It will come as pleasant news to those Italians burdened by
economic woes that authorities like Equitalia and Serit are not
entirely exempt from mistakes when issuing tax demands. Join the
growing number of Italians already having their 'Notifications
Of Tax Demand' cancelled by following these steps below:
The tax demand, the means of choice to fight tax evasion, covers
a wide spectrum of public revenue: Imposed Taxation Duties, INPS,
VAT, Tax Registration, Mortgage and Cadastral Taxes, Inheritance
Taxes, Donation Taxes , Consumer Excise Taxes, Customs Fees,
Vehicle Taxes, Ici (Property Tax), Tarsu (Garbage Collection Tax)
and administrative sanctions (such as, the penalties for violation
of the street code) .
The following, is a brief review of the defects that can lead to
the invalidity of the tax demand. Invalidity of the demaind can
lead to the cancellation of the order, the points to consider
1) Defects in relation to Notification.
At his home residence, at his office of work, where he carries
out his business or trade.
If the addressee is not found in one of these places, the court
bailiff will deliver a copy of the act to a family member or
delegated person provided that they are over the age of fourteen
years and not of diminished responsibility (usually) at home,
office or company headquarters.
In the absence of such persons, the copy is handed over to the
caretaker of the building where the addressee lives, his office or
the company headquarters.
The notification may be sent by mail, in a sealed envelope. If
the mail is received and signed by a person who only occasionally
is found at the dwelling of the addressee, then the notification
may be considered null and void.
2) Previously Received Alleged Act
Make sure you have previously received the alleged act.
Otherwise, the notification is considered void.
3) Orders Where The Motivation and Responsibility Are
The tax notice must always indicate a person responsible for the
procedure and the motivation upon which the tax claim is being
made, i.e. the details and the circumstances that gave rise to the
obligation of the taxpayer and related regulations. The motivation
is essential as it allows the private individual the possibility to
4) The Limitation Period Of Collection
The Public Administration has complied with the limitation
period for the collection. In fact, the amounts owed by taxpayers
must be recorded in the tax roll "enforceable, subject to
forfeiture - by December 31" of the following year in which
the assessment has become final." The date of enforceability
of the role must be indicated in the tax notice, if the amount was
registered on the tax roll subsequent to this date the notification
is considered void. With regard to the deadline for the appeal,
these vary depending on the levy that must be paid.
If it is to do with Income Tax, Registration Tax, Mortgage Tax,
Cadastral Tax, Donation Tax, Inheritance Tax, Vehicle taxes or
Local Taxes, the appeal must be brought before the Provincial Tax
Commission within 60 days.
For social security contributions, the term is 40 days and the
appeal must be presented to the Labour Court.
For the opposition to tax demands that are concerned with the
payment of administrative sanctions (usually fines for breaches of
the Highway Code), the term is 30 days and the competent Judge is
the Justice of the peace.
For all other cases, the competent court is the ordinary court
and the appeals must be lodged in accordance with Articles 22 and
22a of regulation n. 689/1981
As a Tax Demand is still enforceable under the above
circumstances as they stand, it is very important to act
accordingly. The remedies available vary according to the defect
you wish to claim:
If the notification presents an obvious error, such as an error
in calculation, an error relating to the person, double taxation,
tax already paid etc, the citizen contacts directly the creditor,
attaching appropriate documentation, in order to request
cancellation or correction of the notification. This is a
"friendly" procedure of dispute that can be activated and
dealt with by the citizen personally.
In all other cases, particularly when the tax demand presents a
formal defect of notification, the citizens may challenge the tax
claim before the competent judicial authority according to the
terms and conditions provided by law.
However, given the complex and constantly changing legislative
framework, the fecund jurisprudence that has been formed on the
subject, it is always advisable to consult a professional lawyer,
accountant or qualified assistance professional, in order to assess
the best line of action to be taken in or outside of court.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Maltese tax law provides for rules which grant beneficiaries referred to as ‘Highly Qualified Persons' to be taxed at a reduced rate of tax of 15% on their employment income, provided certain conditions are satisfied.
Non-U.S. individuals making direct investments in the United States face a bewildering U.S. tax regime.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).