Ireland: Irish High Court Ruling In Corporate Rescue Case: Revenue Liabilities & Examinership

Last Updated: 17 August 2018
Article by Gavin Smith and Greg Cooney

Welcome Irish High Court Ruling in Corporate Rescue Case: Clarification on Import and Effect of Undertakings to Discharge Current Revenue Liabilities During Period of Protection Afforded by Examinership

Overview

It has become a frequent feature for Irish companies seeking court protection through examinership to provide a written undertaking at the petition stage that it will discharge in full post-petition taxes to the Irish Revenue Commissioners (the 'Revenue') that accrue and fall due during the period of protection. A recent written judgment of the Irish High Court (Ms Justice Baker) in Harley Mechanical Services Ltd & the Companies Act 20141 (the 'Proceedings') has provided welcome clarity on the import and effect of such undertakings.

Walkers' Dublin office acted on behalf of the examiner/ liquidator in the Proceedings and was successful in challenging an order which had the effect of deeming unpaid Revenue liabilities as costs in the examinership and thus given special status such that these monies would be unavailable to the liquidator to discharge his own fees and the claims of other creditors.

Examinership

Ireland boasts a powerful, flexible, corporate restructuring process, which international corporates will recognise as similar to the Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code. Examinership is a court supervised statutory process2 available to an insolvent company which has a reasonable prospect of survival as a going concern. The procedure is commenced by way of presentation of a petition to the Irish High Court (the 'Court') seeking the appointment of an independent office holder called an examiner (invariably an insolvency practitioner) to the company and, if appropriate, related companies.3 Upon the presentation of the petition, the company is placed under the protection of the Court which affords it extensive protection from enforcement or execution action by its creditors. Usually the petitioner is the company itself. However, other stakeholders, such as directors, creditors and shareholders holding at least 10% of the issued share capital of the company, also have standing to present an examinership petition.

From an EU law perspective, examinership, is recognised as a main insolvency proceeding for the purposes of the Recast European Insolvency Regulation ('EIR Recast'). The company which is the primary subject of the petition must have its centre of main interests4 ('COMI') in Ireland. Companies which are incorporated or registered elsewhere in the EU but have their COMI in Ireland can be the subject of the petition. It is also possible to apply for the appointment of an examiner to a foreign (i.e. non-EU) company, as a related company, if that company may be wound up by the courts of Ireland.5

Like Chapter 11, examinership is a debtor-in-possession process whereby (save in exceptional circumstances) the directors retain control and executive power of the company. The Examiner sits along side the directors and management of the company. He or she has a brief period of time (up to 100 days from the date the petition is presented) to put together a restructuring plan to save the company, that is, the scheme of arrangement. This will usually involve sourcing fresh investment and agreeing write-downs with the company's creditors.

The scheme of arrangement is presented to the company's creditors and members at duly convened meetings and voted upon. A striking feature of examinership is that only one class of impaired creditors needs to vote in favour of the proposals, by way of simple majority in number and value, before the Court has jurisdiction to consider whether or not to approve the scheme of arrangement.

The threshold for court approval is that the Court must be satisfied that the proposals will, if implemented, have a reasonable prospect of facilitating the survival of the company as a going concern and that the proposals are not unfairly prejudicial to any interested party. Generally speaking, proposals will not be considered unfairly prejudicial if the dividend/outcome for creditors under the scheme of arrangement is more favourable than it would be in a receivership or liquidation.

The Proceedings

In the Proceedings, Walkers were initially instructed to represent and advise the proposed examiner, Mr Aengus Burns of Grant Thornton. Mr Burns was appointed as examiner (the 'Examiner') on an interim basis on 28 June 2017 and his appointment as Examiner was later confirmed by the Court on 11 July 2017. The petition for Mr Burns to be appointed as Examiner was supported by an affidavit of a director of the company sworn 27 June 2017. The affidavit contained an undertaking on behalf of the company to discharge its Revenue liabilities as they fell due during the period of protection afforded by the examinership process. On 5 September 2017, the Examiner made an application to have the protection of the Court lifted and have the company put into liquidation in circumstances where investment could not ultimately be secured, which investment was needed for the company to have a reasonable prospect of survival. On foot of Mr Burns' application, the company was wound up by the Court and Mr Burns was appointed as Liquidator to the company (the 'Liquidator').

Later in the afternoon of 5 September 2017, after the end of the normal Court day, Counsel on behalf of the Revenue appeared before Ms Justice Baker on an ex parte basis and advised the Court that contrary to the company's undertaking to discharge its Revenue liabilities as they fell due during the protection period, the company had failed to discharge its tax liabilities for the period 1 July to 31 July 2017, which were due to be discharged on or before 23 August 2017. Counsel for the Revenue sought and was granted an order that the sum due for the said period be treated as a priority expense in the examinership (the 'Order'), with the result that these monies would not be available to the Liquidator to discharge his own fees and the claims of other creditors. The Liquidator applied to have the Order set aside.

Liquidator's application

An exchange of affidavits ensued between the Liquidator and the Revenue in which both sides alleged a lack of candour or good faith on the part of the other. The Liquidator took issue with the fact that the Revenue did not make the application earlier in the day on 5 September 2017 and the fact that the application was made ex parte. Counsel for the Revenue argued that the Examiner should have alerted the Court immediately once he became aware that the Revenue liability had not been discharged sometime after 23 August 2017. The Court assessed both parties' allegations and concluded that there was no lack of candour or good faith on the part of either party and proceeded to address the substance of the Liquidator's application i.e. what was the appropriate result arising from the breach of the undertaking.

It was noted by the Court that undertakings in a form similar to that given by the company in the Proceedings are commonly given by companies seeking to have an examiner appointed. The Court noted that a practice has evolved whereby the Revenue, who can frequently be a significant creditor and thus on notice of a petition to appoint an examiner to a company, will consider taking a neutral position when such an undertaking is given and that the giving of such an undertaking is a factor that will be taken into account in the exercise by the Court of its discretionary power to appoint an examiner. The Court then considered the purpose of the undertaking, to whom the undertaking is given and the effect of a breach of the undertaking.

The Court noted that notwithstanding the import and solemnity of the undertaking, the effect of a breach of the same is not to alter or improve the priority status of the Revenue's debt. The Court rejected the argument made by the Revenue that the Examiner had breached the undertaking, which was given by and on behalf of the Company. The Court found that the undertaking to discharge the Revenue liabilities was not an undertaking given to the Revenue; but was an undertaking given to the Court and was to be treated for most purposes as being equivalent to a Court order in identical terms. The Court then proceeded to consider the effect of a breach of such an undertaking.

Counsel for the Revenue argued that the Order did no more than give effect to the situation that would have transpired had the company complied with the terms of the undertaking. It was also argued that the Order was an appropriate sanction to the Examiner/Liquidator for his failure to advise the Court immediately upon becoming aware of the breach of the undertaking by the company. The Liquidator argued that the Court did not have jurisdiction to make the Order as only the Examiner could certify liabilities as being costs of the examinership, albeit subject to Court supervision.

Ultimately, after a careful analysis of the relevant legislation and case law, the Court accepted the argument advanced by the Examiner/Liquidator and set aside the Order.

Case significance

The Proceedings provide welcome clarity to the law on examinership, providing important guidance on the nature and effect of undertakings to discharge Revenue liabilities that arise during the protection period, the potential effect of a breach of the same and clarification on the role of the Court in certifying liabilities as costs in the examinership process.

While examinership did not save the company in this instance, it can often provide a means of survival for certain companies in financial difficulties or those facing insolvency. Directors of such companies would do well to seek professional advice at the earliest available opportunity in order to explore this as a restructuring or rescue option.

Examinership as a cross border restructuring tool

Examinership has been a feature of the Irish corporate restructuring landscape since its inception in 1990 and therefore, as an English speaking common law jurisdiction, it benefits considerably from being administered by a dedicated division of the Irish High Court that has nearly three decades of accumulated knowledge and specialist expertise. Furthermore, in recent years, there have been a number of significant international / cross border restructurings which have utilised examinership successfully, namely the telecommunications group Eircom6 and the oil and gas group Petroceltic7 and so complex multi-jurisdictional issues are well-known to the Irish Courts.8

In light of the legal uncertainty which Brexit has created, it is possible that Ireland will become a more popular legal jurisdiction for directors of international corporates in difficulties and their advisors to consider. With a legal system closely analogous to the highly respected English system, it benefits from the fact that examinership will be recognised as a main insolvency proceeding in the remaining EU member states and that judgments of the Irish Courts are and will continue to be recognised under Brussels Recast.9

Brexit also comes at a time when Europe is embracing Chapter 11 which is the inspiration behind the EU Commission's proposal for a directive on Insolvency, Restructuring and Second Chance.10 In this regard, the vast majority of the terms of the proposals envisaged by the EU Commission, as far as corporates are concerned, are already a tried and tested feature of the Irish corporate restructuring legal system through the examinership process. As explained in greater detail earlier in this article, examinership is available to any companies that have their COMI in Ireland.

This article first appeared in Volume 15, Issue 4 of International Corporate Rescue.

Footnotes

1 [2018] IEHC 80.

2 The legislative code for examinership is set out in Part 10 of the Irish Companies Act 2014 ('the Act').

3 Under section 2 of the Act, a related company is broadly defined and includes but is not limited to a holding company or subsidiary; a company or companies entitled to exercise control the exercise of more than one half of the voting power at any general meeting of the first company; where the businesses of the companies have been so carried on that the separate business of each company is not readily identified; or where there is another body corporate to which both companies are related.

4 As per the EIR Recast, a debtor company's COMI is generally the place where it conducts the administration of its interests of a regular basis as ascertainable by third parties. In most cases there is a rebuttable presumption that a corporate debtor's COMI is the location of its registered office.

5 Under the Act, a foreign company may be wound up by the Irish High Court if it has a sufficient connection to the State and there is a reasonable possible that if a winding up order is made, it will be of benefit to those applying for the winding up order. For example, both BVI and Jersey companies have been considered as being liable to be wound up in Ireland in previous cases.

6 Eircom Limited & Ors & the Companies (Amendment) Act 1990 Record Number 2012/175COS.

7 Petroceltic International plc & the Companies Act 2014 Record Number 2016/75COS.

8 Walkers acted for and advised key stakeholders in both of these examinerships.

9 Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters.

10 Published in November 2016 and currently undergoing the EU legislative procedure.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions