Jersey: Asset Protection In The Channel Islands

Last Updated: 26 February 2013
Article by David Dorgan and Angela Calnan


Asset protection can be achieved by using a variety of different structures, including a trust, foundation, company, limited partnership or a combination of the aforementioned; for example having a trust with an underlying company holding assets.

The term "Asset Protection" can be slightly confusing because no type of trust, foundation, company or partnership under Jersey or Guernsey law is specifically designated an "Asset Protection" structure as if to suggest a particular type of structure existed for this purpose. Whatever structure is used, its purpose is to protect assets, though the reasons why assets need to be protected will vary.

The primary purpose of asset protection structures is to protect against claims made by creditors and consequently are often used for persons embarking on a risky business venture or persons asked to give personal guarantees to the activities of that business. This note considers the extent to which Jersey and Guernsey trusts can be used in this way.

Asset Protection - the Basics

An asset protection structure is established by a person (the transferor) transferring his assets to the structure, whether a trustee, foundation, company or otherwise. In the asset protection scenario, the transferor usually wishes to divest himself of all of his substantial assets, which, on his bankruptcy, would leave little to his creditors. It is up to the transferor how much of his assets he transfers to the structure.

The strategy of divesting assets for asset protection is to ensure that the assets are as remote as possible from the creditor. This means structurally remote, e.g. in a trust with an underlying company, none of which can be said to be controlled by the settlor, and jurisdictionally remote, that is, in this case, there is no nexus to Jersey and Guernsey.

That a creditor "cannot find" the assets or that the assets are expensive to pursue is a significant strategy in establishing an asset protection structure. For this reason it is often suggested that transferring the transferor's primary residence, or illiquid assets, to an asset protection structure may not be beneficial.

This is particularly where the creditor, debtor and asset are all in the same jurisdiction. If a structure is established with the intention of protecting assets from claims by creditors and others, it is obviously essential that very careful consideration should be given to the terms of the constitutional documents of the structure to ensure that the risk of the property being vulnerable to attack is eliminated as far as possible. In general, the following "rules of thumb" should be followed:

  • the structure should have no affiliation with a jurisdiction in which a claim might be brought, recognised or enforced or in which an injunction might be ordered;
  • ideally, the transferor should have no beneficial interest in the property;
  • it is important that the transfer of property is irrevocable to avoid any argument that a power of revocation is a property right capable of being assigned to the creditor;
  • the transferred property should not be situated in the jurisdiction where the transferor (or beneficiaries if applicable) are resident;
  • the transferor should not have any control of the structure and independent persons should be appointed to administer and control the structure. Consequently, the transferor may wish to be appointed as an investment adviser to the structure. If so, control of the property must be expressly divided between investment discretions, controlled by the transferor, and distribution discretions, controlled by the administrators;
  • if a trust and/or foundation is used, the following should be applied:
    • as few as possible (and ideally no) powers should be reserved to the settlor or founder (as applicable) or someone affiliated with a jurisdiction of the type referred to above;
    • the settlor or founder should consider vesting supervision of the trust or foundation in a committee of protectors or guardians (as appropriate) (which may include the settlor or founder);
    • the settlor of a trust should not be appointed a protector since courts have considered this to permit the settlor a significant control over trust assets by being appointed a protector. It is entirely possible that, by analogy, the same principle may be applicable to a founder being appointed a guardian of a foundation;
    • the constitutional documents should state that no one from where the jurisdiction of the settlor, founder or beneficiaries is resident (or one in which the claim is likely to be made) may be appointed as a trustee or protector (if a trust) or a council member or guardian (if a foundation) and that if such a person is appointed, the existing trustee or council members may remove that person immediately;
    • an express provision should be incorporated in the constitutional documents to the effect that the governing law and the forum of administration cannot be changed to that of the jurisdiction in which the settlor, founder or any beneficiary is domiciled or resident (or one in which the claim is likely to be made) and that no trustee or council member may be appointed who is resident in that jurisdiction.

Asset Protection - Legal Principles

The main area of attack of these types of structure is by a creditor seeking to have the transfer of assets set aside on the basis that the transfer was entered into at an undervalue with the intention of defrauding creditors.

The principle is not new: it derives from the Roman law actio Paulina ("Pauline Action", which still forms part of Jersey and Guernsey's customary law) and can be traced through the Statute of Elizabeth (the Fraudulent Conveyances Act of 1571). The modern English legislation (Insolvency Act 1986) interprets "creditors" as meaning creditors at the time of transfer and future creditors (who need not be in the transferor's contemplation at the time the transfer is made). Other Statute of Elizabeth jurisdictions (i.e. Australia, New Zealand, the US) share these roots.

Whilst certain jurisdictions (like the Cayman Islands or the Bahamas) have enacted debtor friendly legislation and hold themselves out as "Asset Protection" jurisdictions, no jurisdiction allows defrauding existing creditors, nor protects a transfer of assets that results in the transferor becoming immediately insolvent.

A fraudulent disposition claim in Jersey and Guernsey may be brought by way of a Pauline Action. The essential elements of a Pauline Action are set out in the judgment of Re Esteem Settlement [2002] JLR 53, a decision of the Royal Court of Jersey. (The Guernsey Court of Appeal held in Flightlease Holdings Guernsey Limited et al v International Lease Finance Corporation (55/2005) that the elements set out in a Jersey case called Re Esteem summarised the relevant Jersey (and Guernsey) law). The ingredients of a Pauline Action are:

  • the person bringing the Pauline Action must have been a creditor at the time of the transaction under attack;
  • for the purposes of a Pauline Action, a person is properly described as a "creditor" if the facts giving rise to the claim pre-date the transaction under attack;
  • the creditor seeking to set aside a transaction must show that the debtor [the transferor] was insolvent at the time of the transaction under attack, or rendered insolvent by that transaction;
  • the debtor's insolvency is measured on the balance sheet test;
  • in order to succeed in an action to set aside a transaction, the creditor must show that the debtor carried out the transaction (e.g. the settlor settled the trust) with the intention of defrauding his creditors; and
  • if the debtor carried out the transaction for more than one purpose, it suffices that the intention to defraud was a substantial purpose.

In Re Esteem it was established that a Pauline Action in Jersey was an action personnelle mobilière, and that for this type of action the limitation period for bringing a claim is 10 years. A shorter limitation period of 6 years exists in Jersey and Guernsey, which is the limitation period for droits personnelles (rights to demand performance or payment). Two Guernsey authorities appear to have been decided on principles akin to the Pauline Action but do not specifically refer to the elements of a Pauline Action, Morgan v Donaldson (18 July 1985) and Le Ray v Martel (7 July 1747). In Morgan it was held that:

"Anyway it is held as part of our law that the gift of things or chattels does not necessarily imply that the donee is responsible for the debts of the donor, but if at the time of the gift the donor knew or ought to have known that he was not solvent, or because of the donation there was not left to him sufficient to satisfy his creditors, then these who are defrauded by this gift can revoke by an action the gift which is made, even if the donee didn't have knowledge of the fraud of the donor ... Now that is the Customary Law ..."

Neither Jersey or Guernsey have statutory provisions preventing transactions at an undervalue entered into with the purpose of putting assets beyond the reach of a person who is making or may at some time make a claim against him, such as s.423 of the UK's Insolvency Act, 1986.


It is important to choose a jurisdiction which offers strong confidentiality laws. Jersey and Guernsey are such jurisdictions.

Asset Protection in Jersey and Guernsey - Conclusions

The requirements of the Pauline Action suggest that creditors will only be able to bring claims in limited circumstances. In particular, the onus is on the creditor to demonstrate firstly that he was a creditor at the time the transfer of assets was made, and secondly, that the transferor was insolvent (or became insolvent) when the transfer was made. Also, the creditor is restricted to a period of 6 years in which to bring a claim.

Provided the "rules of thumb" set out above are followed, there are many good reasons to consider asset protection structures. As a practical matter, often asset protection structures work because a creditor must weigh the costs of finding and pursuing assets against the claim itself, rather than the merits of the structure itself. This again supports the view that the asset protection structure should be located in a remote jurisdiction, with liquid assets, that are easily movable.

Furthermore, the strength of the structure will depend, in part, on the transferor's willingness to be declared insolvent. Being declared insolvent could have a seriously detrimental effect on a person's professional reputation and may lead to disciplinary sanctions for those people who are part of a regulated profession. Another difficulty is that, even if the transferor requests back to him the property transferred to the structure, the independent persons administrating the structure may refuse. The structure has been set up to eliminate the transferor's control and there is no guarantee that the independent administrators will distribute those assets to him.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions