South Africa: Efficiency And The Maize Industry

Last Updated: 13 July 2011
Article by Neil MacKenzie

The problems facing the South African maize industry illustrate the difficulties in balancing economic efficiency with the development objectives of the Competition Act.

Reconciling the many goals of the South African Competition Act presents a significant challenge. The Act prohibits restrictive collaborative and unilateral conduct by firms that yields market outcomes deemed 'inefficient' when measured against consumer, producer and total welfare standards. However, it also seeks to remedy endemic inequality by explicitly promoting a range of social objectives, including employment and the participation of historically disadvantaged people in the economy.

This can create an inherent conflict – achieving the 'development' goals contained in the Act may necessitate sacrificing efficient market outcomes. The complex dilemma facing South Africa's maize industry provides a lens through which this overarching problem may be illustrated.

South Africa has an oversupply of maize at present. Maize consumers pay low prices while bankruptcy threatens many farmers. Silos are full and poor export infrastructure, together with the strong currency, limits the volume of maize that can be sold into the international market. Many producers have been forced to exit the market and financial institutions are also alleged to be refusing to grant financing for upcoming production seasons, as a result of the surplus.

Proposed solutions

In attempting to solve the industry's difficulties, Grain SA, an industry association of maize producers in South Africa, recently applied to the Competition Commission for exemption from application of Chapter 2 of the Competition Act . It sought permission to establish an 'export pool' through which the producers could collectively set prices for the sale of maize into international markets and allocate export markets amongst themselves.

The intended effect would have been to increase the volume of maize exported and to achieve higher prices in international markets. This in turn would have reduced the excess volumes in the South African market and thereby increased prices which could be achieved domestically.

The Commission refused to grant exemption on the basis that:

  • It was not clear that the pooling arrangement would in fact have increased the volume of maize exported from South Africa.
  • The arrangement would have resulted in (artificially) increased food prices, increased the risk to food security and reduced the incentives of maize producers to innovate. There was insufficient evidence of how the exemption would yield benefits which would outweigh the proposed restriction in competition.
  • A number of alternatives, such as crop substitution, converting maize to bio-diesel, producing value added products, hedging on futures markets, storage for future use and the entry into the market of specialised export traders.

In short, the Commission's approach was to allow the market to dictate the acceptable levels of supply, demand and price. While there is an oversupply of maize domestically, consumers should benefit from lower prices. Producers should benefit in future periods of increased demand and reduced supply.

Another solution advocated by maize farmers is to collaboratively restrict output by planting 15% less maize in 2011. This would ensure that stockpiles currently in the system are sold and that future production matches expected demand. However, once again, artificially high prices would be achieved at the expense of consumers.

In practice, the proposed concerted output restriction by maize farmers may be found to contravene the Act's per se prohibition of indirect price fixing. If this were the case, then efficiency considerations would not be relevant in seeking to justify the behaviour. Nevertheless, this example provides a useful illustration of the broad problem of reconciling the Act's divergent goals.

Problems with the per se provisions of the Act and the narrow breadth of section 10 which deals with exemptions have been extensively written about and are not covered in this article.

Problems with 'efficiency'

Neither of these proposed solutions are likely to align with the conventional standard of (static or dynamic) efficiency. Economic theory would hold that less efficient farmers should exit the market, survived by those who realise the scale economies necessary to stay viable in the long term. The market mechanism's invisible hand would determine the most efficient price and output levels.

Although this approach is intuitively (and politically) appealing, the reality in this case is that efficiency and mechanisation are inexorably linked. The minority of farmers, who achieve the scale economies necessary for long term survival, run highly capital-intensive operations with relatively low labour absorption rates per unit of maize produced. Allowing the market mechanism to deal with the oversupply may result in job losses and the bankruptcy of a number of firms.

The victims of the prioritisation of efficiency would be farm labourers and smaller scale, predominantly black farmers – an undesirable and, it is submitted, inefficient outcome when considered in the South African context.

In refusing Grain SA's exemption application, the Commission prioritised the interests of consumers over those of producers, and appears to have prioritised welfare-based efficiency considerations over the developmental and public interest objectives set out in the Act.

Realigning efficiency

The Act envisages that an efficient competitive environment can balance the interests of workers, owners and consumers and achieve development objectives. As the preamble provides, the Act was promulgated in order to "provide all South Africans equal opportunity to participate fairly in the national economy; [and] achieve a more effective and efficient economy...". These two ideals should not be mutually exclusive.

A solution to the apparent conflict between the efficiency and development goals may reside in reconceptualising the conventional 'efficiency' benchmark. As le Roux suggests, a normative interpretation of efficiency should be adopted which incorporates the stated purposes of the Competition Act. Redistribution and employment creation should be valued as efficient outcomes in themselves. The Act invites this integrated approach by requiring that its terms be interpreted in manner that gives effect to its stated purposes.

Ideally, this should be in conjunction with broadening the limited grounds on which an exemption may be granted under section 10 of the Act, and softening the per se approach to certain contraventions of the Act. By incorporating an integrated notion of efficiency into these sections, a more balanced assessment of market behaviour may be conducted and more desirable outcomes achieved.

Unfortunately, the suggested development of the concept of efficiency would come at the cost of some degree of legal certainty. Although the traditional welfare-based version of efficiency may stymie achievement of the Act's public interest goals, it is measurable. This makes it easier to assess, and in turn provides firms with predictable precedents on which their behaviour can be based.

However, the Act's stated objectives appear to allow (and arguably mandate) incorporation of broader social goals into the Commission's assessment of, for example, exemption applications. It is submitted that to cater for any uncertainty that may be created, publication of guidelines and other policy documents by the Commission would be helpful.

As illustrated by the dilemma facing the maize industry, a holistic and uniquely South African account of 'efficiency' could reposition the yardstick which guides the authorities' assessment of competition enquiries. This may help to broaden access to the economy and enable the diverse aims of South Africa's competition policy to be realised.

In the meantime, South Africa's maize producers face significant challenges. The industry's performance in 2011 should provide some insight as to whether the Commission's assessment of Grain SA's exemption application was correct.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions