South Africa: Competition Appeal Court Tightens Up Tribunal Processes

Last Updated: 13 July 2011

Article by Neil MacKenzie and Chloe De Jager

The Competition Appeal Court ("CAC") recently ruled on the case of Netstar, Matrix and Tracker / Competition Commission and Tracetec . The case may provide assistance to firms that are respondents to complaints before the Competition Tribunal, and clarified a number of previously untested areas of South African competition law.

Background facts

The complaint dealt with allegations of an agreement in contravention of section 4(1)(a) of the Competition Act in the market for the tracking and recovery of stolen motor vehicles in South Africa.

The Stolen Vehicle Recovery (SVR) Committee of the Motor Vehicle Security Association in South Africa (VESA) comprised the major players in the industry – Tracker, Netstar and Matrix. After consulting with the vehicle insurance industry association, the SVR committee imposed a number of industry standards to ensure the reliability of firms providing SVR services.

Essentially, the standards required firms to:

  • fit their system in at least 3000 vehicles;
  • have been in operation for over one year;
  • have effected over 100 successful vehicle recoveries, and
  • have a 'recovery rate' (the number of successful recoveries compared with the number of attempted recoveries) that falls within a defined industry average.

To become a member of the SVR committee and become 'accredited' by VESA, a firm's security and recovery systems had to comply with the standards. The complainants' version was that insurance companies would offer discounted premiums on vehicle insurance to customers who fitted their vehicles with VESA accredited systems. This gave accredited firms a clear competitive advantage.

Potential new entrants found themselves in a Catch-22, to enter and grow within the market VESA accreditation was required, but to become VESA accredited, an established presence in the market was necessary.

Provisions of the Act

Section 4(1)(a) of the Competition Act prohibits an agreement or concerted practice between competitors which has the effect of lessening or preventing competition in a market, unless any technological, efficiency or other pro-competitive gains can be proven to outweigh the anti-competitive effect.

An agreement or a concerted practice

The Tribunal's approach in its initial decision of finding that an agreement or concerted practice existed between the firms involved was overturned. Until now, this practice of loosely alleging an agreement or, alternatively a concerted practice, has been common in complaints initiated by the Commission, referrals to the Tribunal and decisions by the Tribunal.

The CAC emphasised the importance of distinguishing between an agreement and a concerted practice by explaining that:

A concerted practice arises from the conduct of the parties and does not amount to an agreement. A possible example might be the type of cartel arrangement where the market leader signals a price by way of public announcement and, in accordance with long-standing practice in the industry, the other participants follow its lead.

By contrast, the CAC held:

... an agreement arises from the actions of and discussions among the parties directed at arriving at an arrangement that will bind them either contractually or by virtue of moral suasion or commercial interest. It may be a contract which is legally binding, or an arrangement or understanding that is not, but which the parties regard as binding upon them. Its essence is that the parties have reached some kind of consensus.

This restricts a complainant to an enquiry based on either an agreement or a concerted practice in its complaint.

Substantially preventing or lessening competition

Whether there has been a preventing or lessening of competition in the market is a factual enquiry, and must be determined based on the evidence which is presented. In addition, the lessening or preventing of competition must be 'substantial'. The CAC held that therefore:

...what is required is something that is neither speculative nor trivial. It may be notional or hypothetical in the sense that there is no actual instance of a person being prevented by the agreement or concerted practice from entering the industry concerned.


The CAC went on to explain that a substantial lessening or preventing of competition alone is not enough. In order for a contravention of section 4(1)(a) to be established, the agreement or concerted practice must be shown to have caused the substantial lessening or preventing of competition.

What is required, as the CAC explains, is to first establish whether in the absence of the agreement or concerted practice, the prevention or lessening of competition would have occurred. Second, the agreement or concerted practice must be shown to be the 'dominant cause' of the substantial lessening or prevention of competition. The lessening or prevention of competition must be 'so closely connected to the agreement or concerted practice that it can properly be said that the former was the effect of the latter and any other action was merely ancillary'.

Application to the facts

In applying these principles to the facts of the case, the CAC found that the existence of an agreement between the SVR committee members could not be established. The standards themselves did not constitute an 'agreement'.

The Court held that, in any event, on the evidence before it, the Commission failed to prove that (on a balance of probabilities) the standards that caused a substantial lessening or preventing of competition in the market. The insurance companies' requirement of reliability on the part of SVR service providers was what made entry into the market difficult for firms without an established infrastructure, reputation and client base.

The appeals succeeded on the basis that no contravention of section 4(1)(a) was established, and the finding by the Tribunal was set aside.

Tribunal's jurisdiction and standard of pleading

The implications of the judgment, however, are not confined to the case that was before the CAC. The case may affect the limits of the Tribunal's jurisdiction to hear particular issues, and the degree of particularity which is required of the Commission in initiating and referring complaints to the Tribunal.

The issue of initiating complaints under the Competition Act was recently dealt with by the Supreme Court of Appeal in the milk cartel case . In the Netstar case, the Court goes on to reaffirm the findings of the Supreme Court of Appeal, and explains:

The Tribunal's jurisdiction is confined to a consideration of the complaint so referred and the terms of that complaint are likewise constrained by the terms of the complaint initiated by the Commissioner or made by some other person.

The CAC then examined the degree of particularity that is required in a complaint referral:

What is required is that the conduct said to contravene the Act must be expressed with sufficient clarity for the party against whom that allegation is made to know what the charge is and be able to prepare to meet and rebut it.


There is no excuse for resorting to vague generalities instead of formulating complaints accurately and in detail in accordance with the provisions of the Act. It is the Tribunal's responsibility to ensure that complaints brought before it are pursued on this basis and also to ensure that it determines only the complaint laid before it, not something else that arises or occurs to it in the course of the proceedings.

The CAC appears to have established a strict standard for articulating a complaint which is to be prosecuted before the Tribunal. If a referral document does not comply with the standards established by the CAC, or extends beyond the scope of the complaint initiated by the Commission, then it may be open to a respondent to challenge the validity of the referral or request further particulars before answering the allegations.

Analysis and conclusion

The Netstar case appears to mark a shift in the jurisprudence of the Competition Appeal Court towards a more fact driven and legal analysis of competition complaints. The Tribunal was strongly criticised for disregarding evidence which supported the respondents, and engaging in a largely theoretical analysis which suited the Commission's case. The Court held:

In conjunction with [the Tribunal's] theoretical approach to the task before it that leaves the unfortunate impression that it was concerned to mould the evidence to fit its theory of harm and the principles it was seeking to apply rather than adjudicating on the case before it. That is something that should be strictly guarded against in any adjudicative body.

This decision, together with the milk cartel case decided by the SCA, is likely to strengthen the position of respondent firms before the Tribunal. While the Tribunal will still adopt a strict approach towards cartel behaviour, this decision reinforces the requirement that the evidence put before the Tribunal is evaluated on an even-handed basis.

How the Netstar case will be applied by the Tribunal and the Appeal Court in future cases remains to be seen. However, it is likely to have significant implications for firms that are the subject of pending prosecutions before the Tribunal, and the conduct of the Commission in its initiation and referral of complaints. Businesses and competition law practitioners should continue to monitor this area of law with interest.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.