Ireland: Bloomberg BNA, Privacy And Security Law Report: Views On Data Protection Issues In Ireland From Rob Corbet

Last Updated: 28 April 2015
Article by Rob Corbet
Most Read Contributor in Ireland, October 2018

As the European Union home to many U.S. digital economy giants, such as Facebook Inc., Google Inc. and Apple Inc., Ireland plays an outsize data protection oversight role. Bloomberg BNA Privacy & Security Law Report Senior Legal Editor Donald G. Aplin posed a series of questions to Rob Corbet, partner and head of the Technology & Innovation practice at Arthur Cox in Dublin, about privacy and security issues in Ireland.

BLOOMBERG BNA: What is it about Ireland that makes U.S.-based tech and online giants like Facebook, Google and Apple—which recently announced that it would be spending $1 billion on a 1.7 million square foot data center near Athenry—want to locate their EU headquarters there?

Corbet: From a data perspective, we enjoy a positive reputation with U.S. companies who regard our data protection environment as a mature one in which regulators engage with companies to ensure meaningful compliance. Companies like Apple and Intel Corp. have been in Ireland for several decades, so there is also a fairly deep-rooted expertise within the Irish tech sector which pre-dates the decisions by Internet giants to locate in Ireland.

In addition, our competitive rate of corporation tax tends to draw most of the headlines, but I think it's important to say that many of the companies you mention have scaled their Irish presence for nontax reasons. For example, our U.S. clients speak very positively about the can-do nature of the Irish workforce and, as a country, we like to think we favor green lights over red tape. Ireland has been recognized by ''Forbes'' as one of the best countries in the world for ease of doing business, and we rank very highly internationally in terms of the availability of skilled labor, innovation and inward investment quality and value.

Although we remain enthusiastic members of the EU, the U.S. is our largest export trading partner so it's probably true to say that many Irish people feel closer to Boston than Berlin.

BLOOMBERG BNA: Do you think the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner of Ireland's privacy audit of Facebook Ireland in 2011 (11 PVLR 23, 1/2/12), and follow-up audit in 2012 (11 PVLR 1448, 9/24/12), established the standard for how the data protection author- ity makes use of its statutory authority in dealing with multinationals, and/or are there other powers at its disposal that you think are equally worth noting?

Corbet: The Facebook audits drew a lot of international attention to Ireland's data protection regime, and indeed, Facebook's data operations in Ireland remain the subject of much attention in the context of the current Court of Justice hearing around the integrity of the U.S.-EU Safe Harbor regime. The two audit reports provided a valuable insight into how in practical terms the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner was applying the EU Data Protection Directive principles in a rich data environment like Facebook.

However, I don't think it's fair to say that the Facebook audit established the ''standard'' as things are continually evolving. The initial audit report of Facebook dates back to 2011, which is an age in terms of the development of the digital economy. For example, since then we have seen the Snowden revelations, the socalled right to be forgotten decision, the European Court of Justice's declaration of invalidity of the Data Retention Directive and the appointment of a new data protection commissioner in Ireland. All of these developments directly impact companies like Facebook, so if another audit was to take place now one would expect there to be a different emphasis.

I should also say that contrary to some reports, the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner has extensive other powers under our domestic data protection legislation, including the power to ''dawn raid,'' to compel compliance using enforcement notices, to seek the destruction of data and to prosecute. The audit right is quite a powerful tool and one that does not exist in many other EU member states, which seem to equate enforcement solely with the ability to impose monetary fines.

BLOOMBERG BNA: Are there data protection compliance issues that mutinationals doing business in Ireland find the most challenging?

Corbet: I think the most frustrating aspect for U.S. clients is the lack of any genuine consistency or predictability across the EU marketplace in terms of how data protection rules are interpreted and applied. When the proposed EU data protection regulation (General Data Protection Regulation) was first published in January 2012, one of the big selling points was the ''one-stopshop'' mechanism, which was intended to reduce the unpredictability of operating across EU borders. Regrettably however, the negotiations around the regulation seem to be slowly driving towards a fudged version of the one stop shop , which seems unlikely to address the original concern.

On the positive side, multinational clients comment favorably on the Irish Office of the Data Protection Commissioner's willingness to pro-actively engage with them in relation to their privacy programs. This seems to distinguish Ireland from other EU markets, where relationships with data protection supervisory authorities seem to be predicated on a level of adversity.

BLOOMBERG BNA: How does Ireland's interesting sort of activist role before the ECJ on some of the larger data protection issues in the EU—from the group Digital Rights Ireland's successful challenge to the EU Data Retention Directive (2006/24/EC) (13 PVLR 660, 4/14/14) to the High Court of Ireland's decision to refer questions about the adequacy of privacy protections for data transfers under the U.S.-EU Safe Harbor Program (13 PVLR 1093, 6/23/14)—comport with the country's general business friendly reputation?

Corbet: The concept of ''business friendly'' should not be confused with any lack of awareness or concern about privacy issues. Irish people are highly concerned about their privacy, and our 1937 Constitution has provided for a right to privacy that pre-dates any data protection directives or indeed Ireland's transposition of the European Convention on Human Rights.

The concept of ''business friendly'' should not be confused with any lack of awareness or concern about privacy issues.

More generally, the Irish system provides a very wide level of access to justice. Civil liberties and other advocacy groups are active in Ireland, and there has been a marked increase in privacy-related litigation in recent years. For example, it is increasingly common for lawyers or individual lay litigants to argue data protection and privacy issues before the courts, and the likes of Digital Rights Ireland also play an important role in ensuring that the courts have the chance to opine on privacy issues. Under our common law system, the jurisprudence continues to grow both domestically and from the ECJ. For example, in the past couple of years the Irish courts have looked at data protection and privacy issues in all manner of contexts, from music piracy to bankruptcy proceedings to CCTV on public transport.

BLOOMBERG BNA: The Irish government gave qualified support to Microsoft Corp. in litigation now before U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit over whether the U.S. government can force Microsoft to turn over user e-mail data located on servers in Ireland (13 PVLR 2162, 12/22/14). What might the implications be for Ireland, and for multinationals doing business there, of an appeals court ruling against Microsoft?

Corbet: The Microsoft warrant case is hugely significant as it goes to the heart of national sovereignty.

The truth is that the U.S. government has an existing mechanism for reaching into foreign servers in the context of criminal investigations. The Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) offers an internationally recognized process to allow U.S. authorities to seek the assistance of the Irish authorities in obtaining evidence located in Ireland, which is required for the purposes of U.S. law enforcement.

It does not sit well with Irish corporations, Irish lawyers or Irish citizens that the U.S. government might seek to ignore the MLAT process in favor of its own domestic warrant processes. I don't think anyone would argue that the U.S. courts and U.S. government would comply with a domestic Irish court order if the roles were reversed?

BLOOMBERG BNA: Before Billy Hawkes left as head of Ireland's data protection commission, he said Ireland was ready to take a leadership role in carrying out the proposed data protection regulation to replace the 20- year-old EU Data Protection Directive (95/46/EC), but not in terms of meting out large fines as a matter of course (13 PVLR 187, 1/27/14). How do you think Ireland is viewed within the EU in matters related to the data privacy regime reform effort and as a data protection regulator?

Corbet: On a professional level I find it deeply frustrating that much of the negative commentary about Ireland's approach to the data protection regulation goes unchallenged. As I mentioned earlier, equating monetary fines with a positive compliance culture makes no sense. Many fines are dished out by EU supervisory authorities with little prior consultation or engagement, and I sometimes wonder if there must be a prize at the Article 29 Working Party meetings for the supervisory authority that gets the most headlines for issuing fines.

The reality of the approach in Ireland is that it is more focused on effecting real compliance by engaging with the companies, initially through proactive discussion and, where necessary, using the amicable resolution process to resolving complaints as set out in our legislation. We are not big on bureaucracy, but if amicable resolution is not possible, the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner is not slow to escalate through the hierarchy of enforcement powers set out in our acts.

The new Irish Data Protection Commissioner, Helen Dixon, has also been promised considerable additional resources to improve the technical competence of her office in dealing with emerging technologies. That reflects a broader governmental attitude that the regulation of the digital economy first requires an understanding of it. It also reflects the growing pull on the resources of that office, which is a consequence of Ireland's success in attracting foreign direct investment in the technology sector. Our U.S. clients have no fear of the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner being provided with additional resources. Their bigger fear is the current unpredictability and inconsistency in the EU's regulatory regime.

BLOOMBERG BNA: Is it too early to assess whether Dixon, who has been in her position for just over six months now (13 PVLR 1612, 9/15/14), is continuing the general approach to enforcement of her predecessor Hawkes?

Corbet: It is immediately clear that Dixon is intent on bringing her own unique style and new priorities to the office. While Hawkes was admired for his diplomacy and his unfailing positivity, Dixon appears to be on a mission to modernize the office of the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner so as to ensure that Ireland offers a best-in-class regulatory regime for data subjects and the companies that serve them. Dixon also seems anxious to increase Ireland's role at the Article 29 subcommittees so as to ensure we have influence in key decisions and opinions that emerge from that forum.

She has undoubtedly mastered her brief in short order, and already she has established a reputation as someone of very high intellect with striking clarity of thought. She speaks regularly at public events where she does not shirk difficult issues (including around enforcement), while the feedback from companies and privacy practitioners who have interacted with her to date has been exceptionally positive. Her first annual report will issue in May, and that will give us a firmer indication of how her general approach might differ from that which has gone before.

Previously published in Privacy & Security Law Report, 14 PVLR 588 (Apr. 6, 2015). Copyright 2015 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com.

This article contains a general summary of developments and is not a complete or definitive statement of the law. Specific legal advice should be obtained where appropriate.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions