Jersey: Representation Of IFM Corporate Trustees Limited

In the matter of the Representation of IFM Corporate Trustees Limited [2015] JRC 160: An interesting case concerning the rectification of a Trust.

On 31st July 2015, the Royal Court gave judgment in In the matter of the Representation of IFM Corporate Trustees Limited [2015] JRC 160 making an order for the rectification of a Trust. In so doing, the Court raised an interesting issue as to whether it should exercise its discretion to rectify a trust if its assistance was sought to rectify a mistake relating to an "aggressive tax avoidance" scheme.

The Facts

IFM (the "Trustee") was trustee of an employer financed retirement benefit scheme (the "Trust"). The Trust was established upon the acquisition of an employment business by the Settlor. The business of the Settlor was to second its staff to third parties, primarily in the UK, and the Settlor ceased its trade on 31st March 2014 Consequently the Trust was no longer active.

The Trust was intended to motivate and incentivise the employees of the Settlor, which employed approximately 2000 employees all of whom were intended to form part of the class of beneficiaries under the Trust.

The previous owner of the Settlor's business had carried out a similar business and put in place a similar structure for rewarding employees as was put in place by the Settlor. It was clear that both the Settlor and the Trustee intended that the employees should be rewarded in the way in which employees of the previous business had been rewarded.

The arrangements between the Settlor, its employees and the Trust were as follows:

  1. The Settlor paid employees the UK national minimum wage as a salary;
  2. This payment was made independently of the Trust;
  3. In addition to the salary, the Settlor also made discretionary loans to employees by way of reward for their services;
  4. These loans were made at the sole discretion of the Settlor, and were not made by the Trustee;
  5. At the end of each month, the Settlor transferred the right to repayment of the discretionary loans to the Trust;
  6. At the same time the Settlor would make a cash contribution to the Trust; and
  7. Discretionary loans, loan rights and cash contributions were all generally contributed to the Trust on a monthly basis.

The loan rights and contributions, once settled into trust, were handled in the following way:-

  1. The loan rights were held on the trusts of one sub-fund (the "Initial Sub-Fund"), which had only two main beneficiaries, including the First Respondent to the proceedings (a specified employee) and the Second Respondent (the "Missing Beneficiary"). The cash contributions were held on the trusts of other sub-funds (the "Subsequent Sub-Funds") which had a large number of main beneficiaries.
  2. Following the appointment of the loan rights and cash contributions, the Trustee entered into an instrument of transposition by which the loan rights and the cash contributions would be transposed so that the Initial Sub-Fund held all the cash contributions and the Subsequent Sub-Funds held the loan rights (on the repayment of a discretionary loan by an employee, the Trustee could potentially benefit employees who were beneficiaries of the Subsequent Sub-Fund). The Settlor motivated its employees in this way so that various tax advantages in the UK might be secured.

The terms of the Trust included a definition of the expression "beneficiaries" which the Court stated "extended to any specified employee, the spouse for the time being and widow of any specified employee, the children or remoter issue, and parent or remoter ancestor of any specified employee and the spouse of issue and ancestors who were the spouse of such a person immediately before their death. What was missing from the Trust was language which would have added other classes of beneficiaries, namely:-

"(i) Any child or remoter issue of any grandparent of any specified employee.

(ii) The spouses of all persons described in paragraph 1 above.

(iii) Any person who was the spouse of a person described in paragraph 1 above immediately before his death."

In relation to the Initial Sub-Fund, the problem arose because the third schedule to the Trust which set out the beneficiaries did not include paragraphs (i) – (iii) above. The Trustee therefore sought rectification of the trust instrument to introduce those potential objects as beneficiaries of the Trust. This would allow the Second Respondent to the proceedings to benefit from the Initial Sub-Fund.


The test for rectification is well established and is as follows:-

"(i) The court must be satisfied that as a result of a genuine mistake the trust deed does not carry out the true intentions of the parties and the settlor in particular;

(ii) There must be full and frank disclosure; and

(iii) There should be no other practical remedy."

Application of the Test

Genuine mistake and no other practical remedy

The evidence indicated that it was the Settlor's intention that the Missing Beneficiary was to be a beneficiary of the Trust and was one of the people whom it was anticipated the Trustee would be likely to benefit. Although there were some 2000 named beneficiaries of the Trust itself, the Initial Sub-Fund defined beneficiaries by reference to named individuals and accordingly the beneficiaries of any of the Subsequent Sub-Funds would be unaffected by any rectification of the Initial Sub-Fund. The Trustee and Settlor were agreed that a mistake had been made at the time of the creation of the Initial Sub-Fund, the only person likely to benefit from that Sub-Fund did not oppose the rectification on the grounds of mistake and there was no other practical remedy for enabling benefit to be paid from the Sub-Fund to the Missing Beneficiary. The Court accepted that the trust instrument did not reflect the intentions of the Settlor and the Trustee and that rectification was the only practical remedy.

Full and Frank Disclosure

On the issue of full and frank disclosure, the Court was concerned that there was little mention of the tax position in the UK in the papers provided to it and that this particular scheme might have fallen into the category of "aggressive tax avoidance". Following argument, the Court understood that this was a DOTAS scheme – a regime allowing HMRC to keep up to date with what types of tax avoidance schemes are in circulation and that HMRC were aware of the scheme generally, the scheme promoter having been required to disclose the main elements to HMRC who were then able to monitor the scheme's use and if necessary legislate to terminate it. The Court therefore accepted that full and frank disclosure had ultimately been made.

Important observations of the Court

The Court observed that if this particular scheme was "aggressive tax avoidance", it might have been a relevant factor in the exercise of its discretion, such as to potentially to lead to the refusal to exercise discretion in favour of the Trustee in respect of its application for rectification.

William Bailhache QC, Bailiff, observed:

"This Court recognises that there are strong ethical arguments why tax payers should recognise their obligations to the state in which they live, making their fair and appropriate contribution towards the outgoings which any modern state has in the provision of services for the benefit of the community ... On the other hand, it has long been the case that, as a matter of law, a citizen is entitled to retain his property unless by appropriate legislation, the state takes it away, or makes it chargeable to tax. That is the basis of the distinction between tax evasion, which is unlawful, and tax avoidance, which is not. To organise one's affairs so as to minimise tax has often been seen as a fundamental freedom, enabling the individual to live his life in accordance with the rules which the state sets down, of which taxation is but one...

"... What seems to us perhaps to be open to argument is whether, in an area which involves the exercise of a judicial discretion in cases where the court's assistance is being sought for a mistake which has been made, there is room for the argument that the discretion ought not to be exercised if on the facts of a particular case, the scheme in question is lawful but appears to be so contrived and artificial that it leaves the Court with distaste if, in effect, it is required to endorse it".


Whether the nature of a lawful tax avoidance scheme (aggressive as it may be) is a relevant factor going to the exercise of the Court's discretion when considering the granting of an equitable remedy did not need to be decided in this case as the Court accepted, in the circumstances, that it was not such a scheme. The matter is therefore for argument on another day. However, what is clear is that trustees must be mindful of both their obligations to the Court to make full and frank disclosure on applications of this kind and to be aware that the argument as to whether the remedy of rectification will be available in relation to aggressive tax avoidance schemes is likely to be a live issue in such applications in the future.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions