borne out by the policy.

In this regard, paragraph 116 sets out carefully the grounds in respect of which co-payments will be required by persons accessing services in terms of the NHIS. In addition, the particular circumstances in respect of which a co-payment may be levied are not exhaustively stated in the policy document.

Those circumstances in respect of which a co-payment may be levied, as currently stated, are as follows:

"(a) Services rendered not in accordance with the national health insurance treatment protocols and guidelines.

(b) Healthcare benefits that are not covered under the national health insurance benefit package (e.g. originator drugs or expensive spectacle frames).

(c) Non-adherence to the appropriately defined referral system.

(d) Services that are rendered by providers that are not accredited and contracted by national health insurance.

(e) Health services utilised by non-insured persons (such as tourists)".

The costs of NHIS are seemingly dealt with in section 15 of the policy. However, they remain vague in relation to assumptions concerning real growth in gross domestic product, which is fundamentally a projection based only on assumptions by the National Treasury. The policy is silent on whether or not changes to NHIS will be required in relation to the growth figures not being achieved over the periods referred to in particularly paragraph 125.

Whilst paragraph 126 states that "[t]he intention is that the national health insurance benefits, to which all South Africans will be entitled, will be of sufficient range and quality that South Africans have a real choice as to whether to continue medical scheme membership or simply draw on their national health insurance entitlements", belies the clarity of the particular benefits to be provided by NHIS.

This is especially true for persons who rely heavily on current medical scheme benefits, whether by way of a medical scheme policy or a short-term insurance policy, and ignores the degree to which the disease identified in the policy have ravaged, and will continue to ravage the South African population.

A timetable is set out in paragraph 159 for the purposes of implementing the NHIS. Certain changes to law will be required in order to introduce such animals as the National Health Insurance Fund, the Office of Health Standards Compliance, and the policies and principles upon which a NHIS will rest. An intensive legal process is therefore to follow commencing from the last quarter of 2011 and continuing in earnest in January 2012.

Notwithstanding a strong desire to participate in the debate concerning the NHIS, the particulars that are required to facilitate reasonable and rationale debate remain absent from the documents published by the Department of Health.

In this regard, the:

  • constituents of the primary benefit package must be clarified;
  • a precise plan for purposes of upgrading public health facilities is required;
  • criteria for the accreditation of healthcare providers, both in the public and private sectors, must be clarified;
  • costs must be confirmed; and
  • nature of the exclusions of healthcare benefits must be stated.

Certainly, constitutional concerns remain especially those relating to the rights currently enjoyed by every South African to freedom of association. This is in addition to other rights in terms of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, to equality, dignity, life, housing and food security, administrative justice and information. In this regard, the following statement was made by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida, Pensacola, in dealing with the healthcare reforms planned by the Obama Administration:

"The existing problems in our national health care system are recognized by everyone in this case. There is widespread sentiment for positive improvements that will reduce costs, improve quality of care, and expand availability in a way that the nation can afford. This is obviously a very difficult task. Regardless of how laudable attempts may have been to accomplish these goals in passing the Act, Congress must operate within the bounds established by the Constitution, Again, this case it not about whether the Act is wise or unwise legislation. It is about the Constitutional role of government". (At page 75 of the judgement, State of Florida et al v United States Department of Health and Human Services et al Case No.: 3:10-cv-91-RV/EMT.)

One accepts that the current policy document is the Green Paper to which the Minister of Health refers in a media statement dated 11 August 2011. However, the difficulty, remains that NHIS is an emotional debate and information should be forthcoming sooner rather than later to make the process of establishing a NHIS meaningful.

While there may be a great deal of scepticism about the ability of a NHIS to solve South Africa's healthcare woes, the constitutionality of such a system will have to be tested. The introduction of major public policies and shifts in fundamental socio economic programming, such as the introduction of a NHIS, require that such social programming be consistent with the Constitution, which governs our land.

Without such consistency, a NHIS will find itself caught in the brambles of legal debate and may be forced to submit to constitutional design rather than a design welding social solidarity, universal coverage and socialist health economics.

The fundamental reality of a NHIS is that no one is opposed, in principle, to universal coverage in respect of healthcare services for all South Africans. However, the enforcement of one single policy, driven by exclusionary rhetoric and absenting proper debate is of concern. This is especially so in relation to the facts that accessing healthcare services is an emotional issue.

Healthcare choices are ultimately made by the individual being able to select the course of action most appropriate for him or her. Certainly, there is nothing in the current policy that militates for changing such social freedoms.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Werksmans Incorporated
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Werksmans Incorporated
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions