Mexico: "Most Counts As "Total When Blocking Websites In Mexico

Last Updated: 9 November 2017
Article by Luis Schmidt

With authors' works of arts often being made freely available online, laws have had to be updated to maintain necessary protection. Luis Schmidt, OLIVARES, investigates a selection of cases that stood in front of the Supreme Court in Mexico about website blocking that have thus impacted the future of copyright law in the country.

The web connects virtual space, where information flows and spreads around to reach all the people. Neutrality is the principle steering the web, which states that the flow of information cannot be affected, limited, or suspended; but, as a last source, in order to protect human rights, before pondering opposing interests.

The web can be viewed as an online community, living apart from the off-line, as it follows a rule of its own. While the off-line community has evolved from a systematized legal framework, the on-line community has developed from the notion of neutrality.

The online community rejects the laws of the offline world, in particular copyright law - or IP in general. Presumably, copyrightlawdoesnotfulfilltheneutrality standard as it makes a distinction between general information that is of free access and information that is reserved. Copyright is viewed as a legal restriction to the flow of information. However, the subject matter of copyright is "works-of-authorship", which is not ordinary free-use-data but artistic creativity made by authors or artists. Copyright grants over works exclusive property rights. Actually, it has been regarded a human right, considering that arts and literature are inherent to human nature.

Works are not created online; they just circulate there. The online community imports works from the off-line community and spreads them all over the virtual world. Technology has played against authors: the web makes it simple for people to gain access to works, the same as they can connect with ordinary information. So, why protect works-of-authorship if the web makes it simple getting them? Especially considering that if they are easy to obtain it is easy as well to use them without asking. The online community "opposes" copyrights, but does it have a fair reason to do it? There would be no need to "ponder" interests or address neutrality if society demanded arts and culture only after honoring the property rights of authors.

Neutrality is not a concept that is new or unique to the web. By definition, aborigine or indigenous communities are self-regulated and neutral societies. Their rules certainly embrace expressions of crafts, folklore, or culture. Strictly speaking, indigenous people do not need to ponder interests or even enforce rights, as they have an organic respect for nature, people and arts. Concerning folklore, artisans and people align in one direction to preserve arts. All is part of tradition. Neutrality is equal to alignment and it works ideally in societies that have a sense of empathy and collective respect for arts and culture.

Modern societies are often disrespectful of culture and of the collective or individual rights of people. A good example is the online community with regard to copyright rights. People tend to behave the same in the world online as they do in the world offline. Therefore, if there is a chance to, they will neglect the rights of authors. They will even "oppose", by invoking as a pretext freedom of expression or access to information. However, the truth is that neutrality can be utopia, since authors are forced to enforce their copyrights in an adverse environment where the web becomes a land of outlaws.

Authors have "moved" to the world "online" the rules of the world "offline", in particular enforcement rules. Not surprisingly, the online community dislikes offline rules, but does not contribute

to solve the copyright problem. Ultimately, the indifference or blindness of society has undermined the sense of neutrality in connection with the web.

Pondering Interests in Copyright Law

The online community finds copyright and access to information as opposing interests. However, is that real? Does society really oppose the right of those who create the art that they consume?

Copyright law does not even cross paths with access to information, since the former targets the sender of the information, while the latter targets the receiver. The neutrality rule admits that as a last resort - and under special situations - the flow of information can be intervened. Copyright law is actually one of those special kinds of situations.

It is contradictory saying that because of copyright law the public is prevented to access information, when society gave copyright law to authors as a vehicle to protect their rights. By virtue of copyright law, the diffuser of works needs authorization to give people access to works. The public does not need authorization to see, listen, or read them. People just need to get the works from an authorized source: that is society's contribution to a balanced system. On the other hand, copyright law is subject to limitations. Among others, the law sets restrictions as to whom can be an author and what can be a work of art; the principles of originality and dichotomy of idea-expression; or the regime of moral and economic rights and exceptions. Accordingly, copyright law provides an inherent rule of balance and proportion, which compensates society's sacrifice to use works freely.

Generally, judges ponder under "proportionality" human rights' interests. Any analysis of proportion requires that the action is:

  1. The most adequate to achieve a pursued objective; and
  2. The least restrictive of human rights. Unless being specifically abusive, enforcing copyrights is an adequate action that does not restrict the rights of audiences. Whether copyright is called a human right or not, enforcing it requires that judges take actions against infringers, as well as injunctive or other preventive measures against those providing the means of infringement. Blocking websites is among the measures available for judges to enforce rights and to prevent and discourage infringement.

Neutrality and Pondering of Interests in Mexico

Mexican courts have resolved two cases addressing making available rights in connection with the blocking of websites. The first case is BA'K, related to the site Plaintiffs, that included authors and recording labels, asked that the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI) ordered all Mexican ISPs block the website. An ISP called Alestra filed an "Amparo" action against the order, arguing that their constitutional rights were affected. Alestra challenged the order and courts made IMPI adjust the scope and approach of the same. As a result, a final and definitive order confirmed the blocking of the BA'K website.

In a more recent case, Sony, Universal and Warner Brothers, as well as music composers represented by their collective society, sued before IMPI, for copyright infringement. IMPI imposed again an order to block the site. As in BA'K, Alestra filed an "Amparo" against the order and challenged the preliminary measures system in itself.

The district court granted Amparo for violations to the rights of access of information and freedom of expression. The court found that "virtual space" would be disrupted if "rules" are imposed to protect "content" or "materials" - referring to works or sound recordings - leading to an "a priori" censorship and disproportionate restriction of fundamental rights and neutrality of the web. Affecting that system requires an analysis of proportionality. The district court stated that the human right of access to information stands over copyrights, considering that is merely economic the nature of the latter. Measures go only against infringers and IMPI cannot block websites. In any event, the court sustained that, as such, the system of provisional measures is constitutional.

The recording labels appealed and obtained that the Supreme Court attract the case. They argued against the blocking of the website based on the UK NewzBin2 and First Row cases. Thus, they relied on The Pirate Bay to argue against freedom of expression as well as Ashby Donald and Telekabel Wien.

In advance to providing a decision, the Supreme Court published a draft resolution addressing the issue of blocking the website. The draft stated that blocking is prohibited and removal of works or recordings has to be concrete. Access to users cannot be stopped when there are "expressions" in a site, no matter if it also displays illegal copies, as it would attempt against the free circulation of "contents", "information", and "ideas" across the web.

The Supreme Court made substantial changes to the draft as published, to finally resolve that blocking is possible indeed in exceptional cases, if the "totality" in a website is non-authorized copies of works or recordings. The Court considered that copyright is a human right that IMPI needs to ponder vis-a-vis other human rights. In the end, the court remanded the case so that that IMPI reviewed the blocking issue, based on proportionality standards.

Last week, justice Pérez Dayan, who was in charge to draft the sentence of the Supreme Court, admitted in a public event that the word "total" utilized in the text couldn't be viewed literally, but rather as an equivalent of "majority". He said that blocking is possible in Mexico, if after pondering, IMPI presumes that the "great majority" of the copies in a given website have not been authorized. Ultimately, the sentence addressed IMPI, to perform a different analysis, but having a great deal of discretionary powers for resolving.


In many respects, the Supreme Court of Justice made important mistakes, as they published a draft that "prohibits" blocking and later gave a final resolution that "permits" it. The sentence was not well written, in particular since it is confusing to employ the word "total", when it was meant to say "majority". Arguably, "proportionality" gives judges lea way for balancing adverse positions, while "totality" is an absolute numeral concept. The idea of "totality" contradicts "proportion". The positive side of the sentence is that Mexican courts have adopted a rule applicable in future infringement cases occurring online.

In principle, blocking shall be available against copyright pirates holding websites where every copy is illegal. However, blocking sites should be extended when a majority - equated to total - of copies are illegal. IMPI shall have authority to impose blocking orders, if it ponders rights effectively. Being a last source to protect a human right like copyright, the blocking system shall guarantee neutrality of the web and accordingly, shall meet the requirements of the on- line community, used to neglect copyright protection. Needless to say that the notion of "proportionality" still needs to progress and develop, same as the meaning of "freedom of expression" and "access to information", in connection with copyright law. The purpose is that the community "online", with own or adopted rules, protects every human right, not only those that they like better.

Originally published in The Copyright Lawyer

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions