Mexico: The Tax Disputes And Litigation Review


Under Mexican jurisdiction, it is very common to have tax disputes between taxpayers and the tax authorities. In those disputes, the taxpayers first try to solve the dispute with meetings held with the tax authorities; however, it is common that the parties do not agree, so taxpayers usually need to start procedures to challenge an assessment or a tax refund denial.1

The Mexican tax authorities usually start audit procedures with all types of taxpayers, when they detect such taxpayers failed to pay all the taxes they should have and they end up with a tax assessment. Regarding tax refunds, it is important to point out that in recent years, the tax authorities have denied such refunds in a very visible manner, mainly, value added tax refunds.

When the tax authorities determine a tax assessment or deny a tax refund, it is very common for taxpayers to end up with a litigation, which may take around three years to obtain a final decision. The fees and costs of such litigations may vary taking into consideration the amounts of the assessments or tax refunds; if the respective lawyer works by itself or in a firm and the prestige of such firm.


Once a tax assessment is determined or a tax refund is denied, the taxpayers have the opportunity to challenge the ruling that contains the tax assessment or the tax refund denial. There are two legal remedies available for purposes of challenging the aforementioned rulings, which are set out below.

i Administrative appeal

In first instance, taxpayers have the option of filing an administrative appeal within a 30 business-day term as of the date the ruling is notified.

It is important to point out that the First Division of the Supreme Court of Justice issued a criterion in which it stated that taxpayers were required to offer the necessary evidence during an audit procedure, otherwise, they would be barred from offering new evidence if they challenge the tax assessment before the Federal Tax Court through an annulment complaint.

In terms of such criterion, if a taxpayer wishes to offer additional evidence to the tax authorities than the one that was provided during the audit procedure, the taxpayer must first file an administrative appeal in order to be able to offer such evidence before the tax authorities.

In accordance with this criterion, in the event that taxpayers intend to offer evidence additional to that submitted during the audit procedure, they must first file an administrative appeal in order to be in a position to do so.

In the event of an unfavourable resolution, taxpayers are entitled to file an annulment complaint against the Federal Tax Court within a 45-business-day term as of the date the resolution of the administrative appeal is notified.

ii Annulment complaint

The other way to challenge an unfavourable resolution is by filing an annulment complaint before the Federal Tax Court within a 45-business-day term as of the date the ruling is notified to the taxpayer.

Against a favourable or unfavourable resolution, the tax authorities or the taxpayers may respectively file an appeal or an 'amparo complaint', before a Collegiate Tribunal within a 15-business-day term as of the date the decision is notified.

iii 'Amparo complaint' or tax authorities appeal

The 'amparo complaint' is filed by taxpayers before a Collegiate Tribunal to challenge decisions issued by the Federal Tax Court within a 15-business-day term as of the date the decision is notified.

The tax authorities can also file an appeal challenging the decision issued by the Federal Tax Court within a 15-business-day term as of the date the decision is notified, and it is also solved by a Collegiate Tribunal.

In case taxpayers file an 'amparo complaint' and the tax authorities also file the respective appeal, the same Collegiate Tribunal will solve them in the same session.

iv Extraordinary appeal

It is important to point out that the parties may file an extraordinary appeal within a 10-business-day term, challenging the decisions issued by a Collegiate Tribunal while solving an 'amparo complaint', only to argue that an article violates the Constitution or human rights.

Such extraordinary appeal is solved by the Supreme Court of Justice, which decides if the matter is transcendent and important before admitting the aforementioned extraordinary appeal.

v Guarantee

In accordance with the Federal Tax Code, if an administrative appeal is filed before the tax authorities, taxpayers will not have to offer any security to guarantee the tax assessment until the tax authorities rule on the administrative appeal.

However, in the event that an annulment complaint is filed challenging a tax assessment or once the aforementioned administrative appeal is solved unfavourably to the taxpayers' interests, it would be necessary to offer a guarantee for purposes of securing the tax assessment.

Taxpayers must secure it as follows:

  1. cash deposit;
  2. security interest or mortgage;
  3. security bond granted by an authorised institution;
  4. joint and several liability assumed by a third party;
  5. administrative-law attachment; and
  6. securities or loan portfolios.

Finally, it is important to mention that there is no significant difference in the dispute if the tax assessments or tax refunds correspond to personal, corporate or partnership taxes.


i Administrative appeals

As we have previously mentioned, the tax authorities are in charge of solving administrative appeals that taxpayers may file against an assessment or a tax refund denial.

In fact, there is a special legal section that is part of the Mexican tax authorities that is in charge of solving the aforementioned administrative appeals. The persons in charge of solving such appeals are tax authorities' officers depending on the tax residence of the taxpayer.

Such appeals take approximately six months to be solved (it may take a longer or shorter time depending on how difficult it is to study the appeal); however, under the Federal Tax Code, if the tax authorities do not issue a decision within a three-month term, taxpayers may choose to take such omission as an unfavourable negative decision and proceed to challenge it or wait until a formal decision is issued.

In practice, it is unlikely that taxpayers will obtain favourable decisions at this stage, unless they prove that during the audit procedure the tax authorities did not analyse all the evidence that was submitted or even when taxpayers submit evidence during the appeal additional to that submitted during the audit procedure.

This is so because, as previously mentioned, the Supreme Court of Justice issued a criterion in which it established that the evidence that was not provided during the audit procedure can only be provided while filing the administrative appeal.

ii Annulment complaints

Annulment complaints are solved by a Federal Tax Court, which is integrated by three collegiate judges. It may take around a year for the Federal Tax Court to issue its first instance decision. However, the parties are entitled to challenge such decision through an 'amparo complaint' (taxpayers) or an appeal (tax authorities), which will be resolved by a Collegiate Tribunal.

It is common to offer as evidence a tax opinion issued by a certified public accountant in the annulment complaints filed to challenge a tax assessment or a tax refund denial. However, it depends on the specific case and what the taxpayer needs to prove to demonstrate the illegality of the assessment or the origin of the tax refund.

When such expert opinion is offered as evidence, the parties (taxpayer and tax authorities) should appoint an accountant expert who will be in charge of such opinion. In case such opinions differ, the Federal Tax Court must appoint a third-party expert whose opinion will prevail.

iii 'Amparo complaint' or tax authorities appeal

The 'amparo complaint' or the tax authorities' appeal is resolved by a Collegiate Tribunal, which is integrated by three judges.

It usually takes around seven months for the Collegiate Tribunals to issue their decisions, which can only be challenged through an extraordinary appeal.

iv Extraordinary appeal

As we previously commented, the parties may file an extraordinary appeal challenging the decisions issued by a Collegiate Tribunal, only to argue that an article violates the Constitution or human rights.

Such extraordinary appeal is solved by the Supreme Court of Justice, which is integrated by 11 judges divided in two sections. Such judges issue their decisions by sections (first and second sections) or in full seating.

Regarding tax assessments and tax refunds, only a few matters end up in an extraordinary appeal before the Supreme Court of Justice, since they are mainly solved with the 'amparo complaint' or the authorities appeal before the Collegiate Tribunal.


Usually, under Mexican legislation, tax disputes conclude with a final decision that determines the legality or illegality of a tax assessment or a tax refund.

If the decision is favourable to the taxpayer, the tax authorities will annul the assessment. In case the taxpayer had already paid the assessment, the tax authorities will refund the taxes with adjustment for inflation, surcharges and fines. If the matter is a tax refund, the tax authorities will refund the taxes with adjustment for inflation and surcharges.

In case the decision is unfavourable to the taxpayer, regarding tax assessments, the taxpayer will have to pay such assessment to the tax authorities including adjustment for inflation, surcharges and fines. If the matter is a tax refund, the taxpayer legality of the denial will be confirmed.

Criminal penalties will only be imposed on such taxpayers that commit any of the crimes typified in the Federal Tax Code, such as tax fraud or contraband.


i Recovering overpaid tax

Taxpayers may recover overpaid taxes as long as they prove that such taxes should have never been paid to the tax authorities.

In order to recover such amounts, taxpayers must file before the tax authorities a tax refund application in which they must specify why the specific amounts correspond to overpaid tax.

In case the tax authorities deny such tax refund, taxpayers may challenge such decision through the procedures that we have already explained.

ii Challenging administrative decisions

Administrative decisions or assessments may always be challenged by means of any of the procedures set forth herein.

It is important to point out that under Mexican law, taxpayers are allowed to assert formal and substantive arguments. However, under recent criterion issued by the Supreme Court of Justice, formal arguments can only declare the nullity of a ruling to provide that such formal violation is amended.

iii Claimants

The parties entitled to file tax claims, are those who are obliged to pay the applicable tax, or those who have already paid the tax and file a tax refund application.

Regarding the value added tax, for purposes of filing a tax claim, the parties must demonstrate whether they lodged the value added tax refund or passed on the value added tax to another party in accordance with the value added tax mechanic set forth in Mexican law and if they are entitled to claim the refund thereof.


It is not common for taxpayers to recover the costs incurred to challenge a tax assessment or a tax refund; however, under the Tax Administration Services Law, the tax authorities are responsible for paying the damages caused by their officers derived from the performance of their duties.

In fact, under Tax Administration Services Law, the tax authorities must indemnify taxpayers when their ruling is declared null and void as a result of not being duly grounded in law and fact or the competence of the tax authorities; is contrary to a criterion issued by the Supreme Court of Justice in terms of legality; or is declared null for abuse of power.

However, in practice, it is unlikely to obtain a decision where the courts order the tax authorities to pay such costs.

The tax authorities are never entitled to charge their costs regarding tax claims.

However, under the Federal Tax Code, tax authorities are entitled to recover the costs incurred in other kind of procedures, such as the seizure process, which we will not analyse in this chapter.


i Taxpayers' Ombudsman

The Mexican Taxpayers' Ombudsman, better known as PRODECON, is an independent public organisation that arises by a Decree of Law published on 4 September 2006.

On 1 September 2011 the Taxpayers' Ombudsman (PRODECON) opened its doors to the public as a decentralised public agency on tax matters that follows up those procedures of grievance or complaint against acts of the federal tax authorities that violate the rights of taxpayers.

Among other faculties, PRODECON plays a major role on the conclusive agreements (arbitrage procedure), which are the first alternative means of tax dispute resolution procedure in the Mexican tax system.

In order to initiate a conclusive agreement, the taxpayer needs to have a ruling issued by the tax authorities with a classification of acts or omissions within an audit procedure. However, it is important to mention that under the Mexican Federal Tax Code, one of the requirements that should be met in order to initiate the conclusive agreement is that a tax deficiency has not been assessed.

The conclusive agreement allows a negotiation between taxpayers and the tax authorities in which the PRODECON acts as a mediator and it may grant mutual benefits for the parties.

It is important to bear in mind that the issuance of a conclusive agreement is binding on the parties and cannot be challenged, however, if the taxpayers do not agree with the tax authorities' proposal, they may decline it.

In recent years, PRODECON has played an important role in tax disputes, and has clearly provided a new option for taxpayers to avoid litigation against tax assessments and tax refunds.

ii Mutual agreement procedures

The mutual agreement procedure is another alternative dispute resolution applicable in Mexico, which is established in the Treaties for the Avoidance of Double Taxation entered into by the Mexican government with other governments.

Such mutual agreement procedure can be initiated simultaneously with the administrative appeal that has already been described in this chapter and it suspends the resolution of the administrative appeal or the annulment complaint.

To initiate such procedure, taxpayers must first file a writ before the Mexican tax authorities. Once the writ is filed, the competent tax authority must solve if the filling of said writ is duly grounded, and if so, try to find the solution unilaterally.

If the competent authority considers said writ is grounded but the authority is not in a position to adopt a favourable decision, it must try to solve the matter through a mutual agreement with the competent authority of the other country.

By means of the mutual agreement procedure previously referred to, the Mexican tax authorities will establish the terms and conditions of the agreement.

If the other country's government agrees to a correlative adjustment, the most common outcome will result in the elimination of the double taxation, through the 'corresponding adjustment'.

Once the agreement between said authorities is concluded, the taxpayer will be notified of the decision, with the corresponding explanation. After the taxpayer accepts the decision, said tax authorities will exchange written confirmation of the agreement, which will also be notified to the taxpayer.

Subsequently, both tax authorities will execute the result, effectively repairing the non-conforming assessment.

If the decision is favourable to the taxpayer, it will express its conformity and commit to abandon any claim or appeal that it may have filed in Mexico or it will refrain from filing any other claims or appeals.

Once the taxpayer has expressed its conformity, the competent authorities shall proceed to enforce said decision within their jurisdictions, or carry out the necessary proceedings for it.

With respect to the mutual agreement procedure, there is a Manual for the Application of the Administrative Process of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development that establishes that usually the authorities grant a two-year period to issue a decision, and if the competent authorities do not come to an agreement they may continue their discussions, or consider the possibility of granting a reasonable extension in order to reach such agreement.


Under the Mexican Federal Tax Code, tax provisions that set forth burdens as well as exceptions thereto for private parties, in addition to those that define violations and set forth penalties, are of strict application. Provisions that define the taxpayers, the activity subject to tax, the amount to which the tax rate applies, rates or the tax rate schedule thereof, are considered to impose burdens on private parties.

Other tax provisions will be interpreted by applying any method for legal interpretation. In the absence of an express tax provision, the provisions of federal law will be applied, provided that the application thereof is not contrary to the essence of tax legislation.

In terms of the aforementioned, there are no general anti-avoidance rules for tax purposes; however, the Mexican legislation establishes special anti-avoidance rules, such as the case of the Mexican Income Tax Law, which establishes an exemption for transactions entered into between related parties.

In fact, the Mexican Income Tax Law establishes that for the purposes of calculating Mexican-source income, the tax authorities may, in exercising the powers of verification afforded by law, determine that a transaction is a sham exclusively for tax purposes. Such determination shall be duly based in law and facts within the review procedure and the existence of the sham shall be stated in the ruling assessing the taxpayer's fiscal situation, provided that the transactions had been conducted between related parties as set in such Law.

It is also important to point out that for fiscal year 2013 a modification was proposed for the Mexican Federal Tax Code in order to establish that if the tax authorities detect practices or operations from taxpayers that formally do not imply a taxable activity and lack business rationality, they could assess the corresponding tax. However, such amendment was not approved and never came into effect.

Also, the Mexican Income Tax Law establishes as a non-deductible item the interest on a taxpayer's debts that exceeds the equivalent of three times its shareholders' equity, and that comes from debts entered into with foreign-resident related parties.

In addition, the Mexican Income Tax Law establishes as a non-deductible item, payments of interests, royalties or technical assistance made to a foreign entity that controls or is controlled by the taxpayer, when:

  1. The foreign entity that receives payment is considered transparent.
  2. The payment is considered non-existent for tax purposes of the country or territory where the foreign entity is found.
  3. The foreign entity does not consider such payment as income subject to tax under applicable tax provisions.

Also the Mexican Income Tax Law establishes the possibility to be treated as dividends for purposes of such Law, interests derived from credits extended to legal entities or to permanent establishments in Mexico of foreign residents, by Mexican residents or foreign residents that are related to the party paying the credit. Such is the case of interests derived from back-to-back loans, even if extended through a financial institution residing in Mexico or abroad.


Mexico has entered into several treaties for the avoidance of double taxation with many countries worldwide. However, there are no specific domestic rules applicable to the interpretation and application thereof.

Derived from the above, in order to interpret and apply such treaties, Mexico should observe the Vienna Convention in the Law of Treaties, the Model Convention of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development with its commentaries, as well the respective protocols.


i Relevant operations report

For fiscal year 2014, a modification was added to the Mexican Federal Tax Code that obliges taxpayers to provide to the tax authorities a report of the relevant transactions they carried out.

In terms of such modification, in order for the tax authorities to exercise their functions effectively and efficiently, it is essential that they have the relevant information in a timely manner, and due to the proposal to eliminate the obligation to submit audited tax reports, it is necessary for the authorities to replace that information through requests made to the taxpayers.

Due to the above, a section was added to the Federal Tax Code providing that taxpayers must submit to the tax authorities information related to the relevant operations indicated in the official form approved by such authorities, within a 30-day-term counted from the date the operations were entered into. It also provides, that whenever taxpayers submit the information in an incomplete or erroneous manner, they will have a 30-dayterm counted from the notice of the tax authorities to correct the information wrongly submitted, and if that information is not corrected the obligation shall be considered as unfulfilled.

The tax authorities established a catalog of 36 operations considered relevant contained in different fields, such as:

  1. financial operations;
  2. transfer pricing operations;
  3. reorganisation and restructuring operations, and
  4. other relevant operations.

We consider taxpayers should take into account the obligation of reporting such relevant operations to the tax authorities and be aware of its importance.

ii Amend on human rights

Also, it is important to point out that in 2011, an amend was made to the Federal Constitution, which basically obliges all Mexican authorities, including the Judicial Branch, to always apply the human rights to private parties, including taxpayers. Derived from such amend, all judicial authorities, including the Federal Tax Court, the Collegiate Tribunals and the Mexican Supreme Court of Justice, should issue their decisions taking into consideration the taxpayers human rights, especially those provided by international treaties or agreements entered by Mexico.

Even though the aforementioned amend was a big step to respect human rights at all levels, the Supreme Court of Justice has already issued a criterion in which it established that if an article of the Mexican Constitution goes against a human right provided in a treaty entered into by Mexico, such provision must prevail, which, from our standpoint, is a regression for the evolution of human rights.

iii Value added tax refunds

As previously commented under the introduction section, in recent years the tax authorities have denied tax refunds in a very visible manner, mainly refunds related to value added tax.

In fact, the tax authorities sometimes fail to respond to such refunds, or when they do so, they merely limit their response to the request of additional documents in order to proceed to such refunds.

Also, it is important to point out that the tax authorities in recent years have requested from taxpayers documents that are not related or irrelevant to the respective tax refund, in order to deny such refund.


Even though the Mexican Taxpayers' Ombudsman (PRODECON) has played an important role in the past years in order for taxpayers to negotiate with the tax authorities and to solve disputes between such parties, we consider that there is much work to be done in order to challenge the tax authorities' position in many matters.

With respect to the above, we propose that PRODECON continue with the important role that it has been playing.

Also, we consider that it would be advisable to afford greater power to such organisation so that its recommendations become mandatory for tax authorities.

In recent years, we have also realised that the Supreme Court of Justice has issued its decisions regarding tax matters, in a manner that does not benefit taxpayers.

In view of the foregoing, taking into consideration that the Supreme Court of Justice is the highest court in Mexico, we strongly believe that the designation of new judges must be made preferring officers with a judicial carrier over officers with a background related to the tax authorities or tax administration. This is to avoid such judges issuing decisions with interests other than the administration of justice.

With respect to the above, in our opinion, a requirement that should be met in order to become a judge for the Supreme Court of Justice, is that the candidate has never worked (or at least for a long period of time) in the public administration, particularly in the Tax Administration Service.

Originally published by Law Business Research Ltd.


1. There are also other causes for tax disputes, such as fines, but tax assessments and tax refunds are the most common, so we will focus on them in this chapter.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.