Jersey: Just And Equitable Winding Up In Jersey- Who Will Take On The Role Of Liquidator?

Last Updated: 15 May 2009
Article by Philip Le Cornu, Kerry Lawrence, Steve Meiklejohn and Edward Mackereth

Most Read Contributor in Jersey, September 2018

Introduction

With most economies on the edge of, or else in recession, the number of insolvency proceedings in a number of jurisdictions, will undoubtedly increase. Jersey will be no exception, not only with regard to local businesses facing difficulties, but also with regard to Jersey entities that form part of broader financial structures.

There have been two recent Jersey decisions concerning the provisions of the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 (as amended) (the "Law") relating to winding up on just and equitable grounds, which might become a fertile area involving court appointed liquidators in Jersey given current economic conditions.

Just and equitable winding up

Article 155 of the Law provides that the Royal Court can order that a Jersey company be wound up on just and equitable grounds. In the Matter of Belgravia [2008] JRC161 (23 September 2008) and Bisson v Bish & Others [2008] JRC193 (11 November 2008) confirm the basis on which the Royal Court will exercise the jurisdiction. In short, both decisions demonstrate that the Royal Court will in broad terms follow English principles and authority (the respective statutory provisions being similar), some of which has been considered in previous Royal Court decisions.

The need for an investigation

Belgravia involved an application by three Jersey companies which had various roles within a regulated collective investment fund structure. The Belgravia group (ultimately held by Barclays Private Bank and Trust Limited ("Barclays") as trustee of a Jersey law trust) had been under regulatory scrutiny by the Jersey Financial Services Commission ("JFSC"). Various directions had been issued by the JFSC in relation to Belgravia ultimately resulting in (amongst other things) a suspension of subscriptions and redemptions into the respective Belgravia managed funds. Barclays had appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP to investigate the financial position of the Belgravia entities. Deloitte's report concluded that, in part, the Belgravia group was insolvent. That, combined with fears of shares being issued that would dilute Barclays' holding, further raised the levels of concern at Barclays and the JFSC - both were of the view that a full investigation into Belgravia's affairs was required.

In considering the application (made by Barclays but in the name of the Belgravia entities by representation), the Royal Court referred to earlier decisions where it had held that the approach to the circumstances in which Article 155 would be applied was to be flexible. The Court identified the available routes in Jersey law for winding up the Belgravia companies - a creditors' winding up (which would require a shareholders' resolution); a declaration en désastre; or a just and equitable winding up. Reasons in support of the just and equitable winding up advanced by Barclays included the need for an investigation (being a recognised category in England for the exercise of the just and equitable jurisdiction), the flexibility of the procedure as compared to a désastre (particularly where certain subsidiaries were not insolvent); and the importance of the choice of liquidator - in a creditors' winding up it is an appointment by creditors or shareholders¹; in a désastre the Viscount acts; and in a just and equitable winding up the Court appoints a liquidator. The Court in this case had no hesitation in granting the order and appointing two Deloitte representatives as liquidators.

Deadlock

Bisson concerned a company in deadlock. The three shareholders accepted that there had been a complete breakdown of mutual trust and confidence between them (two of whom also served as directors) with allegations of impropriety being made on both sides. Whilst the application for a just and equitable winding up by the largest shareholder was supported by the other shareholders, the Court first considered whether a voluntary winding up was the correct route. In granting the order sought, the Court accepted, based on earlier Jersey2 authority (which had followed English decisions) that deadlock could be sufficient ground to order a winding up on just and equitable grounds and that, on the facts, the requisite degree was shown to exist. The Court referred to some of the categories of circumstances that had been accepted by the court previously (eg, the stratum of the company has gone3; the need for an investigation4). The Court also noted that grounds existed to grant the order on the basis that the alternative routes of a voluntary or a creditors winding up both required a degree of agreement (a directors' statement in a voluntary winding up or forming and acting as a liquidator's committee in a creditors' winding up) which would not be forthcoming given the degree of acrimony between the parties. Representatives of Begbies Traynor were appointed to act as liquidators, with various orders made as to how the winding up was to proceed.

Who can act as liquidator?

In Bisson there had been a time when it was not clear who would act as liquidator. As a consequence, the Viscount had been convened to the proceedings by the Court with the possibility of him being appointed. The Viscount submitted that there was no legal basis for his appointment as a liquidator in a just and equitable winding up and that, in any event, he did not wish to take the appointment. The Viscount submitted that by reason of Article 7 of the Companies (General Provisions) (Jersey) Order 2002, he could only accept an appointment as a liquidator under a creditors' winding up5. Article 7 provides that for a public company or one being wound up as a creditors' winding up, only the Viscount or else persons who are members of the respective Institutes of Chartered Accountants in England, Wales, Scotland or Ireland or of the Association of Chartered Certified Accounts can be appointed as liquidator.

The Court did not have to decide the issue in Bisson due to the agreement to appoint the representatives of Begbies Traynor but the Viscount's submissions do highlight the issue of who can or would want to be appointed to wind up the affairs of a Jersey company in Jersey. The Viscount is responsible for administering désastres in Jersey (whether personal or corporate) as the debtor's property is vested in him as a matter of law once the declaration is made6. Whilst (subject to funding) the Viscount can engage professional accountancy assistance in circumstances where he is appointed (whether under a désastre or other Court ordered proceedings) it is apparent that the Viscount did not wish to see his already onerous case load increased further.

The future of Court appointments

With the increase in corporate winding ups, many of which are likely to involve (as in the case of Belgravia) complex and specialised financial structures, there will be a corresponding increase in appointments of liquidators. It is noteworthy that the Royal Court continues to be willing to exercise the just and equitable jurisdiction to appoint experienced professionals to take on appointments as liquidators. Obviously the jurisdiction to grant such relief is not unlimited and would not typically be available to creditors, for whom désastre proceedings remain the obvious route. It will be a matter for the legislature to consider whether, in the current economic climate, the legislative framework in Jersey is likely to swamp the Viscount with unmanageable levels of appointments if there is a dramatic rise in the numbers of désastre proceedings.

As a postscript, in August 2008 in its decision In the Matter of the IMK Family Trust7 the Royal Court appointed for the first time receivers in respect of a Jersey trust, holding that it had an inherent jurisdiction so to do; the receivers were representatives of KPMG. That decision has been upheld on appeal by the Court of Appeal8. It will be interesting to see to what extent that jurisdiction will be exercised in the future.

Footnotes

1. However, Article 175(1) of the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 provides that the Court can appoint a liquidator in a creditors' winding up if no liquidator is acting; see also Re Fontayne and Fenbury Limited Unreported, 19 September 1996

2. Jean v Murfitt, Murco Overseas Limited and the Viscount [1996] JLR N8c

3. Re Leveraged Income Fund Limited 2002/209 31 October 2001

4. In the Matter of Belgravia

5. Ie under Part 21, Chapter 4 of the Law

6. Article 8 Bankruptcy (Désastre) (Jersey) Law 1990

7. [2008] JRC136 (15 August 2008)

8. [2008] JCA196 (19 November 2008)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions