Mexico: Licensing Computer-Implemented Inventions: Challenges In A Heterogeneous Patent World

Last Updated: 21 February 2012
Article by Héctor Chagoya

A new virtual reality vs. the patent system

The legal system of every country has evolved through different mechanisms to adapt to technological development and changes. While Civil Law countries adapt the codes to new realities through complex procedures, Common Law countries rely on the interpretation given by courts to the same laws in the light of the new social and technology environment.

Intellectual property rights are inevitably linked to technology advances and development. This is why perhaps they have been subject to international treaties very early, to ensure that all countries will provide protection according to certain basic principles that are expected to be common to all nations. Perhaps the best example of such standardization is the Agreement on the Trade Related aspects of Intellectual Property (TRIPS), which has been adopted by every country that is part of the World Trade Organization (WTO).

In spite of such treaties, the one definition that practically no international treaty includes is the definition of what is considered in each country an "invention". This lack of definition has leaded to different approaches, especially with regard to what is now known as "computer-implemented inventions" in the prosecution and enforcement of IP rights, particularly regarding patents.

Due to the fact that computer programs are subject to copyrights in many countries, but certain procedures may be patented in others, this area of technology is facing great troubles with regard to the certainty and scope of the rights conferred to the owners of intellectual property thereof.

Upon analyzing the development of patent systems, particularly with regard to patentable subject matter, the "tangible" aspect of an invention has been crucial for determining patentability. From the necessity to provide prototypes to the deposit of biological materials under the Budapest Treaty, the need to demonstrate a tangible result, or at least, that someone skilled in the art may reduce to practice an invention, has been one of the requirements of almost every patent system. This need is probably inherent to the definition of invention, conceived as a human creation that must be materialized or has the potential to be materialized. Basically the concept implies that something is not a creation if it lies only in the mind of a person.

Accordingly, in the beginning of the patent systems everything abstract was not considered an invention by default. This includes everything that needs to occur inside the mind of a person, that needs a human being to process information through his mind and then achieve a result or conclusion that is useful to make decisions that may, or may not, have a physical result.

Under this principles, a number of countries exclude from the definition of invention expressly business methods, mathematical methods, game rules, mental acts and the like, as the same occurred in the mind of someone and not in the tangible world, or at least they did not have a tangible effect in general.

However, advances in the processing capabilities of computers, in telecommunications and networks, and in technologies related to sensing all kinds of signals, together with software development that makes all of those operable, have been able to substitute the human mind (and many times humans) in several ways. In fact, all of those elements that formerly occurred in the mind of a person, have become true inventions, in the sense that they do not occur in the abstract arena of the mind, but are actually creations that are meant to occur in a physical instrument, namely, a computer.

This new "virtual reality" has pressured the patent system internationally, and the different patent offices and governments are handling this change differently, but without considering that the old rules were meant to deal with a technology environment that has made possible in the tangible world what otherwise would have been impossible, thus giving birth to new inventions of a different nature.

The different approach that countries are taking towards computer-implemented inventions and the recent changes in the local practices worldwide with regard to patentability of such inventions, imposes a challenge to licensing, particularly in international transactions.

The reason is simple: if the scope of protection is not clear and it changes from one country to the other, licensing strategies become more difficult and the management of a licensing program must take into account such differences.

Furthermore, the telecommunications world has nowadays no frontiers, and the consequences of such lack of frontiers are also a challenge to the patent systems, as will be hereinafter analyzed.

No frontiers?

Cloud computing and augmented reality, constitute perhaps the biggest business trends in the commercialization of computer-implemented inventions arena. Portability of data and interchangeability of systems is one of the key components of services regarding information technologies and the management thereof and all the systems, sensors and methods of all kinds that are developed in connection with such systems and its interaction with humans are driving the future of electronic products.

However, the lack of frontiers in the operation of such systems impose further challenges to the intellectual property systems and, consequently to licensing.

Assuming that all patent systems were homogeneous with regard to the criteria on patentability of computer-implemented inventions, the territorial nature of the protection granted by a patent would still be a difficult element to manage, because very likely not all of the steps of a process or method patent will be performed within the same jurisdiction, and the services derived there from will very likely be sold also outside the jurisdiction where the patent is in full effect.

In fact, even with homogeneous criteria, a patent could have been filed in one country and not in another country for either strategic or financial reasons, but in any case, the technology would be protected in some countries and not in other countries.

Accordingly, enforcement of patents in these areas of technology becomes harder, and the freedom to operate has become a very difficult issue to determine in this kind of technology.

In international transactions, if we consider that the scope of the rights might be different from country to country, worldwide licensing is not a simple task.

Furthermore, the connectivity demanded by users have made standards a must for all the players in the electronics arena, which we all know have tremendous implications regarding anti-trust and licensing of patents that are necessary (essential) for compliance of such standards.

The importance of standardization and the role of the patent system in connection therewith is more important than ever. As in the case of cloud computing, industry standards are applicable beyond frontiers, but patents have only regional effect. Therefore, the scope and need of the licenses of essential patents has become a key factor in the commercialization of electronics and will remain so in the future.

All of the above impose the need of being extremely careful in obtaining IP, managing the same, and of course in licensing strategies thereof, thus challenging IP professionals to develop strategies that can deal with this adverse, or at least complex environment.

Open Source?

Technologies that are derived from open source models pose an ever more difficult task for licensing in the computer-implemented inventions arena.

The combination of open source technologies with proprietary technologies and the difficulties inherent to the activities performed under an open source license are also a further consideration, especially because open source users are usually (with exceptions of course) fierce detractors of the patent system.

Accordingly, handling a licensing program that incorporates somehow open source technologies bundled with proprietary technologies and then trying to commercialize the same pose a further challenge in the due diligence of computer-implemented technologies, because inventorship dilutes and often is difficult to allocate, independently of the burdens or conditions that the open-source license in itself may include regarding ownership of future developments.

As in the cases explained before, both inventorship and open-sources licenses are determined in accordance with the laws of the territory, and therefore international transactions are very difficult when open source technologies are involved.

What to do?

From the IP system point of view, it is important to work internationally in standardizing the scope and kind of rights conferred regarding computer-implemented inventions. Clearly the current rules are blurry enough within jurisdictions and the need for international consensus will increase in importance as commercial activities with these inventions also increases.

Meanwhile, in designing a licensing program based on computer-implemented inventions, at least the following topics must be considered on a case-by-case basis:

a. Consider differentiated licenses market by market.

Even if the licensee is the same for different territories, it makes sense to have differentiated licenses for each territory taking into consideration the scope of patent rights, the applicable standards and the actual source of revenue of the product/service that is finally sold.

b. Consider the territorial source of revenue.

One of the areas that are more consistent regarding international treatment of transactions is taxation. Taxes are usually paid according to what is known as the "source of revenue", which in turn is determined on where is legally located the person that is receiving an income, the person that is paying, and the place where the service or product is performed/delivered. In the cases where it is not clear where infringement based on sales or distribution occurs, because of difficulties in defining the territory where the activities are performed, the source of revenue is a very good tool for demonstrating the territory where the exploitation occurred, which is a better standing in the case of infringement actions. In differentiated licenses by territory, this consideration will also make possible taking advantage of taxation treaties with more efficiency.

c. Consider ownership issues and the potential use of open source or other pooling practices in due diligence.

Due diligence regarding ownership must be very careful and most consider the potential participation of inventors in different countries with different laws and perhaps under obligations imposed by licenses on open source programming.

d. Analyze before obtaining IP the activities that may be performed inside and outside the territories.

Depending on the patent system in the territory, you should analyze always the activities that may be performed outside the territory and the rules for infringement applicable in every market of interest. This will ensure an IP protection strategy with greater possibilities of enforceability, which will give both parties more certainty in a licensing transaction.

e. Analyze before obtaining IP the activities that may be performed inside and outside the territories.

Depending on the patent system in the territory, you should analyze always the activities that may be performed outside the territory and the rules for infringement applicable in every market of interest. This will ensure an IP protection strategy with greater possibilities of enforceability, which will give both parties more certainty in a licensing transaction.

f. If you are licensee, be sure that you pay for what you should.

Especially with patents that are essential for standards, there might be relevant territories where the patent rights are not enforceable or simply do not exist. Accordingly, bundling territories might be considered an anti-trust practice that could or should be avoided. However, consideration of the above recommendations is necessary also because "bundling" might not be the case if different activities are performed in different territories.


Under the current circumstances, patent systems must evolve to develop more homogeneous criteria regarding computer-implemented inventions in terms of scope, patentability and international enforceability thereof.

Unfortunately this does not seem to be occurring soon. In the meantime, factors including the practices on a territorial basis must be considered in developing an IP and licensing program. Even if a transaction is made with a single licensee, there might be necessary differentiated licenses by territory that may take into account the specific circumstances in such territory regarding the breadth and availability of IP rights for computer-implemented inventions.

The environment will still continue evolving, hopefully, towards a more transparent and effective system that will allow business under clear rules for everybody in the computer-implemented inventions arena.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Héctor Chagoya
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.