Russian Federation: Rental Lease Relationship: Current Trends In Dispute Resolution

Last Updated: 15 September 2009
Article by Vladimir Pestrikov

Recently the balance of interests in the real estate market in Russia has shifted significantly. The reason for that change is that the economic downturn caused a declining demand for commercial nonresidential premises and reduced the revenues of many market players. The low demand for office and trade premises entails reduction of rental rates. In terms of financial crisis lessees are trying to reduce their rental costs and compel lessors to decrease the rental rates due to the current market situation. In this respect the most important issue is what legal options and mechanisms are available to the parties to amend or terminate an effective lease contract.

Discussed below are some recent rulings in Russian courts regarding extending lease contracts and/or amending its terms.

CASE: Kalinka Stockmann v. Smolensky Passazh

Serious problems for a lessor or lessee may arise if an effective long-term lease contract does not provide any grounds to amend rental lease rates or unilaterally rescind the agreement. The is especially true when external circumstances in the real estate market have substantially changed and the other party is reluctant to review the terms of lease in order to reflect these changes.

The latest example of a controversy between lessor and lessee of commercial premises is the notorious case of ZAO "Kalinka Stockmann" against LLC "Smolensky Passazh" and ZAO "Mosstroyekonombank" that was finally resolved by the Presidium of the Higher Court of Arbitration of the RF (further referred to as "HCA") just a few weeks ago.

Further let us briefly examine the merits and legal issues of this dispute and comment on the principal findings in the arbitration award and court's decision.

The dispute between the lessee (Kalinka Stockmann) and the lessor (Smolensky Passazh) arose from the duty to extend the existing lease contract concluded in 1997 with respect to the premises in the Business and Trade Center "Smolensky Passazh" in Moscow to another 10 year term. The lease contract contained a clause that entitled the lessee to extend the contract (that expired in 2007) to another ten-year term upon notification to the lessor within 6 months prior to the date of expiration of the contract. The clause also stipulated that the terms and conditions of the lease contract had to remain unchanged for the next term of lease. In 2007 the lessee duly notified the lessor of its will to extend the contract. However, the lessor did not agree and demanded to free the premises occupied by the lessee. Objecting to the extension, Smolensky Passazh referred to the losses that would occur if the lease relationship continued on the previously stated conditions. According to the provisions of the contract, the rental rate was determined by the parties at the beginning of the relationship (i.e. ten years ago) and was calculated on the basis of the lessee's annual turnover. The lessee's turnover was in fact very low in recent years, so that the continuation of the lease relationship would be unfeasible and unfavorable for Smolensky Passazh.

The circumstances of this matter allow us to conclude that the lessor made an obvious error during contract negotiation and formation of the lease agreement. In an attempt to contract a prospective foreign lessee, the lessor signed a long-term lease agreement (indeed for the period of twenty years) without setting up a mechanism for periodical rate revision. As a result, the lessor found himself in a very difficult position after ten years.

The contract incorporated an arbitration clause providing that all disputes or claims arising out of or relating to the lease contract shall be submitted to the International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Chamber of Trade and Commerce of the Russian Federation (hereinafter referred to as "ICAC"). Kalinka Stockmann filed an action to the ICAC aiming to resolve the dispute concerning the extension of lease. The arbitration tribunal of the ICAC adjudicated the case and made an award on 29.04.2008, holding the following: (1) to recognize the plaintiff's right to extend the lease contract entered into with the defendant; (2) to order the defendant – Smolensky Passazh – to extend the term of the contract for another ten years by means of signing and registering an appropriate addendum to the contract. Thus, the award was rendered in favor of the lessee; the arbitral tribunal supported the claim and held it to be in compliance with the Russian legislation dismissing the arguments of Smolensky Passazh.

However, that was only an interim victory for Kalinka Stockmann. Smolensky Passazh brought a petition to the supervising state court namely Moscow Arbitration Court claiming to set aside the ICAC award (case № А40-28757/08-25-228). Subsequently this case was litigated in the cassation instance - Federal Arbitration Court of Moscow region (Russian abbreviation – "FAS MO"), and the final verdict was made by the Presidium of the Higher Court of Arbitration. All the state arbitration courts upheld the claim and ruled to set aside the arbitral award on the grounds of article 34 of the Federal Law "On international commercial arbitration."

In the given case Smolensky Passazh raised many arguments to invalidate the award in its petitions filed in the courts. Among the appellant's grounds were: violation of the procedural rules by the arbitrators while dealing with the case; appointing a biased arbitrator; refusal to dismiss an arbitrator; non-arbitrability of the subject matter and contradiction of the award to the public order of the RF. The courts treated and evaluated these grounds differently and therefore came to their conclusions in different ways. Some grounds were initially upheld by the lower courts but then overturned; other reasons were initially disregarded and then later admitted by the superior courts. This disparity represents additional evidence that the Russian judicial practice still remains unclear and inconsistent as to the application of the principles of arbitrability and recognition and enforcement of the international commercial arbitration awards in Russia.

Without going into to much detail concerning all of the peculiarities and controversies of the court rulings in this case, we will illustrate below the most significant findings of the courts that can potentially impact the future legal practice.

First of all, FAS MO affirmed the conclusion of the Moscow Arbitration Court that the subject matter of this dispute can not be submitted to the arbitration. The courts held that the dispute involved the issue of state registration of the rights to an immovable property (under s. 1 of the article 452 and article 651 of the Civil Code of the RF (the "CC RF") an agreement to extend a lease contract requires state registration), and, therefore, affected public interests and belonged to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Russian state courts1. However, the panel of judges of the HCA did not agree with this statement when revisiting the case. In the Ruling dated 03 March 2009 No 17481/08 they argued that the subject matter of the dispute was not public on its character or the persons involved, and, therefore, such a dispute could be validly submitted to and resolved by an international arbitration. The issue of state registration of lease rights lies outside the scope of the claim to extend the term of the lease contract. The state registration requirement did not convert this pure commercial relationship to a matter of public interest. Nevertheless, the Presidium of the HCA did not express an opinion on this issue in reviewing the decision, choosing rather to remain silent on this problem. In summary, the arbitrability issue in disputes involving state registration of rights to real estate is still uncertain in our judicial system. Although the negative approach of the state courts is still prevailing in Russia, there are some visible steps demonstrating a possible shift towards a more favorable attitude of recognizing the jurisdiction of international commercial arbitration courts in this type of dispute.

Secondly, we draw your attention to the final Ruling of the Presidium of the HCA on the case (No 17481/08, as of 19 May 2009). In its decision the court focused only on a single reason for setting aside the ICAC award; considering no other arguments that were examined by the courts of the lower instances. The Presidium recognized the right to extension provision stated in the body of the lease contract but said that the "procedure of formation" of such an extension to the lease contract had not been established by the parties. Further, the HCA referred to the common procedure of extending the lease by concluding a new lease contract for the next term pursuant to article 620 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation.

Based on these statements, the court concluded that the scope of the arbitration clause did not cover the conclusion of a lease contract for the new term, because the parties did not envisaged that and restricted the effect of the arbitration clause only to the disputes arising out of or related to the initial lease contract expired on 30.04.2008. Thus, the HCA finally held that the ICAC had no competence to arbitrate this matter.

In our opinion, there is a factual and logical mistake in the reasoning of the Presidium of the HCA. It misinterpreted the main legal issue in the dispute resolved by the tribunal of arbitrators, namely the issue of the validity of the substantive right of the lessee to demand the extension of the lease contract. The right for extension and conditions of the extension were laid out in the main lease contract, so that the given controversy arose from the contract itself and was within the scope of arbitration clause. The plaintiff grounded its claim on the terms of the lease contract as opposed to article 621 of the CC RF that can only be applied in the absence of the relevant contractual provisions. The lack of detailed procedure in the contract for specific ways of documentation and signing the extension is a simply technical issue and can not be decisive.

Application of article 451 of the Civil Code of the RF to lease contracts

This year FAS MO has made some other notable decisions concerning disputes between lessors and lessees dealing with changing conditions of the lease agreement and introducing appropriate amendments to the contract. The most significant legal development from those cases was the application of provisions of article 451 of the Civil Code of the RF regulating the substantial change of circumstances to lease contracts by the arbitration courts.

In the case OAO "Kompomash" (plaintiff, lessor) vs. ZAO "Kompomash-TEK" (defendant, lessee) the Moscow Arbitration Court supported the claim of the lessor and ordered the introduction of amendments to the lease contract and an increase in the annual rental lease rate pursuant to article 451of the CC RF (case № А40-80315/06-64-569). FAS MO affirmed the ruling; the HCA, in turn, also upheld the decisions of Moscow courts. The courts reasoned that the external circumstances had substantially changed since the date of entering into the contract by the parties. In the Ruling of the HAC on this case the court stated: the market value of the lease for the non-residential premises had grown to the extent that if the plaintiff could have foreseen that, the contract would have been concluded on substantially different terms. The market value of the lease was determined on the basis of the expert opinion made by an appraiser appointed by the court.

In another similar case FAS MO also came to a decision that the merits of dispute met all necessary conditions prescribed in s. 2 of article 451 and awarded appropriate amendments to the lease contract (case № А40-44212/07-64-364). The court held that the significant growth of rental lease rates in the market constitutes substantial change of circumstances in the meaning of the article 451. FAS MO asserted that the growth resulted from a change in the economic situation of the country due to objective causes. "The parties to the lease agreement could not foresee this violent change in the market and the plaintiff was not in a position to control or influence these circumstances acting diligently and in good-faith", so the HCA.

Therefore, in summary the arbitration courts of higher instances in Russia have adopted a new approach in the judicial practice allowing parties to a lease agreement to seek application of article 451 in a judicial procedure in order to amend the initial terms of the contract, primarily the lease rate (in the case described above the rate was increased in favor of lessors). We believe that these judicial precedents can potentially become an effective method for reviewing the lease rates for the benefit of either a lessor or a lessee taking into account the current financial crisis and turbulence in the real estate market. This approach is especially remarkable in light of general trend in judicial practice where the courts are reluctant to apply article 451 of the CC RF to other types of civil law relations (particularly to loan contracts).


1 This approach corresponds to the position indicated in clause 27 of the Informational Letter of the Presidium of the Higher Court of Arbitration of the RF as of 22.December 2005, No 96.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.