Jersey: Principles Applicable To Legal Costs Incurred In Trust Related Proceedings In Jersey By Trustees, Other Fiduciaries And Beneficiaries

Last Updated: 8 January 2014
Article by Nigel Sanders

Most Read Contributor in Jersey, September 2018

In its decision in Des Pallieres v JP Morgan Chase & Co the Jersey Court of Appeal has provided a clear view of the principles that apply to costs awards in trust proceedings for parties acting in a fiduciary capacity.  The Court of Appeal's decision was preceded earlier this summer by the Royal Court's decision in Re Dunlop Settlement  in which the costs incurred by a beneficiary in trust related proceedings were considered, and which itself serves as a useful summary of the principles that will be applied.

The key point that emerges from the Court of Appeal's judgment is that the principle of indemnity is paramount with regard to the costs incurred in trust proceedings by a trustee or other person with fiduciary functions in respect of a trust.  The Court of Appeal confirmed that persons exercising fiduciary functions are entitled to an implied equitable indemnity in respect of costs reasonably incurred by that person in the exercise of those functions.  That indemnity is equivalent to the statutory indemnity enjoyed by a trustee and, accordingly, will lead as a matter of principle, to a prima facie entitlement to recover costs on a full trustee indemnity basis.  That right of indemnity (whether express or implied) can only be lost in circumstances where the trustee is guilty of misconduct or acting unreasonably.

The Royal Court's decision in Re Dunlop has confirmed the principle that beneficiaries convened to trust proceedings are also prima facie entitled to have their costs paid out of the trust fund on the indemnity (as opposed to standard) basis (which therefore is not the full indemnity to which a fiduciary would be entitled).  Similarly, that entitlement can be lost in circumstances where the beneficiary acts unreasonably.

Background

The proceedings in Des Pallieres involved an application for disclosure by Mr Des Pallieres (BDP) against JP Morgan Chase & Co (JPM).  JPM was the settlor of an employee benefit trust (EBT) of which BDP (a former employee) was a beneficiary (including of a sub-trust within the EBT).  JPM had a power to remove and appoint trustees and appoint a protector, which were agreed to be fiduciary powers.

The history of the proceedings, which were brought pursuant to Article 51 of the Trusts (Jersey) Law, was somewhat convoluted due to the way in which BDP had initially sought to raise hostile issues within an application for disclosure against both JPM and the trustee of the EBT.  The hostile elements of the claim had been removed, and the application had proceeded to hearing as a trust directions application (albeit one commenced by JPM as beneficiary).

Royal Court decision

In the Royal Court, it was accepted that BDP would have a right to seek disclosure against JPM in connection with the exercise of its fiduciary powers.  However, JPM had never exercised its powers of appointment or removal.  The Court ultimately held that the documents of which BDP sought disclosure were in part available from the trustee or, in many cases were an attempt by BDP to obtain pre-action disclosure in respect of matters that BDP had indicated he might pursue JPM.  Accordingly, the disclosure orders sought were refused.

The Royal Court awarded JPM its costs on the full trustee indemnity basis, but granted leave  to BDP to appeal because the Court considered the question of how to categorise the nature of the proceedings (applying the principles in Re Buckton) which involved considering whether they were hostile or not to be a difficult one;  the Royal Court also thought it important for the Court of Appeal to consider the somewhat novel area of law involving the position of a settlor with fiduciary powers. 

By way of reminder, in Re Buckton it was held that there are 3 principal categories of proceedings: (1) applications by trustees for directions or guidance on a question of construction; (2) a similar kind of application brought by someone other than the trustee; and (3) hostile claims by a beneficiary.  Cases in categories (1) and (2) are necessary for the administration of the trust and, therefore, the costs of all parties will ordinarily be directed to be paid from the trust fund.  Cases in category (3) will typically result in costs orders following usual litigation principles - ie, the loser pays.

BDP argued that because the application he made was essentially one for pre-action disclosure - despite being brought under Article 51 and despite the hostile elements being removed - the costs should be awarded on the basis of hostile proceedings (Buckton category (3)).  He therefore argued that they should not be ordered to be paid from the EBT (or more particularly, BDP's sub-fund) but should be ordered to be paid by him personally on a standard hostile litigation basis. 

Court of Appeal decision

The Court of Appeal held that the costs order of the Royal Court was the correct one.  However, it also held that the question of which of the Buckton categories the application fell into, did not need to be answered when looking at a trustee's or other fiduciary's costs.  It held that JPM's entitlement to costs from the trust fund arose out of its implied right of indemnity as a party acting in a fiduciary capacity, irrespective of the nature of the proceedings.  Nugee JA expressed the view that he did not consider that a hostile claim by a beneficiary against a trustee would fall within the Buckton categories at all.

In reaching its judgment, the Court of Appeal focused on the nature of the application, rejecting arguments that JPM had been acting in its own interests in resisting the scale of the disclosure sought.  In doing so the Court gave helpful guidance on other kinds of litigation in which trustees or fiduciaries might be engaged in that capacity.  For example, if a trustee is sued for breach of trust unsuccessfully, the Court considered that the right of indemnity would still apply, although the beneficiary might be held personally liable to meet the trustee's costs on a standard or indemnity litigation costs basis - the trustee could thereafter seek to recover from the trust the unrecovered costs (such as after assessment/taxation).  Even if a breach of trust action were successful, it does not follow automatically that the trustee will have to bear the costs of the proceedings personally - for example, if an established breach were to be held to be minor or innocent the right of indemnity might still apply.

The Court of Appeal confirmed that the right of indemnity is one that can be lost in circumstances where the trustee or other fiduciary has been found guilty of misconduct.

Re Dunlop Settlement

The Court of Appeal in BDP v JPM cited with approval the costs judgment of the Bailiff in the Royal Court in Re Dunlop.  The factual background to the substantive decision in Re Dunlop is described in an earlier briefing .  In short, it involved the surrender of discretion by the trustee of the settlement and the authorisation by the Court of the trustee to enter into an agreement for the settlement of various claims in respect of the trust and its assets.

The Bailiff's judgment addressed the claim by one of the beneficiaries of the trust for recovery of her costs from the trust fund.  The beneficiary had opposed the decision that was reached in the proceedings.  The Royal Court referred to the Re Buckton principles and their application to beneficiaries' costs in trust litigation, as applied by the Court of Appeal in Jersey in Trilogy Management Limited v YT Charitable Foundation (International) Limited.  

As regards the Buckton categories, the Bailiff held that the application was an administrative one brought by the trustee and, therefore, fell within category (1).  As a consequence, the beneficiary had a prime facie right to an indemnity costs order unless deprived of that right through her own unreasonable conduct.  For numerous reasons (such as not taking part in a mediation, failing to comply with orders for the filing of evidence, filing a "palpably wrong" witness statement and persisting in her opposition) the Bailiff held that the beneficiary had acted unreasonably.  Rather than seeking to reach a view on an issues based cost award, the Bailiff adopted a broad approach and awarded her only half of her costs on the indemnity basis.

Conclusion

These decisions are important: they clarify and reiterate the principles which will be applied when the Courts in Jersey approach awards of costs in trust litigation.  The very clear message from the Court of Appeal with regard to the indemnity enjoyed not only by trustees but also other fiduciaries will bring some degree of certainty to those acting in such positions who are convened to trust proceedings.  The Royal Court decision also signals to beneficiaries that, if convened to a trust application they will likely recover their costs on an indemnity basis.  Equally important for trustees and beneficiaries alike, where a claim for breach of trust is brought unsuccessfully by a beneficiary, the starting point will be that the trustee will be able to look to its right of indemnity to recover its costs in full from the trust assets.

As a postscript, there is one area of potential ambiguity that arises from the judgments, namely the circumstances where the trustee's right of indemnity or the beneficiary's prima facie entitlement can be lost.  The Court of Appeal made reference to the loss of the right of indemnity where a trustee/fiduciary is found (as opposed alleged) to have been guilty of "misconduct".   The Bailiff had remarked in Re Dunlop that the Court of Appeal in Alhamrani v JP Morgan Trust Company (Jersey) Limited had found that a "trustee may lose its costs indemnity by acting unreasonably rather than the higher test of being guilty of misconduct."  Arguments over just how high the test that will be applied is, could still therefore arise in future cases.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions