The much debated legislative bill present by the Italian government aimed at regulating the ".it" domain names seems destined for the time being to be frozen.
Aimed at preventing different forms of cybersquatting, or the appropriation of domaine names for trading purposes, the bill was unfortunately ill-conceived, confused and excessively restrictive. However, some kind of regulation more articulate than "first come, first served" is badly needed.
Actually, besides the "traditional" use of the ".it" by Italian domestic business, there has recently been a massive registration of domain names by foreign organisations in Italy, largely due to the attention generated by the secondary meanings of the suffix "it" which coincides with the English pronoun (as in "buy.it"!) and the usual acronym for the Information Technology.
In the meantime, litigants must rely on the sparse Italian case law to find guidelines in this respect. An interesting and operational model is WIPO arbitration where the handling of conflicts on this matter have thusfar been largely successful. The system, while limited in its scope, permits rapid resolutions at competitive costs, without prejudice for the possibile subsequent commencement of following civil or criminal proceedings whenever appropriate.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Where standard printed terms and conditions of a contract are inconsistent with its special terms and conditions, the special conditions will prevail so as not to defeat the main object and intention of the contract.
The Common Reporting Standard is, like FATCA before it (a regime established by US legislation, the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act), an information exchange regime aimed at international tax transparency.
An assignment of rights under a contract is normally restricted to the benefit of the contract. Where a party wishes to transfer both the benefit and burden of the contract this generally needs to be done by way of a novation.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).