Search
Searching Content indexed under Patent by Mintz ordered by Published Date Descending.
Links to Result pages
 
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 . . .  
>>Next
 
Title
Country
Organisation
Author
Date
1
PTAB Confirms (Again) That The AIA's "Enhanced Estoppel" Provision Applies To Concurrent IPR Proceedings
In a decision from the PTAB issued last week, the Board confirmed that the "enhanced estoppel" provision of 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(1) applies to co-pending IPR proceedings when a final written decision issues in a first IPR.
United States
22 Aug 2019
2
Effect Of Prosecution History Estoppel On Infringement Claim Under Doctrine Of Equivalents
The Federal Circuit in Amgen Inc. v. Coherus Biosciences Inc. affirmed a district court decision that once certain subject matter is clearly and unmistakably surrendered during prosecution, the patentee is barred from ...
United States
21 Aug 2019
3
Understanding The USPTO's Interpretation Of 35 U.S.C. § 112 For Computer-Implemented Functional Claim Limitations
Patent practitioners, inventors, in-house counsel, and patent examiners alike have been clamoring for more guidance on computer-implemented functional claim limitations invoking § 112(f) since the Federal Circuit's en banc ...
United States
21 Jun 2019
4
The International Trade Commission Has Broad Jurisdictional Authority, Including Indirect Sellers
On April 26, 2019, Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") Lord clearly stated in Certain Intraoral Scanner and Related Hardware and Software that the International Trade Commission's ("ITC")
United States
17 Jun 2019
5
Federal Circuit Affirms That The ITC Cannot Investigate An FDCA Violation Without The FDA's Say-So
In Amarin Pharma, Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n (18-1247), the Federal Circuit affirmed the International Trade Commission's ("ITC") finding that Amarin's false advertising claim under § 43(a) of the Lanham Act was precluded by the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
United States
13 Jun 2019
6
Claim Construction Of "Customary And Ordinary" Meaning Does Not Justify Amendment Of Noninfringement And Invalidity Contentions
Recently, in a patent infringement action pending in the Eastern District of Michigan, Webasto Thermo & Comfort N. Am., Inc. v. BesTop, Inc., No. 2:16-cv-13456.
United States
12 Jun 2019
7
Score This One In Favor Of Standard-Essential Patent Owners: Recent Decision Makes Satisfying FRAND Obligations Easier
A recent decision in the Eastern District of Texas should provide standard-essential patent ("SEP") owners with more clarity and optimism when negotiating SEP licenses.
United States
11 Jun 2019
8
Another Shoe Drops In The Qualcomm Patent Licensing Saga
Just when observers thought Qualcomm could celebrate its successful litigation with Apple another decision has come down which could have major implications for Qualcomm's business going forward.
United States
7 Jun 2019
9
Performing A Service Without Selling The Process Still Triggers The On-Sale Bar
Services play a large role in today's economy, and it is important to be mindful of how certain pitfalls that apply to product-based intellectual property rights also apply to method
United States
7 Jun 2019
10
ITC Alj McNamara In Apple-Qualcomm Investigation: Exclusion Orders Are Incentives To Design- Around
In her April 16, 2019 Public Interest Findings, ALJ McNamara decisively stated that antitrust issues disguised as competitive conditions arguments are not a factor in the ITC proceeding between Apple and Qualcomm.
United States
5 Jun 2019
11
Director Iancu Roundtable With BIOCOM San Diego
Andrei Iancu, the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTO, believes that the U.S. needs a strong patent system in order to excel and thrive in the global economy.
United States
3 Jun 2019
12
Under New Guidance: Patent Eligibility Of Computerized Diagnostics At The PTAB
We previously reported on a PTAB decision involving a case in which a patent eligibility rejection was overcome by replacing a "comparing" step with a recitation that the sample is from a particular patient population.
United States
29 May 2019
13
District Court Of Delaware Awards An Ongoing Royalty That Applies Not Just To Adjudicated Products But Also To Non-Adjudicated Products That Are "Not Colorably Different."
Recently, in Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 v. TCL Commc'n Tech. Holdings Ltd., the Delaware District Court awarded the prevailing plaintiff in a patent infringement suit ...
United States
28 May 2019
14
ML Strategies Health Care Preview Week Of May 6, 2019
This week, the full House is poised to take its first action on drug pricing, voting on a pair of bills that would improve access to drug patents.
United States
27 May 2019
15
Where Both Parties Behave Badly In Litigation, Attorneys' Fees Are Unlikely To Be Awarded
On April 25, 2019, in Int'l Designs Corp., LLC, et. al. v. Hair Art Int'l, Inc., Judge George H. Wu in the Central District of California denied Hair Art's motion for attorneys' fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285.
United States
23 May 2019
16
Dueling Declaratory Judgment Suits Result In A Dismissal And Boomerang Transfer Back To The First-Filed Forum Under TC Heartland
On April 17, 2019, Judge Gilstrap of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, in Apicore v. Beloteca, No. 19-cv-00077, held that while the court
United States
16 May 2019
17
Understanding Antedating Of A Prior Art Reference For A Patent
The Federal Circuit's decision in ATI Technologies ULC v. Iancu (April 11, 2019) highlights the proper standard to use in evaluating whether a claimed invention was reduced to practice before
United States
2 May 2019
18
Collateral Estoppel Bars Assertion Of Patent Claims That Do Not "Materially Alter The Question Of Invalidity" Relative To Claims Invalidated In IPR Proceedings
On April 4, 2019, Chief Judge Patti Saris of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts held in Intellectual Ventures I, LLC v. Lenovo Group Ltd. that a final determination
United States
26 Apr 2019
19
Patent Claim Preamble Lessons From Arctic Cat Inc. v. GEP Power Products
The general rule is that a patent claim's preamble does not limit the claim unless the preamble gives life, meaning, and vitality to the claim.
United States
26 Apr 2019
20
Precedential PTAB Panel Says Petitioners Can Join Their Own Earlier-Filed IPRs And Join New Issues In Limited Circumstance
In its first decision since its inception, the Precedential Opinion Panel ("POP") for the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in Proppant Express Investments, LLC v. Oren Technologies, LLC, IPR2018-00914, ...
United States
11 Apr 2019
Links to Result pages
 
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 . . .  
>>Next