Ireland: Looking Over It

Last Updated: 18 January 2018
Article by Jonathan Law

Conventional wisdom in the private funds industry has tended toward fund domiciliation in a few key jurisdictions, but the evolving legal and regulatory environment in other jurisdictions like the EU, Dubai and Ireland, for instance, may counsel in favour of a rebalancing of the factors that originally weighed in favour of a hedge fund manager's decision to domicile a fund in a certain jurisdiction.

This article looks at how the factors traditionally regarded as drawbacks of a new jurisdiction, such as increased regulation, could actually be potential advantages.


Hedge fund managers typically consider re-domiciliation for four main reasons: regulation, operations, costs and marketing restrictions. From a regulatory perspective, a change in jurisdiction can result in either a lighter or a more substantive governing regime, both of which can be advantageous depending on the circumstances.

In addition, from time to time, changes in the regulatory landscape of a particular jurisdiction or a failure to adopt and implement international regulatory changes can create concerns that prompt managers to redomicile.

Operational considerations often aren't the sole driver of a decision to redomicile, but they can be influential when re-domiciliation would result in significant savings. Conversely, cost may be the deciding factor against re-domiciliation if an increase in costs cannot be passed on to the fund.

The fund's key service providers could also request or require a change in domicile for regulatory alignment or other reasons.


When managers move from a lessregulated jurisdiction to a more highly regulated one, it's typically for marketing reasons. The decision is typically animated by concerns about investor capital—either the manager has experienced outflows or one or more investors conveys that the fund must move to a more heavily regulated jurisdiction to garner additional allocations. Highly regulated jurisdictions can also be optimal locations for managers reigniting their marketing activities to new investors.

The same rationale applies for funds moving from an offshore environment to a more highly regulated jurisdiction, particularly because increased regulation means greater transparency for investors or the additional benefits that inure from domiciliation in an established market.

The principal deterrents to moving funds to a more highly regulated domicile are cost-related. Increased regulation often results in increased costs to the fund, the manager or both, and a change in domicile often requires a manager to invest resources in performing again the same research and inquiry for the new jurisdiction that it initially performed during the decision and diligence process for the original domicile in order to develop familiarity with its regulatory and operational environment. Managers may also have to convince existing investors that the potential for access to additional capital by being in a new jurisdiction will benefit the investors as a matter of the economy of scale and broader investment opportunities.

Although these drawbacks are unavoidable, set against the balance of advantages, re-domiciliation can still decidedly benefit investors. Of course, if the manager is not successful in delivering on the anticipated economies of scale and/or accessing new sources of capital and target investments, its relationship with investors will suffer. Investor sentiment can also shift should other unexpected legal or operational consequences transpire.


In some cases, there are benefits for offshore funds in one jurisdiction to move to another jurisdiction with a similar level of regulation and operational requirements, but with which investors have a higher degree of familiarity and comfort. An example of such a jurisdiction is the Cayman Islands.

By adopting FATCA, CRS, beneficial ownership reporting, an LLC vehicle model broadly similar to Delaware's and maintaining ongoing discussions about securing compliance with other international transparency initiatives, Cayman has shown that it prizes its leading offshore jurisdiction title.

That positioning can directly and/ or indirectly assist managers redomiciling from another offshore jurisdiction since Cayman is perceived to have a higher level of regulation and transparency than other offshore jurisdictions.


A hedge fund manager's decision to redomicile should always be made and assessed within the context of its relationship with investors. From the outset, the manager or the fund's governing body should contact investors and set out the business case that undergirds the proposal to redomicile. Because managers are trusted advisers with the expertise to assess the needs of the fund, managers should highlight the specific reasons redomiciling is in investors' best interests while also explaining the decision's potential adverse consequences. Next, a manager should task a team to review the new jurisdiction's operational requirements and assess, among other things, whether redomiciling will increase staffing requirements for the manager's middle or back office; and the costs associated with redomiciliation, including which will be borne by the manager and which will be borne by the fund. Together, these considerations should form the basis for the redomiciliation budget.

The re-domiciliation process itself involves two main considerations: rules intrinsic to and extrinsic to the fund. Managers should consider, on one hand, the internal mechanisms, permissions and timelines that arise out of the fund's governing agreements and impact on the re-domiciliation variables. At the same time, the manager must consider regulatory requirements in both the existing and the new jurisdiction.

Typically, in-house and outside counsel drive the re-domiciliation project once the initial analyses have been conducted.

The project plan should address the sequence and timetable for fulfilling requirements in both jurisdictions and involve frequent liaising between counsel in each jurisdiction to ensure that the process is completed properly, on time and without any risk that the fund is technically either domiciled in two places at any one time or left without legal domicile.

The logistics of filing the documents with two sets of entity registries and two sets of regulators need to be carefully managed as well.


Ireland. It is more common for funds to move to Ireland than the reverse. A migration into Ireland requires the incoming fund manager to certify that it is solvent at the time of migration, and that certification has to be supported by an opinion from the fund's auditors.

The remainder of the re-domiciliation process, however, should be handled by the counsel in the original domicile and local counsel in Ireland simultaneously.

Hedge fund managers redomiciling from Cayman, Bermuda and BVI often can maintain the same administrator since Irish administration firms maintain a significant presence in those jurisdictions.

Other EU member states. When the fund is redomiciling into an EU member state, immediately the AIFMD or UCITS regimes are relevant. One of the infrastructure conditions on an EU-domiciled regulated fund is that it must appoint a depository or custodian.

From an operational level, appointing a depository or custodian is the primary change that creates the most work for managers. There could also be a requirement that the custody of assets come under a depository in an EU member state but that doesn't necessarily mean a manager must begin transferring the custody of assets from an existing provider to a new provider. It does, however, likely mean that an existing provider has to sign an agreement with an EU depository.

In terms of fund administration, audit or other service providers, a redomicile may not require that fresh relationships are established, because it may be possible to retain the same firms, although the manager may have to engage with a different office of that same firm if they have a global business.


From an operational perspective, custodians, depositories, auditors, directors and other necessary third parties typically do not charge onboarding fees and instead tend to assume the costs of redomiciliation specific to their function.

Costs for attorneys fees, however, are a different matter, and may account for the bulk of the cost associated with redomiciling a fund, because the process requires two sets of lawyers whose fees depend on the law firms involved, the complexity of the redomiciliation and concerns specific to the facts of each fund and jurisdiction.

Whether the manager or the fund bears these costs depends on agreements with and/or disclosures to investors. The manager may well decide that some or all of the costs can legitimately be charged to investors because they will benefit from the move. Some managers, on the other hand, bear most of the costs.


It should be noted that there is no mandatory requirement for investors to be given a vote on re-domiciliation. Considering the substantial nature of a change of jurisdiction, though, managers do typically at least discuss the project with shareholders. In circumstances where no formal vote is taken, the manager commonly offers investors the opportunity to redeem out under a special redemption procedure.

The fund's liquidity also factors into managers' strategic roadmap for redomiciliation, particularly if the fund is illiquid. Investors may dissent to the decision to change jurisdictions but may not be able to redeem, and such circumstances can increase managers' legal risk vis-à-vis investors.

Other similarly knotty scenarios include cases in which a vote is required but there is some element in the fund's governing documents that makes the vote more difficult to carry – such as failure to procure a majority or high quorum requirements – or cases in which potential regulatory issues create practical problems with individual investors.

The latter would occur if, for example, a manager intends to redomicile as a registered fund in Cayman, which requires that all existing and new investors meet a minimum investment threshold. The Cayman requirement could be problematic for certain individual investors if the original jurisdiction has no investment minimum or has an investment minimum that is lower than the Cayman threshold.

For those investors who don't meet the new domicile's requirements, either a redemption must occur or they have to add to their investments. Either of these scenarios can create difficulties for managers navigating investor relationships.

Service provider relationships also could be affected by re-domiciliation. A manager may need to employ the services of a locally-regulated administrator or an administrator located in one of a number of approved overseas jurisdiction for AML purposes, for instance.

In addition, the directors of the fund likely need to be registered with the new local regulator and all annual audits should be signed off on by a locally-approved auditor. Most larger funds have the resources to address these issues by engaging additional services or replacing existing service providers as may be necessary.


Managers must, of course, engage outside legal counsel to advise on the regulatory requirements of a new jurisdiction, what they must do to comply and potential risks. Counsel should also advise on and explain issues that might not immediately be obvious, such as data protection and banking secrecy laws, and AML issues. Any regulatory variations could require a manager to implement operational changes, or prompt amendments to existing investor disclosures.

A manager should also consider other impacts and risks aside from those that are purely related to the fund's new legal and regulatory environment before making the decision to redomicile a fund. Separately, any pre-existing claims or rights of action arising out of a fund's original jurisdiction generally are preserved since the fund remains the same legal entity. In some cases, setting up a parallel fund domiciled in an onshore jurisdiction, such as the EU, is less risky than re-domiciliation for managers with offshore funds. These parallel funds pursue the same or a similar strategy as the offshore fund.

Managers may choose this alternative over redomiciling in recognition of the two distinct investor universes that would be targeted by the respective funds.

Originally published in Offshore Investment December 2017/January 2018

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions