South Africa: Efficiency And The Maize Industry

Last Updated: 13 July 2011
Article by Neil MacKenzie

The problems facing the South African maize industry illustrate the difficulties in balancing economic efficiency with the development objectives of the Competition Act.

Reconciling the many goals of the South African Competition Act presents a significant challenge. The Act prohibits restrictive collaborative and unilateral conduct by firms that yields market outcomes deemed 'inefficient' when measured against consumer, producer and total welfare standards. However, it also seeks to remedy endemic inequality by explicitly promoting a range of social objectives, including employment and the participation of historically disadvantaged people in the economy.

This can create an inherent conflict – achieving the 'development' goals contained in the Act may necessitate sacrificing efficient market outcomes. The complex dilemma facing South Africa's maize industry provides a lens through which this overarching problem may be illustrated.

South Africa has an oversupply of maize at present. Maize consumers pay low prices while bankruptcy threatens many farmers. Silos are full and poor export infrastructure, together with the strong currency, limits the volume of maize that can be sold into the international market. Many producers have been forced to exit the market and financial institutions are also alleged to be refusing to grant financing for upcoming production seasons, as a result of the surplus.

Proposed solutions

In attempting to solve the industry's difficulties, Grain SA, an industry association of maize producers in South Africa, recently applied to the Competition Commission for exemption from application of Chapter 2 of the Competition Act . It sought permission to establish an 'export pool' through which the producers could collectively set prices for the sale of maize into international markets and allocate export markets amongst themselves.

The intended effect would have been to increase the volume of maize exported and to achieve higher prices in international markets. This in turn would have reduced the excess volumes in the South African market and thereby increased prices which could be achieved domestically.

The Commission refused to grant exemption on the basis that:

  • It was not clear that the pooling arrangement would in fact have increased the volume of maize exported from South Africa.
  • The arrangement would have resulted in (artificially) increased food prices, increased the risk to food security and reduced the incentives of maize producers to innovate. There was insufficient evidence of how the exemption would yield benefits which would outweigh the proposed restriction in competition.
  • A number of alternatives, such as crop substitution, converting maize to bio-diesel, producing value added products, hedging on futures markets, storage for future use and the entry into the market of specialised export traders.

In short, the Commission's approach was to allow the market to dictate the acceptable levels of supply, demand and price. While there is an oversupply of maize domestically, consumers should benefit from lower prices. Producers should benefit in future periods of increased demand and reduced supply.

Another solution advocated by maize farmers is to collaboratively restrict output by planting 15% less maize in 2011. This would ensure that stockpiles currently in the system are sold and that future production matches expected demand. However, once again, artificially high prices would be achieved at the expense of consumers.

In practice, the proposed concerted output restriction by maize farmers may be found to contravene the Act's per se prohibition of indirect price fixing. If this were the case, then efficiency considerations would not be relevant in seeking to justify the behaviour. Nevertheless, this example provides a useful illustration of the broad problem of reconciling the Act's divergent goals.

Problems with the per se provisions of the Act and the narrow breadth of section 10 which deals with exemptions have been extensively written about and are not covered in this article.

Problems with 'efficiency'

Neither of these proposed solutions are likely to align with the conventional standard of (static or dynamic) efficiency. Economic theory would hold that less efficient farmers should exit the market, survived by those who realise the scale economies necessary to stay viable in the long term. The market mechanism's invisible hand would determine the most efficient price and output levels.

Although this approach is intuitively (and politically) appealing, the reality in this case is that efficiency and mechanisation are inexorably linked. The minority of farmers, who achieve the scale economies necessary for long term survival, run highly capital-intensive operations with relatively low labour absorption rates per unit of maize produced. Allowing the market mechanism to deal with the oversupply may result in job losses and the bankruptcy of a number of firms.

The victims of the prioritisation of efficiency would be farm labourers and smaller scale, predominantly black farmers – an undesirable and, it is submitted, inefficient outcome when considered in the South African context.

In refusing Grain SA's exemption application, the Commission prioritised the interests of consumers over those of producers, and appears to have prioritised welfare-based efficiency considerations over the developmental and public interest objectives set out in the Act.

Realigning efficiency

The Act envisages that an efficient competitive environment can balance the interests of workers, owners and consumers and achieve development objectives. As the preamble provides, the Act was promulgated in order to "provide all South Africans equal opportunity to participate fairly in the national economy; [and] achieve a more effective and efficient economy...". These two ideals should not be mutually exclusive.

A solution to the apparent conflict between the efficiency and development goals may reside in reconceptualising the conventional 'efficiency' benchmark. As le Roux suggests, a normative interpretation of efficiency should be adopted which incorporates the stated purposes of the Competition Act. Redistribution and employment creation should be valued as efficient outcomes in themselves. The Act invites this integrated approach by requiring that its terms be interpreted in manner that gives effect to its stated purposes.

Ideally, this should be in conjunction with broadening the limited grounds on which an exemption may be granted under section 10 of the Act, and softening the per se approach to certain contraventions of the Act. By incorporating an integrated notion of efficiency into these sections, a more balanced assessment of market behaviour may be conducted and more desirable outcomes achieved.

Unfortunately, the suggested development of the concept of efficiency would come at the cost of some degree of legal certainty. Although the traditional welfare-based version of efficiency may stymie achievement of the Act's public interest goals, it is measurable. This makes it easier to assess, and in turn provides firms with predictable precedents on which their behaviour can be based.

However, the Act's stated objectives appear to allow (and arguably mandate) incorporation of broader social goals into the Commission's assessment of, for example, exemption applications. It is submitted that to cater for any uncertainty that may be created, publication of guidelines and other policy documents by the Commission would be helpful.

As illustrated by the dilemma facing the maize industry, a holistic and uniquely South African account of 'efficiency' could reposition the yardstick which guides the authorities' assessment of competition enquiries. This may help to broaden access to the economy and enable the diverse aims of South Africa's competition policy to be realised.

In the meantime, South Africa's maize producers face significant challenges. The industry's performance in 2011 should provide some insight as to whether the Commission's assessment of Grain SA's exemption application was correct.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.