Mexico: Licensing Computer-Implemented Inventions: Challenges In A Heterogeneous Patent World

Last Updated: 21 February 2012
Article by Héctor Chagoya
Most Read Contributor in Mexico, November 2018

A new virtual reality vs. the patent system

The legal system of every country has evolved through different mechanisms to adapt to technological development and changes. While Civil Law countries adapt the codes to new realities through complex procedures, Common Law countries rely on the interpretation given by courts to the same laws in the light of the new social and technology environment.

Intellectual property rights are inevitably linked to technology advances and development. This is why perhaps they have been subject to international treaties very early, to ensure that all countries will provide protection according to certain basic principles that are expected to be common to all nations. Perhaps the best example of such standardization is the Agreement on the Trade Related aspects of Intellectual Property (TRIPS), which has been adopted by every country that is part of the World Trade Organization (WTO).

In spite of such treaties, the one definition that practically no international treaty includes is the definition of what is considered in each country an "invention". This lack of definition has leaded to different approaches, especially with regard to what is now known as "computer-implemented inventions" in the prosecution and enforcement of IP rights, particularly regarding patents.

Due to the fact that computer programs are subject to copyrights in many countries, but certain procedures may be patented in others, this area of technology is facing great troubles with regard to the certainty and scope of the rights conferred to the owners of intellectual property thereof.

Upon analyzing the development of patent systems, particularly with regard to patentable subject matter, the "tangible" aspect of an invention has been crucial for determining patentability. From the necessity to provide prototypes to the deposit of biological materials under the Budapest Treaty, the need to demonstrate a tangible result, or at least, that someone skilled in the art may reduce to practice an invention, has been one of the requirements of almost every patent system. This need is probably inherent to the definition of invention, conceived as a human creation that must be materialized or has the potential to be materialized. Basically the concept implies that something is not a creation if it lies only in the mind of a person.

Accordingly, in the beginning of the patent systems everything abstract was not considered an invention by default. This includes everything that needs to occur inside the mind of a person, that needs a human being to process information through his mind and then achieve a result or conclusion that is useful to make decisions that may, or may not, have a physical result.

Under this principles, a number of countries exclude from the definition of invention expressly business methods, mathematical methods, game rules, mental acts and the like, as the same occurred in the mind of someone and not in the tangible world, or at least they did not have a tangible effect in general.

However, advances in the processing capabilities of computers, in telecommunications and networks, and in technologies related to sensing all kinds of signals, together with software development that makes all of those operable, have been able to substitute the human mind (and many times humans) in several ways. In fact, all of those elements that formerly occurred in the mind of a person, have become true inventions, in the sense that they do not occur in the abstract arena of the mind, but are actually creations that are meant to occur in a physical instrument, namely, a computer.

This new "virtual reality" has pressured the patent system internationally, and the different patent offices and governments are handling this change differently, but without considering that the old rules were meant to deal with a technology environment that has made possible in the tangible world what otherwise would have been impossible, thus giving birth to new inventions of a different nature.

The different approach that countries are taking towards computer-implemented inventions and the recent changes in the local practices worldwide with regard to patentability of such inventions, imposes a challenge to licensing, particularly in international transactions.

The reason is simple: if the scope of protection is not clear and it changes from one country to the other, licensing strategies become more difficult and the management of a licensing program must take into account such differences.

Furthermore, the telecommunications world has nowadays no frontiers, and the consequences of such lack of frontiers are also a challenge to the patent systems, as will be hereinafter analyzed.

No frontiers?

Cloud computing and augmented reality, constitute perhaps the biggest business trends in the commercialization of computer-implemented inventions arena. Portability of data and interchangeability of systems is one of the key components of services regarding information technologies and the management thereof and all the systems, sensors and methods of all kinds that are developed in connection with such systems and its interaction with humans are driving the future of electronic products.

However, the lack of frontiers in the operation of such systems impose further challenges to the intellectual property systems and, consequently to licensing.

Assuming that all patent systems were homogeneous with regard to the criteria on patentability of computer-implemented inventions, the territorial nature of the protection granted by a patent would still be a difficult element to manage, because very likely not all of the steps of a process or method patent will be performed within the same jurisdiction, and the services derived there from will very likely be sold also outside the jurisdiction where the patent is in full effect.

In fact, even with homogeneous criteria, a patent could have been filed in one country and not in another country for either strategic or financial reasons, but in any case, the technology would be protected in some countries and not in other countries.

Accordingly, enforcement of patents in these areas of technology becomes harder, and the freedom to operate has become a very difficult issue to determine in this kind of technology.

In international transactions, if we consider that the scope of the rights might be different from country to country, worldwide licensing is not a simple task.

Furthermore, the connectivity demanded by users have made standards a must for all the players in the electronics arena, which we all know have tremendous implications regarding anti-trust and licensing of patents that are necessary (essential) for compliance of such standards.

The importance of standardization and the role of the patent system in connection therewith is more important than ever. As in the case of cloud computing, industry standards are applicable beyond frontiers, but patents have only regional effect. Therefore, the scope and need of the licenses of essential patents has become a key factor in the commercialization of electronics and will remain so in the future.

All of the above impose the need of being extremely careful in obtaining IP, managing the same, and of course in licensing strategies thereof, thus challenging IP professionals to develop strategies that can deal with this adverse, or at least complex environment.

Open Source?

Technologies that are derived from open source models pose an ever more difficult task for licensing in the computer-implemented inventions arena.

The combination of open source technologies with proprietary technologies and the difficulties inherent to the activities performed under an open source license are also a further consideration, especially because open source users are usually (with exceptions of course) fierce detractors of the patent system.

Accordingly, handling a licensing program that incorporates somehow open source technologies bundled with proprietary technologies and then trying to commercialize the same pose a further challenge in the due diligence of computer-implemented technologies, because inventorship dilutes and often is difficult to allocate, independently of the burdens or conditions that the open-source license in itself may include regarding ownership of future developments.

As in the cases explained before, both inventorship and open-sources licenses are determined in accordance with the laws of the territory, and therefore international transactions are very difficult when open source technologies are involved.

What to do?

From the IP system point of view, it is important to work internationally in standardizing the scope and kind of rights conferred regarding computer-implemented inventions. Clearly the current rules are blurry enough within jurisdictions and the need for international consensus will increase in importance as commercial activities with these inventions also increases.

Meanwhile, in designing a licensing program based on computer-implemented inventions, at least the following topics must be considered on a case-by-case basis:

a. Consider differentiated licenses market by market.

Even if the licensee is the same for different territories, it makes sense to have differentiated licenses for each territory taking into consideration the scope of patent rights, the applicable standards and the actual source of revenue of the product/service that is finally sold.

b. Consider the territorial source of revenue.

One of the areas that are more consistent regarding international treatment of transactions is taxation. Taxes are usually paid according to what is known as the "source of revenue", which in turn is determined on where is legally located the person that is receiving an income, the person that is paying, and the place where the service or product is performed/delivered. In the cases where it is not clear where infringement based on sales or distribution occurs, because of difficulties in defining the territory where the activities are performed, the source of revenue is a very good tool for demonstrating the territory where the exploitation occurred, which is a better standing in the case of infringement actions. In differentiated licenses by territory, this consideration will also make possible taking advantage of taxation treaties with more efficiency.

c. Consider ownership issues and the potential use of open source or other pooling practices in due diligence.

Due diligence regarding ownership must be very careful and most consider the potential participation of inventors in different countries with different laws and perhaps under obligations imposed by licenses on open source programming.

d. Analyze before obtaining IP the activities that may be performed inside and outside the territories.

Depending on the patent system in the territory, you should analyze always the activities that may be performed outside the territory and the rules for infringement applicable in every market of interest. This will ensure an IP protection strategy with greater possibilities of enforceability, which will give both parties more certainty in a licensing transaction.

e. Analyze before obtaining IP the activities that may be performed inside and outside the territories.

Depending on the patent system in the territory, you should analyze always the activities that may be performed outside the territory and the rules for infringement applicable in every market of interest. This will ensure an IP protection strategy with greater possibilities of enforceability, which will give both parties more certainty in a licensing transaction.

f. If you are licensee, be sure that you pay for what you should.

Especially with patents that are essential for standards, there might be relevant territories where the patent rights are not enforceable or simply do not exist. Accordingly, bundling territories might be considered an anti-trust practice that could or should be avoided. However, consideration of the above recommendations is necessary also because "bundling" might not be the case if different activities are performed in different territories.


Under the current circumstances, patent systems must evolve to develop more homogeneous criteria regarding computer-implemented inventions in terms of scope, patentability and international enforceability thereof.

Unfortunately this does not seem to be occurring soon. In the meantime, factors including the practices on a territorial basis must be considered in developing an IP and licensing program. Even if a transaction is made with a single licensee, there might be necessary differentiated licenses by territory that may take into account the specific circumstances in such territory regarding the breadth and availability of IP rights for computer-implemented inventions.

The environment will still continue evolving, hopefully, towards a more transparent and effective system that will allow business under clear rules for everybody in the computer-implemented inventions arena.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Héctor Chagoya
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions