South Africa: Taxing South African Residents

Last Updated: 28 July 2011
Article by Ernest Mazansky

Originally published June 2011

A recent decision of the Cape Town Tax Court highlights uncertainty surrounding the application of the double tax agreement between South Africa and Luxembourg in relation to South Africa's so-called exit charge.

In terms of this rule a South African resident, on ceasing residence, is deemed to dispose of, with certain exceptions, the resident's worldwide assets at market value, thereby triggering a capital gain. The exceptions apply, first, to immovable property in South Africa (because, contrary to the general principle that non-residents are not liable for capital gains tax (CGT) on assets located in South Africa, non-residents are liable for CGT on disposals of immovable property); and, secondly, to assets attributable to a non-resident's permanent establishment in South Africa (because such an asset is subject to CGT in the hands of the non-resident on disposal). Under the exit charge rules, the resident is deemed to have disposed of the asset at market value on the day immediately preceding the cessation of residence, no doubt in order to avoid the argument that otherwise there would be no liability for CGT, i.e. the deemed disposal occurs while the person is still a resident1.

The facts, briefly, were as follows: The taxpayer was an investment holding company, incorporated in South Africa and listed on the JSE. Its sole asset comprised a 100% interest in another company2, which, in turn, owned 100% of a Guernsey company, which itself owned 65% of a UK based company. In July 2002 the taxpayer's board of directors met in Luxembourg and resolved that all future meetings would be held in that country. Notwithstanding that one of its executive directors remained in South Africa to perform certain functions on behalf of the taxpayer, it appears to have been common cause that the taxpayer transferred its residence to Luxembourg3. Thus the company was resident both in South Africa and Luxembourg – the former by reason of incorporation and the latter by reason of management. Nothing is stated in the judgment that the tie-breaker article in the South Africa / Luxembourg double tax agreement4 rendered the company to be a resident of Luxembourg, but this seems to be implied by the fact that it appears to be common cause that the company was resident in Luxembourg under the treaty.

The executive director then left South Africa at the end of January 2003, at which time the permanent establishment ceased. With effect from 26 February 2003 an amendment to the definition of "resident" in section 1 of the Income Tax Act, became effective, and that amendment states that a person, otherwise meeting the tests of residence, will not be a resident if that person is deemed exclusively to be a resident of another country for the purposes of the application of any double tax agreement. Thus notwithstanding the fact that the company remained a resident by reason of incorporation up until that date, the court acknowledged that this status changed with effect from the date the amendment took effect5.

The SARS applied the so-called exit charge and taxed the company. It is evident from the judgment that various arguments were raised by counsel for both the taxpayer and the SARS, but the court refrained from dealing with the various concepts, each of which, in the words of the judgment, "bristles with difficulties of interpretation, as became apparent during the hearing before this court"6. The court, instead, chose not to deal with any of these issues and instead found in favour of the taxpayer based on article 13(4) of the double tax agreement, which, in effect, grants sole rights to Luxembourg to tax any capital gain arising on the alienation of any property in South Africa (other than certain enumerated types of property which are not relevant here).

Counsel for the SARS argued that article 13 refers to the alienation of property, and here there was no such alienation – merely a deemed disposal. The court did not accept this argument, given that the South African legislation stated that, upon cessation of residence, the person, "will be treated for the purposes of [the legislation] as having disposed of an asset". The court could not see any reason why a deemed disposal of property should not be treated as an alienation of property for the purposes of the double tax agreement, and the judge agreed with the taxpayer's counsel, who argued that it would be absurd if a taxpayer were to be protected in terms of the article from liability for tax resulting from a gain arising from an actual alienation of property, but not a deemed alienation.

Counsel for the SARS counsel argued that if the taxpayer was correct, it would mean that the deemed disposal would never apply if a party were to migrate to a country with whom South Africa has concluded a double tax agreement. The judge's response was that the same might be said in respect of an actual disposal, but this is not a reason for concluding that the article in the agreement would not apply.

It is clear that a number of questions remain unanswered (or, at any rate, not dealt with by the court). For example, if it was common cause that the taxpayer gave up residence in July 2002, what prevented the exit charge from being triggered given that the deemed disposal is deemed to occur on the day before? Was the reason because an executive director remained in South Africa to tie things up before he, too, departed seven months later, and thus the asset was attributable to a permanent establishment in South Africa and therefore exempt from the exit charge? Was the executive director's presence in South Africa sufficient to create a permanent establishment in the circumstances? And, if it was, were the shares in the subsidiary attributable to the permanent establishment (given that the taxpayer was a pure investment-holding company whose sole asset comprised shares in another company, it is difficult to envisage how there could be a permanent establishment or that the shares are attributable thereto – after all, one would expect that all of the management functions would be exercised by the board of directors in circumstances such as this; and one would ask what business could be carried on7; and if there was an office, were the functions not auxiliary8)? If there was permanent establishment to which the shares were attributable, was the termination of that permanent establishment considered in the light of the exit charge? If there was indeed a permanent establishment, and the shares were indeed attributable thereto, and the deemed disposal took place the day before the termination of the permanent establishment, why would the gain not be taxable in South Africa? After all, article 13(2) of the treaty does permit South Africa to tax a gain from the alienation of movable property forming part of the business property of a permanent establishment in South Africa9. What relevance did the amendment to the definition of "resident" with effect from 26 February 2003 have on the matter? After all, would not the company in any event be deemed to have been exclusively a resident of Luxembourg under the double tax agreement?10

It is regrettable that the court, with respect, went no further than to raise various legal issues without analysing them, and, instead, fell back on what appears to be an easy option, even though its own finding "bristles" with uncertainties.

It will therefore come as no surprise that the SARS has noted an appeal.


1. None of these aspects appears in the judgment itself, and are set out as background information. No doubt these issues were canvassed during the course of the hearing and argument, but this article is based purely upon a reading of the judgment.

2. Which, it is assumed, was not a South African-resident company.

3. The test for residence of a South African company is either that it is incorporated in South Africa or it has its place of effective management here. The continued presence of the executive director in Johannesburg, does not, from the judgment, seem to have caused the SARS to contend that effective management remained in South Africa.

4.See article 4(3).

5 One would have thought that this was the situation in any event by reason of the application of the double tax agreement, and that this status arose in July 2002 and not only in 26 February 2003, but the court refrained from dealing with these issues.

6 The court hearing took place over four days in October 2010.

7 Which is a requirement for a permanent establishment.

8 Which results in there being deemed to be no permanent establishment.

9 And if the court has concluded that a deemed alienation must be treated the same way as an actual alienation in finding for the taxpayer, then the taxpayer cannot complain when the same logic is used here.

10 I should not be construed, by these questions, as having formed the view that the SARS ought to have succeeded. It is just that there are so many factual and legal questions that have not been dealt with in the judgment.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions