Jersey: In the Matter of The Representation of AA [2010] JRC 164

Last Updated: 12 January 2011
Most Read Contributor in Jersey, September 2018

The distinction between "forum for administration" clauses and "exclusive jurisdiction" clauses in the context of trusts

This judgment from Commissioner Clyde-Smith with Jurats Liddiard and Nicolle set aside a service of proceedings on respondents outside of Jersey and stayed the proceedings. The importance of the judgement is the Court's consideration of the "forum for administration" and "exclusive jurisdiction" clauses in the context of trusts.


The proceedings in question concerned a representation brought in the Royal Court of Jersey by AA (a Swiss company) which was the present trustee of a Jersey law trust (the "Trust"). The representation sought certain orders against the former trustees, namely two Guernsey companies regulated by the Guernsey Financial Services Commission, and which former trustees continued to hold and administer the trust assets in Guernsey. The nature of the orders requested by AA constituted hostile proceedings against the former trustees.

Importantly, the Guernsey courts were already seized of several other applications in relation to the Trust, brought by the former trustees.

With respect to the representation in the Jersey courts, the former trustees appeared under protest as to jurisdiction and issued a summons to set service aside and to stay the representation.


It was not in dispute that on an application to serve proceedings out of the jurisdiction in accordance with the Service of Process Rules 1994, AA must show:

  1. that the Court has jurisdiction to hear the matter;
  2. that there is a serious issue to be tried; and
  3. that Jersey is clearly the most convenient forum for the resolution of the issues.

The former trustees did not dispute (1) and (2), and the issue was therefore whether AA could satisfy the Court that Jersey was clearly the most convenient forum. In effect, this required the Court to consider the "forum for administration" provision found in the trust deed of the Trust.

The clause in question is one that most Jersey trustees will be familiar with, in that it provided:

"...this Trust is established under and shall be governed in all respects by the laws of the Island of Jersey which shall be the proper law of this Trust and the courts thereof shall be the forum for the administration of this Trust."

AA's advocate submitted that this provision conferred an exclusive e jurisdiction on the Jersey court in connection with all disputes arising out of the Trust, and in support, he relied upon the Court of Appeal decision in Koonmen v Bender and Others [2002] JCA 218.

In response, the former trustee's advocate drew from an article by Paul Matthews entitled "What is a trust jurisdiction clause?", published in the Jersey and Guernsey Law Review in October 2003, which criticised the Koonmen decision as making the mistake of treating the "forum of administration" clause as being a contractual provision and misunderstanding the meaning of such clauses.

By way of background, Paul Matthew's article asserts that jurisdiction clauses are essentially contractual, and as a trust is not a contract, it therefore could not bind persons, such as beneficiaries, who are not party to the trust deed. His view is that "forum for administration" provisions are quite different to exclusive jurisdiction clauses. The administration referred to, in Professor Matthew's view, is not intended to include contentious breach of trust litigation. Rather, it is concerned with aspects of the administration of the trust which require the assistance of the court, such as clarifying the true construction of trust terms, or seeking directions as to whether the trustee should take or defend legal action against third parties. In contrast, an exclusive jurisdiction clause has its place in a contract between parties to a transaction who agree that, if a dispute arises out of their transaction, they will submit their dispute to a particular tribunal. Paul Matthews' criticisms were recently cited with approval by the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands, which decided not to follow Koonmen.

As the superior court, the Court of Appeal decision in Koonmen is binding on the Royal Court. Bearing this in mind, the Royal Court, in determining that the provision did not amount to an exclusive jurisdiction provision notwithstanding the decision in Koonmen, the Court relied on "important" differences between the trust deed in Koonmen (which included the words "exclusive jurisdiction" in the interpretation of the proper law clause) and the trust deed in this matter (which did not contain those words). Further, the Royal Court asserted that it was a question of the Court construing the particular deed before it in order to derive from it the presumed intentions of the parties, conducted against the background of the surrounding circumstances or matrix of facts existing at the time when the document was executed.

In this case, the Court noted that the Trust here had no connection with Jersey save for the adoption of Jersey law as the proper law and the Jersey courts as the forum for administration. Accordingly, the court's judgment was that it was not the intention of the draftsman of the trust that the courts of Jersey should have exclusive jurisdiction over all disputes in relation to the Trust. The Court accordingly held that the Jersey Courts did not have exclusive jurisdiction over the matters raised in AA's representation, and that the Guernsey courts were the most convenient forum.

As a safety measure, the Court further held that if it were wrong and the trust deed did confer exclusive jurisdiction on the Jersey courts, then in exercise of the Court's discretion and applying Koonmen, the Court's judgement was that the circumstances in this case were exceptional and justified the Court overriding the express choice of forum provision.


The Royal Court is bound by the Court of Appeal decision in Koonmen, although the case shows an implied approval of Professor Paul Matthews' clear and reasoned criticism of the decision in Koonmen.

In this case, the Royal Court avoided having to apply the outcome from the Koonmen decision by noting relevant differences in the two trust deeds and focussing on the importance of construing the particular deed against the background of the surrounding circumstances in order to derive from it the presumed intention of the parties. The Royal Court also reminded us that it can override an exclusive jurisdiction clause in the interests of justice, and this would have been one of those cases if the clause in question had amounted to an exclusive jurisdiction clause.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions