After a long period of time, particularly from 1942 to 1990, during which the Italian legal interest rate was fixed at 5% per year, and the national jurisprudence allowed supplementary adjustments for inflation in order to avoid unduly awarding the defaulting debtor, Italian legislators have begun to fiddle with legal interest. Over the past few years, the legislators initially doubled the rate to 10%, with the declared objective of, inter alia, reducing frivolous resistance against debt collection actions, which was previously and artificially encouraged by the inadequacy of legal interest as a deterrent for outstanding debts. Then they reduced the rate(s) again to 5%, and again, from the beginning of 1999, to 2.5%, placing the legal rate substantially below not only the prime lending rate, but also the normal earning power of money, however invested.
Such an inconvenient reform, which will heavily weigh on the judicial system as well as (the) on the execution of judgements, confirms and strengthens the opportunity to timely undertake appropriate collection initiatives every time there is an overdue debt.
The importance must also be stressed of utilising, whenever possible, contractual interest rates, to be proved under Italian law through documentary evidence, or at least to collect any evidence related to the patrimonial damages exceeding the legal interest, which were suffered as a consequence of the delay, such as for instance that pertaining to the financial costs incurred in the same period.
Another strategy, especially in international transactions, is that of adopting choice of law clauses that guarantee the application of national laws awarding more substantial legal interest. Many European countries, including England, are moving, albeit with some degree of caution, exactly in the opposite direction than that of the Italian legal system, and the Italian court, according to the Rome Convention and the recent reform of the Italian international private law, fully recognise the will of the parties in this respect, provided that such clauses do not interfere with consumer's protection provisions.
For further information contact Studio Legale Sutti .
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
By 27 December 2016, the Croatian Parliament needs to implement the Directive 2014/104/EU on antitrust damages actions, which is expected to streamline the procedure for private individuals and businesses to sue for damages...
The EU's one-stop shop principle for concentrations faces an uncertain future following for the UK's Brexit decision. Several scenarios could play out...
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).