The special aspects of the provisions relating to settlement agreements in labour cases will never be sufficiently emphasised.
The ordinary provisions of law whereby settlements of a dispute must be evidenced in writing, in labour cases are integrated by the provisions of Art. 2113 of the Italian Civil Code, under which settlements having as their object the rights of employees that cannot be derogated from as provided by laws or national collective bargaining agreements, are not valid; the employee has the right to challenge said settlements within six months of their execution.
To this should be added that precedents agree that employees are subject to said time limit, as regards their declarations, only if they have rendered them clearly and being fully aware of the specific rights to which they are entitled and with the conscious intent to abandon them.
This was confirmed recently by the Pretore of Genoa by judgement of 07/03/91 which states "should the reciprocal concessions and waivers of the parties in relation to their respective positions, not be identifiable on the basis of the executed declaration, there will follow the nullity for absolute uncertainty of the alleged settlement".
Thus, declarations obtained from the employee as generally occurs at the time of payments of the termination indemnities due, such as "receives by way of settlements" or "has nothing more to claim in relation to the employment which has been terminated", are not only subject to challenge, but are not even cured by the lapsing of the mentioned six month time limit.
Given this, it appears advisable that an employer, each time he is in the presence of a risk inherent to possible future challenges, should systematically formalise the amicable settlements reached with the employee through the mechanism of conciliation before the Court.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Victoria Plumbing had been using VICTORIAN PLUMBING in parallel to Victoria Plum's use of VICTORIA PLUMB, for 15 years. Both parties had been using their respective marks for retail of bathroom products.
Choosing the ideal brand name is no mean feat. For it to be truly valuable to your business, it needs to be registered as a trade mark, but this is easier said than done.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).