One of the Italian legislature's current objectives is to promote alternative dispute resolution in company law matters. To achieve this aim, the Parliament recently issued Law 366 of October 3 2001, which sets out guidelines for the reform of Italian company law as it applies to limited and publicly limited companies and cooperatives. Pursuant to Article 1 of the law, the specific details of how this will be accomplished will be set out in supplementary legislation, which the government will adopt following proposals from the Ministry of Justice, the Treasury and the Ministry of Trade.
Article 12 of Law 366, entitled "New Rules of Procedure", directly addresses the issues of arbitration and alternative dispute resolution. The existing procedural requirements for arbitration are set out in Chapter 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Article 806 of this chapter provides that parties may generally refer disputes to arbitration, provided that the subject matter of the dispute is capable of resolution by private agreement (the article includes a list of matters which are not deemed to be capable of such resolution). Among other things, Article 808 of Chapter 8 makes provision for arbitration by way of a contractual clause or in a separate document and, by reference to Article 807, provides that such clauses must be in writing and clear as to their subject matter. Article 12.3 of Law 366 refers specifically to both articles when stating that the government, by way of derogation from these provisions, may introduce legislation allowing for a company's shareholders to include an arbitration clause in the memorandum and articles of association in relation to some or all company law matters, including disputes concerning the transfer of shares and shareholders agreements. This seemingly extends the circumstances in which the parties can have recourse to arbitration. In addition, where the subject matter of a dispute is not capable of resolution by private agreement, the law provides that the arbitration agreement must refer to arbitration decisions that are based on equity being expressly excluded, and the award shall be challengeable for violation of law.
Article 12.4 of Law 366 states that the government is also empowered to provide for conciliation in company disputes before certain private bodies which can guarantee their efficiency and capability, and which are registered with the Ministry of Justice.
Statements of principle to this effect have been made, but little substantive legislation has so far been enacted, and none concerning alternative dispute resolution. The government has until October 2002 to produce the details of the proposed reforms.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide
to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Where standard printed terms and conditions of a contract are inconsistent with its special terms and conditions, the special conditions will prevail so as not to defeat the main object and intention of the contract.
Following the decision in the Mercury Case, a practice of ‘virtual signings and closings' has developed to avoid the logistical problems in getting a document signed.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).